Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ Trump’s secret China deal (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free ANIC Stock Alerts

Agronomics (ANIC) Competitors

Agronomics logo
GBX 6.10 -0.05 (-0.81%)
As of 06/23/2026 12:43 PM Eastern
Compare

ANIC vs. AATG, BGLF, ARR, GSF, and RECI

Should you buy Agronomics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Agronomics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Agronomics include Albion Technology & Gen VCT (AATG), Blackstone Loan Financing (BGLF), Aurora Investment Trust (ARR), Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (GSF), and Real Estate Credit Investments (RECI). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Agronomics compare to Albion Technology & Gen VCT?

Albion Technology & Gen VCT (LON:AATG) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Albion Technology & Gen VCT has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics. Agronomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albion Technology & Gen VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Albion Technology & Gen VCT£5.74M46.55£5.59M£1.2751.33
Agronomics-£11.92M-5.55-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

Agronomics has a consensus target price of GBX 13.30, indicating a potential upside of 118.03%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Agronomics is more favorable than Albion Technology & Gen VCT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Albion Technology & Gen VCT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Albion Technology & Gen VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Agronomics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Albion Technology & Gen VCT Neutral
Agronomics Neutral

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Albion Technology & Gen VCT's net margin of 82.73%. Albion Technology & Gen VCT's return on equity of 1.73% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Albion Technology & Gen VCT82.73% 1.73% 2.17%
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

1.5% of Albion Technology & Gen VCT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Agronomics shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Albion Technology & Gen VCT shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Agronomics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Albion Technology & Gen VCT beats Agronomics on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Blackstone Loan Financing?

Agronomics (LON:ANIC) and Blackstone Loan Financing (LON:BGLF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Agronomics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Blackstone Loan Financing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Agronomics Neutral
Blackstone Loan Financing Neutral

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Blackstone Loan Financing's net margin of 96.70%. Blackstone Loan Financing's return on equity of 19.06% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agronomics135.81% -12.24% 2.20%
Blackstone Loan Financing 96.70%19.06%11.82%

0.6% of Agronomics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are held by institutional investors. 16.7% of Agronomics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Blackstone Loan Financing has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics. Agronomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blackstone Loan Financing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agronomics-£11.92M-5.55-£436.90K-£1.60N/A
Blackstone Loan Financing£7.00B0.00£6.86B£0.28N/A

Agronomics has a beta of 0.962, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Loan Financing has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Agronomics presently has a consensus price target of GBX 13.30, indicating a potential upside of 118.03%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Agronomics is more favorable than Blackstone Loan Financing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Blackstone Loan Financing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Blackstone Loan Financing beats Agronomics on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Aurora Investment Trust?

Agronomics (LON:ANIC) and Aurora Investment Trust (LON:ARR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Agronomics has a beta of 0.962, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aurora Investment Trust has a beta of 1.3832655, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Aurora Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Agronomics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Aurora Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Agronomics. Aurora Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Agronomics' score of 0.00 indicating that Aurora Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Agronomics Neutral
Aurora Investment Trust Positive

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Aurora Investment Trust's net margin of 97.16%. Aurora Investment Trust's return on equity of 14.45% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agronomics135.81% -12.24% 2.20%
Aurora Investment Trust 97.16%14.45%18.36%

0.6% of Agronomics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.5% of Aurora Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 16.7% of Agronomics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Aurora Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Agronomics presently has a consensus target price of GBX 13.30, suggesting a potential upside of 118.03%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Agronomics is more favorable than Aurora Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Aurora Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Aurora Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics. Agronomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aurora Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agronomics-£11.92M-5.55-£436.90K-£1.60N/A
Aurora Investment Trust£48.61M5.31£50.31M£41.895.68

Summary

Aurora Investment Trust beats Agronomics on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Gore Street Energy Storage Fund?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Agronomics has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agronomics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-8.47-£5.96M-£6.35N/A
Agronomics-£11.92M-5.55-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Agronomics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral
Agronomics Neutral

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.37207288, suggesting that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agronomics has a beta of 0.962, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's net margin of 131.36%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity of -6.58% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund131.36% -6.58% -0.64%
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

16.9% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Agronomics shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Agronomics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund currently has a consensus target price of GBX 60, indicating a potential upside of 21.21%. Agronomics has a consensus target price of GBX 13.30, indicating a potential upside of 118.03%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Agronomics is more favorable than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Agronomics beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Agronomics compare to Real Estate Credit Investments?

Real Estate Credit Investments (LON:RECI) and Agronomics (LON:ANIC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Agronomics has a net margin of 135.81% compared to Real Estate Credit Investments' net margin of 75.80%. Real Estate Credit Investments' return on equity of 7.08% beat Agronomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Real Estate Credit Investments75.80% 7.08% 4.07%
Agronomics 135.81%-12.24%2.20%

Agronomics has a consensus target price of GBX 13.30, indicating a potential upside of 118.03%. Given Agronomics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Agronomics is more favorable than Real Estate Credit Investments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Real Estate Credit Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Agronomics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

39.5% of Real Estate Credit Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Agronomics shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Real Estate Credit Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Agronomics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Real Estate Credit Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Agronomics. Agronomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Real Estate Credit Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Real Estate Credit Investments£26.07M9.67£233.91M£8.6013.26
Agronomics-£11.92M-5.55-£436.90K-£1.60N/A

In the previous week, Real Estate Credit Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Agronomics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Real Estate Credit Investments and 0 mentions for Agronomics. Real Estate Credit Investments' average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Agronomics' score of 0.00 indicating that Real Estate Credit Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Real Estate Credit Investments Positive
Agronomics Neutral

Real Estate Credit Investments has a beta of 0.195, suggesting that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agronomics has a beta of 0.962, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Real Estate Credit Investments beats Agronomics on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Agronomics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ANIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ANIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ANIC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricAgronomicsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£66.09M£2.45B£6.08B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A6.03%5.27%6.16%
P/E Ratio-3.8125.8716.31365.73
Price / Sales-5.552,081.971,100.8786,253.69
Price / Cash0.8660.1684.9827.85
Price / Book0.391.376.657.92
Net Income-£436.90K£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.17%-0.50%-0.23%-0.93%
1 Month Performance-10.87%-0.16%1.00%-0.76%
1 Year Performance-13.03%9.72%19.70%69.29%

Agronomics Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ANIC
Agronomics
1.8806 of 5 stars		GBX 6.10
-0.8%		GBX 13.30
+118.0%		-12.9%£66.09M-£11.92MN/AN/A
AATG
Albion Technology & Gen VCT
N/AGBX 64
flat		N/A-2.7%£262.23M£5.74M50.39N/A
BGLF
Blackstone Loan Financing
N/AN/AN/AN/A£262.12M£7.00B3.19N/A
ARR
Aurora Investment Trust
N/AGBX 240
+0.4%		N/A-5.2%£260.33M£48.61M5.73N/A
GSF
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
N/AGBX 51.50
-1.2%		GBX 60
+16.5%		-21.8%£260.13M-£29.52MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:ANIC) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Nearly 40% of Americans now hold a positive view of socialism - and former hedge fund manager Whitney Tilson s...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Quick favor to ask you
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book at no charge - the same book that sells for $...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Top Banks Warn: A Strange Day is Coming to America
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are warning clients about a developing crisis that could suppress portfolio g...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
A drilling crew just broke a record nobody expected
A drilling crew in Beaver County, Utah hit 15,765 feet of solid granite in 16 days - a job the Department of E...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Read this before you touch SPCX
SPCX is live on Nasdaq - but a market expert who called AMD before it climbed as high as 7,100% says buying th...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Millionaire trader who went 13-for-13 on Trump in 2025 now turns his attention to Elon.
Hedge fund trader Larry Benedict went 13-for-13 in Q1 2025 - not a single losing trade - and finished the year...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Karp just filed Form 144
On May 12, 2026, Palantir CEO Alex Karp filed to sell 585,000 shares - roughly $95.93 million. Combined with f...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel