Go Pro

Everest Global (EVST) Competitors

GBX 110 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/27/2026

EVST vs. OHT, AAAP, AGTA, WALG, and PIL

Should you buy Everest Global stock or one of its competitors? Everest Global's main competitors and comparable companies include Ocean Harvest Technology Group (OHT), Anglo African Agriculture (AAAP), Agriterra (AGTA), Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L) (WALG), and Produce Investments (PIL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Everest Global compare to Ocean Harvest Technology Group?

Everest Global (LON:EVST) and Ocean Harvest Technology Group (LON:OHT) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Ocean Harvest Technology Group has a net margin of -101.14% compared to Everest Global's net margin of -202.16%. Everest Global's return on equity of 199.88% beat Ocean Harvest Technology Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Everest Global-202.16% 199.88% -23.41%
Ocean Harvest Technology Group -101.14%-107.80%-33.75%

7.4% of Everest Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.8% of Ocean Harvest Technology Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.6% of Everest Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 77.9% of Ocean Harvest Technology Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Everest Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ocean Harvest Technology Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Everest Global Neutral
Ocean Harvest Technology Group Neutral

Ocean Harvest Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Global. Ocean Harvest Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everest Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everest Global£566.76K0.75-£4.30M-£286.00N/A
Ocean Harvest Technology Group£2.57M0.49-£3.35M-£0.02N/A

Summary

Everest Global and Ocean Harvest Technology Group tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Global compare to Anglo African Agriculture?

Everest Global (LON:EVST) and Anglo African Agriculture (LON:AAAP) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

7.4% of Everest Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.6% of Everest Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Anglo African Agriculture has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Everest Global's net margin of -202.16%. Everest Global's return on equity of 199.88% beat Anglo African Agriculture's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Everest Global-202.16% 199.88% -23.41%
Anglo African Agriculture N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Everest Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Anglo African Agriculture'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Everest Global Neutral
Anglo African Agriculture Neutral

Anglo African Agriculture has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Global. Everest Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Anglo African Agriculture, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everest Global£566.76K0.75-£4.30M-£286.00N/A
Anglo African Agriculture£1.30M0.00N/A-£2.70N/A

Summary

Everest Global and Anglo African Agriculture tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Global compare to Agriterra?

Agriterra (LON:AGTA) and Everest Global (LON:EVST) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Agriterra has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Global. Agriterra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everest Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agriterra£10.39M0.04-£3.23M-£0.03N/A
Everest Global£566.76K0.75-£4.30M-£286.00N/A

Agriterra has a beta of -0.26, suggesting that its share price is 126% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Everest Global has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Agriterra has a net margin of -31.03% compared to Everest Global's net margin of -202.16%. Everest Global's return on equity of 199.88% beat Agriterra's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agriterra-31.03% -38.26% -4.29%
Everest Global -202.16%199.88%-23.41%

In the previous week, Agriterra's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Everest Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Agriterra Neutral
Everest Global Neutral

7.4% of Everest Global shares are held by institutional investors. 81.8% of Agriterra shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of Everest Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Agriterra beats Everest Global on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Global compare to Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L)?

Everest Global (LON:EVST) and Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L) (LON:WALG) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Everest Global's net margin of -202.16%. Everest Global's return on equity of 199.88% beat Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Everest Global-202.16% 199.88% -23.41%
Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L) N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Everest Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Everest Global Neutral
Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L) Neutral

7.4% of Everest Global shares are held by institutional investors. 16.6% of Everest Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Everest Global.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everest Global£566.76K0.75-£4.30M-£286.00N/A
Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Everest Global beats Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L) on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Everest Global compare to Produce Investments?

Everest Global (LON:EVST) and Produce Investments (LON:PIL) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

7.4% of Everest Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.6% of Everest Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Everest Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Produce Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Everest Global Neutral
Produce Investments Neutral

Produce Investments has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Everest Global's net margin of -202.16%. Everest Global's return on equity of 199.88% beat Produce Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Everest Global-202.16% 199.88% -23.41%
Produce Investments N/A N/A N/A

Produce Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Everest Global.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everest Global£566.76K0.75-£4.30M-£286.00N/A
Produce InvestmentsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Everest Global beats Produce Investments on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Everest Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EVST and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EVST and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EVST vs. The Competition

MetricEverest GlobalFood Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£425K£5.71B£15.93B£2.92B
Dividend YieldN/A3.10%3.20%6.17%
P/E Ratio-0.3812.1313.61367.33
Price / Sales0.7583.64263,621.7883,334.32
Price / CashN/A112.3657.5727.89
Price / Book110.003.414.476.99
Net Income-£4.30M£766.90M£838.96M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A3.12%1.43%0.75%
1 Month Performance31.66%0.72%0.66%3.41%
1 Year PerformanceN/A41.18%12.81%22.85%

Everest Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EVST
Everest Global
N/AGBX 110
flat
N/AN/A£425K£566.76KN/A17
OHT
Ocean Harvest Technology Group
N/AGBX 1
flat
N/AN/A£1.26M£2.57MN/A35
AAAP
Anglo African Agriculture
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.03M£1.30MN/A501
AGTA
Agriterra
N/AGBX 0.55
flat
N/A+0.0%£407K£10.39MN/A402
WALG
Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£138KN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:EVST) was last updated on 8/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners