Go Pro
→ I’ll probably get hate mail for this (but it’s worth it) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free ALU Stock Alerts

The Alumasc Group (ALU) Competitors

The Alumasc Group logo
GBX 220 -1.00 (-0.45%)
As of 11:56 AM Eastern
Compare

ALU vs. NXR, SUR, SRAD, EPWN, and KGP

Should you buy The Alumasc Group stock or one of its competitors? The Alumasc Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Norcros (NXR), Sureserve Group (SUR), Stelrad Group (SRAD), Epwin Group (EPWN), and Kingspan Group (KGP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "building products" industry.

How does The Alumasc Group compare to Norcros?

The Alumasc Group (LON:ALU) and Norcros (LON:NXR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

The Alumasc Group has a net margin of 7.07% compared to Norcros' net margin of 0.08%. The Alumasc Group's return on equity of 18.04% beat Norcros' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Alumasc Group7.07% 18.04% 11.16%
Norcros 0.08%0.15%6.15%

The Alumasc Group has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Norcros has a beta of 1.046, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

The Alumasc Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Norcros pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. The Alumasc Group pays out 54.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Norcros pays out 3,533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Alumasc Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Norcros has a consensus target price of GBX 470, suggesting a potential upside of 44.62%. Given Norcros' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Norcros is more favorable than The Alumasc Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Alumasc Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Norcros
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Norcros has higher revenue and earnings than The Alumasc Group. The Alumasc Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Norcros, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Alumasc Group£106.44M0.74£8.65M£20.4010.78
Norcros£393.40M0.74£26.81M£0.301,083.33

14.1% of The Alumasc Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.6% of Norcros shares are held by institutional investors. 27.8% of The Alumasc Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 35.3% of Norcros shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Norcros had 1 more articles in the media than The Alumasc Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Norcros and 0 mentions for The Alumasc Group. The Alumasc Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Norcros'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Alumasc Group Neutral
Norcros Neutral

Summary

Norcros beats The Alumasc Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Alumasc Group compare to Sureserve Group?

The Alumasc Group (LON:ALU) and Sureserve Group (LON:SUR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

The Alumasc Group has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sureserve Group has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

The Alumasc Group has a net margin of 7.07% compared to Sureserve Group's net margin of 3.82%. Sureserve Group's return on equity of 19.74% beat The Alumasc Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Alumasc Group7.07% 18.04% 11.16%
Sureserve Group 3.82%19.74%7.08%

14.1% of The Alumasc Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.8% of Sureserve Group shares are held by institutional investors. 27.8% of The Alumasc Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.1% of Sureserve Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sureserve Group has higher revenue and earnings than The Alumasc Group. Sureserve Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Alumasc Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Alumasc Group£106.44M0.74£8.65M£20.4010.78
Sureserve Group£304.16M0.00£14.77M£0.09N/A

In the previous week, The Alumasc Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sureserve Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Alumasc Group Neutral
Sureserve Group Neutral

Summary

The Alumasc Group and Sureserve Group tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Alumasc Group compare to Stelrad Group?

The Alumasc Group (LON:ALU) and Stelrad Group (LON:SRAD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

Stelrad Group has higher revenue and earnings than The Alumasc Group. The Alumasc Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stelrad Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Alumasc Group£106.44M0.74£8.65M£20.4010.78
Stelrad Group£279.60M0.70£16.13M£0.66231.82

Stelrad Group has a consensus target price of GBX 190, suggesting a potential upside of 24.18%. Given Stelrad Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Stelrad Group is more favorable than The Alumasc Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Alumasc Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Stelrad Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Stelrad Group had 4 more articles in the media than The Alumasc Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Stelrad Group and 0 mentions for The Alumasc Group. Stelrad Group's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat The Alumasc Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Stelrad Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Alumasc Group Neutral
Stelrad Group Positive

The Alumasc Group has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stelrad Group has a beta of 0.401, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

The Alumasc Group has a net margin of 7.07% compared to Stelrad Group's net margin of 0.30%. The Alumasc Group's return on equity of 18.04% beat Stelrad Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Alumasc Group7.07% 18.04% 11.16%
Stelrad Group 0.30%1.61%7.46%

14.1% of The Alumasc Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of Stelrad Group shares are held by institutional investors. 27.8% of The Alumasc Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Stelrad Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

The Alumasc Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Stelrad Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. The Alumasc Group pays out 54.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stelrad Group pays out 1,189.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Stelrad Group beats The Alumasc Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Alumasc Group compare to Epwin Group?

The Alumasc Group (LON:ALU) and Epwin Group (LON:EPWN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

The Alumasc Group has a net margin of 7.07% compared to Epwin Group's net margin of 5.12%. The Alumasc Group's return on equity of 18.04% beat Epwin Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Alumasc Group7.07% 18.04% 11.16%
Epwin Group 5.12%16.03%4.30%

Epwin Group has higher revenue and earnings than The Alumasc Group. The Alumasc Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Epwin Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Alumasc Group£106.44M0.74£8.65M£20.4010.78
Epwin Group£338.50M0.48£8.74M£0.12991.70

The Alumasc Group has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Epwin Group has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, The Alumasc Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Epwin Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Alumasc Group Neutral
Epwin Group Neutral

The Alumasc Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Epwin Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. The Alumasc Group pays out 54.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Epwin Group pays out 42.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

14.1% of The Alumasc Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of Epwin Group shares are held by institutional investors. 27.8% of The Alumasc Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Epwin Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

The Alumasc Group beats Epwin Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Alumasc Group compare to Kingspan Group?

Kingspan Group (LON:KGP) and The Alumasc Group (LON:ALU) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and profitability.

62.0% of Kingspan Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.1% of The Alumasc Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of Kingspan Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.8% of The Alumasc Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kingspan Group has higher revenue and earnings than The Alumasc Group. Kingspan Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Alumasc Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kingspan Group£8.34B0.00£598M£3.24N/A
The Alumasc Group£106.44M0.74£8.65M£20.4010.78

In the previous week, Kingspan Group's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat The Alumasc Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Kingspan Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kingspan Group Positive
The Alumasc Group Neutral

The Alumasc Group has a net margin of 7.07% compared to Kingspan Group's net margin of 0.00%. Kingspan Group's return on equity of 19.39% beat The Alumasc Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kingspan GroupN/A 19.39% 7.19%
The Alumasc Group 7.07%18.04%11.16%

Kingspan Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 49 per share. The Alumasc Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Kingspan Group pays out 1,512.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Alumasc Group pays out 54.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Alumasc Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Kingspan Group has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Alumasc Group has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kingspan Group beats The Alumasc Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get The Alumasc Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ALU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ALU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ALU vs. The Competition

Export
MetricThe Alumasc GroupBuilding Products IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£79.11M£8.94B£10.88B£2.88B
Dividend Yield5.05%2.07%97.00%6.09%
P/E Ratio10.7851.4124.69368.56
Price / Sales0.7419.44351.6183,672.53
Price / Cash6.5515.2724.8527.89
Price / Book2.363.974.547.26
Net Income£8.65M£4.88B£608.54M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.02%0.80%1.08%1.12%
1 Month Performance-3.93%4.44%2.36%2.56%
1 Year Performance-39.73%1.94%13.84%70.21%

The Alumasc Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ALU
The Alumasc Group
N/AGBX 220
-0.5%		N/A-39.0%£79.11M£106.44M10.78420
NXR
Norcros
2.2487 of 5 stars		GBX 316
-0.3%		GBX 470
+48.7%		+15.1%£283.12M£393.40M1,053.332,400
SUR
Sureserve Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£212.37M£304.16M1,383.332,756
SRAD
Stelrad Group
3.7425 of 5 stars		GBX 152
-2.3%		GBX 190
+25.0%		-5.9%£198.03M£279.60M230.302,960
EPWN
Epwin Group
N/AGBX 119.50
flat		N/AN/A£162.63M£338.50M991.702,151

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:ALU) was last updated on 8/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
I’ll probably get hate mail for this (but it’s worth it)
A Texas tech company is sitting on a $51 billion backlog, building the infrastructure behind Grok, Nvidia's AI...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War: What Happened at 1:11 P.M. Outside D.C.?
A source with ties to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the U.S. State Department revealed details of a potential 7 t...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
$8B is moving in... are you?
Venture capital investment in US crypto companies hit $7.9 billion last year, up 44 percent from the year befo...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
The government values gold at $42. It's really $4,800.
The U.S. Treasury still values its gold reserves at 42.22 dollars an ounce, a price set in 1973. Gold trades n...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel