Free Trial

Castelnau Group (CGL) Competitors

Castelnau Group logo
GBX 91.12 +0.13 (+0.14%)
As of 11/13/2026 12:32 PM Eastern

CGL vs. JFJ, GROW, FCSS, GSS, and EDIN

Should you buy Castelnau Group stock or one of its competitors? Castelnau Group's main competitors and comparable companies include JPMorgan Japanese (JFJ), Molten Ventures (GROW), Fidelity China Special (FCSS), Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (GSS), and Edinburgh Investment (EDIN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Castelnau Group compare to JPMorgan Japanese?

Castelnau Group (LON:CGL) and JPMorgan Japanese (LON:JFJ) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

JPMorgan Japanese has higher revenue and earnings than Castelnau Group. JPMorgan Japanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castelnau Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Castelnau Group£46.84M6.49£95.01M£11.597.86
JPMorgan Japanese£245.55M4.63£194.81M£149.065.22

Castelnau Group has a beta of 0.156, indicating that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Japanese has a beta of 1.028, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

0.6% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan Japanese has a net margin of 96.52% compared to Castelnau Group's net margin of 74.08%. JPMorgan Japanese's return on equity of 20.00% beat Castelnau Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Castelnau Group74.08% 12.23% -0.50%
JPMorgan Japanese 96.52%20.00%8.06%

In the previous week, Castelnau Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Japanese'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Castelnau Group Neutral
JPMorgan Japanese Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan Japanese beats Castelnau Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castelnau Group compare to Molten Ventures?

Castelnau Group (LON:CGL) and Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 75.09% compared to Castelnau Group's net margin of 74.08%. Castelnau Group's return on equity of 12.23% beat Molten Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Castelnau Group74.08% 12.23% -0.50%
Molten Ventures 75.09%9.21%-3.46%

In the previous week, Molten Ventures had 1 more articles in the media than Castelnau Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Molten Ventures and 0 mentions for Castelnau Group. Castelnau Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Molten Ventures'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Castelnau Group Neutral
Molten Ventures Neutral

Castelnau Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Molten Ventures. Castelnau Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Castelnau Group£46.84M6.49£95.01M£11.597.86
Molten Ventures£148M7.59-£33.58M£69.009.52

0.6% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.9% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Molten Ventures has a consensus target price of GBX 708.67, indicating a potential upside of 7.86%. Given Molten Ventures' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than Castelnau Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Castelnau Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Castelnau Group has a beta of 0.156, suggesting that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9564402, suggesting that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Molten Ventures beats Castelnau Group on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castelnau Group compare to Fidelity China Special?

Castelnau Group (LON:CGL) and Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Castelnau Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity China Special'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Castelnau Group Neutral
Fidelity China Special Neutral

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 81.41% compared to Castelnau Group's net margin of 74.08%. Castelnau Group's return on equity of 12.23% beat Fidelity China Special's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Castelnau Group74.08% 12.23% -0.50%
Fidelity China Special 81.41%9.12%N/A

0.6% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Castelnau Group has a beta of 0.156, indicating that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.895, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than Castelnau Group. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castelnau Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Castelnau Group£46.84M6.49£95.01M£11.597.86
Fidelity China Special£146.54M6.98£997.06M£29.757.65

Summary

Fidelity China Special beats Castelnau Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castelnau Group compare to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund?

Castelnau Group (LON:CGL) and Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (LON:GSS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Castelnau Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Genesis Emerging Markets Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Castelnau Group Neutral
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund Neutral

Castelnau Group has a net margin of 74.08% compared to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Castelnau Group's return on equity of 12.23% beat Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Castelnau Group74.08% 12.23% -0.50%
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund N/A N/A N/A

Castelnau Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castelnau Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Castelnau Group£46.84M6.49£95.01M£11.597.86
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund£250.40M0.00N/A£140.70N/A

0.6% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Castelnau Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Castelnau Group beats Genesis Emerging Markets Fund on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castelnau Group compare to Edinburgh Investment?

Castelnau Group (LON:CGL) and Edinburgh Investment (LON:EDIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Castelnau Group has a beta of 0.156, indicating that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Edinburgh Investment has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Edinburgh Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Castelnau Group. Castelnau Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Edinburgh Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Castelnau Group£46.84M6.49£95.01M£11.597.86
Edinburgh Investment£79.43M13.35£180.50M£55.9115.67

In the previous week, Edinburgh Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Castelnau Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Edinburgh Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Castelnau Group Neutral
Edinburgh Investment Neutral

Edinburgh Investment has a net margin of 89.72% compared to Castelnau Group's net margin of 74.08%. Castelnau Group's return on equity of 12.23% beat Edinburgh Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Castelnau Group74.08% 12.23% -0.50%
Edinburgh Investment 89.72%7.03%6.69%

0.6% of Castelnau Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of Edinburgh Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Castelnau Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Edinburgh Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Edinburgh Investment beats Castelnau Group on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Castelnau Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGL vs. The Competition

MetricCastelnau GroupCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£303.49M£5.36B£14.06B£2.84B
Dividend YieldN/A5.57%4.92%5.10%
P/E Ratio7.8622.7719.3423.37
Price / Sales6.497.634.815.03
Price / Cash7.4729.6320.2320.23
Price / Book0.921.811.822.45
Net Income£95.01M£419.50M£1.33B£5.88B
7 Day Performance0.14%0.06%0.09%0.74%
1 Month Performance0.41%-1.19%0.10%-1.85%
1 Year Performance6.14%-1.60%5.09%7.73%

Castelnau Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGL
Castelnau Group
N/AGBX 91.13
+0.1%
N/A+13.9%£303.49M£46.84M7.86N/A
JFJ
JPMorgan Japanese
N/AGBX 789
+1.2%
N/A+5.9%£1.15B£245.55M5.29N/A
GROW
Molten Ventures
1.231 of 5 stars
GBX 671.50
+1.4%
GBX 708.67
+5.5%
+55.1%£1.15B£148M9.7320
FCSS
Fidelity China Special
N/AGBX 235.61
+0.7%
N/A-29.8%£1.06B£146.54M7.92N/A
GSS
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.06B£250.40M6.181,626

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CGL) was last updated on 11/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners