Go Pro

Brickability Group (BRCK) Competitors

Brickability Group logo
GBX 50.90 -0.10 (-0.20%)
As of 11:48 AM Eastern

BRCK vs. FERG, NTG, ASY, GMS, and AA4

Should you buy Brickability Group stock or one of its competitors? Brickability Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Ferguson (FERG), Northgate (NTG), Andrews Sykes Group (ASY), Gulf Marine Services (GMS), and Amedeo Air Four Plus (AA4). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "trading companies & distributors" industry.

How does Brickability Group compare to Ferguson?

Brickability Group (LON:BRCK) and Ferguson (LON:FERG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Brickability Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Ferguson pays an annual dividend of GBX 337.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 144.2%. Brickability Group pays out 877.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ferguson pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ferguson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Brickability Group has a beta of 0.306, suggesting that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferguson has a beta of 1.118, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Ferguson has a net margin of 6.55% compared to Brickability Group's net margin of 0.20%. Ferguson's return on equity of 35.11% beat Brickability Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brickability Group0.20% 0.71% 4.09%
Ferguson 6.55%35.11%10.15%

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than Brickability Group. Ferguson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brickability Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brickability Group£645.36M0.25£16.36M£0.40127.25
Ferguson£31.32B0.01£2.10B£1.02 thousand0.23

Brickability Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 93, indicating a potential upside of 82.71%. Given Brickability Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brickability Group is more favorable than Ferguson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brickability Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ferguson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Ferguson had 10 more articles in the media than Brickability Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Ferguson and 1 mentions for Brickability Group. Brickability Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Ferguson's score of 0.22 indicating that Brickability Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brickability Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ferguson
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

16.5% of Brickability Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.7% of Ferguson shares are held by institutional investors. 13.6% of Brickability Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ferguson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ferguson beats Brickability Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brickability Group compare to Northgate?

Brickability Group (LON:BRCK) and Northgate (LON:NTG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Brickability Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Northgate pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.18 per share. Brickability Group pays out 877.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Northgate pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Brickability Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Northgate. Northgate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brickability Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brickability Group£645.36M0.25£16.36M£0.40127.25
Northgate£729.28M0.00N/A£35.50N/A

Brickability Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 93, indicating a potential upside of 82.71%. Given Brickability Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brickability Group is more favorable than Northgate.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brickability Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Northgate
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Brickability Group had 1 more articles in the media than Northgate. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brickability Group and 0 mentions for Northgate. Brickability Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Northgate's score of 0.00 indicating that Brickability Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brickability Group Positive
Northgate Neutral

16.5% of Brickability Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.6% of Brickability Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brickability Group has a net margin of 0.20% compared to Northgate's net margin of 0.00%. Brickability Group's return on equity of 0.71% beat Northgate's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brickability Group0.20% 0.71% 4.09%
Northgate N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Brickability Group beats Northgate on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brickability Group compare to Andrews Sykes Group?

Andrews Sykes Group (LON:ASY) and Brickability Group (LON:BRCK) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

Andrews Sykes Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brickability Group. Andrews Sykes Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brickability Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Andrews Sykes Group£76.50M3.19£17.31M£43.2013.50
Brickability Group£645.36M0.25£16.36M£0.40127.25

Andrews Sykes Group has a net margin of 23.64% compared to Brickability Group's net margin of 0.20%. Andrews Sykes Group's return on equity of 35.67% beat Brickability Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Andrews Sykes Group23.64% 35.67% 16.52%
Brickability Group 0.20%0.71%4.09%

Brickability Group has a consensus price target of GBX 93, suggesting a potential upside of 82.71%. Given Brickability Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brickability Group is more favorable than Andrews Sykes Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Andrews Sykes Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Brickability Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.1% of Andrews Sykes Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Brickability Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of Andrews Sykes Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.6% of Brickability Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Andrews Sykes Group has a beta of 0.282, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brickability Group has a beta of 0.306, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Brickability Group had 1 more articles in the media than Andrews Sykes Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brickability Group and 0 mentions for Andrews Sykes Group. Brickability Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Andrews Sykes Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Brickability Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Andrews Sykes Group Neutral
Brickability Group Positive

Andrews Sykes Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 25.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Brickability Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Andrews Sykes Group pays out 60.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brickability Group pays out 877.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Brickability Group beats Andrews Sykes Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brickability Group compare to Gulf Marine Services?

Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) and Brickability Group (LON:BRCK) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Gulf Marine Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brickability Group. Gulf Marine Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brickability Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gulf Marine Services£188.12M1.18£48.19M£1.6411.74
Brickability Group£645.36M0.25£16.36M£0.40127.25

Gulf Marine Services has a net margin of 10.06% compared to Brickability Group's net margin of 0.20%. Gulf Marine Services' return on equity of 4.61% beat Brickability Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gulf Marine Services10.06% 4.61% 5.32%
Brickability Group 0.20%0.71%4.09%

Gulf Marine Services has a beta of 0.651, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brickability Group has a beta of 0.306, indicating that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

7.6% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Brickability Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.6% of Brickability Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brickability Group has a consensus target price of GBX 93, suggesting a potential upside of 82.71%. Given Brickability Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brickability Group is more favorable than Gulf Marine Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gulf Marine Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Brickability Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Gulf Marine Services and Gulf Marine Services both had 1 articles in the media. Brickability Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Gulf Marine Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Brickability Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gulf Marine Services
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brickability Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Brickability Group beats Gulf Marine Services on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brickability Group compare to Amedeo Air Four Plus?

Brickability Group (LON:BRCK) and Amedeo Air Four Plus (LON:AA4) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Brickability Group has a beta of 0.306, suggesting that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amedeo Air Four Plus has a beta of 0.42011246, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Brickability Group had 1 more articles in the media than Amedeo Air Four Plus. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brickability Group and 0 mentions for Amedeo Air Four Plus. Brickability Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Amedeo Air Four Plus' score of 0.00 indicating that Brickability Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brickability Group Positive
Amedeo Air Four Plus Neutral

Brickability Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 93, indicating a potential upside of 82.71%. Given Brickability Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Brickability Group is more favorable than Amedeo Air Four Plus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brickability Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Amedeo Air Four Plus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Brickability Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Amedeo Air Four Plus pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.0%. Brickability Group pays out 877.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Amedeo Air Four Plus pays out 97.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Amedeo Air Four Plus is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Amedeo Air Four Plus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brickability Group. Amedeo Air Four Plus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brickability Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brickability Group£645.36M0.25£16.36M£0.40127.25
Amedeo Air Four Plus£143.46M1.31£25.96M£8.218.82

16.5% of Brickability Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.0% of Amedeo Air Four Plus shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.6% of Brickability Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Amedeo Air Four Plus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Amedeo Air Four Plus has a net margin of 12.69% compared to Brickability Group's net margin of 0.20%. Amedeo Air Four Plus' return on equity of 8.21% beat Brickability Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brickability Group0.20% 0.71% 4.09%
Amedeo Air Four Plus 12.69%8.21%N/A

Summary

Brickability Group and Amedeo Air Four Plus tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Brickability Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BRCK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BRCK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BRCK vs. The Competition

MetricBrickability GroupTrading Companies & Distributors IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£163.25M£9.66B£10.91B£2.89B
Dividend Yield6.95%3.39%97.00%6.11%
P/E Ratio127.2529.4228.34368.55
Price / Sales0.2523.50348.8083,655.22
Price / Cash30.4448.5024.8327.89
Price / Book0.813.784.567.32
Net Income£16.36M£373.80M£607.65M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.20%1.70%1.61%1.14%
1 Month Performance4.73%4.06%3.21%2.66%
1 Year Performance-16.28%8.65%13.29%69.71%

Brickability Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BRCK
Brickability Group
3.0642 of 5 stars
GBX 50.90
-0.2%
GBX 93
+82.7%
-16.1%£163.25M£645.36M127.25800
FERG
Ferguson
N/AGBX 234.33
flat
N/A-98.6%£454.46M£31.32B0.2336,000
NTG
Northgate
N/AN/AN/AN/A£333.08M£729.28M7.043,000
ASY
Andrews Sykes Group
N/AGBX 579
+0.7%
N/A+23.0%£242.36M£76.50M13.40500
GMS
Gulf Marine Services
N/AGBX 19.22
+0.3%
N/A-1.8%£220.76M£188.12M11.725,480

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BRCK) was last updated on 8/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners