Go Pro

GoldMining (GOLD) Competitors

GoldMining logo
C$1.37 +0.09 (+7.03%)
As of 07/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

GOLD vs. ODV, TMQ, NSR, FVL, and AU

Should you buy GoldMining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares GoldMining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with GoldMining include Osisko Development (ODV), Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Nomad Royalty (NSR), Freegold Ventures (FVL), and Aurion Resources (AU). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does GoldMining compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) and GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

GoldMining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -189.60%. GoldMining's return on equity of -8.10% beat Osisko Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Osisko Development-189.60% -10.60% -16.19%
GoldMining N/A -8.10%-12.10%

In the previous week, Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat GoldMining's score of 0.00 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development Positive
GoldMining Neutral

GoldMining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Osisko Development. GoldMining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Osisko DevelopmentC$37.69M29.19-C$332.96M-C$0.49N/A
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A

Osisko Development has a beta of 2.188337, suggesting that its share price is 119% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GoldMining has a beta of 1.684726, suggesting that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.

21.5% of Osisko Development shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.4% of GoldMining shares are held by institutional investors. 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of GoldMining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Osisko Development currently has a consensus target price of C$9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 149.31%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than GoldMining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
GoldMining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Osisko Development beats GoldMining on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Trilogy Metals?

GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoldMining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.28N/A

Trilogy Metals has a consensus price target of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 44.63%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than GoldMining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GoldMining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

GoldMining's return on equity of -8.10% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GoldMiningN/A -8.10% -12.10%
Trilogy Metals N/A -36.21%-2.82%

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than GoldMining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 0 mentions for GoldMining. GoldMining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trilogy Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
GoldMining Neutral
Trilogy Metals Neutral

GoldMining has a beta of 1.684726, indicating that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.385419, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

9.4% of GoldMining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.4% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of GoldMining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats GoldMining on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Nomad Royalty?

GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) and Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Nomad Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than GoldMining. GoldMining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A
Nomad RoyaltyC$31.28M0.00C$614.70KC$0.01N/A

In the previous week, GoldMining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nomad Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
GoldMining Neutral
Nomad Royalty Neutral

Nomad Royalty's return on equity of 0.00% beat GoldMining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GoldMiningN/A -8.10% -12.10%
Nomad Royalty N/A N/A N/A

9.4% of GoldMining shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of GoldMining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nomad Royalty beats GoldMining on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Freegold Ventures?

GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) and Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Freegold Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoldMining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A
Freegold VenturesN/AN/A-C$809.92K-C$0.01N/A

GoldMining has a beta of 1.684726, indicating that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.782481, indicating that its share price is 178% more volatile than the broader market.

9.4% of GoldMining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of GoldMining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Freegold Ventures had 1 more articles in the media than GoldMining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Freegold Ventures and 0 mentions for GoldMining. Freegold Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat GoldMining's score of 0.00 indicating that Freegold Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GoldMining Neutral
Freegold Ventures Positive

Freegold Ventures' return on equity of -5.11% beat GoldMining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GoldMiningN/A -8.10% -12.10%
Freegold Ventures N/A -5.11%-0.68%

Summary

Freegold Ventures beats GoldMining on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Aurion Resources?

Aurion Resources (CVE:AU) and GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

GoldMining's return on equity of -8.10% beat Aurion Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aurion ResourcesN/A -15.29% -3.68%
GoldMining N/A -8.10%-12.10%

20.1% of Aurion Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.4% of GoldMining shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.3% of Aurion Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of GoldMining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Aurion Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoldMining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aurion ResourcesN/AN/A-C$2.59M-C$0.06N/A
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A

Aurion Resources has a beta of 0.755643, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GoldMining has a beta of 1.684726, indicating that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Aurion Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled GoldMining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aurion Resources Neutral
GoldMining Neutral

Summary

Aurion Resources beats GoldMining on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get GoldMining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GOLD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GOLD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GOLD vs. The Competition

MetricGoldMiningGold IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$273.92MC$4.89BC$4.59BC$12.43B
Dividend YieldN/A5.64%5.03%6.18%
P/E Ratio-17.1336.7123.0836.20
Price / SalesN/A204.036,056.9210.11
Price / Cash71.6022.1126.8182.29
Price / Book1.1911.198.654.47
Net Income-C$24.12MC$6.39MC$157.26MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance5.38%1.36%0.97%0.85%
1 Month Performance-8.67%-3.89%-5.54%-1.49%
1 Year Performance37.00%52.59%46.36%35.24%

GoldMining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GOLD
GoldMining
N/AC$1.37
+7.0%
N/A+37.0%C$273.92MN/AN/A21,300
ODV
Osisko Development
1.1025 of 5 stars
C$3.42
+0.9%
C$9.00
+163.2%
+18.4%C$1.04BC$37.69MN/A310
TMQ
Trilogy Metals
1.6774 of 5 stars
C$4.78
+1.3%
C$7.00
+46.4%
+160.2%C$824.77MN/AN/A5
NSR
Nomad Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$594.42MC$31.28M967.006
FVL
Freegold Ventures
N/AC$1.00
+6.4%
N/A-16.8%C$577.70MN/AN/A3

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GOLD) was last updated on 7/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners