Ur-Energy Competitors

Maverix Metals (TSE:MMX) and Ur-Energy (TSE:URE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Maverix Metals and Ur-Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Maverix Metals and Ur-Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Maverix Metals presently has a consensus target price of C$8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.83%. Given Maverix Metals' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Maverix Metals is more favorable than Ur-Energy.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Maverix Metals and Ur-Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Maverix Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Ur-Energy. Ur-Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maverix Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Maverix Metals pays an annual dividend of C$0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Ur-Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 44.9%. Maverix Metals pays out 18.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ur-Energy pays out -548.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ur-Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Maverix Metals beats Ur-Energy on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ur-Energy (TSE:URE) and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V) (CVE:KNT) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Ur-Energy and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V)'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ur-Energy and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V)'s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V) has higher revenue and earnings than Ur-Energy. Ur-Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Ur-Energy and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V), as reported by MarketBeat.com.

K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V) has a consensus price target of C$10.35, suggesting a potential upside of 29.54%. Given K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V)'s higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V) is more favorable than Ur-Energy.

Summary

K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V) beats Ur-Energy on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ur-Energy (TSE:URE) and Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V) (CVE:NVO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Ur-Energy and Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V), as reported by MarketBeat.

Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V) has a consensus price target of C$3.05, suggesting a potential upside of 28.15%. Given Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V)'s higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V) is more favorable than Ur-Energy.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ur-Energy and Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V)'s revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ur-Energy. Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ur-Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ur-Energy and Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V)'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Ur-Energy beats Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V) on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Uranium Participation (TSE:U) and Ur-Energy (TSE:URE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Uranium Participation and Ur-Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Uranium Participation and Ur-Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Uranium Participation presently has a consensus price target of C$6.23, suggesting a potential upside of 19.94%. Given Uranium Participation's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Uranium Participation is more favorable than Ur-Energy.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Uranium Participation and Ur-Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Uranium Participation has higher revenue and earnings than Ur-Energy. Ur-Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Uranium Participation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Uranium Participation beats Ur-Energy on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ur-Energy (TSE:URE) and GoGold Resources (TSE:GGD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Ur-Energy and GoGold Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

GoGold Resources has a consensus target price of C$3.63, indicating a potential upside of 44.42%. Given GoGold Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe GoGold Resources is more favorable than Ur-Energy.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ur-Energy and GoGold Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

GoGold Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Ur-Energy. Ur-Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoGold Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ur-Energy and GoGold Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

GoGold Resources beats Ur-Energy on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

McEwen Mining (TSE:MUX) and Ur-Energy (TSE:URE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares McEwen Mining and Ur-Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ur-Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than McEwen Mining. Ur-Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares McEwen Mining and Ur-Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for McEwen Mining and Ur-Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

Ur-Energy beats McEwen Mining on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.