CCH vs. BNZL, SBRY, BME, OCDO, IMB, GRG, TATE, ABF, TSCO, and RKT
Should you be buying Coca-Cola HBC stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Coca-Cola HBC include Bunzl (BNZL), J Sainsbury (SBRY), B&M European Value Retail (BME), Ocado Group (OCDO), Imperial Brands (IMB), Greggs (GRG), Tate & Lyle (TATE), Associated British Foods (ABF), Tesco (TSCO), and Reckitt Benckiser Group (RKT). These companies are all part of the "consumer defensive" sector.
Bunzl (LON:BNZL) and Coca-Cola HBC (LON:CCH) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, community ranking and dividends.
Bunzl pays an annual dividend of GBX 68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Coca-Cola HBC pays an annual dividend of GBX 67 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Bunzl pays out 4,415.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Coca-Cola HBC pays out 4,527.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
Coca-Cola HBC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bunzl. Coca-Cola HBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bunzl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Bunzl currently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,875, suggesting a potential downside of 6.60%. Coca-Cola HBC has a consensus price target of GBX 2,860, suggesting a potential upside of 11.11%. Given Bunzl's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Coca-Cola HBC is more favorable than Bunzl.
63.9% of Bunzl shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Coca-Cola HBC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Bunzl shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.2% of Coca-Cola HBC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Bunzl has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Coca-Cola HBC has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Bunzl received 105 more outperform votes than Coca-Cola HBC when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 60.52% of users gave Coca-Cola HBC an outperform vote while only 60.10% of users gave Bunzl an outperform vote.
Coca-Cola HBC has a net margin of 6.25% compared to Coca-Cola HBC's net margin of 4.46%. Bunzl's return on equity of 19.34% beat Coca-Cola HBC's return on equity.
In the previous week, Bunzl had 6 more articles in the media than Coca-Cola HBC. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Bunzl and 1 mentions for Coca-Cola HBC. Bunzl's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Coca-Cola HBC's score of 0.35 indicating that Coca-Cola HBC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Summary
Coca-Cola HBC beats Bunzl on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Coca-Cola HBC News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CCH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CCH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Coca-Cola HBC Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
