Free Trial

B.P. Marsh & Partners (BPM) Competitors

B.P. Marsh & Partners logo
GBX 690 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/29/2026 12:43 PM Eastern

BPM vs. TFIF, SOI, SLPE, MRCH, and APAX

Should you buy B.P. Marsh & Partners stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares B.P. Marsh & Partners with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with B.P. Marsh & Partners include TwentyFour Income (TFIF), Schroder Oriental Income (SOI), Standard Life Private Equity Trust (SLPE), The Merchants Trust (MRCH), and Apax Global Alpha (APAX). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to TwentyFour Income?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

TwentyFour Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£120.08M2.03£53.77M£269.202.56
TwentyFour Income£97.54M9.68£868.58M£12.478.71

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Income pays out 88.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 2 more articles in the media than TwentyFour Income. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 1 mentions for TwentyFour Income. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat TwentyFour Income's score of 0.25 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TwentyFour Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.2, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.23198003, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

2.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.8% of TwentyFour Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.4% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 62.41%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat TwentyFour Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
TwentyFour Income 62.41%11.04%N/A

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats TwentyFour Income on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Schroder Oriental Income?

Schroder Oriental Income (LON:SOI) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Schroder Oriental Income's net margin of 94.62%. Schroder Oriental Income's return on equity of 39.20% beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Oriental Income94.62% 39.20% -2.12%
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

Schroder Oriental Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Schroder Oriental Income pays out 29.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

7.2% of Schroder Oriental Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Schroder Oriental Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.4% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Schroder Oriental Income has a beta of 1.1079109, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.2, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroder Oriental Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder Oriental Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Oriental Income£97.72M10.10£106.18M£40.5310.86
B.P. Marsh & Partners£120.08M2.03£53.77M£269.202.56

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Schroder Oriental Income. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 2 mentions for Schroder Oriental Income. Schroder Oriental Income's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' score of 1.29 indicating that Schroder Oriental Income is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Schroder Oriental Income
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
B.P. Marsh & Partners
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Schroder Oriental Income beats B.P. Marsh & Partners on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Standard Life Private Equity Trust?

Standard Life Private Equity Trust (LON:SLPE) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Standard Life Private Equity Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for Standard Life Private Equity Trust. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Standard Life Private Equity Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Standard Life Private Equity Trust Neutral
B.P. Marsh & Partners Positive

B.P. Marsh & Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Standard Life Private Equity Trust. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Standard Life Private Equity Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Standard Life Private Equity Trust£289.51M3.21N/A£186.203.24
B.P. Marsh & Partners£120.08M2.03£53.77M£269.202.56

Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays out 7.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Standard Life Private Equity Trust's net margin of 0.00%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat Standard Life Private Equity Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Standard Life Private Equity TrustN/A N/A N/A
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

17.9% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 47.4% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Standard Life Private Equity Trust on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to The Merchants Trust?

The Merchants Trust (LON:MRCH) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 2 more articles in the media than The Merchants Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 1 mentions for The Merchants Trust. The Merchants Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' score of 1.29 indicating that The Merchants Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
The Merchants Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
B.P. Marsh & Partners
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

The Merchants Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 29.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. The Merchants Trust pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

The Merchants Trust has a beta of 0.686, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.2, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

5.3% of The Merchants Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of The Merchants Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.4% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The Merchants Trust has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Merchants Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Merchants Trust£165.40M5.65£109.11M£109.595.78
B.P. Marsh & Partners£120.08M2.03£53.77M£269.202.56

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to The Merchants Trust's net margin of 93.22%. The Merchants Trust's return on equity of 17.67% beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Merchants Trust93.22% 17.67% 7.70%
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

Summary

The Merchants Trust beats B.P. Marsh & Partners on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Apax Global Alpha?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Apax Global Alpha (LON:APAX) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.2, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Apax Global Alpha has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Apax Global Alpha's net margin of 132.67%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat Apax Global Alpha's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
Apax Global Alpha 132.67%-4.53%2.57%

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Apax Global Alpha. Apax Global Alpha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£120.08M2.03£53.77M£269.202.56
Apax Global Alpha-£44.79M-20.62£4.12M-£0.11N/A

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Apax Global Alpha. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for Apax Global Alpha. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Apax Global Alpha's score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners Positive
Apax Global Alpha Neutral

2.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Apax Global Alpha shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.4% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Apax Global Alpha shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Apax Global Alpha pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Apax Global Alpha pays out -120.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Apax Global Alpha on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get B.P. Marsh & Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BPM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BPM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BPM vs. The Competition

MetricB.P. Marsh & PartnersAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£243.29M£2.36B£5.82B£2.80B
Dividend Yield1.99%5.92%5.20%6.07%
P/E Ratio2.5625.3816.10365.74
Price / Sales2.032,034.401,296.0687,758.72
Price / Cash7.8560.1595.1727.89
Price / Book1.011.386.487.79
Net Income£53.77M£264.68M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.68%0.97%1.06%0.82%
1 Month Performance2.86%2.72%2.82%10.96%
1 Year Performance6.09%13.16%20.58%78.71%

B.P. Marsh & Partners Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BPM
B.P. Marsh & Partners
N/AGBX 690
flat
N/A+4.5%£243.29M£120.08M2.5616
TFIF
TwentyFour Income
N/AGBX 108.20
-0.2%
N/A-1.1%£944.39M£97.54M8.68N/A
SOI
Schroder Oriental Income
N/AGBX 425
+1.0%
N/A+59.1%£941.81M£97.72M10.49180
SLPE
Standard Life Private Equity Trust
N/AGBX 604
+0.7%
N/A+7.3%£928.63M£289.51M3.24N/A
MRCH
The Merchants Trust
N/AGBX 629
+0.3%
N/A+12.4%£925.66M£165.40M5.74N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BPM) was last updated on 5/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners