Go Pro
→ Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised (From Stansberry Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free BPM Stock Alerts

B.P. Marsh & Partners (BPM) Competitors

B.P. Marsh & Partners logo
GBX 672 -3.00 (-0.44%)
As of 09/11/2026 12:15 PM Eastern
Compare

BPM vs. USA, CORD, TRY, MUT, and APAX

Should you buy B.P. Marsh & Partners stock or one of its competitors? B.P. Marsh & Partners's main competitors and comparable companies include Baillie Gifford US Growth (USA), Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (CORD), TR Property Investment Trust (TRY), Murray Income Trust (MUT), and Apax Global Alpha (APAX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

Baillie Gifford US Growth (LON:USA) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford US Growth. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford US Growth. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Baillie Gifford US Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford US Growth Neutral
B.P. Marsh & Partners Positive

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Baillie Gifford US Growth's net margin of 88.83%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat Baillie Gifford US Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford US Growth88.83% 7.17% N/A
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

Baillie Gifford US Growth has a beta of 0.618, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

5.8% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.7% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Baillie Gifford US Growth has higher earnings, but lower revenue than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford US Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford US Growth£58.05M16.76£84.35M£19.8117.74
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.69£53.77M£125.905.34

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Baillie Gifford US Growth on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Cordiant Digital Infrastructure?

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (LON:CORD) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cordiant Digital Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure£163.11M5.82£846.28M£20.815.96
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.69£53.77M£125.905.34

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a beta of 0.807, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, meaning that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

39.1% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 47.7% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Cordiant Digital Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for Cordiant Digital Infrastructure. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure Neutral
B.P. Marsh & Partners Positive

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a net margin of 432.24% compared to B.P. Marsh & Partners' net margin of 160.46%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's return on equity of 14.55% beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure432.24% 14.55% 5.89%
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

Summary

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure beats B.P. Marsh & Partners on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to TR Property Investment Trust?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and TR Property Investment Trust (LON:TRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TR Property Investment Trust has a beta of 1.484, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

TR Property Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TR Property Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.69£53.77M£125.905.34
TR Property Investment Trust£77.76M11.84£284.71M£22.3212.99

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 3 more articles in the media than TR Property Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for TR Property Investment Trust. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat TR Property Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners Positive
TR Property Investment Trust Neutral

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.3% of TR Property Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.7% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of TR Property Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to TR Property Investment Trust's net margin of 79.93%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat TR Property Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
TR Property Investment Trust 79.93%6.52%-24.58%

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. TR Property Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 16 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TR Property Investment Trust pays out 71.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats TR Property Investment Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Murray Income Trust?

Murray Income Trust (LON:MUT) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Murray Income Trust has a beta of 1.181, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, meaning that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Murray Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Murray Income Trust pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Murray Income Trust's net margin of 95.27%. Murray Income Trust's return on equity of 13.83% beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Murray Income Trust95.27% 13.83% 4.65%
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

Murray Income Trust has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murray Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Murray Income Trust£120.88M7.50£90.45M£119.708.11
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.69£53.77M£125.905.34

10.3% of Murray Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Murray Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 47.7% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Murray Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 1 mentions for Murray Income Trust. Murray Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' score of 1.14 indicating that Murray Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Murray Income Trust Very Positive
B.P. Marsh & Partners Positive

Summary

Murray Income Trust beats B.P. Marsh & Partners on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Apax Global Alpha?

Apax Global Alpha (LON:APAX) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Apax Global Alpha. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for Apax Global Alpha. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Apax Global Alpha's score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Apax Global Alpha Neutral
B.P. Marsh & Partners Positive

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Apax Global Alpha. Apax Global Alpha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Apax Global Alpha-£44.79M-20.62£4.12M-£0.11N/A
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.69£53.77M£125.905.34

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Apax Global Alpha's net margin of 57.27%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat Apax Global Alpha's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Apax Global Alpha57.27% 0.67% 2.57%
B.P. Marsh & Partners 160.46%13.59%12.41%

Apax Global Alpha has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, meaning that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

14.3% of Apax Global Alpha shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Apax Global Alpha shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.7% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Apax Global Alpha pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Apax Global Alpha pays out -120.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Apax Global Alpha on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get B.P. Marsh & Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BPM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BPM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricB.P. Marsh & PartnersCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£235.60M£5.52B£13.80B£2.51B
Dividend Yield2.05%7.48%5.94%6.23%
P/E Ratio5.3430.5425.67366.83
Price / Sales3.691,199.94503.9283,599.68
Price / Cash7.8547.9240.4527.89
Price / Book0.983.532.756.33
Net Income£53.77M£418.04M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.18%-1.39%-1.17%-0.69%
1 Month Performance-0.40%-1.45%0.25%0.18%
1 Year Performance-2.61%4.83%9.27%20.03%

B.P. Marsh & Partners Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BPM
B.P. Marsh & Partners
N/AGBX 672
-0.4%		N/A-1.9%£235.60M£63.79M5.3416
USA
Baillie Gifford US Growth
N/AGBX 349
+0.9%		N/A+31.7%£965.77M£58.05M17.62N/A
CORD
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure
N/AGBX 125.50
+1.2%		N/A+29.2%£960.98M£163.11M6.03N/A
TRY
TR Property Investment Trust
N/AGBX 300
+0.3%		N/A-7.8%£952.05M£77.76M13.4426
MUT
Murray Income Trust
N/AGBX 994
-0.2%		N/A+8.4%£927.54M£120.88M8.30147,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BPM) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon Musk to Trigger Next AI Wave on November 11th?
Jeff Brown picked Nvidia in 2016, before shares surged 37,800 percent. Now he's identified another AI company ...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why I'm NOT Buying the SpaceX IPO (And What I'm Buying Instead)
Don't buy Nvidia... Not when the AI companies that will define the next decade are selling for pennies. You wo...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
This 38 Dollar Fund Holds Every Major AI Stock and Pays Weekly
The biggest AI stocks like Nvidia, CrowdStrike, and Palantir now trade for hundreds of dollars a share. One fu...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Musk says UBI is coming. I say it's already here.
Elon Musk says AI could make money irrelevant by 2036. One income program already exists today, funded not by ...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
The income “unicorn” Todd Phillips has been waiting 2 years to see again
Retirement income specialist Todd Phillips once tracked an unusual income vehicle nicknamed the 10.3 percent U...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
your job is on the list
The CEO of one of the largest AI labs on earth said it plainly: AI could wipe out half of all entry-level whit...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
What Is A Roth Conversion, And How Do I Set One Up?
A Roth conversion moves money from a traditional IRA or employer plan into a Roth IRA, triggering income tax t...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel