Go Pro
→ Your $29.97 book is free today (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free BPM Stock Alerts

B.P. Marsh & Partners (BPM) Competitors

B.P. Marsh & Partners logo
GBX 676.50 +0.50 (+0.07%)
As of 08/21/2026 12:28 PM Eastern
Compare

BPM vs. CORD, MUT, SLPE, APAX, and USA

Should you buy B.P. Marsh & Partners stock or one of its competitors? B.P. Marsh & Partners's main competitors and comparable companies include Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (CORD), Murray Income Trust (MUT), Standard Life Private Equity Trust (SLPE), Apax Global Alpha (APAX), and Baillie Gifford US Growth (USA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Cordiant Digital Infrastructure?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (LON:CORD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and profitability.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a beta of 0.819, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cordiant Digital Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.81£53.77M£125.905.37
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure£163.11M5.80£846.28M£20.815.93

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cordiant Digital Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners Neutral
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure Neutral

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a net margin of 432.24% compared to B.P. Marsh & Partners' net margin of 160.46%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's return on equity of 14.55% beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure 432.24%14.55%5.89%

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.2% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.6% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure beats B.P. Marsh & Partners on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Murray Income Trust?

Murray Income Trust (LON:MUT) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Murray Income Trust's net margin of 93.90%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat Murray Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Murray Income Trust93.90% 12.73% 4.65%
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

10.3% of Murray Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Murray Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 46.6% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Murray Income Trust has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murray Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Murray Income Trust£120.88M7.69£90.45M£119.708.32
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.81£53.77M£125.905.37

Murray Income Trust has a beta of 1.177, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, meaning that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Murray Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Murray Income Trust pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Murray Income Trust had 3 more articles in the media than B.P. Marsh & Partners. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Murray Income Trust and 0 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners. Murray Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Murray Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Murray Income Trust Very Positive
B.P. Marsh & Partners Neutral

Summary

Murray Income Trust beats B.P. Marsh & Partners on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Standard Life Private Equity Trust?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Standard Life Private Equity Trust (LON:SLPE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Standard Life Private Equity Trust. Standard Life Private Equity Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.81£53.77M£125.905.37
Standard Life Private Equity Trust£289.51M3.17N/A£186.203.20

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Standard Life Private Equity Trust's net margin of 0.00%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat Standard Life Private Equity Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
Standard Life Private Equity Trust N/A N/A N/A

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.6% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Standard Life Private Equity Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners Neutral
Standard Life Private Equity Trust Neutral

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays out 7.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Standard Life Private Equity Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Standard Life Private Equity Trust on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Apax Global Alpha?

Apax Global Alpha (LON:APAX) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Apax Global Alpha pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Apax Global Alpha pays out -120.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Apax Global Alpha has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, meaning that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

14.3% of Apax Global Alpha shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Apax Global Alpha shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.6% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Apax Global Alpha's net margin of 57.27%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat Apax Global Alpha's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Apax Global Alpha57.27% 0.67% 2.57%
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

In the previous week, Apax Global Alpha's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled B.P. Marsh & Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Apax Global Alpha Neutral
B.P. Marsh & Partners Neutral

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Apax Global Alpha. Apax Global Alpha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Apax Global Alpha-£44.79M-20.62£4.12M-£0.11N/A
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.81£53.77M£125.905.37

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Apax Global Alpha on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

Baillie Gifford US Growth (LON:USA) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Baillie Gifford US Growth has higher earnings, but lower revenue than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford US Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford US Growth£58.05M15.64£84.35M£19.8116.56
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.81£53.77M£125.905.37

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Baillie Gifford US Growth's net margin of 88.83%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat Baillie Gifford US Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford US Growth88.83% 7.17% N/A
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

5.8% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.6% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Baillie Gifford US Growth has a beta of 0.631, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford US Growth had 2 more articles in the media than B.P. Marsh & Partners. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Baillie Gifford US Growth and 0 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners. Baillie Gifford US Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Baillie Gifford US Growth is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford US Growth Positive
B.P. Marsh & Partners Neutral

Summary

Baillie Gifford US Growth beats B.P. Marsh & Partners on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get B.P. Marsh & Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BPM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BPM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricB.P. Marsh & PartnersCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£237.00M£5.66B£13.63B£2.54B
Dividend Yield2.07%7.38%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio5.3739.0929.61367.57
Price / Sales3.811,235.26516.5783,481.74
Price / Cash7.8548.3138.1927.89
Price / Book0.992.132.187.19
Net Income£53.77M£416.48M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.54%-0.25%-0.30%0.30%
1 Month Performance-0.81%2.06%2.37%3.31%
1 Year Performance-3.22%5.71%9.68%22.13%

B.P. Marsh & Partners Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BPM
B.P. Marsh & Partners
N/AGBX 676.50
+0.1%		N/A-3.2%£237.00M£63.79M5.3716
CORD
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure
N/AGBX 123.15
+0.5%		N/A+24.2%£943.00M£163.11M5.92N/A
MUT
Murray Income Trust
N/AGBX 1,004
flat		N/A+9.8%£936.87M£120.88M8.39147,000
SLPE
Standard Life Private Equity Trust
N/AGBX 604
+1.0%		N/A+9.0%£928.63M£289.51M3.24N/A
APAX
Apax Global Alpha
N/AGBX 191.50
flat		N/AN/A£923.78M-£44.79MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BPM) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel