Which has better valuation & earnings, AEM or GFI?

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Agnico Eagle Mines $11.91B 6.56 $4.46B $10.64 14.45 Gold Fields $8.75B 3.62 $3.57B N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to AEM or GFI?

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 13 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 3 mentions for Gold Fields. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Agnico Eagle Mines' score of 0.04 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Agnico Eagle Mines 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Gold Fields 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GFI or B?

Barrick Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gold Fields $8.75B 3.62 $3.57B N/A N/A Barrick Mining $16.96B 3.75 $4.99B $3.62 10.56

Does the media refer more to GFI or B?

In the previous week, Barrick Mining had 10 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Barrick Mining and 3 mentions for Gold Fields. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Barrick Mining's score of 0.63 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gold Fields 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Barrick Mining 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, WPM or GFI?

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Wheaton Precious Metals $2.31B 22.68 $1.47B $3.96 29.19 Gold Fields $8.75B 3.62 $3.57B N/A N/A

Does the media prefer WPM or GFI?

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals and Wheaton Precious Metals both had 3 articles in the media. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Gold Fields' score of 1.18 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Wheaton Precious Metals 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Gold Fields 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GFI or AU?

Gold Fields has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AngloGold Ashanti. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gold Fields $8.75B 3.62 $3.57B N/A N/A AngloGold Ashanti $11.17B 3.82 $2.64B $6.82 12.40

Does the media favor GFI or AU?

In the previous week, AngloGold Ashanti had 5 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for AngloGold Ashanti and 3 mentions for Gold Fields. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat AngloGold Ashanti's score of 0.13 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gold Fields 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive AngloGold Ashanti 0 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation & earnings, GFI or FNV?

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gold Fields $8.75B 3.62 $3.57B N/A N/A Franco-Nevada $1.82B 22.98 $1.11B $7.10 30.60

Does the media prefer GFI or FNV?

In the previous week, Gold Fields had 2 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Gold Fields and 1 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Franco-Nevada's score of 0.34 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gold Fields 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Franco-Nevada 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Gold Fields (GFI) Competitors

$35.35 +1.63 (+4.82%)

Closing price 07/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$35.40 +0.05 (+0.13%)

As of 07/2/2026 07:58 PM Eastern

Compare

GFI vs. AEM, B, WPM, AU, and FNV

Should you buy Gold Fields stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gold Fields with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gold Fields include Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Barrick Mining (B), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), AngloGold Ashanti (AU), and Franco-Nevada (FNV). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Gold Fields compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines	39.46%	21.09%	15.27%
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Agnico Eagle Mines currently has a consensus price target of $232.75, indicating a potential upside of 51.34%. Gold Fields has a consensus price target of $49.75, indicating a potential upside of 40.72%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Gold Fields	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36

Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 13 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 3 mentions for Gold Fields. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Agnico Eagle Mines' score of 0.04 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Gold Fields	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines	$11.91B	6.56	$4.46B	$10.64	14.45
Gold Fields	$8.75B	3.62	$3.57B	N/A	N/A

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Gold Fields on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Barrick Mining?

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and Barrick Mining (NYSE:B) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Barrick Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Barrick Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Barrick Mining has a net margin of 32.14% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Barrick Mining's return on equity of 14.81% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A
Barrick Mining	32.14%	14.81%	10.38%

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barrick Mining has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Barrick Mining pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Barrick Mining pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Gold Fields currently has a consensus target price of $49.75, indicating a potential upside of 40.72%. Barrick Mining has a consensus target price of $53.15, indicating a potential upside of 39.09%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Barrick Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gold Fields	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36
Barrick Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

Barrick Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields	$8.75B	3.62	$3.57B	N/A	N/A
Barrick Mining	$16.96B	3.75	$4.99B	$3.62	10.56

In the previous week, Barrick Mining had 10 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Barrick Mining and 3 mentions for Gold Fields. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Barrick Mining's score of 0.63 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gold Fields	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Barrick Mining	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Barrick Mining beats Gold Fields on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE:WPM) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals and Wheaton Precious Metals both had 3 articles in the media. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Gold Fields' score of 1.18 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Gold Fields	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals	$2.31B	22.68	$1.47B	$3.96	29.19
Gold Fields	$8.75B	3.62	$3.57B	N/A	N/A

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

70.3% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 65.55% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity of 20.20% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals	65.55%	20.20%	19.28%
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A

Wheaton Precious Metals currently has a consensus price target of $154.73, indicating a potential upside of 33.87%. Gold Fields has a consensus price target of $49.75, indicating a potential upside of 40.72%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Gold Fields	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 19.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Gold Fields on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to AngloGold Ashanti?

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

Gold Fields presently has a consensus target price of $49.75, suggesting a potential upside of 40.72%. AngloGold Ashanti has a consensus target price of $111.80, suggesting a potential upside of 32.24%. Given Gold Fields' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than AngloGold Ashanti.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gold Fields	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36
AngloGold Ashanti	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

Gold Fields has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AngloGold Ashanti.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields	$8.75B	3.62	$3.57B	N/A	N/A
AngloGold Ashanti	$11.17B	3.82	$2.64B	$6.82	12.40

In the previous week, AngloGold Ashanti had 5 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for AngloGold Ashanti and 3 mentions for Gold Fields. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat AngloGold Ashanti's score of 0.13 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gold Fields	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
AngloGold Ashanti	0 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. AngloGold Ashanti pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. AngloGold Ashanti pays out 68.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.1% of AngloGold Ashanti shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AngloGold Ashanti has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

AngloGold Ashanti has a net margin of 31.11% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. AngloGold Ashanti's return on equity of 36.41% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A
AngloGold Ashanti	31.11%	36.41%	23.85%

Summary

AngloGold Ashanti beats Gold Fields on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Franco-Nevada?

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Gold Fields currently has a consensus target price of $49.75, indicating a potential upside of 40.72%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus target price of $268.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.37%. Given Gold Fields' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gold Fields	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36
Franco-Nevada	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Franco-Nevada pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields	$8.75B	3.62	$3.57B	N/A	N/A
Franco-Nevada	$1.82B	22.98	$1.11B	$7.10	30.60

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.12% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of 18.10% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A
Franco-Nevada	65.12%	18.10%	16.82%

24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gold Fields had 2 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Gold Fields and 1 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Franco-Nevada's score of 0.34 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gold Fields	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Franco-Nevada	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Gold Fields beats Franco-Nevada on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gold Fields News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GFI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Gold Fields	MINING Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$30.19B	$11.41B	$4.59B	$23.33B
Dividend Yield	3.56%	1.69%	5.03%	4.00%
P/E Ratio	N/A	11.69	23.08	31.53
Price / Sales	3.62	15.01	6,056.92	119.84
Price / Cash	8.63	34.83	26.81	25.23
Price / Book	3.65	6.24	8.65	4.81
Net Income	$3.57B	$719.98M	$157.26M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	5.47%	4.34%	0.97%	0.56%
1 Month Performance	-6.66%	-6.96%	-5.54%	3.95%
1 Year Performance	46.10%	51.38%	46.36%	18.30%

Gold Fields Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GFI Gold Fields	4.6667 of 5 stars	$35.36 +4.8%	$49.75 +40.7%	+46.8%	$30.19B	$8.75B	N/A	6,628	Positive News Gap Up
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines	4.8321 of 5 stars	$166.79 +0.1%	$236.08 +41.5%	+29.5%	$84.59B	$13.54B	15.68	18,216	Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
B Barrick Mining	4.9822 of 5 stars	$40.16 -0.5%	$53.46 +33.1%	+79.9%	$67.10B	$16.96B	11.09	27,000	Analyst Forecast Gap Up
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals	4.528 of 5 stars	$121.72 -0.7%	$155.64 +27.9%	+28.8%	$55.66B	$2.31B	30.74	40	Positive News Analyst Forecast Gap Up
AU AngloGold Ashanti	4.7211 of 5 stars	$86.33 -5.0%	$114.00 +32.0%	+81.4%	$45.88B	$9.89B	12.66	12,634	Gap Up High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:GFI) was last updated on 7/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Gold Fields (GFI) Competitors

GFI vs. AEM, B, WPM, AU, and FNV

How does Gold Fields compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Barrick Mining?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to AngloGold Ashanti?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Franco-Nevada?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GFI vs. The Competition

Gold Fields Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Gold Fields (GFI) Competitors

GFI vs. AEM, B, WPM, AU, and FNV

How does Gold Fields compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Is AEM or GFI more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in AEM or GFI?

Do analysts rate AEM or GFI?

Is AEM or GFI a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to AEM or GFI?

Which has better valuation & earnings, AEM or GFI?

Which has more risk and volatility, AEM or GFI?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Barrick Mining?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GFI or B?

Is GFI or B more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, GFI or B?

Is GFI or B a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer GFI or B?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GFI or B?

Does the media refer more to GFI or B?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Does the media prefer WPM or GFI?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, WPM or GFI?

Which has more risk & volatility, WPM or GFI?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of WPM or GFI?

Is WPM or GFI more profitable?

Do analysts recommend WPM or GFI?

Is WPM or GFI a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to AngloGold Ashanti?

Do analysts recommend GFI or AU?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GFI or AU?

Does the media favor GFI or AU?

Is GFI or AU a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GFI or AU?

Which has more volatility and risk, GFI or AU?

Is GFI or AU more profitable?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Franco-Nevada?

Which has more volatility and risk, GFI or FNV?

Do analysts recommend GFI or FNV?

Is GFI or FNV a better dividend stock?

Which has better valuation & earnings, GFI or FNV?

Is GFI or FNV more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GFI or FNV?

Does the media prefer GFI or FNV?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GFI vs. The Competition

Gold Fields Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools