Go Pro

Camellia (CAM) Competitors

Camellia logo
GBX 5,750 +100.00 (+1.77%)
As of 11:57 AM Eastern

CAM vs. HFG, BD15, OGN, PURE, and FIF

Should you buy Camellia stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Camellia with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Camellia include Hilton Food Group (HFG), Tate & Lyle (BD15), Origin Enterprises (OGN), PureCircle (PURE), and Finsbury Food Group (FIF). These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Camellia compare to Hilton Food Group?

Camellia (LON:CAM) and Hilton Food Group (LON:HFG) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Camellia has a beta of 0.354, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hilton Food Group has a beta of 0.734, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

2.5% of Camellia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.2% of Hilton Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Camellia shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Hilton Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Camellia pays an annual dividend of GBX 260 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Hilton Food Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Camellia pays out -139.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hilton Food Group pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hilton Food Group has a net margin of 1.14% compared to Camellia's net margin of -1.83%. Hilton Food Group's return on equity of 14.17% beat Camellia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Camellia-1.83% -1.73% -1.27%
Hilton Food Group 1.14%14.17%4.96%

Hilton Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Camellia. Camellia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hilton Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Camellia£268M0.54-£20.24M-£186.70N/A
Hilton Food Group£4.21B0.13£46.35M£87.307.04

Hilton Food Group has a consensus price target of GBX 703.75, suggesting a potential upside of 14.49%. Given Hilton Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hilton Food Group is more favorable than Camellia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Camellia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Hilton Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Hilton Food Group had 2 more articles in the media than Camellia. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hilton Food Group and 2 mentions for Camellia. Hilton Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Camellia's score of -0.60 indicating that Hilton Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Camellia
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Hilton Food Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Hilton Food Group beats Camellia on 16 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Camellia compare to Tate & Lyle?

Tate & Lyle (LON:BD15) and Camellia (LON:CAM) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Camellia had 2 more articles in the media than Tate & Lyle. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Camellia and 0 mentions for Tate & Lyle. Tate & Lyle's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Camellia's score of -0.60 indicating that Tate & Lyle is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tate & Lyle Neutral
Camellia Negative

Tate & Lyle pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Camellia pays an annual dividend of GBX 260 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Tate & Lyle pays out 12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Camellia pays out -139.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Camellia is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Tate & Lyle has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Camellia's net margin of -1.83%. Tate & Lyle's return on equity of 0.00% beat Camellia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tate & LyleN/A N/A N/A
Camellia -1.83%-1.73%-1.27%

2.5% of Camellia shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Camellia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tate & Lyle has higher revenue and earnings than Camellia. Camellia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tate & Lyle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tate & Lyle£1.38B0.00N/A£58.50N/A
Camellia£268M0.54-£20.24M-£186.70N/A

Summary

Tate & Lyle beats Camellia on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Camellia compare to Origin Enterprises?

Origin Enterprises (LON:OGN) and Camellia (LON:CAM) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Camellia had 1 more articles in the media than Origin Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Camellia and 1 mentions for Origin Enterprises. Origin Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Camellia's score of -0.60 indicating that Origin Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Origin Enterprises
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Camellia
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Origin Enterprises has a net margin of 1.78% compared to Camellia's net margin of -1.83%. Origin Enterprises' return on equity of 9.12% beat Camellia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Origin Enterprises1.78% 9.12% 2.96%
Camellia -1.83%-1.73%-1.27%

Origin Enterprises has higher revenue and earnings than Camellia. Camellia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Origin Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Origin Enterprises£2.13B0.18£3.62B£37.189.84
Camellia£268M0.54-£20.24M-£186.70N/A

Origin Enterprises pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Camellia pays an annual dividend of GBX 260 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Origin Enterprises pays out 46.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Camellia pays out -139.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Origin Enterprises has a beta of 0.198, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Camellia has a beta of 0.354, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Origin Enterprises
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Camellia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

47.2% of Origin Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Camellia shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Origin Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Camellia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Origin Enterprises beats Camellia on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Camellia compare to PureCircle?

PureCircle (LON:PURE) and Camellia (LON:CAM) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

PureCircle has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Camellia's net margin of -1.83%. PureCircle's return on equity of 0.00% beat Camellia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PureCircleN/A N/A N/A
Camellia -1.83%-1.73%-1.27%

PureCircle has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Camellia. Camellia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PureCircle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PureCircle£121.14M0.00N/A-£35.80N/A
Camellia£268M0.54-£20.24M-£186.70N/A

2.5% of Camellia shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Camellia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Camellia had 2 more articles in the media than PureCircle. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Camellia and 0 mentions for PureCircle. PureCircle's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Camellia's score of -0.60 indicating that PureCircle is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PureCircle Neutral
Camellia Negative

Summary

PureCircle beats Camellia on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Camellia compare to Finsbury Food Group?

Finsbury Food Group (LON:FIF) and Camellia (LON:CAM) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Finsbury Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Camellia. Camellia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Finsbury Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Finsbury Food Group£413.74M0.00£10.77M£0.08N/A
Camellia£268M0.54-£20.24M-£186.70N/A

65.7% of Finsbury Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Camellia shares are held by institutional investors. 24.5% of Finsbury Food Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Camellia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Camellia had 2 more articles in the media than Finsbury Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Camellia and 0 mentions for Finsbury Food Group. Finsbury Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Camellia's score of -0.60 indicating that Finsbury Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Finsbury Food Group Neutral
Camellia Negative

Finsbury Food Group has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Camellia has a beta of 0.354, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Finsbury Food Group has a net margin of 2.60% compared to Camellia's net margin of -1.83%. Finsbury Food Group's return on equity of 9.29% beat Camellia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Finsbury Food Group2.60% 9.29% 5.12%
Camellia -1.83%-1.73%-1.27%

Finsbury Food Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Camellia pays an annual dividend of GBX 260 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Finsbury Food Group pays out 3,750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Camellia pays out -139.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Camellia is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Finsbury Food Group beats Camellia on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Camellia News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CAM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CAM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CAM vs. The Competition

MetricCamelliaFood Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£145.36M£5.78B£16.21B£2.88B
Dividend Yield4.60%3.15%3.19%6.11%
P/E Ratio-30.8013.3714.03368.40
Price / Sales0.5482.68263,621.2083,666.86
Price / Cash2.40112.6157.6727.89
Price / Book0.443.524.657.20
Net Income-£20.24M£772.21M£838.44M£5.89B
7 Day Performance5.50%0.14%0.69%2.03%
1 Month Performance5.73%-0.94%-0.16%1.71%
1 Year Performance-0.21%39.50%13.08%74.56%

Camellia Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CAM
Camellia
N/AGBX 5,750
+1.8%
N/A-1.3%£145.36M£268MN/A104,728
HFG
Hilton Food Group
2.7217 of 5 stars
GBX 599
+5.5%
GBX 703.75
+17.5%
-28.0%£510.95M£4.21B6.867,000
BD15
Tate & Lyle
N/AN/AN/AN/A£455.63M£1.38B1.694,441
OGN
Origin Enterprises
1.1803 of 5 stars
GBX 366
flat
N/A+9,595.4%£393.40M£2.13B9.8410,000
PURE
PureCircle
N/AN/AN/AN/A£183.53M£121.14MN/A10

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CAM) was last updated on 8/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners