Free Trial

Coca-Cola HBC (CCH) Competitors

Coca-Cola HBC logo
GBX 4,203.28 -60.72 (-1.42%)
As of 12:20 PM Eastern

CCH vs. CCEP, BVIC, FEVR, BAG, and NICL

Should you buy Coca-Cola HBC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Coca-Cola HBC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Coca-Cola HBC include Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP), Britvic (BVIC), Fevertree Drinks (FEVR), A.G. BARR (BAG), and Nichols (NICL). These companies are all part of the "beverages - non - alcoholic" industry.

How does Coca-Cola HBC compare to Coca-Cola Europacific Partners?

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (LON:CCEP) and Coca-Cola HBC (LON:CCH) are both large-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners presently has a consensus price target of GBX 8,320, indicating a potential upside of 23.81%. Coca-Cola HBC has a consensus price target of GBX 4,794.25, indicating a potential upside of 14.06%. Given Coca-Cola Europacific Partners' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Coca-Cola Europacific Partners is more favorable than Coca-Cola HBC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Coca-Cola HBC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners has a beta of 0.511, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coca-Cola HBC has a beta of 0.552, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

20.9% of Coca-Cola Europacific Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.5% of Coca-Cola HBC shares are held by institutional investors. 17.3% of Coca-Cola Europacific Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 99.1% of Coca-Cola HBC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Coca-Cola HBC's net margin of 8.10%. Coca-Cola HBC's return on equity of 26.03% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners9.29% 24.39% 4.80%
Coca-Cola HBC 8.10%26.03%5.79%

In the previous week, Coca-Cola HBC had 4 more articles in the media than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Coca-Cola HBC and 0 mentions for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners. Coca-Cola HBC's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Coca-Cola HBC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners Neutral
Coca-Cola HBC Positive

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Coca-Cola HBC. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coca-Cola HBC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners£20.90B1.42£1.94B£426.0015.77
Coca-Cola HBC£11.60B1.32£748.04M£259.0016.23

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 204 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Coca-Cola HBC pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Coca-Cola HBC pays out 39.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Coca-Cola HBC beats Coca-Cola Europacific Partners on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Coca-Cola HBC compare to Britvic?

Coca-Cola HBC (LON:CCH) and Britvic (LON:BVIC) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Coca-Cola HBC pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Britvic pays an annual dividend of GBX 32 per share. Coca-Cola HBC pays out 39.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Britvic pays out 61.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Coca-Cola HBC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

29.5% of Coca-Cola HBC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Britvic shares are owned by institutional investors. 99.1% of Coca-Cola HBC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Britvic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Coca-Cola HBC has a beta of 0.552, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Britvic has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Coca-Cola HBC currently has a consensus price target of GBX 4,794.25, indicating a potential upside of 14.06%. Given Coca-Cola HBC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Coca-Cola HBC is more favorable than Britvic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Coca-Cola HBC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Britvic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Coca-Cola HBC has a net margin of 8.10% compared to Britvic's net margin of 6.62%. Britvic's return on equity of 34.24% beat Coca-Cola HBC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Coca-Cola HBC8.10% 26.03% 5.79%
Britvic 6.62%34.24%6.56%

In the previous week, Coca-Cola HBC had 4 more articles in the media than Britvic. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Coca-Cola HBC and 0 mentions for Britvic. Coca-Cola HBC's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Britvic's score of 0.00 indicating that Coca-Cola HBC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Coca-Cola HBC Positive
Britvic Neutral

Coca-Cola HBC has higher revenue and earnings than Britvic. Britvic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coca-Cola HBC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Coca-Cola HBC£11.60B1.32£748.04M£259.0016.23
Britvic£1.83B0.00£129.05M£51.67N/A

Summary

Coca-Cola HBC beats Britvic on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Coca-Cola HBC compare to Fevertree Drinks?

Coca-Cola HBC (LON:CCH) and Fevertree Drinks (LON:FEVR) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Coca-Cola HBC has a beta of 0.552, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fevertree Drinks has a beta of 1.157, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

29.5% of Coca-Cola HBC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Fevertree Drinks shares are owned by institutional investors. 99.1% of Coca-Cola HBC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.0% of Fevertree Drinks shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Coca-Cola HBC pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Fevertree Drinks pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Coca-Cola HBC pays out 39.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fevertree Drinks pays out 91.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Coca-Cola HBC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Coca-Cola HBC has higher revenue and earnings than Fevertree Drinks. Coca-Cola HBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fevertree Drinks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Coca-Cola HBC£11.60B1.32£748.04M£259.0016.23
Fevertree Drinks£325M2.81£23.91M£18.6242.75

Coca-Cola HBC currently has a consensus price target of GBX 4,794.25, indicating a potential upside of 14.06%. Fevertree Drinks has a consensus price target of GBX 955, indicating a potential upside of 19.97%. Given Fevertree Drinks' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fevertree Drinks is more favorable than Coca-Cola HBC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Coca-Cola HBC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Fevertree Drinks
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Coca-Cola HBC has a net margin of 8.10% compared to Fevertree Drinks' net margin of 6.95%. Coca-Cola HBC's return on equity of 26.03% beat Fevertree Drinks' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Coca-Cola HBC8.10% 26.03% 5.79%
Fevertree Drinks 6.95%9.32%4.91%

In the previous week, Coca-Cola HBC had 4 more articles in the media than Fevertree Drinks. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Coca-Cola HBC and 0 mentions for Fevertree Drinks. Coca-Cola HBC's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Fevertree Drinks' score of 0.00 indicating that Coca-Cola HBC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Coca-Cola HBC Positive
Fevertree Drinks Neutral

Summary

Coca-Cola HBC beats Fevertree Drinks on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Coca-Cola HBC compare to A.G. BARR?

