LON:IMB

Imperial Brands Competitors

GBX 1,561
-15.50 (-0.98 %)
(As of 08/4/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
1,561
1,583
50-Day Range
1,528
1,625
52-Week Range
1,142
1,686
Volume2.44 million shs
Average Volume1.75 million shs
Market Capitalization£14.77 billion
P/E Ratio5.32
Dividend Yield8.76%
BetaN/A

Imperial Brands (LON:IMB) Vs. RKT, TSCO, CCH, TATE, FEVR, and BVIC

Should you be buying IMB stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer defensive" are considered alternatives and competitors to Imperial Brands, including Reckitt Benckiser Group (RKT), Tesco (TSCO), Coca-Cola HBC (CCH), Tate & Lyle (TATE), Fevertree Drinks (FEVR), and Britvic (BVIC).

Reckitt Benckiser Group (LON:RKT) and Imperial Brands (LON:IMB) are both large-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Reckitt Benckiser Group and Imperial Brands, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Reckitt Benckiser Group01502.83
Imperial Brands11402.50

Reckitt Benckiser Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 7,411.67, indicating a potential upside of 30.88%. Imperial Brands has a consensus target price of GBX 1,893.20, indicating a potential upside of 21.28%. Given Reckitt Benckiser Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Reckitt Benckiser Group is more favorable than Imperial Brands.

Dividends

Reckitt Benckiser Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Imperial Brands pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Reckitt Benckiser Group pays out -0.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Imperial Brands pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares Reckitt Benckiser Group and Imperial Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Reckitt Benckiser GroupN/AN/AN/A
Imperial BrandsN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Reckitt Benckiser Group and Imperial Brands' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Reckitt Benckiser Group£13.68 billion2.96N/AGBX (226.40)-25.01
Imperial Brands£16.96 billion0.87N/AGBX 293.605.32

Reckitt Benckiser Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Imperial Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Reckitt Benckiser Group beats Imperial Brands on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Imperial Brands (LON:IMB) and Tesco (LON:TSCO) are both large-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Imperial Brands and Tesco, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Imperial Brands11402.50
Tesco00303.00

Imperial Brands currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,893.20, indicating a potential upside of 21.28%. Tesco has a consensus price target of GBX 285, indicating a potential upside of 22.13%. Given Tesco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tesco is more favorable than Imperial Brands.

Dividends

Imperial Brands pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Tesco pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Imperial Brands pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tesco pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares Imperial Brands and Tesco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Imperial BrandsN/AN/AN/A
TescoN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Imperial Brands and Tesco's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial Brands£16.96 billion0.87N/AGBX 293.605.32
Tesco£57.89 billion0.31N/AGBX 80.602.90

Tesco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Imperial Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Imperial Brands beats Tesco on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Imperial Brands (LON:IMB) and Coca-Cola HBC (LON:CCH) are both large-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Imperial Brands and Coca-Cola HBC, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Imperial Brands11402.50
Coca-Cola HBC00703.00

Imperial Brands currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,893.20, indicating a potential upside of 21.28%. Coca-Cola HBC has a consensus price target of GBX 2,741.67, indicating a potential downside of 1.52%. Given Imperial Brands' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Imperial Brands is more favorable than Coca-Cola HBC.

Dividends

Imperial Brands pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Coca-Cola HBC pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Imperial Brands pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Coca-Cola HBC pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Imperial Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Imperial Brands and Coca-Cola HBC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Imperial BrandsN/AN/AN/A
Coca-Cola HBCN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Imperial Brands and Coca-Cola HBC's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial Brands£16.96 billion0.87N/AGBX 293.605.32
Coca-Cola HBC£6.13 billion1.66N/AGBX 97.3028.61

Imperial Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coca-Cola HBC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Imperial Brands beats Coca-Cola HBC on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Imperial Brands (LON:IMB) and Tate & Lyle (LON:TATE) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Imperial Brands and Tate & Lyle's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial Brands£16.96 billion0.87N/AGBX 293.605.32
Tate & Lyle£2.81 billion1.22N/AGBX 53.8013.56

Imperial Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tate & Lyle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Imperial Brands and Tate & Lyle, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Imperial Brands11402.50
Tate & Lyle00103.00

Imperial Brands currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,893.20, indicating a potential upside of 21.28%. Tate & Lyle has a consensus price target of GBX 870, indicating a potential upside of 19.28%. Given Imperial Brands' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Imperial Brands is more favorable than Tate & Lyle.

Profitability

This table compares Imperial Brands and Tate & Lyle's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Imperial BrandsN/AN/AN/A
Tate & LyleN/AN/AN/A

Dividends

Imperial Brands pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Tate & Lyle pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Imperial Brands pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tate & Lyle pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Imperial Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Imperial Brands beats Tate & Lyle on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fevertree Drinks (LON:FEVR) and Imperial Brands (LON:IMB) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fevertree Drinks and Imperial Brands' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fevertree Drinks£252.10 million11.14N/AGBX 35.8067.32
Imperial Brands£16.96 billion0.87N/AGBX 293.605.32

Imperial Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fevertree Drinks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fevertree Drinks and Imperial Brands, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fevertree Drinks16102.00
Imperial Brands11402.50

Fevertree Drinks currently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,292.86, suggesting a potential downside of 4.86%. Imperial Brands has a consensus target price of GBX 1,893.20, suggesting a potential upside of 21.28%. Given Imperial Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Imperial Brands is more favorable than Fevertree Drinks.

Profitability

This table compares Fevertree Drinks and Imperial Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fevertree DrinksN/AN/AN/A
Imperial BrandsN/AN/AN/A

Dividends

Fevertree Drinks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Imperial Brands pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Fevertree Drinks pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Imperial Brands pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Imperial Brands beats Fevertree Drinks on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Britvic (LON:BVIC) and Imperial Brands (LON:IMB) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Britvic and Imperial Brands' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Britvic£1.33 billion2.01N/AGBX 33.2030.15
Imperial Brands£16.96 billion0.87N/AGBX 293.605.32

Imperial Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Britvic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Britvic and Imperial Brands, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Britvic02502.71
Imperial Brands11402.50

Britvic currently has a consensus target price of GBX 960, suggesting a potential downside of 4.10%. Imperial Brands has a consensus target price of GBX 1,893.20, suggesting a potential upside of 21.28%. Given Imperial Brands' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Imperial Brands is more favorable than Britvic.

Profitability

This table compares Britvic and Imperial Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
BritvicN/AN/AN/A
Imperial BrandsN/AN/AN/A

Dividends

Britvic pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Imperial Brands pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Britvic pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Imperial Brands pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Imperial Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Imperial Brands beats Britvic on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.


Imperial Brands Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
RKT
Reckitt Benckiser Group
2.4$5,663.00-0.8%£40.45 billion£13.68 billion-25.01Insider Buying
Tesco logo
TSCO
Tesco
2.4$233.35-0.9%£18.04 billion£57.89 billion2.90
Coca-Cola HBC logo
CCH
Coca-Cola HBC
1.8$2,784.00-0.6%£10.16 billion£6.13 billion28.61
Tate & Lyle logo
TATE
Tate & Lyle
2.0$729.40-1.3%£3.42 billion£2.81 billion13.56
Fevertree Drinks logo
FEVR
Fevertree Drinks
1.5$2,410.00-0.6%£2.81 billion£252.10 million67.32
Britvic logo
BVIC
Britvic
2.1$1,001.00-0.6%£2.67 billion£1.33 billion30.15Gap Up
PZ Cussons logo
PZC
PZ Cussons
1.8$246.00-1.6%£1.05 billion£616.10 million273.33
Dairy Crest Group logo
DCG
Dairy Crest Group
1.5N/AN/A£958.60 million£461.60 million22.08
Hilton Food Group logo
HFG
Hilton Food Group
2.2$1,124.00-1.4%£923.49 million£2.77 billion23.47
Bakkavor Group logo
BAKK
Bakkavor Group
1.6$125.60-0.8%£727.76 million£1.79 billion21.66Gap Down
Greencore Group logo
GNC
Greencore Group
1.6$131.00-0.2%£689.78 million£1.13 billion-17.70
Total Produce logo
TOT
Total Produce
1.4$165.00-0.0%£641.85 million£3.82 billion18.75
A.G. BARR logo
BAG
A.G. BARR
1.6$565.00-0.0%£632.96 million£227 million32.85Analyst Report
Naked Wines logo
WINE
Naked Wines
1.5$846.00-0.2%£621.29 million£340.23 million-61.30
Tate & Lyle logo
BD15
Tate & Lyle
1.5$110.50-1.8%£508.55 million£2.81 billion2.05
Hotel Chocolat Group logo
HOTC
Hotel Chocolat Group
1.4$370.00-2.7%£507.46 million£146.47 million-60.66Gap Up
AEP
Anglo-Eastern Plantations
1.4$602.00-1.3%£238.61 million£269.06 million10.42
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners
1.3$52.20-1.1%£237.97 million£10.61 billion47.89News Coverage
Tribal Group logo
TRB
Tribal Group
1.5$107.00-0.0%£224.24 million£72.95 million34.52News Coverage
Kerry Group logo
KYGA
Kerry Group
1.1$124.10-0.6%£219.43 million£7.12 billion39.71Dividend Cut
Analyst Report
PureCircle logo
PURE
PureCircle
1.0N/AN/A£183.53 million£121.14 million-2.78News Coverage
Accrol Group logo
ACRL
Accrol Group
2.1$47.60-1.1%£151.79 million£136.59 million-43.27
Carr's Group logo
CARR
Carr's Group
1.8$157.00-0.2%£147.10 million£397.11 million17.25
Cake Box logo
CBOX
Cake Box
1.8$330.00-0.3%£132 million£21.91 million39.29
VINO
Virgin Wines UK
1.1$220.00-0.0%£122.84 million£70.95 million20.56
W7L
Warpaint London
1.2$157.50-3.2%£120.88 million£40.29 million-121.15News Coverage
WBI
Woodbois
1.4$4.65-0.0%£86.35 million£15.26 million-11.63News Coverage
WEY
Wey Education
0.9$52.00-1.9%£72.73 million£8.36 million86.67
DVRG
DeepVerge
0.3$29.25-6.8%£62.93 million£4.48 million-13.93Gap Up
DVRG
DeepVerge
0.0$29.25-6.8%£62.93 million£4.48 million-13.93Gap Up
GUS
Gusbourne
0.8$101.00-0.5%£46.96 million£2.11 million-15.30
GLB
Glanbia
1.5$14.85-0.4%£43.26 million£3.82 billion30.56
BSD
B.S.D Crown
0.1$28.00-1.8%£36.22 millionN/A25.45Gap Down
BAR
Brand Architekts Group
1.2$173.70-0.7%£29.93 million£14.73 million-7.79
FIH
FIH group
1.5$225.00-0.0%£28.16 million£32.58 million2,250.00Gap Up
High Trading Volume
Dekel Agri-Vision logo
DKL
Dekel Agri-Vision
0.9$4.75-1.1%£25.45 million£22.55 million-11.88
DIS
Distil
1.0$2.19-4.1%£10.99 million£3.62 million21.90Gap Up
OBOR
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)
0.8$42.00-0.0%£9.06 millionN/A-0.08High Trading Volume
MLVN
Malvern International
0.9$0.25-8.0%£5.22 million£1.90 million-0.83High Trading Volume
GFHG
Grand Fortune High Grade
1.0$2.50-20.0%£4 million£26.00-12.50Gap Down
UKR
Ukrproduct Group
0.9$5.25-0.0%£2.08 million£55.51 million-1.81
AAAP
Anglo African Agriculture
0.9$5.28-4.4%£1.16 million£1.77 million-1.02Gap Up
WALG
Walcom Group Limited (WALG.L)
0.9$0.20-0.0%£138,000.00N/A0.00
(CVR.L) logo
CVR
(CVR.L)
1.0N/AN/A£0.00N/A0.00Gap Down
High Trading Volume
CRAW
Crawshaw Group
1.0$2.00-0.0%£0.00N/A0.00
This page was last updated on 8/4/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research.