Go Pro
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free BPM Stock Alerts

B.P. Marsh & Partners (BPM) Competitors

B.P. Marsh & Partners logo
GBX 648 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 10/2/2026 12:31 PM Eastern
Compare

BPM vs. TRY, VEIL, PHI, JEO, and APEO

Should you buy B.P. Marsh & Partners stock or one of its competitors? B.P. Marsh & Partners's main competitors and comparable companies include TR Property Investment Trust (TRY), Vietnam Enterprise (VEIL), Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (PHI), European Opportunities Trust (JEO), and abrdn Private Equity Opportunities (APEO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to TR Property Investment Trust?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and TR Property Investment Trust (LON:TRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.3% of TR Property Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.7% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of TR Property Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TR Property Investment Trust has a beta of 1.484, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to TR Property Investment Trust's net margin of 79.93%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat TR Property Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
TR Property Investment Trust 79.93%6.52%-24.58%

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. TR Property Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 16 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TR Property Investment Trust pays out 71.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners and B.P. Marsh & Partners both had 1 articles in the media. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat TR Property Investment Trust's score of 0.75 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TR Property Investment Trust
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

TR Property Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TR Property Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.56£53.77M£125.905.15
TR Property Investment Trust£77.76M11.12£284.71M£22.3212.21

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners and TR Property Investment Trust tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Vietnam Enterprise?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Vietnam Enterprise (LON:VEIL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vietnam Enterprise. Vietnam Enterprise is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.56£53.77M£125.905.15
Vietnam Enterprise£369.38M2.39-£4.24M£208.003.46

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Vietnam Enterprise's net margin of 96.37%. Vietnam Enterprise's return on equity of 19.70% beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
Vietnam Enterprise 96.37%19.70%-7.53%

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of Vietnam Enterprise shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.7% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Vietnam Enterprise shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Vietnam Enterprise had 5 more articles in the media than B.P. Marsh & Partners. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Vietnam Enterprise and 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Vietnam Enterprise's score of 0.29 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Vietnam Enterprise
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, indicating that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vietnam Enterprise has a beta of 0.538, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Vietnam Enterprise on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Pacific Horizon Investment Trust?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (LON:PHI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's net margin of 97.56%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's return on equity of 43.97% beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust 97.56%43.97%3.98%

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 47.7% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, indicating that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a beta of 1.182, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pacific Horizon Investment Trust. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.56£53.77M£125.905.15
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust£243.03M3.64£26.66M£288.483.94

In the previous week, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than B.P. Marsh & Partners. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pacific Horizon Investment Trust and 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' score of 0.78 indicating that Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust beats B.P. Marsh & Partners on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to European Opportunities Trust?

European Opportunities Trust (LON:JEO) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.7% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 1 more articles in the media than European Opportunities Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for European Opportunities Trust. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat European Opportunities Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
European Opportunities Trust Neutral
B.P. Marsh & Partners Positive

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher revenue and earnings than European Opportunities Trust. European Opportunities Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
European Opportunities Trust-£62.33M0.00N/A-£65.20N/A
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.56£53.77M£125.905.15

European Opportunities Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. European Opportunities Trust pays out -0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to European Opportunities Trust's net margin of 0.00%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat European Opportunities Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
European Opportunities TrustN/A N/A N/A
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats European Opportunities Trust on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to abrdn Private Equity Opportunities?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and abrdn Private Equity Opportunities (LON:APEO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. abrdn Private Equity Opportunities pays an annual dividend of GBX 17 per share. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn Private Equity Opportunities pays out 4,250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. B.P. Marsh & Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

abrdn Private Equity Opportunities has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. abrdn Private Equity Opportunities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.56£53.77M£125.905.15
abrdn Private Equity Opportunities£80.21M0.00£60.96M£0.40N/A

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of abrdn Private Equity Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. 47.7% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of abrdn Private Equity Opportunities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to abrdn Private Equity Opportunities' net margin of 76.01%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat abrdn Private Equity Opportunities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
abrdn Private Equity Opportunities 76.01%5.18%3.35%

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Private Equity Opportunities has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Private Equity Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for abrdn Private Equity Opportunities. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat abrdn Private Equity Opportunities' score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners Positive
abrdn Private Equity Opportunities Neutral

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats abrdn Private Equity Opportunities on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get B.P. Marsh & Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BPM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BPM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BPM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricB.P. Marsh & PartnersCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£227.18M£5.14B£13.34B£2.80B
Dividend Yield2.16%7.55%6.02%6.18%
P/E Ratio5.1529.4024.49366.17
Price / Sales3.561,203.20499.2289,425.29
Price / Cash7.8547.7746.4527.89
Price / Book0.953.492.706.83
Net Income£53.77M£417.69M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.15%-0.72%-1.04%-0.73%
1 Month Performance-4.52%4.84%0.37%16.61%
1 Year Performance-5.86%11.37%11.52%23.09%

B.P. Marsh & Partners Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BPM
B.P. Marsh & Partners
N/AGBX 648
flat		N/A-6.5%£227.18M£63.79M5.1516
TRY
TR Property Investment Trust
N/AGBX 282.50
-0.2%		N/A-14.6%£896.52M£77.76M12.6626
VEIL
Vietnam Enterprise
N/AGBX 729
-0.4%		N/A-3.1%£895.39M£369.38M3.50N/A
PHI
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust
N/AGBX 1,146
+1.2%		N/A+49.9%£890.52M£243.03M3.9718,800
JEO
European Opportunities Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£886.70M-£62.33MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BPM) was last updated on 10/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel