Free Trial

M.P. Evans Group (MPE) Competitors

M.P. Evans Group logo
GBX 1,793.78 +11.78 (+0.66%)
As of 05/8/2026 12:44 PM Eastern

MPE vs. AEP, TOT, CAM, PAL, and RE

Should you be buying M.P. Evans Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of M.P. Evans Group include Anglo-Eastern Plantations (AEP), Total Produce (TOT), Camellia (CAM), Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) (PAL), and R.E.A. (RE). These companies are all part of the "farm products" industry.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Anglo-Eastern Plantations?

M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) and Anglo-Eastern Plantations (LON:AEP) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Anglo-Eastern Plantations has higher revenue and earnings than M.P. Evans Group. M.P. Evans Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Anglo-Eastern Plantations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M.P. Evans Group£371.00M2.52£80.16M£211.808.47
Anglo-Eastern Plantations£465.21M1.64£81.78M£231.428.57

M.P. Evans Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,750, indicating a potential downside of 2.44%. Given M.P. Evans Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe M.P. Evans Group is more favorable than Anglo-Eastern Plantations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M.P. Evans Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Anglo-Eastern Plantations
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Anglo-Eastern Plantations pays an annual dividend of GBX 88.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Anglo-Eastern Plantations pays out 38.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

7.8% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Anglo-Eastern Plantations shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 54.8% of Anglo-Eastern Plantations shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Anglo-Eastern Plantations had 1 more articles in the media than M.P. Evans Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Anglo-Eastern Plantations and 1 mentions for M.P. Evans Group. Anglo-Eastern Plantations' average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat M.P. Evans Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Anglo-Eastern Plantations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
M.P. Evans Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Anglo-Eastern Plantations
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Anglo-Eastern Plantations' net margin of 19.53%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Anglo-Eastern Plantations' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M.P. Evans Group29.97% 19.40% 10.06%
Anglo-Eastern Plantations 19.53%15.73%7.34%

M.P. Evans Group has a beta of 0.344, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Anglo-Eastern Plantations has a beta of 0.153, indicating that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Anglo-Eastern Plantations on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Total Produce?

Total Produce (LON:TOT) and M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

M.P. Evans Group has a consensus price target of GBX 1,750, indicating a potential downside of 2.44%. Given Total Produce's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Total Produce is more favorable than M.P. Evans Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Total Produce
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
M.P. Evans Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 1 more articles in the media than Total Produce. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 0 mentions for Total Produce. Total Produce's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled M.P. Evans Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Total Produce Neutral
M.P. Evans Group Neutral

M.P. Evans Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Total Produce. Total Produce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M.P. Evans Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Total Produce£3.82B0.00N/A£8.80N/A
M.P. Evans Group£371.00M2.52£80.16M£211.808.47

7.8% of M.P. Evans Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Total Produce's net margin of 0.00%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Total Produce's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Total ProduceN/A N/A N/A
M.P. Evans Group 29.97%19.40%10.06%

Total Produce pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share. M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Total Produce pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Total Produce on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Camellia?

M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) and Camellia (LON:CAM) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

M.P. Evans Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,750, suggesting a potential downside of 2.44%. Given M.P. Evans Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe M.P. Evans Group is more favorable than Camellia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M.P. Evans Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Camellia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

M.P. Evans Group has a beta of 0.344, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Camellia has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Camellia's net margin of -1.83%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Camellia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M.P. Evans Group29.97% 19.40% 10.06%
Camellia -1.83%-1.73%-1.27%

7.8% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Camellia shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Camellia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Camellia pays an annual dividend of GBX 260 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Camellia pays out -227.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Camellia is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

M.P. Evans Group has higher revenue and earnings than Camellia. Camellia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M.P. Evans Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M.P. Evans Group£371.00M2.52£80.16M£211.808.47
Camellia£264.80M0.54-£20.24M-£114.24N/A

In the previous week, Camellia had 3 more articles in the media than M.P. Evans Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Camellia and 1 mentions for M.P. Evans Group. M.P. Evans Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Camellia's score of -0.33 indicating that M.P. Evans Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
M.P. Evans Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Camellia
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Camellia on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)?

M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) and Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) (LON:PAL) are both small-cap farm products industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

M.P. Evans Group has higher revenue and earnings than Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L). Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M.P. Evans Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M.P. Evans Group£371.00M2.52£80.16M£211.808.47
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)£11K0.00N/A-£1.70N/A

7.8% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 1 more articles in the media than Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 0 mentions for Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L). M.P. Evans Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
M.P. Evans Group Neutral
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) Neutral

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M.P. Evans Group29.97% 19.40% 10.06%
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) N/A N/A N/A

M.P. Evans Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,750, suggesting a potential downside of 2.44%. Given Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)'s higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) is more favorable than M.P. Evans Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M.P. Evans Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L) on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to R.E.A.?

M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) and R.E.A. (LON:RE) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to R.E.A.'s net margin of 5.22%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat R.E.A.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M.P. Evans Group29.97% 19.40% 10.06%
R.E.A. 5.22%4.10%2.53%

M.P. Evans Group has a beta of 0.344, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, R.E.A. has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500.

M.P. Evans Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,750, suggesting a potential downside of 2.44%. R.E.A. has a consensus target price of GBX 260, suggesting a potential upside of 122.22%. Given R.E.A.'s higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe R.E.A. is more favorable than M.P. Evans Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M.P. Evans Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
R.E.A.
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. R.E.A. pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. R.E.A. pays out 133.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

M.P. Evans Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than R.E.A.. M.P. Evans Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than R.E.A., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M.P. Evans Group£371.00M2.52£80.16M£211.808.47
R.E.A.£387.39M0.16£4.07M£6.0119.48

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 1 more articles in the media than R.E.A.. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 0 mentions for R.E.A.. M.P. Evans Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled R.E.A.'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
M.P. Evans Group Neutral
R.E.A. Neutral

7.8% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.4% of R.E.A. shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.4% of R.E.A. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats R.E.A. on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get M.P. Evans Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MPE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MPE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MPE vs. The Competition

MetricM.P. Evans GroupFarm Products IndustryDefensive SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£935.92M£183.34M£8.24B£2.86B
Dividend Yield3.27%3.11%3.24%6.14%
P/E Ratio8.477.19891.03366.07
Price / Sales2.5269.74992,148.7488,620.17
Price / Cash6.229.00140.8927.89
Price / Book1.9310.069.587.72
Net Income£80.16M£375.04M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.06%314.91%33.19%63.96%
1 Month Performance15.71%0.78%-0.71%3.12%
1 Year Performance71.65%360.14%278.83%87.68%

M.P. Evans Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MPE
M.P. Evans Group
1.28 of 5 stars
GBX 1,793.78
+0.7%
GBX 1,750
-2.4%
+71.7%£935.92M£371.00M8.4712,800
AEP
Anglo-Eastern Plantations
N/AGBX 1,780
-6.3%
N/AN/A£684.73M£436.63M7.9612,671
TOT
Total Produce
N/AN/AN/AN/A£641.85M£3.82B18.755,974
CAM
Camellia
N/AGBX 6,170
+0.7%
N/A+14.1%£155.98M£264.80MN/A104,728
PAL
Equatorial Palm Oil plc (PAL.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£91.26M£11KN/A3

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MPE) was last updated on 5/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners