Dekel Agri-Vision (DKL) Competitors

Everest Global has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dekel Agri-Vision has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Everest Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Dekel Agri-Vision. Everest Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dekel Agri-Vision, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dekel Agri-Vision has a net margin of -7.58% compared to Everest Global's net margin of -195.02%. Everest Global's return on equity of 471.31% beat Dekel Agri-Vision's return on equity.

In the previous week, Dekel Agri-Vision had 10 more articles in the media than Everest Global. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Dekel Agri-Vision and 0 mentions for Everest Global. Everest Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Dekel Agri-Vision's score of -0.02 indicating that Everest Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

7.4% of Everest Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.0% of Dekel Agri-Vision shares are held by institutional investors. 16.6% of Everest Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.7% of Dekel Agri-Vision shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Agriterra has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Dekel Agri-Vision. Agriterra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dekel Agri-Vision, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

5.0% of Dekel Agri-Vision shares are held by institutional investors. 20.7% of Dekel Agri-Vision shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 81.8% of Agriterra shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dekel Agri-Vision has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agriterra has a beta of -0.26, meaning that its share price is 126% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Dekel Agri-Vision had 10 more articles in the media than Agriterra. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Dekel Agri-Vision and 0 mentions for Agriterra. Agriterra's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Dekel Agri-Vision's score of -0.02 indicating that Agriterra is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Dekel Agri-Vision has a net margin of -7.58% compared to Agriterra's net margin of -31.03%. Dekel Agri-Vision's return on equity of -33.61% beat Agriterra's return on equity.

In the previous week, Dekel Agri-Vision had 10 more articles in the media than Produce Investments. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Dekel Agri-Vision and 0 mentions for Produce Investments. Produce Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Dekel Agri-Vision's score of -0.02 indicating that Produce Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Produce Investments has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Dekel Agri-Vision's net margin of -7.58%. Produce Investments' return on equity of 0.00% beat Dekel Agri-Vision's return on equity.

5.0% of Dekel Agri-Vision shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.7% of Dekel Agri-Vision shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Produce Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Dekel Agri-Vision.

In the previous week, Dekel Agri-Vision had 8 more articles in the media than M.P. Evans Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Dekel Agri-Vision and 2 mentions for M.P. Evans Group. M.P. Evans Group's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Dekel Agri-Vision's score of -0.02 indicating that M.P. Evans Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Dekel Agri-Vision's net margin of -7.58%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Dekel Agri-Vision's return on equity.

M.P. Evans Group has a consensus target price of GBX 1,750, indicating a potential downside of 6.22%. Given M.P. Evans Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe M.P. Evans Group is more favorable than Dekel Agri-Vision.

Dekel Agri-Vision has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M.P. Evans Group has a beta of 0.344, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

5.0% of Dekel Agri-Vision shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. 20.7% of Dekel Agri-Vision shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

M.P. Evans Group has higher revenue and earnings than Dekel Agri-Vision. Dekel Agri-Vision is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M.P. Evans Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.