A.G. BARR (LON:BAG) and Coca-Cola HBC (LON:CCH) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

A.G. BARR pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Coca-Cola HBC pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. A.G. BARR pays out 41.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Coca-Cola HBC pays out 39.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

A.G. BARR has a beta of 0.366, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coca-Cola HBC has a beta of 0.552, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Coca-Cola HBC has higher revenue and earnings than A.G. BARR. A.G. BARR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coca-Cola HBC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
A.G. BARR£437.30M1.53£36.51M£41.8014.42
Coca-Cola HBC£11.60B1.32£748.04M£259.0016.23

39.3% of A.G. BARR shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.5% of Coca-Cola HBC shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of A.G. BARR shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 99.1% of Coca-Cola HBC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, A.G. BARR had 1 more articles in the media than Coca-Cola HBC. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for A.G. BARR and 4 mentions for Coca-Cola HBC. A.G. BARR's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Coca-Cola HBC's score of 0.75 indicating that A.G. BARR is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
A.G. BARR
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Coca-Cola HBC
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

A.G. BARR has a net margin of 10.77% compared to Coca-Cola HBC's net margin of 8.10%. Coca-Cola HBC's return on equity of 26.03% beat A.G. BARR's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
A.G. BARR10.77% 14.27% 7.77%
Coca-Cola HBC 8.10%26.03%5.79%

A.G. BARR presently has a consensus price target of GBX 777.50, indicating a potential upside of 28.99%. Coca-Cola HBC has a consensus price target of GBX 4,794.25, indicating a potential upside of 14.06%. Given A.G. BARR's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe A.G. BARR is more favorable than Coca-Cola HBC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
A.G. BARR
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Coca-Cola HBC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Coca-Cola HBC beats A.G. BARR on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Coca-Cola HBC compare to Nichols?

Nichols (LON:NICL) and Coca-Cola HBC (LON:CCH) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Coca-Cola HBC has higher revenue and earnings than Nichols. Nichols is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coca-Cola HBC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nichols£175.05M1.96£18.72M£58.3316.12
Coca-Cola HBC£11.60B1.32£748.04M£259.0016.23

In the previous week, Coca-Cola HBC had 4 more articles in the media than Nichols. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Coca-Cola HBC and 0 mentions for Nichols. Coca-Cola HBC's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Nichols' score of 0.00 indicating that Coca-Cola HBC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nichols Neutral
Coca-Cola HBC Positive

Nichols has a beta of 0.472, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coca-Cola HBC has a beta of 0.552, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Nichols has a net margin of 12.25% compared to Coca-Cola HBC's net margin of 8.10%. Coca-Cola HBC's return on equity of 26.03% beat Nichols' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nichols12.25% 23.59% 12.97%
Coca-Cola HBC 8.10%26.03%5.79%

Nichols pays an annual dividend of GBX 32.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Coca-Cola HBC pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Nichols pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Coca-Cola HBC pays out 39.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

2.9% of Nichols shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.5% of Coca-Cola HBC shares are held by institutional investors. 9.0% of Nichols shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 99.1% of Coca-Cola HBC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nichols presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,390, indicating a potential upside of 47.87%. Coca-Cola HBC has a consensus price target of GBX 4,794.25, indicating a potential upside of 14.06%. Given Nichols' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nichols is more favorable than Coca-Cola HBC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nichols
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Coca-Cola HBC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Coca-Cola HBC beats Nichols on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Coca-Cola HBC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CCH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CCH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CCH vs. The Competition

MetricCoca-Cola HBCBeverages IndustryDefensive SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£15.32B£9.84B£8.29B£2.79B
Dividend Yield2.45%2.38%3.26%6.09%
P/E Ratio16.236.57887.96366.15
Price / Sales1.32151.08992,149.6288,429.84
Price / Cash4.118.47140.8827.89
Price / Book5.125.139.577.74
Net Income£748.04M£553.25M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.34%-1.74%-0.61%0.82%
1 Month Performance-4.59%-1.87%-1.07%2.78%
1 Year Performance10.50%7.21%271.94%87.90%

Coca-Cola HBC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CCH
Coca-Cola HBC
4.1146 of 5 stars
GBX 4,203.29
-1.4%
GBX 4,794.25
+14.1%
+13.0%£15.32B£11.60B16.2332,700
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners
2.6317 of 5 stars
GBX 6,995
+1.4%
GBX 8,320
+18.9%
+2.4%£31.17B£20.90B16.4227,600
BVIC
Britvic
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.28B£1.83B25.414,430
FEVR
Fevertree Drinks
N/AGBX 822.36
+1.6%
GBX 955
+16.1%
-7.8%£947.41M£325M44.17375
BAG
A.G. BARR
4.4609 of 5 stars
GBX 645
+1.6%
GBX 777.50
+20.5%
-13.3%£715.45M£437.30M15.431,030

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CCH) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners