Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page (From Reagan Gold Group) (Ad)tc pixel Free BPM Stock Alerts

B.P. Marsh & Partners (BPM) Competitors

B.P. Marsh & Partners logo
GBX 702.44 +9.39 (+1.35%)
As of 12:31 PM Eastern
Compare

BPM vs. EWI, BBGI, TRY, PHI, and TFIF

Should you buy B.P. Marsh & Partners stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares B.P. Marsh & Partners with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with B.P. Marsh & Partners include Edinburgh Worldwide (EWI), BBGI Global Infrastructure (BBGI), TR Property Investment Trust (TRY), Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (PHI), and TwentyFour Income (TFIF). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Edinburgh Worldwide?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Edinburgh Worldwide (LON:EWI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Edinburgh Worldwide. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for Edinburgh Worldwide. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Edinburgh Worldwide'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners Neutral
Edinburgh Worldwide Neutral

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Edinburgh Worldwide's net margin of 94.47%. Edinburgh Worldwide's return on equity of 25.75% beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
Edinburgh Worldwide 94.47%25.75%-6.45%

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of Edinburgh Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Edinburgh Worldwide shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Edinburgh Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Edinburgh Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.88£53.77M£125.905.58
Edinburgh Worldwide£180.36M5.37£70.29M£48.855.73

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.202, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Edinburgh Worldwide has a beta of 0.756, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Edinburgh Worldwide beats B.P. Marsh & Partners on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to BBGI Global Infrastructure?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and BBGI Global Infrastructure (LON:BBGI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.202, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BBGI Global Infrastructure has a beta of 0.23, meaning that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 1 more articles in the media than BBGI Global Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for BBGI Global Infrastructure. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BBGI Global Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners Neutral
BBGI Global Infrastructure Neutral

BBGI Global Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BBGI Global Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.88£53.77M£125.905.58
BBGI Global Infrastructure£67.98M14.48£54.89M£7.7217.93

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to BBGI Global Infrastructure's net margin of 61.84%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat BBGI Global Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
BBGI Global Infrastructure 61.84%2.52%3.32%

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. BBGI Global Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BBGI Global Infrastructure pays out 103.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.9% of BBGI Global Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 47.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of BBGI Global Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners and BBGI Global Infrastructure tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to TR Property Investment Trust?

TR Property Investment Trust (LON:TRY) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

TR Property Investment Trust has a beta of 1.4906461, suggesting that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.202, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

12.8% of TR Property Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of TR Property Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TR Property Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. TR Property Investment Trust pays out -140.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TR Property Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, TR Property Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than B.P. Marsh & Partners. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for TR Property Investment Trust and 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat TR Property Investment Trust's score of -0.06 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TR Property Investment Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
B.P. Marsh & Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

TR Property Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than B.P. Marsh & Partners. TR Property Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TR Property Investment Trust-£27.26M-35.92£284.71M-£11.35N/A
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.88£53.77M£125.905.58

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to TR Property Investment Trust's net margin of 79.93%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat TR Property Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TR Property Investment Trust79.93% 6.52% -24.58%
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats TR Property Investment Trust on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Pacific Horizon Investment Trust?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (LON:PHI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.202, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a beta of 1.2635638, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pacific Horizon Investment Trust. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.88£53.77M£125.905.58
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust£243.03M4.13£26.66M£288.484.34

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's net margin of 97.19%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's return on equity of 34.20% beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust 97.19%34.20%3.98%

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than B.P. Marsh & Partners. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pacific Horizon Investment Trust and 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust beats B.P. Marsh & Partners on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to TwentyFour Income?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.202, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.23193814, suggesting that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TwentyFour Income had 2 more articles in the media than B.P. Marsh & Partners. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for TwentyFour Income and 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners. TwentyFour Income's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that TwentyFour Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
TwentyFour Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Income pays out 88.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

TwentyFour Income has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.88£53.77M£125.905.58
TwentyFour Income£97.54M9.93£868.58M£12.478.79

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 62.41%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat TwentyFour Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
TwentyFour Income 62.41%11.04%N/A

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.5% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by institutional investors. 47.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

TwentyFour Income beats B.P. Marsh & Partners on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get B.P. Marsh & Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BPM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BPM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricB.P. Marsh & PartnersAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£246.67M£2.47B£6.08B£2.96B
Dividend Yield1.99%6.03%5.27%6.16%
P/E Ratio5.5825.6015.91365.86
Price / Sales3.882,106.501,102.3286,363.35
Price / Cash7.8560.1648.6227.85
Price / Book1.031.386.688.02
Net Income£53.77M£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.36%-0.34%-0.27%-0.21%
1 Month Performance4.53%0.29%1.08%0.11%
1 Year Performance1.14%10.84%21.11%74.25%

B.P. Marsh & Partners Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BPM
B.P. Marsh & Partners
N/AGBX 702.44
+1.4%		N/A-0.2%£246.67M£63.79M5.5816
EWI
Edinburgh Worldwide
N/AGBX 285
-0.3%		N/A+71.9%£985.77M£180.36M5.83N/A
BBGI
BBGI Global Infrastructure
N/AGBX 138.50
flat		N/AN/A£984.71M£67.98M17.931,160
TRY
TR Property Investment Trust
N/AGBX 308.50
-1.4%		N/A-8.3%£979.03M-£27.26MN/A26
PHI
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust
N/AGBX 1,211.95
-0.2%		N/A+101.3%£970.60M£243.03M4.2018,800

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BPM) was last updated on 6/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
I’m shouting ‘Buy Now’ before this stock soars
In 2023, Marc Chaikin's system flagged an automotive stock as bearish - and it fell 35% shortly after. Today, ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
PH: Do THESE 4 things to your bank account now …
In a few short months, the US government could gain unprecedented powers over personal bank accounts - includi...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock's CEO is calling this "the next major evolution"
Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock - the world's largest asset manager with $10 trillion under management - is calli...
Awesomely, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
Every time Musk needs a company, he buys it. He needs this one.
Elon Musk doesn't rent - he buys. When he needed batteries, he built the Gigafactory. When he needed solar, he...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
New Chip takes minutes, not days
George Gilder believes today's AI data centers could become tomorrow's typewriters - replaced by a single wafe...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel