Free Trial
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free ANIC Stock Alerts

Agronomics (ANIC) Competitors

Agronomics logo
GBX 6.60 -0.15 (-2.22%)
As of 12:14 PM Eastern
Compare

ANIC vs. AATG, AAEV, GSF, FJV, and NESF

Should you buy Agronomics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Agronomics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Agronomics include Albion Technology & Gen VCT (AATG), Albion Enterprise VCT (AAEV), Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (GSF), Fidelity Japan Trust (FJV), and NextEnergy Solar Fund (NESF). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Agronomics compare to Albion Technology & Gen VCT?

Albion Technology & Gen VCT (LON:AATG) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

1.5% of Albion Technology & Gen VCT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Agronomics shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Albion Technology & Gen VCT shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.2% of Agronomics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Albion Technology & Gen VCT and Albion Technology & Gen VCT both had 1 articles in the media. Albion Technology & Gen VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Agronomics'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Albion Technology & Gen VCT
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Agronomics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Albion Technology & Gen VCT has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics. Agronomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albion Technology & Gen VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Albion Technology & Gen VCT£5.74M48.81£5.59M£1.2752.76
Agronomics-£11.92M-5.85-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Albion Technology & Gen VCT's net margin of 82.73%. Albion Technology & Gen VCT's return on equity of 1.73% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Albion Technology & Gen VCT82.73% 1.73% 2.17%
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

Summary

Albion Technology & Gen VCT beats Agronomics on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Albion Enterprise VCT?

Agronomics (LON:ANIC) and Albion Enterprise VCT (LON:AAEV) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

0.1% of Agronomics shares are held by institutional investors. 16.2% of Agronomics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Albion Enterprise VCT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Agronomics had 1 more articles in the media than Albion Enterprise VCT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Agronomics and 0 mentions for Albion Enterprise VCT. Agronomics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Albion Enterprise VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Agronomics Neutral
Albion Enterprise VCT Neutral

Albion Enterprise VCT has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics. Agronomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albion Enterprise VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agronomics-£11.92M-5.85-£436.90K-£1.60N/A
Albion Enterprise VCT£4.55M60.07£252.09M£0.72145.83

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Albion Enterprise VCT's net margin of 29.49%. Albion Enterprise VCT's return on equity of 1.17% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agronomics135.81% -12.24% 2.20%
Albion Enterprise VCT 29.49%1.17%0.86%

Agronomics has a beta of 0.919, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Albion Enterprise VCT has a beta of 0.03, indicating that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Agronomics and Albion Enterprise VCT tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Gore Street Energy Storage Fund?

Agronomics (LON:ANIC) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Agronomics had 1 more articles in the media than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Agronomics and 0 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Agronomics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gore Street Energy Storage Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Agronomics Neutral
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral

0.1% of Agronomics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.2% of Agronomics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a consensus target price of GBX 60, suggesting a potential upside of 13.64%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than Agronomics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Agronomics has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agronomics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agronomics-£11.92M-5.85-£436.90K-£1.60N/A
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-9.03-£5.96M-£6.35N/A

Agronomics has a beta of 0.919, suggesting that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.363, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's net margin of 131.36%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity of -6.58% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agronomics135.81% -12.24% 2.20%
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 131.36%-6.58%-0.64%

Summary

Agronomics beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Fidelity Japan Trust?

Agronomics (LON:ANIC) and Fidelity Japan Trust (LON:FJV) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Agronomics had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity Japan Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Agronomics and 0 mentions for Fidelity Japan Trust. Agronomics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity Japan Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Agronomics Neutral
Fidelity Japan Trust Neutral

Fidelity Japan Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics. Agronomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Japan Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agronomics-£11.92M-5.85-£436.90K-£1.60N/A
Fidelity Japan Trust£9.26M28.94£6.24M£6.9234.06

0.1% of Agronomics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fidelity Japan Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 16.2% of Agronomics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Fidelity Japan Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Fidelity Japan Trust's net margin of 72.86%. Fidelity Japan Trust's return on equity of 3.48% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agronomics135.81% -12.24% 2.20%
Fidelity Japan Trust 72.86%3.48%1.92%

Agronomics has a beta of 0.919, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Japan Trust has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fidelity Japan Trust beats Agronomics on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to NextEnergy Solar Fund?

NextEnergy Solar Fund (LON:NESF) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, Agronomics had 1 more articles in the media than NextEnergy Solar Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Agronomics and 0 mentions for NextEnergy Solar Fund. NextEnergy Solar Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Agronomics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
NextEnergy Solar Fund Neutral
Agronomics Neutral

Agronomics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NextEnergy Solar Fund. NextEnergy Solar Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agronomics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NextEnergy Solar Fund£6.50M39.52-£13.68M-£1.01N/A
Agronomics-£11.92M-5.85-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

26.4% of NextEnergy Solar Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Agronomics shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of NextEnergy Solar Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.2% of Agronomics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to NextEnergy Solar Fund's net margin of -19.62%. NextEnergy Solar Fund's return on equity of -1.06% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NextEnergy Solar Fund-19.62% -1.06% -2.16%
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

NextEnergy Solar Fund has a beta of 0.314, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agronomics has a beta of 0.919, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Agronomics beats NextEnergy Solar Fund on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Agronomics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ANIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ANIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ANIC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricAgronomicsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£69.73M£2.37B£5.76B£2.79B
Dividend YieldN/A5.99%5.27%6.09%
P/E Ratio-4.1325.2115.77366.15
Price / Sales-5.851,964.78995.1088,429.84
Price / Cash0.8660.1790.3227.89
Price / Book0.421.354.407.74
Net Income-£436.90K£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.37%-0.13%0.43%0.82%
1 Month Performance-1.49%2.39%2.28%2.78%
1 Year Performance-7.04%13.44%21.88%87.90%

Agronomics Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ANIC
Agronomics
N/AGBX 6.60
-2.2%		N/A-3.0%£69.73M-£11.92MN/AN/A
AATG
Albion Technology & Gen VCT
N/AGBX 67
flat		N/A-3.7%£280.04M£1.41M186.11N/A
AAEV
Albion Enterprise VCT
N/AGBX 107.50
flat		N/A-5.8%£280.03M£4.55M149.31N/A
GSF
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1.1534 of 5 stars		GBX 53.90
-2.0%		GBX 60
+11.3%		-14.4%£272.25M-£29.52MN/AN/A
FJV
Fidelity Japan Trust
N/AGBX 235.72
flat		N/AN/A£267.96M£9.26M34.06N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:ANIC) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
I’m sounding the alarm
Meta is cutting 10% of its workforce. Microsoft offered voluntary retirement to 7% of U.S. employees. Oracle, ...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
What Expenses Can Be Deducted From Capital Gains Tax This Year?
Capital gains taxes can quietly erode investment returns - but the tax code offers legitimate ways to potentia...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Musk's acquisition pattern points to ONE stock
Musk needed solar - he acquired SolarCity. Needed data - he bought Twitter. The pattern is clear: when a suppl...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Just Named His Secret AI Project. It's Called "Golden Dawn."
Behind a hidden government lab in Tennessee, 40,000 scientists are reportedly finishing work on an AI system d...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
This is the worst news for stocks in 50 years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are issuing a rare warning: what's ahead for U.S. stocks could be the worst e...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock, JPMorgan, and Goldman are all stock piling the same asset… are you?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Fidelity, ARK Invest and Andreessen Horowitz are all buying the same asset...
Awesomely, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel