Tree Island Steel (TSL) Competitors

30.8% of Champion Iron shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tree Island Steel shares are held by institutional investors. 11.3% of Champion Iron shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 63.4% of Tree Island Steel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Champion Iron has higher revenue and earnings than Tree Island Steel. Tree Island Steel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Champion Iron, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Champion Iron presently has a consensus price target of C$6.33, indicating a potential upside of 31.94%. Given Champion Iron's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Champion Iron is more favorable than Tree Island Steel.

In the previous week, Champion Iron had 3 more articles in the media than Tree Island Steel. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Champion Iron and 0 mentions for Tree Island Steel. Tree Island Steel's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Champion Iron's score of -0.04 indicating that Tree Island Steel is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Champion Iron has a beta of 0.521625, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tree Island Steel has a beta of 0.183057, meaning that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Champion Iron pays an annual dividend of C$0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Tree Island Steel pays an annual dividend of C$0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Champion Iron pays out 58.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tree Island Steel pays out -28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Champion Iron has a net margin of 10.38% compared to Tree Island Steel's net margin of -3.18%. Champion Iron's return on equity of 12.64% beat Tree Island Steel's return on equity.

0.1% of Tree Island Steel shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. 63.4% of Tree Island Steel shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tree Island Steel. Tree Island Steel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a consensus price target of C$29.50, indicating a potential upside of 6.81%. Given Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is more favorable than Tree Island Steel.

In the previous week, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty had 2 more articles in the media than Tree Island Steel. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty and 0 mentions for Tree Island Steel. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Tree Island Steel's score of 0.00 indicating that Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Tree Island Steel has a beta of 0.183057, indicating that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.337385, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Tree Island Steel pays an annual dividend of C$0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Tree Island Steel pays out -28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 98.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 60.64% compared to Tree Island Steel's net margin of -3.18%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 15.70% beat Tree Island Steel's return on equity.

Tree Island Steel has a net margin of -3.18% compared to Algoma Steel Group's net margin of -47.22%. Tree Island Steel's return on equity of -4.70% beat Algoma Steel Group's return on equity.

Tree Island Steel has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Algoma Steel Group. Tree Island Steel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Algoma Steel Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tree Island Steel pays an annual dividend of C$0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Algoma Steel Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Tree Island Steel pays out -28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Algoma Steel Group pays out -1.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tree Island Steel is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

0.1% of Tree Island Steel shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.4% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by institutional investors. 63.4% of Tree Island Steel shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tree Island Steel has a beta of 0.183057, indicating that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Algoma Steel Group has a beta of 1.515421, indicating that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Tree Island Steel's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Algoma Steel Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Algoma Steel Group has a consensus price target of C$7.88, indicating a potential upside of 19.50%. Given Algoma Steel Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Algoma Steel Group is more favorable than Tree Island Steel.

Chesapeake Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tree Island Steel's net margin of -3.18%. Chesapeake Gold's return on equity of -2.96% beat Tree Island Steel's return on equity.

Tree Island Steel has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Gold. Chesapeake Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tree Island Steel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

0.1% of Tree Island Steel shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of Chesapeake Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 63.4% of Tree Island Steel shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 32.9% of Chesapeake Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tree Island Steel has a beta of 0.183057, meaning that its share price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chesapeake Gold has a beta of 2.131819, meaning that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Chesapeake Gold had 1 more articles in the media than Tree Island Steel. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesapeake Gold and 0 mentions for Tree Island Steel. Tree Island Steel's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesapeake Gold'saverage media sentiment score.