Free Trial

Agronomics (ANIC) Competitors

Agronomics logo
GBX 4.70 +0.10 (+2.17%)
As of 10/2/2026 12:31 PM Eastern

ANIC vs. FTV, KIT, IAT, HEIT, and MWY

Should you buy Agronomics stock or one of its competitors? Agronomics's main competitors and comparable companies include Foresight VCT (FTV), Keystone Investment Trust (KIT), Invesco Asia Trust (IAT), Harmony Energy Income Trust (HEIT), and Mid Wynd International Inv Tr (MWY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Agronomics compare to Foresight VCT?

Agronomics (LON:ANIC) and Foresight VCT (LON:FTV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Foresight VCT has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agronomics-£11.92M-4.27-£436.90K-£1.60N/A
Foresight VCT£672K319.45£24.62MN/AN/A

Agronomics presently has a consensus target price of GBX 13.30, indicating a potential upside of 182.98%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Agronomics is more favorable than Foresight VCT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Foresight VCT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

0.6% of Agronomics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Foresight VCT shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.9% of Agronomics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Foresight VCT shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Agronomics had 2 more articles in the media than Foresight VCT. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Agronomics and 1 mentions for Foresight VCT. Foresight VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Agronomics' score of 0.00 indicating that Foresight VCT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Agronomics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Foresight VCT
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Agronomics has a beta of 0.983, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Foresight VCT has a beta of 0.05, meaning that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Foresight VCT's net margin of -671.03%. Foresight VCT's return on equity of -2.79% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agronomics135.81% -12.24% 2.20%
Foresight VCT -671.03%-2.79%4.98%

Summary

Agronomics beats Foresight VCT on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Keystone Investment Trust?

Keystone Investment Trust (LON:KIT) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Agronomics has a consensus price target of GBX 13.30, suggesting a potential upside of 182.98%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Agronomics is more favorable than Keystone Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Keystone Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Keystone Investment Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Keystone Investment Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keystone Investment TrustN/A N/A N/A
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

Keystone Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Agronomics. Agronomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keystone Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keystone Investment Trust-£52.98M0.00N/A-£93.30N/A
Agronomics-£11.92M-4.27-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

In the previous week, Agronomics had 3 more articles in the media than Keystone Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Agronomics and 0 mentions for Keystone Investment Trust. Keystone Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Agronomics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keystone Investment Trust Neutral
Agronomics Neutral

0.6% of Agronomics shares are held by institutional investors. 19.9% of Agronomics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Agronomics beats Keystone Investment Trust on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Invesco Asia Trust?

Invesco Asia Trust (LON:IAT) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Invesco Asia Trust's net margin of 56.35%. Invesco Asia Trust's return on equity of 2.30% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Invesco Asia Trust56.35% 2.30% 1.81%
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

Agronomics has a consensus target price of GBX 13.30, suggesting a potential upside of 182.98%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Agronomics is more favorable than Invesco Asia Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Invesco Asia Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Invesco Asia Trust has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agronomics has a beta of 0.983, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Agronomics had 3 more articles in the media than Invesco Asia Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Agronomics and 0 mentions for Invesco Asia Trust. Invesco Asia Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Agronomics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Invesco Asia Trust Neutral
Agronomics Neutral

59.7% of Invesco Asia Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Agronomics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Invesco Asia Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.9% of Agronomics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Invesco Asia Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics. Agronomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Invesco Asia Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Invesco Asia Trust£10.03M0.00£88.19M£128.70N/A
Agronomics-£11.92M-4.27-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

Summary

Agronomics beats Invesco Asia Trust on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Harmony Energy Income Trust?

Agronomics (LON:ANIC) and Harmony Energy Income Trust (LON:HEIT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Agronomics presently has a consensus target price of GBX 13.30, suggesting a potential upside of 182.98%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Agronomics is more favorable than Harmony Energy Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Harmony Energy Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Harmony Energy Income Trust's net margin of 102.92%. Agronomics' return on equity of -12.24% beat Harmony Energy Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agronomics135.81% -12.24% 2.20%
Harmony Energy Income Trust 102.92%-24.41%-7.49%

0.6% of Agronomics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.3% of Harmony Energy Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.9% of Agronomics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Harmony Energy Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Agronomics had 3 more articles in the media than Harmony Energy Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Agronomics and 0 mentions for Harmony Energy Income Trust. Agronomics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Harmony Energy Income Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Agronomics Neutral
Harmony Energy Income Trust Neutral

Agronomics has higher revenue and earnings than Harmony Energy Income Trust. Harmony Energy Income Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agronomics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agronomics-£11.92M-4.27-£436.90K-£1.60N/A
Harmony Energy Income Trust-£31.97M-6.56-£34.03M-£15.01N/A

Agronomics has a beta of 0.983, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harmony Energy Income Trust has a beta of 0.2, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Agronomics beats Harmony Energy Income Trust on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Mid Wynd International Inv Tr?

Mid Wynd International Inv Tr (LON:MWY) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Mid Wynd International Inv Tr's net margin of 72.26%. Mid Wynd International Inv Tr's return on equity of 2.13% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mid Wynd International Inv Tr72.26% 2.13% 7.66%
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

In the previous week, Agronomics had 2 more articles in the media than Mid Wynd International Inv Tr. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Agronomics and 1 mentions for Mid Wynd International Inv Tr. Mid Wynd International Inv Tr's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Agronomics' score of 0.00 indicating that Mid Wynd International Inv Tr is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mid Wynd International Inv Tr
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Agronomics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Agronomics has a consensus price target of GBX 13.30, suggesting a potential upside of 182.98%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Agronomics is more favorable than Mid Wynd International Inv Tr.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mid Wynd International Inv Tr
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Mid Wynd International Inv Tr has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics. Mid Wynd International Inv Tr is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agronomics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mid Wynd International Inv Tr-£10.11M-21.00£44.34M-£18.48N/A
Agronomics-£11.92M-4.27-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

6.7% of Mid Wynd International Inv Tr shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Agronomics shares are held by institutional investors. 9.8% of Mid Wynd International Inv Tr shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.9% of Agronomics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mid Wynd International Inv Tr has a beta of 0.728, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agronomics has a beta of 0.983, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Agronomics beats Mid Wynd International Inv Tr on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Agronomics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ANIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ANIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ANIC vs. The Competition

MetricAgronomicsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£50.92M£5.16B£13.12B£2.46B
Dividend YieldN/A7.57%6.04%6.25%
P/E Ratio-2.9429.4524.42366.74
Price / Sales-4.271,200.87500.0889,426.67
Price / Cash0.8647.6745.5127.89
Price / Book0.303.482.706.83
Net Income-£436.90K£416.56M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-5.81%-0.74%-1.04%-0.72%
1 Month Performance-9.62%-2.71%-3.20%-1.01%
1 Year Performance-22.95%9.00%10.47%22.82%

Agronomics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ANIC
Agronomics
1.6481 of 5 stars
GBX 4.70
+2.2%
GBX 13.30
+183.0%
-23.0%£50.92M-£11.92MN/AN/A
FTV
Foresight VCT
N/AGBX 59.50
-2.5%
N/AN/A£214.67M£672K31.1918,000
KIT
Keystone Investment Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£211.78M-£52.98MN/AN/A
IAT
Invesco Asia Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£209.82M£10.03M2.41N/A
HEIT
Harmony Energy Income Trust
N/AGBX 92.38
flat
N/A+0.0%£209.66M-£31.97MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ANIC) was last updated on 10/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners