Go Pro

Agronomics (ANIC) Competitors

Agronomics logo
GBX 5.34 +0.04 (+0.66%)
As of 08/21/2026 12:28 PM Eastern

ANIC vs. CCPG, BRK, FTV, JUSC, and IIT

Should you buy Agronomics stock or one of its competitors? Agronomics's main competitors and comparable companies include CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities (CCPG), Brooks Macdonald Group (BRK), Foresight VCT (FTV), JPMorgan US Smaller Companies (JUSC), and The Independent Investment Trust (IIT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Agronomics compare to CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities?

CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities (LON:CCPG) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CVC Credit Partners European OpportunitiesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Agronomics-£11.92M-4.85-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

0.6% of Agronomics shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.9% of Agronomics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Agronomics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities Neutral
Agronomics Neutral

Agronomics has a consensus price target of GBX 13.30, indicating a potential upside of 149.30%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Agronomics is more favorable than CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities' net margin of 0.00%. CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities' return on equity of 0.00% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CVC Credit Partners European OpportunitiesN/A N/A N/A
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

Summary

Agronomics beats CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Brooks Macdonald Group?

Brooks Macdonald Group (LON:BRK) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Brooks Macdonald Group has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics. Agronomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brooks Macdonald Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brooks Macdonald Group£117.92M1.87£6.54M£99.7014.34
Agronomics-£11.92M-4.85-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

Brooks Macdonald Group has a beta of 0.781, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agronomics has a beta of 0.977, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Brooks Macdonald Group's net margin of 5.71%. Brooks Macdonald Group's return on equity of 4.43% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brooks Macdonald Group5.71% 4.43% 7.37%
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

Brooks Macdonald Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,650, indicating a potential upside of 15.38%. Agronomics has a consensus price target of GBX 13.30, indicating a potential upside of 149.30%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Agronomics is more favorable than Brooks Macdonald Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brooks Macdonald Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Brooks Macdonald Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Agronomics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brooks Macdonald Group Neutral
Agronomics Neutral

61.8% of Brooks Macdonald Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Agronomics shares are held by institutional investors. 10.1% of Brooks Macdonald Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.9% of Agronomics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Brooks Macdonald Group beats Agronomics on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Foresight VCT?

Foresight VCT (LON:FTV) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Foresight VCT's net margin of -5.33%. Foresight VCT's return on equity of 0.01% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Foresight VCT-5.33% 0.01% 4.98%
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

Agronomics has a consensus price target of GBX 13.30, suggesting a potential upside of 149.30%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Agronomics is more favorable than Foresight VCT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Foresight VCT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Foresight VCT has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Foresight VCT£672K327.30£24.62MN/AN/A
Agronomics-£11.92M-4.85-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

In the previous week, Foresight VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Agronomics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Foresight VCT Neutral
Agronomics Neutral

Foresight VCT has a beta of 0.053351663, suggesting that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agronomics has a beta of 0.977, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Foresight VCT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Agronomics shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Foresight VCT shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.9% of Agronomics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Agronomics beats Foresight VCT on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to JPMorgan US Smaller Companies?

JPMorgan US Smaller Companies (LON:JUSC) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Agronomics has a consensus target price of GBX 13.30, suggesting a potential upside of 149.30%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Agronomics is more favorable than JPMorgan US Smaller Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JPMorgan US Smaller Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

JPMorgan US Smaller Companies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Agronomics. JPMorgan US Smaller Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agronomics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan US Smaller Companies-£33.89M-6.48£11.79M-£60.38N/A
Agronomics-£11.92M-4.85-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to JPMorgan US Smaller Companies' net margin of 109.83%. Agronomics' return on equity of -12.24% beat JPMorgan US Smaller Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan US Smaller Companies109.83% -14.73% 3.11%
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

JPMorgan US Smaller Companies has a beta of 1.163, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agronomics has a beta of 0.977, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

12.9% of JPMorgan US Smaller Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Agronomics shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of JPMorgan US Smaller Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.9% of Agronomics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, JPMorgan US Smaller Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Agronomics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan US Smaller Companies Neutral
Agronomics Neutral

Summary

Agronomics beats JPMorgan US Smaller Companies on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to The Independent Investment Trust?

The Independent Investment Trust (LON:IIT) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, The Independent Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Agronomics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Independent Investment Trust Neutral
Agronomics Neutral

The Independent Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Agronomics. Agronomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Independent Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Independent Investment Trust-£50.48M0.00N/A£0.89N/A
Agronomics-£11.92M-4.85-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

Agronomics has a consensus price target of GBX 13.30, indicating a potential upside of 149.30%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Agronomics is more favorable than The Independent Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Independent Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.6% of Agronomics shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.9% of Agronomics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to The Independent Investment Trust's net margin of 0.00%. The Independent Investment Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Independent Investment TrustN/A N/A N/A
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

Summary

Agronomics beats The Independent Investment Trust on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Agronomics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ANIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ANIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ANIC vs. The Competition

MetricAgronomicsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£57.42M£5.66B£13.63B£2.54B
Dividend YieldN/A7.38%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio-3.3339.0929.61367.57
Price / Sales-4.851,262.20520.7583,481.74
Price / Cash0.8648.3130.7127.89
Price / Book0.343.752.847.19
Net Income-£436.90K£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-5.99%-0.25%-0.30%0.30%
1 Month Performance4.61%2.06%2.37%3.31%
1 Year Performance-27.66%5.71%9.68%22.13%

Agronomics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ANIC
Agronomics
N/AGBX 5.34
+0.7%
GBX 13.30
+149.3%
-27.7%£57.42M-£11.92MN/AN/A
CCPG
CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities
N/AN/AN/AN/A£224.83MN/AN/AN/A
BRK
Brooks Macdonald Group
2.9247 of 5 stars
GBX 1,430
flat
GBX 1,650
+15.4%
-21.4%£220.91M£117.92M14.34512
FTV
Foresight VCT
N/AGBX 62.50
+2.5%
N/AN/A£219.95M£672K31.1918,000
JUSC
JPMorgan US Smaller Companies
N/AGBX 438
-1.8%
N/A+7.6%£218.60M-£33.89MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ANIC) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners