Tree Island Steel (TSL) Competitors

In the previous week, Champion Iron had 3 more articles in the media than Tree Island Steel. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Champion Iron and 0 mentions for Tree Island Steel. Champion Iron's average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Tree Island Steel's score of 0.00 indicating that Champion Iron is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Tree Island Steel pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Champion Iron pays an annual dividend of C$0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Tree Island Steel pays out -17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Champion Iron pays out 62.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Champion Iron has a net margin of 9.48% compared to Tree Island Steel's net margin of -4.20%. Champion Iron's return on equity of 11.28% beat Tree Island Steel's return on equity.

Champion Iron has higher revenue and earnings than Tree Island Steel. Tree Island Steel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Champion Iron, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Champion Iron has a consensus target price of C$6.19, indicating a potential upside of 48.38%. Given Champion Iron's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Champion Iron is more favorable than Tree Island Steel.

Tree Island Steel has a beta of 0.371827, meaning that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Champion Iron has a beta of 0.293546, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of Tree Island Steel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.8% of Champion Iron shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.4% of Tree Island Steel shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.3% of Champion Iron shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tree Island Steel has a beta of 0.371827, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.335951, suggesting that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tree Island Steel's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Labrador Iron Ore Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Tree Island Steel pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Tree Island Steel pays out -17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 93.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a consensus target price of C$29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 2.50%. Given Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is more favorable than Tree Island Steel.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Tree Island Steel. Tree Island Steel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 55.72% compared to Tree Island Steel's net margin of -4.20%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 14.38% beat Tree Island Steel's return on equity.

0.1% of Tree Island Steel shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.9% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. 63.4% of Tree Island Steel shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Algoma Steel Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tree Island Steel'saverage media sentiment score.

Algoma Steel Group currently has a consensus target price of C$7.83, suggesting a potential upside of 10.64%. Given Algoma Steel Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Algoma Steel Group is more favorable than Tree Island Steel.

Tree Island Steel has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Algoma Steel Group. Tree Island Steel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Algoma Steel Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Algoma Steel Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Tree Island Steel pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Algoma Steel Group pays out -0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tree Island Steel pays out -17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tree Island Steel is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

18.3% of Algoma Steel Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tree Island Steel shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.6% of Algoma Steel Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 63.4% of Tree Island Steel shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tree Island Steel has a net margin of -4.20% compared to Algoma Steel Group's net margin of -47.22%. Tree Island Steel's return on equity of -5.86% beat Algoma Steel Group's return on equity.

Algoma Steel Group has a beta of 1.623325, indicating that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tree Island Steel has a beta of 0.371827, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tree Island Steel's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lara Exploration'saverage media sentiment score.

0.1% of Tree Island Steel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.0% of Lara Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.4% of Tree Island Steel shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Lara Exploration shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lara Exploration has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tree Island Steel. Lara Exploration is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tree Island Steel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tree Island Steel has a net margin of -4.20% compared to Lara Exploration's net margin of -528.27%. Tree Island Steel's return on equity of -5.86% beat Lara Exploration's return on equity.

Tree Island Steel has a beta of 0.371827, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lara Exploration has a beta of -0.683388, indicating that its stock price is 168% less volatile than the broader market.