Free Trial
→ I was right about SpaceX (From Brownstone Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free BPM Stock Alerts

B.P. Marsh & Partners (BPM) Competitors

B.P. Marsh & Partners logo
GBX 667 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 12:20 PM Eastern
Compare

BPM vs. SLPE, APAX, RICA, TFIF, and MRCH

Should you be buying B.P. Marsh & Partners stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of B.P. Marsh & Partners include Standard Life Private Equity Trust (SLPE), Apax Global Alpha (APAX), Ruffer Investment (RICA), TwentyFour Income (TFIF), and The Merchants Trust (MRCH). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Standard Life Private Equity Trust?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Standard Life Private Equity Trust (LON:SLPE) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

2.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.4% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners and B.P. Marsh & Partners both had 1 articles in the media. Standard Life Private Equity Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.69 beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Standard Life Private Equity Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Standard Life Private Equity Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays out 7.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 424.26% compared to Standard Life Private Equity Trust's net margin of 0.00%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 30.90% beat Standard Life Private Equity Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners424.26% 30.90% 12.41%
Standard Life Private Equity Trust N/A N/A N/A

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Standard Life Private Equity Trust. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Standard Life Private Equity Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£120.08M1.96£53.77M£269.202.48
Standard Life Private Equity Trust£289.51M3.20N/A£186.203.23

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners and Standard Life Private Equity Trust tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Apax Global Alpha?

Apax Global Alpha (LON:APAX) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Apax Global Alpha has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.2, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500.

14.3% of Apax Global Alpha shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Apax Global Alpha shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.4% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Apax Global Alpha. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for Apax Global Alpha. Apax Global Alpha's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled B.P. Marsh & Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Apax Global Alpha Neutral
B.P. Marsh & Partners Neutral

Apax Global Alpha pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Apax Global Alpha pays out -120.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 424.26% compared to Apax Global Alpha's net margin of 132.67%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 30.90% beat Apax Global Alpha's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Apax Global Alpha132.67% -4.53% 2.57%
B.P. Marsh & Partners 424.26%30.90%12.41%

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Apax Global Alpha. Apax Global Alpha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B.P. Marsh & Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Apax Global Alpha-£44.79M-20.62£4.12M-£0.11N/A
B.P. Marsh & Partners£120.08M1.96£53.77M£269.202.48

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Apax Global Alpha on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to Ruffer Investment?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.2, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.214, suggesting that its share price is 79% less volatile than the S&P 500.

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ruffer Investment pays out 47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. B.P. Marsh & Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Ruffer Investment. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for Ruffer Investment. Ruffer Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Ruffer Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners Neutral
Ruffer Investment Positive

2.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.1% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 47.4% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 424.26% compared to Ruffer Investment's net margin of 62.53%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 30.90% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners424.26% 30.90% 12.41%
Ruffer Investment 62.53%4.37%0.45%

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£120.08M1.96£53.77M£269.202.48
Ruffer Investment£44.42M20.42£8.78M£12.6124.35

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Ruffer Investment on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to TwentyFour Income?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Income pays out 88.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

2.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.8% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by institutional investors. 47.4% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.2, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.23175839, suggesting that its share price is 77% less volatile than the S&P 500.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 424.26% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 62.41%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 30.90% beat TwentyFour Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners424.26% 30.90% 12.41%
TwentyFour Income 62.41%11.04%N/A

TwentyFour Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£120.08M1.96£53.77M£269.202.48
TwentyFour Income£97.54M9.57£868.58M£12.478.62

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 1 more articles in the media than TwentyFour Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for TwentyFour Income. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TwentyFour Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners Neutral
TwentyFour Income Neutral

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats TwentyFour Income on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does B.P. Marsh & Partners compare to The Merchants Trust?

The Merchants Trust (LON:MRCH) and B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

The Merchants Trust has a beta of 1.0888884, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.2, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500.

5.3% of The Merchants Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of The Merchants Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.4% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

The Merchants Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 29.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. The Merchants Trust pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, The Merchants Trust and The Merchants Trust both had 1 articles in the media. The Merchants Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat B.P. Marsh & Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that The Merchants Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
The Merchants Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
B.P. Marsh & Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

The Merchants Trust has higher revenue and earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Merchants Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Merchants Trust£165.40M5.45£109.11M£109.595.57
B.P. Marsh & Partners£120.08M1.96£53.77M£269.202.48

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 424.26% compared to The Merchants Trust's net margin of 93.22%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 30.90% beat The Merchants Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Merchants Trust93.22% 17.67% 7.70%
B.P. Marsh & Partners 424.26%30.90%12.41%

Summary

The Merchants Trust beats B.P. Marsh & Partners on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get B.P. Marsh & Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BPM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BPM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BPM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricB.P. Marsh & PartnersAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£235.18M£2.37B£5.71B£2.77B
Dividend Yield2.05%5.99%5.26%6.15%
P/E Ratio2.4825.3215.47366.05
Price / Sales1.962,084.69999.2588,619.87
Price / Cash7.8560.1888.5727.89
Price / Book0.981.364.417.72
Net Income£53.77M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
1 Month Performance0.36%3.88%3.10%4.08%
1 Year Performance-6.03%14.97%23.06%89.87%

B.P. Marsh & Partners Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BPM
B.P. Marsh & Partners
N/AGBX 667
flat		N/A-6.1%£235.18M£120.08M2.4816
SLPE
Standard Life Private Equity Trust
N/AGBX 602
flat		N/A+5.4%£925.55M£289.51M3.23N/A
APAX
Apax Global Alpha
N/AGBX 191.50
flat		N/AN/A£923.78M-£44.79MN/AN/A
RICA
Ruffer Investment
N/AGBX 309.03
-0.5%		N/A+8.4%£911.51M£44.42M24.51N/A
TFIF
TwentyFour Income
N/AGBX 106.61
+0.0%		N/A-1.7%£906.40M£97.54M8.55N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BPM) was last updated on 5/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
One executive order. The biggest wealth transfer of your lifetime.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American
Iran's Supreme Leader has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed as leverage against the U.S. - and with 40% of ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
Satellite Images Spot Potential $10 Trillion Discovery
'Dark Energy': Elon Musk's Next Potential $10 Trillion Move A highly secure site in West Texas now houses a...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
JPMorgan Just Made $6,300 Gold Call. Are You Exposed?
JPMorgan just raised its 2026 gold forecast to 6,300 - and outlined a credible path to 8,000 if everyday inves...
Vault Metal | Sponsoredtc pixel
No. You’re not imagining it…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
"Computers are about to become obsolete" - George Gilder. Here’s why.
George Gilder predicted the iPhone 16 years early, called Netflix a decade before it dominated streaming, and ...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel