Go Pro
→ Your First Trade Playbook is expiring (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free CGL Stock Alerts

Castelnau Group (CGL) Competitors

Castelnau Group logo
GBX 88.80 +0.80 (+0.91%)
As of 07/21/2026 05:09 AM Eastern
Compare

CGL vs. FCSS, GROW, GSS, SDP, and EDIN

Should you buy Castelnau Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Castelnau Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Castelnau Group include Fidelity China Special (FCSS), Molten Ventures (GROW), Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (GSS), Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (SDP), and Edinburgh Investment (EDIN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Castelnau Group compare to Fidelity China Special?

Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) and Castelnau Group (LON:CGL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 81.41% compared to Castelnau Group's net margin of 74.08%. Castelnau Group's return on equity of 12.89% beat Fidelity China Special's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity China Special81.41% 9.12% N/A
Castelnau Group 74.08%12.89%-0.50%

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than Castelnau Group. Castelnau Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity China Special, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity China Special£146.54M8.06£997.06M£29.758.71
Castelnau Group£54.06M5.48£95.01M£13.816.43

In the previous week, Fidelity China Special had 3 more articles in the media than Castelnau Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Fidelity China Special and 0 mentions for Castelnau Group. Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Castelnau Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity China Special is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity China Special Very Positive
Castelnau Group Neutral

Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.88374627, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castelnau Group has a beta of 0.166, indicating that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fidelity China Special beats Castelnau Group on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castelnau Group compare to Molten Ventures?

Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) and Castelnau Group (LON:CGL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Molten Ventures currently has a consensus target price of GBX 638.67, suggesting a potential upside of 10.11%. Given Molten Ventures' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than Castelnau Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Castelnau Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9573506, indicating that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castelnau Group has a beta of 0.166, indicating that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Castelnau Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Molten Ventures. Castelnau Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Molten Ventures£148M6.74-£33.58M£69.008.41
Castelnau Group£54.06M5.48£95.01M£13.816.43

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 75.09% compared to Castelnau Group's net margin of 74.08%. Castelnau Group's return on equity of 12.89% beat Molten Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Molten Ventures75.09% 9.21% -3.46%
Castelnau Group 74.08%12.89%-0.50%

41.0% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Molten Ventures had 1 more articles in the media than Castelnau Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Molten Ventures and 0 mentions for Castelnau Group. Molten Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Castelnau Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Molten Ventures Neutral
Castelnau Group Neutral

Summary

Molten Ventures beats Castelnau Group on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castelnau Group compare to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund?

Castelnau Group (LON:CGL) and Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (LON:GSS) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Castelnau Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castelnau Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Castelnau Group£54.06M5.48£95.01M£13.816.43
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund£250.40M0.00N/A£140.70N/A

Castelnau Group has a net margin of 74.08% compared to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Castelnau Group's return on equity of 12.89% beat Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Castelnau Group74.08% 12.89% -0.50%
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund N/A N/A N/A

0.3% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Castelnau Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Genesis Emerging Markets Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Castelnau Group Neutral
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund Neutral

Summary

Castelnau Group beats Genesis Emerging Markets Fund on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castelnau Group compare to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund?

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (LON:SDP) and Castelnau Group (LON:CGL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a beta of 1.0268201, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castelnau Group has a beta of 0.166, suggesting that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Castelnau Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund Positive
Castelnau Group Neutral

17.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Castelnau Group. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castelnau Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund£191.10M5.32£121.21M£135.645.98
Castelnau Group£54.06M5.48£95.01M£13.816.43

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a net margin of 95.12% compared to Castelnau Group's net margin of 74.08%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's return on equity of 20.01% beat Castelnau Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund95.12% 20.01% -1.73%
Castelnau Group 74.08%12.89%-0.50%

Summary

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund beats Castelnau Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castelnau Group compare to Edinburgh Investment?

Edinburgh Investment (LON:EDIN) and Castelnau Group (LON:CGL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

9.7% of Edinburgh Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Edinburgh Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Edinburgh Investment had 6 more articles in the media than Castelnau Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Edinburgh Investment and 0 mentions for Castelnau Group. Edinburgh Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Castelnau Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Edinburgh Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Edinburgh Investment Very Positive
Castelnau Group Neutral

Edinburgh Investment has a net margin of 89.72% compared to Castelnau Group's net margin of 74.08%. Castelnau Group's return on equity of 12.89% beat Edinburgh Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Edinburgh Investment89.72% 7.03% 6.69%
Castelnau Group 74.08%12.89%-0.50%

Edinburgh Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Castelnau Group. Castelnau Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Edinburgh Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Edinburgh Investment£79.43M13.23£180.50M£55.9114.83
Castelnau Group£54.06M5.48£95.01M£13.816.43

Edinburgh Investment has a beta of 0.9565895, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castelnau Group has a beta of 0.166, indicating that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Edinburgh Investment beats Castelnau Group on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Castelnau Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CGL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCastelnau GroupAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£296.16M£2.46B£6.17B£2.83B
Dividend YieldN/A6.02%5.24%6.16%
P/E Ratio6.4361.7429.57368.32
Price / Sales5.481,785.181,731.8084,394.26
Price / Cash7.4760.49111.1727.89
Price / Book0.891.316.607.49
Net Income£95.01M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.22%-0.55%-0.25%0.39%
1 Month Performance-2.42%-0.39%0.01%-0.62%
1 Year Performance12.18%6.99%14.02%62.74%

Castelnau Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGL
Castelnau Group
N/AGBX 88.80
+0.9%		N/A+9.9%£296.16M£54.06M6.43N/A
FCSS
Fidelity China Special
N/AGBX 258
+0.4%		N/A-6.5%£1.18B£146.54M8.67N/A
GROW
Molten Ventures
1.5444 of 5 stars		GBX 617
+1.1%		GBX 638.67
+3.5%		+63.6%£1.06B£148M8.9420
GSS
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.06B£250.40M6.181,626
SDP
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund
N/AGBX 828
+0.4%		N/A+38.9%£1.04B£191.10M6.10N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CGL) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
NNVC: FDA = New Momentum Wave!
NanoViricides (NYSE: NNVC) just received FDA Orphan Drug Designation for its antiviral NV-387, targeting measl...
Equiscreen | Sponsoredtc pixel
Oxford Club Analyst’s Urgent AI Warning
Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist at The Oxford Club, is sharing a private presentation with a warn...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
He bet half his $9 billion on ONE stock
One of the most successful fund managers of the past 50 years put more than $4.5 billion - over half his fund ...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The cat is out the bag
Almost 80,000 tech jobs vanished in the first three months of 2026. Meta cut 14,000 roles, Microsoft offered s...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
What's the Best Way to Lower RMD Taxes?
Once you turn 73, the IRS requires you to take distributions from your IRA, 401(k), and other retirement accou...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel