Go Pro
→ Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free BPM Stock Alerts

B.P. Marsh & Partners (BPM) Competitors

B.P. Marsh & Partners logo
GBX 672 -1.85 (-0.27%)
As of 08:21 AM Eastern
Compare

BPM vs. APAX, JEO, APEO, ICGT, and RICA

Should you buy B.P. Marsh & Partners stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares B.P. Marsh & Partners with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with B.P. Marsh & Partners include Apax Global Alpha (APAX), European Opportunities Trust (JEO), abrdn Private Equity Opportunities (APEO), ICG Enterprise Trust (ICGT), and Ruffer Investment (RICA). These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Apax Global Alpha?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Apax Global Alpha (LON:APAX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Apax Global Alpha shares are held by institutional investors. 47.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Apax Global Alpha shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Apax Global Alpha. Apax Global Alpha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.71£53.77M£125.905.34
Apax Global Alpha-£44.79M-20.62£4.12M-£0.11N/A

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Apax Global Alpha has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Apax Global Alpha. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for Apax Global Alpha. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Apax Global Alpha's score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners Positive
Apax Global Alpha Neutral

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Apax Global Alpha's net margin of 57.27%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat Apax Global Alpha's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
Apax Global Alpha 57.27%0.67%2.57%

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Apax Global Alpha pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Apax Global Alpha pays out -120.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Apax Global Alpha on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to European Opportunities Trust?

European Opportunities Trust (LON:JEO) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 2 more articles in the media than European Opportunities Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for European Opportunities Trust. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat European Opportunities Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
European Opportunities Trust Neutral
B.P. Marsh & Partners Positive

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to European Opportunities Trust's net margin of 0.00%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat European Opportunities Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
European Opportunities TrustN/A N/A N/A
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

European Opportunities Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. European Opportunities Trust pays out -0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher revenue and earnings than European Opportunities Trust. European Opportunities Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
European Opportunities Trust-£62.33M0.00N/A-£65.20N/A
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.71£53.77M£125.905.34

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats European Opportunities Trust on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to abrdn Private Equity Opportunities?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and abrdn Private Equity Opportunities (LON:APEO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

abrdn Private Equity Opportunities has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. abrdn Private Equity Opportunities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.71£53.77M£125.905.34
abrdn Private Equity Opportunities£80.21M0.00£60.96M£0.40N/A

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 2 more articles in the media than abrdn Private Equity Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for abrdn Private Equity Opportunities. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat abrdn Private Equity Opportunities' score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners Positive
abrdn Private Equity Opportunities Neutral

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. abrdn Private Equity Opportunities pays an annual dividend of GBX 17 per share. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn Private Equity Opportunities pays out 4,250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. B.P. Marsh & Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to abrdn Private Equity Opportunities' net margin of 76.01%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat abrdn Private Equity Opportunities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
abrdn Private Equity Opportunities 76.01%5.18%3.35%

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of abrdn Private Equity Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. 47.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of abrdn Private Equity Opportunities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Private Equity Opportunities has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats abrdn Private Equity Opportunities on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to ICG Enterprise Trust?

ICG Enterprise Trust (LON:ICGT) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, ICG Enterprise Trust had 2 more articles in the media than B.P. Marsh & Partners. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for ICG Enterprise Trust and 2 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners. ICG Enterprise Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' score of 0.83 indicating that ICG Enterprise Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ICG Enterprise Trust
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
B.P. Marsh & Partners
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ICG Enterprise Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
B.P. Marsh & Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to ICG Enterprise Trust's net margin of -52.20%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat ICG Enterprise Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ICG Enterprise Trust-52.20% -0.66% 0.78%
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

ICG Enterprise Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. ICG Enterprise Trust pays out -277.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ICG Enterprise Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

ICG Enterprise Trust has a beta of 0.488, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, meaning that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher revenue and earnings than ICG Enterprise Trust. ICG Enterprise Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ICG Enterprise Trust£2.98M292.26£32.56M-£13.35N/A
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.71£53.77M£125.905.34

18.6% of ICG Enterprise Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of ICG Enterprise Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

ICG Enterprise Trust and B.P. Marsh & Partners tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Ruffer Investment?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Ruffer Investment's net margin of 62.53%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
Ruffer Investment 62.53%4.37%0.45%

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ruffer Investment. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.71£53.77M£125.905.34
Ruffer Investment£91.91M9.42£8.78M£28.3510.35

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.201, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ruffer Investment pays out 21.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Ruffer Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 1 mentions for Ruffer Investment. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Ruffer Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ruffer Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Ruffer Investment on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get B.P. Marsh & Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BPM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BPM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricB.P. Marsh & PartnersCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£236.81M£5.46B£13.87B£2.83B
Dividend Yield2.07%7.51%5.95%6.15%
P/E Ratio5.3436.7928.68368.44
Price / Sales3.711,112.27460.9283,484.28
Price / Cash7.8584.8844.5027.89
Price / Book0.983.693.687.08
Net Income£53.77M£417.14M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.01%7.67%3.60%6.25%
1 Month Performance-2.50%-1.17%0.12%0.12%
1 Year Performance-2.78%5.74%13.02%64.12%

B.P. Marsh & Partners Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BPM
B.P. Marsh & Partners
N/AGBX 672
-0.3%		N/A-2.5%£236.81M£63.79M5.3416
APAX
Apax Global Alpha
N/AGBX 191.50
flat		N/AN/A£923.78M-£44.79MN/AN/A
JEO
European Opportunities Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£886.70M-£62.33MN/AN/A
APEO
abrdn Private Equity Opportunities
N/AN/AN/AN/A£880.29M£80.21M1,435.00N/A
ICGT
ICG Enterprise Trust
1.6058 of 5 stars		GBX 1,440
+1.3%		N/A-1.1%£876.10M£2.98MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BPM) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Where to Put $100 Before Trump's New Tech Law Rolls Out
The Financial Times says a new tech law puts America 'on the verge of a financial revolution.' Yahoo Finance e...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
“The unseen winner of the AI race” is not SpaceX
Marc Chaikin - the analyst who called Nvidia before its historic run - says a tech firm labeled 'the unseen wi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel