Free Trial

GoldMining (GOLD) Competitors

GoldMining logo
C$1.53 -0.11 (-6.71%)
As of 05/15/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

GOLD vs. ODV, TMQ, FVL, NSR, and VGZ

Should you buy GoldMining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares GoldMining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with GoldMining include Osisko Development (ODV), Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Freegold Ventures (FVL), Nomad Royalty (NSR), and Vista Gold (VGZ). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does GoldMining compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) and GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

GoldMining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -189.60%. GoldMining's return on equity of -8.10% beat Osisko Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Osisko Development-189.60% -10.60% -16.19%
GoldMining N/A -8.10%-12.10%

18.1% of Osisko Development shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of GoldMining shares are held by institutional investors. 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of GoldMining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Osisko Development has a beta of 2.255934, meaning that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GoldMining has a beta of 1.572483, meaning that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Osisko Development presently has a consensus target price of C$9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 113.27%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than GoldMining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
GoldMining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

GoldMining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Osisko Development. GoldMining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Osisko DevelopmentC$37.69M34.10-C$332.96M-C$0.95N/A
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 1 more articles in the media than GoldMining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Osisko Development and 1 mentions for GoldMining. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat GoldMining's score of 0.00 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
GoldMining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Osisko Development beats GoldMining on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Trilogy Metals?

GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 3 more articles in the media than GoldMining. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 1 mentions for GoldMining. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.16 beat GoldMining's score of 0.00 indicating that Trilogy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GoldMining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Trilogy Metals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoldMining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.28N/A

Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.02%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than GoldMining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GoldMining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

9.7% of GoldMining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of GoldMining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

GoldMining has a beta of 1.572483, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, suggesting that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

GoldMining's return on equity of -8.10% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GoldMiningN/A -8.10% -12.10%
Trilogy Metals N/A -36.21%-2.82%

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats GoldMining on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Freegold Ventures?

Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) and GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Freegold Ventures and Freegold Ventures both had 1 articles in the media. Freegold Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat GoldMining's score of 0.00 indicating that Freegold Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freegold Ventures
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GoldMining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Freegold Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoldMining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freegold VenturesN/AN/A-C$809.92K-C$0.01N/A
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A

Freegold Ventures' return on equity of -5.11% beat GoldMining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freegold VenturesN/A -5.11% -0.68%
GoldMining N/A -8.10%-12.10%

Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.376159, meaning that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GoldMining has a beta of 1.572483, meaning that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

8.1% of Freegold Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of GoldMining shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of GoldMining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Freegold Ventures beats GoldMining on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Nomad Royalty?

GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) and Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Nomad Royalty's return on equity of 0.00% beat GoldMining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GoldMiningN/A -8.10% -12.10%
Nomad Royalty N/A N/A N/A

Nomad Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than GoldMining. GoldMining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A
Nomad RoyaltyC$31.28M0.00C$614.70KC$0.01N/A

In the previous week, GoldMining had 1 more articles in the media than Nomad Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for GoldMining and 0 mentions for Nomad Royalty. GoldMining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nomad Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
GoldMining Neutral
Nomad Royalty Neutral

9.7% of GoldMining shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of GoldMining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nomad Royalty beats GoldMining on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Vista Gold?

Vista Gold (TSE:VGZ) and GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

Vista Gold has a beta of 3.500555, suggesting that its share price is 250% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GoldMining has a beta of 1.572483, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

6.5% of Vista Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of GoldMining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Vista Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of GoldMining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Vista Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoldMining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vista GoldN/AN/AC$7.97M-C$0.06N/A
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A

GoldMining's return on equity of -8.10% beat Vista Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vista GoldN/A -32.73% -28.08%
GoldMining N/A -8.10%-12.10%

In the previous week, GoldMining had 1 more articles in the media than Vista Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for GoldMining and 0 mentions for Vista Gold. Vista Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled GoldMining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vista Gold Neutral
GoldMining Neutral

Summary

GoldMining beats Vista Gold on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get GoldMining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GOLD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GOLD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GOLD vs. The Competition

MetricGoldMiningGold IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$327.42MC$5.16BC$4.83BC$12.37B
Dividend YieldN/A5.69%4.98%6.23%
P/E Ratio-19.1337.2223.1437.12
Price / SalesN/A228.266,703.1011.47
Price / Cash71.6022.1127.1682.42
Price / Book1.3313.306.984.37
Net Income-C$24.12MC$6.39MC$159.16MC$299.62M
7 Day Performance-7.27%-1.95%-1.18%-0.80%
1 Month Performance-19.47%-2.80%-1.07%-0.10%
1 Year Performance44.34%101.94%82.48%55.23%

GoldMining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GOLD
GoldMining
N/AC$1.53
-6.7%
N/A+44.3%C$327.42MN/AN/A21,300
ODV
Osisko Development
1.0868 of 5 stars
C$4.47
+1.6%
C$9.00
+101.3%
+70.2%C$1.36BC$35.48MN/A310
TMQ
Trilogy Metals
2.4836 of 5 stars
C$6.16
+1.3%
C$7.00
+13.6%
+247.0%C$1.06BN/AN/A5
FVL
Freegold Ventures
N/AC$1.20
+2.6%
N/A+14.7%C$693.24MN/AN/A3
NSR
Nomad Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$594.42MC$31.28M967.006

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GOLD) was last updated on 5/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners