Free Trial

Camellia (CAM) Competitors

Camellia logo
GBX 5,600 -125.00 (-2.18%)
As of 10/9/2026 11:56 AM Eastern

CAM vs. BD15, OGN, PURE, FIF, and KYGA

Should you buy Camellia stock or one of its competitors? Camellia's main competitors and comparable companies include Tate & Lyle (BD15), Origin Enterprises (OGN), PureCircle (PURE), Finsbury Food Group (FIF), and Kerry Group (KYGA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Camellia compare to Tate & Lyle?

Camellia (LON:CAM) and Tate & Lyle (LON:BD15) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

2.5% of Camellia shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Camellia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tate & Lyle has higher revenue and earnings than Camellia. Tate & Lyle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Camellia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Camellia£264.90M0.53-£20.24M£709.107.90
Tate & Lyle£1.38B0.00N/A£58.50N/A

Camellia has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Tate & Lyle's net margin of 0.00%. Camellia's return on equity of 6.33% beat Tate & Lyle's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Camellia7.06% 6.33% -1.27%
Tate & Lyle N/A N/A N/A

Camellia pays an annual dividend of GBX 260 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Tate & Lyle pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Camellia pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tate & Lyle pays out 12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Camellia had 1 more articles in the media than Tate & Lyle. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Camellia and 0 mentions for Tate & Lyle. Camellia's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Tate & Lyle's score of 0.00 indicating that Camellia is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Camellia Neutral
Tate & Lyle Neutral

Summary

Camellia beats Tate & Lyle on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Camellia compare to Origin Enterprises?

Camellia (LON:CAM) and Origin Enterprises (LON:OGN) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Origin Enterprises had 4 more articles in the media than Camellia. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Origin Enterprises and 1 mentions for Camellia. Origin Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Camellia's score of 0.04 indicating that Origin Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Camellia
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Origin Enterprises
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Camellia has a beta of 0.355, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Origin Enterprises has a beta of 0.198, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

2.5% of Camellia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.1% of Origin Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Camellia shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Origin Enterprises shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Camellia pays an annual dividend of GBX 260 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Origin Enterprises pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Camellia pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Origin Enterprises pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Camellia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Origin Enterprises
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Camellia has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Origin Enterprises' net margin of 2.21%. Origin Enterprises' return on equity of 10.71% beat Camellia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Camellia7.06% 6.33% -1.27%
Origin Enterprises 2.21%10.71%2.96%

Origin Enterprises has higher revenue and earnings than Camellia. Camellia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Origin Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Camellia£264.90M0.53-£20.24M£709.107.90
Origin Enterprises£2.12B0.17£3.62B£41.398.21

Summary

Origin Enterprises beats Camellia on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Camellia compare to PureCircle?

PureCircle (LON:PURE) and Camellia (LON:CAM) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Camellia has a net margin of 7.06% compared to PureCircle's net margin of 0.00%. Camellia's return on equity of 6.33% beat PureCircle's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PureCircleN/A N/A N/A
Camellia 7.06%6.33%-1.27%

PureCircle has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Camellia. PureCircle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Camellia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PureCircle£121.14M0.00N/A-£35.80N/A
Camellia£264.90M0.53-£20.24M£709.107.90

In the previous week, Camellia had 1 more articles in the media than PureCircle. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Camellia and 0 mentions for PureCircle. Camellia's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat PureCircle's score of 0.00 indicating that Camellia is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PureCircle Neutral
Camellia Neutral

2.5% of Camellia shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Camellia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Camellia beats PureCircle on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Camellia compare to Finsbury Food Group?

Finsbury Food Group (LON:FIF) and Camellia (LON:CAM) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Finsbury Food Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Camellia pays an annual dividend of GBX 260 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Finsbury Food Group pays out 3,750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Camellia pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Camellia is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Camellia had 1 more articles in the media than Finsbury Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Camellia and 0 mentions for Finsbury Food Group. Camellia's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Finsbury Food Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Camellia is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Finsbury Food Group Neutral
Camellia Neutral

65.7% of Finsbury Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Camellia shares are held by institutional investors. 24.5% of Finsbury Food Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Camellia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Finsbury Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Camellia. Finsbury Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Camellia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Finsbury Food Group£413.74M0.00£10.77M£0.08N/A
Camellia£264.90M0.53-£20.24M£709.107.90

Finsbury Food Group has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Camellia has a beta of 0.355, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Camellia has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Finsbury Food Group's net margin of 2.60%. Finsbury Food Group's return on equity of 9.29% beat Camellia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Finsbury Food Group2.60% 9.29% 5.12%
Camellia 7.06%6.33%-1.27%

Summary

Finsbury Food Group beats Camellia on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Camellia compare to Kerry Group?

Camellia (LON:CAM) and Kerry Group (LON:KYGA) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Kerry Group has higher revenue and earnings than Camellia. Kerry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Camellia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Camellia£264.90M0.53-£20.24M£709.107.90
Kerry Group£6.63B0.02£62.65B£392.400.22

Camellia has a beta of 0.355, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kerry Group has a beta of 0.487, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

2.5% of Camellia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of Kerry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Camellia shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Kerry Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kerry Group has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Camellia's net margin of 7.06%. Kerry Group's return on equity of 13.08% beat Camellia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Camellia7.06% 6.33% -1.27%
Kerry Group 9.43%13.08%4.77%

Kerry Group has a consensus price target of GBX 99, suggesting a potential upside of 13.47%. Given Kerry Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kerry Group is more favorable than Camellia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Camellia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Kerry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Kerry Group had 1 more articles in the media than Camellia. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Kerry Group and 1 mentions for Camellia. Kerry Group's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Camellia's score of 0.04 indicating that Kerry Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Camellia
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Kerry Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Camellia pays an annual dividend of GBX 260 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Kerry Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 140 per share and has a dividend yield of 160.5%. Camellia pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kerry Group pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kerry Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Kerry Group beats Camellia on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Camellia News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CAM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CAM vs. The Competition

MetricCamelliaFood Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£144.72M£5.32B£15.89B£2.44B
Dividend Yield4.54%3.28%3.31%6.27%
P/E Ratio7.9013.2513.85367.13
Price / Sales0.5382.29264,297.0188,484.04
Price / Cash2.40111.9857.2427.89
Price / Book0.433.704.347.13
Net Income-£20.24M£772.49M£844.17M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.89%0.57%0.85%-0.08%
1 Month Performance-0.88%-4.27%-2.58%-0.55%
1 Year Performance-5.25%33.67%9.74%22.43%

Camellia Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CAM
Camellia
N/AGBX 5,600
-2.2%
N/A-5.2%£144.72M£264.90M7.90104,728
BD15
Tate & Lyle
N/AN/AN/AN/A£455.63M£1.38B1.694,441
OGN
Origin Enterprises
2.5867 of 5 stars
GBX 349.20
-3.0%
N/A+8,731.2%£375.35M£2.12B9.3910,000
PURE
PureCircle
N/AN/AN/AN/A£183.53M£121.14MN/A10
FIF
Finsbury Food Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£143.42M£413.74M1,375.00206

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CAM) was last updated on 10/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners