Blue Star Capital (BLU) Competitors

Blue Star Capital logo
GBX 7.50 +0.75 (+11.11%)
As of 08:33 AM Eastern

BLU vs. BHMU, TEK, KZG, KWG, and LMS

Should you buy Blue Star Capital stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Blue Star Capital with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Blue Star Capital include BH Macro USD (BHMU), Tekcapital (TEK), Kazera Global (KZG), Kingswood (KWG), and LMS Capital (LMS). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Blue Star Capital compare to BH Macro USD?

Blue Star Capital (LON:BLU) and BH Macro USD (LON:BHMU) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Blue Star Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BH Macro USD'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blue Star Capital Neutral
BH Macro USD Neutral

BH Macro USD has a net margin of 173.32% compared to Blue Star Capital's net margin of 0.00%. BH Macro USD's return on equity of 13.25% beat Blue Star Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Star CapitalN/A -68.08% -42.27%
BH Macro USD 173.32%13.25%-0.31%

BH Macro USD has higher revenue and earnings than Blue Star Capital. Blue Star Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Macro USD, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Star CapitalN/AN/A-£5.35M-£1.93N/A
BH Macro USD£277.60M0.05£4.33B£45.680.10

2.7% of Blue Star Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of BH Macro USD shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.0% of Blue Star Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BH Macro USD shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Blue Star Capital has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BH Macro USD has a beta of 0.18969847, indicating that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

BH Macro USD beats Blue Star Capital on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Star Capital compare to Tekcapital?

Tekcapital (LON:TEK) and Blue Star Capital (LON:BLU) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

Blue Star Capital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tekcapital's net margin of -272.31%. Tekcapital's return on equity of -25.94% beat Blue Star Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tekcapital-272.31% -25.94% 14.01%
Blue Star Capital N/A -68.08%-42.27%

Tekcapital has a beta of 0.866, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blue Star Capital has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

0.8% of Tekcapital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.7% of Blue Star Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Tekcapital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.0% of Blue Star Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tekcapital has higher revenue and earnings than Blue Star Capital. Blue Star Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tekcapital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tekcapital£279.40K48.28£19.73M-£10.00N/A
Blue Star CapitalN/AN/A-£5.35M-£1.93N/A

In the previous week, Tekcapital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Blue Star Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tekcapital Neutral
Blue Star Capital Neutral

Summary

Tekcapital and Blue Star Capital tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Star Capital compare to Kazera Global?

Blue Star Capital (LON:BLU) and Kazera Global (LON:KZG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Blue Star Capital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. Blue Star Capital's return on equity of -68.08% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Star CapitalN/A -68.08% -42.27%
Kazera Global -15,996.15%-89.18%-11.84%

In the previous week, Kazera Global had 4 more articles in the media than Blue Star Capital. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Kazera Global and 0 mentions for Blue Star Capital. Kazera Global's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Blue Star Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Kazera Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blue Star Capital Neutral
Kazera Global Positive

Kazera Global has higher revenue and earnings than Blue Star Capital. Blue Star Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kazera Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Star CapitalN/AN/A-£5.35M-£1.93N/A
Kazera Global£26K508.68-£2.74M-£0.43N/A

Blue Star Capital has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kazera Global has a beta of 1.244, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

2.7% of Blue Star Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Kazera Global shares are held by institutional investors. 7.0% of Blue Star Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.4% of Kazera Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Kazera Global beats Blue Star Capital on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Star Capital compare to Kingswood?

Blue Star Capital (LON:BLU) and Kingswood (LON:KWG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Blue Star Capital has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kingswood has a beta of -0.21, meaning that its stock price is 121% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Blue Star Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kingswood'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blue Star Capital Neutral
Kingswood Neutral

Blue Star Capital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kingswood's net margin of -21.16%. Kingswood's return on equity of -28.43% beat Blue Star Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Star CapitalN/A -68.08% -42.27%
Kingswood -21.16%-28.43%3.99%

2.7% of Blue Star Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of Kingswood shares are held by institutional investors. 7.0% of Blue Star Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Kingswood shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Blue Star Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kingswood. Kingswood is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Star Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Star CapitalN/AN/A-£5.35M-£1.93N/A
Kingswood£81.02M0.17-£46.02M-£0.04N/A

Summary

Blue Star Capital beats Kingswood on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Star Capital compare to LMS Capital?

Blue Star Capital (LON:BLU) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Blue Star Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blue Star Capital Neutral
LMS Capital Neutral

2.7% of Blue Star Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.0% of Blue Star Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

LMS Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Blue Star Capital. Blue Star Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LMS Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Star CapitalN/AN/A-£5.35M-£1.93N/A
LMS Capital-£3.94M-3.27-£4.84M-£7.00N/A

Blue Star Capital has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Blue Star Capital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. LMS Capital's return on equity of -10.48% beat Blue Star Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Star CapitalN/A -68.08% -42.27%
LMS Capital -148.07%-10.48%-7.08%

Summary

LMS Capital beats Blue Star Capital on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Blue Star Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BLU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BLU vs. The Competition

MetricBlue Star CapitalAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.57M£2.42B£6.02B£2.77B
Dividend Yield1.24%6.03%5.27%6.16%
P/E Ratio-3.8925.7316.19366.61
Price / SalesN/A2,047.311,077.7786,103.13
Price / CashN/A60.3285.1527.87
Price / BookN/A1.386.657.85
Net Income-£5.35M£265.27M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-7.41%-0.61%-0.50%-0.97%
1 Month Performance-13.79%-0.25%0.69%-0.79%
1 Year Performance-61.27%9.52%19.23%68.88%

Blue Star Capital Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BLU
Blue Star Capital
N/AGBX 7.50
+11.1%
N/A-71.7%£3.57MN/AN/A3
BHMU
BH Macro USD
N/AGBX 4.32
-0.2%
N/A+9.7%£14.18M£277.60M0.09N/A
TEK
Tekcapital
N/AGBX 5.47
+2.8%
N/A-32.8%£14.07M£279.40KN/A6
KZG
Kazera Global
N/AGBX 1.25
+26.3%
N/A-38.9%£13.79M£26KN/A29
KWG
Kingswood
N/AGBX 1.97
flat
N/A+8.2%£13.52M£81.02MN/A421

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BLU) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners