Go Pro
→ Your $29.97 book is free today (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free MPE Stock Alerts

M.P. Evans Group (MPE) Competitors

M.P. Evans Group logo
GBX 1,592 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/10/2026 11:55 AM Eastern
Compare

MPE vs. AEP, TOT, OGN, CAM, and PAL

Should you buy M.P. Evans Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares M.P. Evans Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with M.P. Evans Group include Anglo-Eastern Plantations (AEP), Total Produce (TOT), Origin Enterprises (OGN), Camellia (CAM), and Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) (PAL). These companies are all part of the "farm products" industry.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Anglo-Eastern Plantations?

Anglo-Eastern Plantations (LON:AEP) and M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Anglo-Eastern Plantations and Anglo-Eastern Plantations both had 2 articles in the media. Anglo-Eastern Plantations' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat M.P. Evans Group's score of 0.57 indicating that Anglo-Eastern Plantations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Anglo-Eastern Plantations
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
M.P. Evans Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Anglo-Eastern Plantations has higher revenue and earnings than M.P. Evans Group. Anglo-Eastern Plantations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M.P. Evans Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Anglo-Eastern Plantations£465.21M1.39£81.78M£23.147.26
M.P. Evans Group£371.00M2.23£80.16M£211.807.52

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Anglo-Eastern Plantations' net margin of 19.53%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Anglo-Eastern Plantations' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Anglo-Eastern Plantations19.53% 15.73% 7.34%
M.P. Evans Group 29.97%19.40%10.06%

Anglo-Eastern Plantations pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Anglo-Eastern Plantations pays out 38.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

M.P. Evans Group has a consensus price target of GBX 1,750, suggesting a potential upside of 9.92%. Given M.P. Evans Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe M.P. Evans Group is more favorable than Anglo-Eastern Plantations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Anglo-Eastern Plantations
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
M.P. Evans Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Anglo-Eastern Plantations has a beta of 0.134, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M.P. Evans Group has a beta of 0.313, indicating that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

7.7% of Anglo-Eastern Plantations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Anglo-Eastern Plantations shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Anglo-Eastern Plantations on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Total Produce?

M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) and Total Produce (LON:TOT) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

8.4% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

M.P. Evans Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,750, indicating a potential upside of 9.92%. Given M.P. Evans Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe M.P. Evans Group is more favorable than Total Produce.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M.P. Evans Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Total Produce
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Total Produce pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Total Produce pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

M.P. Evans Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Total Produce. Total Produce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M.P. Evans Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M.P. Evans Group£371.00M2.23£80.16M£211.807.52
Total Produce£3.82B0.00N/A£8.80N/A

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 2 more articles in the media than Total Produce. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 0 mentions for Total Produce. M.P. Evans Group's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Total Produce's score of 0.00 indicating that M.P. Evans Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
M.P. Evans Group Positive
Total Produce Neutral

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Total Produce's net margin of 0.00%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Total Produce's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M.P. Evans Group29.97% 19.40% 10.06%
Total Produce N/A N/A N/A

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Total Produce on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Origin Enterprises?

M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) and Origin Enterprises (LON:OGN) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

8.4% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.3% of Origin Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Origin Enterprises shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Origin Enterprises has higher revenue and earnings than M.P. Evans Group. M.P. Evans Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Origin Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M.P. Evans Group£371.00M2.23£80.16M£211.807.52
Origin Enterprises£2.13B0.18£3.62B£37.189.82

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group and M.P. Evans Group both had 2 articles in the media. Origin Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat M.P. Evans Group's score of 0.57 indicating that Origin Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
M.P. Evans Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Origin Enterprises
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Origin Enterprises' net margin of 1.78%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Origin Enterprises' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M.P. Evans Group29.97% 19.40% 10.06%
Origin Enterprises 1.78%9.12%2.96%

M.P. Evans Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,750, indicating a potential upside of 9.92%. Given M.P. Evans Group's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe M.P. Evans Group is more favorable than Origin Enterprises.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M.P. Evans Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Origin Enterprises
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Origin Enterprises pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Origin Enterprises pays out 46.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

M.P. Evans Group has a beta of 0.313, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Origin Enterprises has a beta of 0.198, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Origin Enterprises on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Camellia?

Camellia (LON:CAM) and M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Camellia has a beta of 0.361, meaning that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M.P. Evans Group has a beta of 0.313, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Camellia pays an annual dividend of GBX 260 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Camellia pays out -139.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Camellia is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

2.5% of Camellia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Camellia shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Camellia's net margin of -1.83%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Camellia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Camellia-1.83% -1.73% -1.27%
M.P. Evans Group 29.97%19.40%10.06%

M.P. Evans Group has a consensus target price of GBX 1,750, indicating a potential upside of 9.92%. Given M.P. Evans Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe M.P. Evans Group is more favorable than Camellia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Camellia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
M.P. Evans Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

M.P. Evans Group has higher revenue and earnings than Camellia. Camellia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M.P. Evans Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Camellia£268M0.52-£20.24M-£186.70N/A
M.P. Evans Group£371.00M2.23£80.16M£211.807.52

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 1 more articles in the media than Camellia. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 1 mentions for Camellia. M.P. Evans Group's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Camellia's score of 0.00 indicating that M.P. Evans Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Camellia
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
M.P. Evans Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Camellia on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)?

M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) and Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) (LON:PAL) are both small-cap farm products industry companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

8.4% of M.P. Evans Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 2 more articles in the media than Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L). MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 0 mentions for Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L). M.P. Evans Group's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that M.P. Evans Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
M.P. Evans Group Positive
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) Neutral

M.P. Evans Group has higher revenue and earnings than Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L). Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M.P. Evans Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M.P. Evans Group£371.00M2.23£80.16M£211.807.52
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)£11K0.00N/A-£1.70N/A

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M.P. Evans Group29.97% 19.40% 10.06%
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) N/A N/A N/A

M.P. Evans Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,750, suggesting a potential upside of 9.92%. Given M.P. Evans Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe M.P. Evans Group is more favorable than Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M.P. Evans Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) on 13 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get M.P. Evans Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MPE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MPE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricM.P. Evans GroupFarm Products IndustryDefensive SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£826.61M£247.28M£8.55B£3.02B
Dividend Yield3.88%3.28%3.16%6.17%
P/E Ratio7.526.70888.45368.17
Price / Sales2.2364.82992,149.5384,564.79
Price / Cash6.229.00140.9027.87
Price / Book1.7210.319.737.68
Net Income£80.16M£375.04M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance5.01%-0.05%-0.49%-0.60%
1 Month Performance1.66%-4.07%-0.50%-1.04%
1 Year Performance31.57%306.46%243.98%61.81%

M.P. Evans Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MPE
M.P. Evans Group
2.4565 of 5 stars		GBX 1,592
flat		GBX 1,750
+9.9%		+31.6%£826.61M£371.00M7.5212,800
AEP
Anglo-Eastern Plantations
N/AGBX 168
+3.7%		N/A-80.2%£644.44M£465.21M7.2612,671
TOT
Total Produce
N/AN/AN/AN/A£641.85M£3.82B18.755,974
OGN
Origin Enterprises
1.8873 of 5 stars		GBX 365
flat		N/A+9,633.3%£392.33M£2.13B9.8210,000
CAM
Camellia
N/AGBX 5,500
+1.4%		N/A-5.2%£137.13M£268MN/A104,728

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MPE) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Better than SpaceX? Grab this ticker instead.
Larry Benedict generated $274 million for his clients by finding the trades most investors missed. Now he says...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel