BPM vs. OCI, APAX, ICGT, JEO, MUT, APEO, SDP, RICA, TFIF, and SAIN
Should you be buying B.P. Marsh & Partners stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of B.P. Marsh & Partners include Oakley Capital Investments (OCI), Apax Global Alpha (APAX), ICG Enterprise Trust (ICGT), European Opportunities Trust (JEO), Murray Income Trust (MUT), abrdn Private Equity Opportunities (APEO), Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (SDP), Ruffer Investment (RICA), TwentyFour Income (TFIF), and Scottish American Investment (SAIN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
B.P. Marsh & Partners vs. Its Competitors
B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Oakley Capital Investments (LON:OCI) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.
B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Oakley Capital Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oakley Capital Investments pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. B.P. Marsh & Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
0.0% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.6% of Oakley Capital Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 47.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.5% of Oakley Capital Investments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Oakley Capital Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for Oakley Capital Investments. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Oakley Capital Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.
B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 577.55% compared to Oakley Capital Investments' net margin of 88.84%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 22.24% beat Oakley Capital Investments' return on equity.
B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oakley Capital Investments has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Oakley Capital Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than B.P. Marsh & Partners. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oakley Capital Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Oakley Capital Investments on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get B.P. Marsh & Partners News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BPM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
B.P. Marsh & Partners Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:BPM) was last updated on 10/10/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
