British American Tobacco Competitors

Unilever (LON:ULVR) and British American Tobacco (LON:BATS) are both large-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Unilever and British American Tobacco's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

British American Tobacco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Unilever, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Unilever pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. British American Tobacco pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Unilever pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. British American Tobacco pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. British American Tobacco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Unilever and British American Tobacco, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Unilever presently has a consensus target price of GBX 4,708.18, indicating a potential upside of 26.12%. British American Tobacco has a consensus target price of GBX 3,495.17, indicating a potential upside of 40.62%. Given British American Tobacco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe British American Tobacco is more favorable than Unilever.

Profitability

This table compares Unilever and British American Tobacco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

British American Tobacco beats Unilever on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Diageo (LON:DGE) and British American Tobacco (LON:BATS) are both large-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Diageo and British American Tobacco's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

British American Tobacco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diageo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Diageo pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. British American Tobacco pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Diageo pays out 1.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. British American Tobacco pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. British American Tobacco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Diageo and British American Tobacco, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Diageo presently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,210.53, indicating a potential upside of 14.15%. British American Tobacco has a consensus target price of GBX 3,495.17, indicating a potential upside of 40.62%. Given British American Tobacco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe British American Tobacco is more favorable than Diageo.

Profitability

This table compares Diageo and British American Tobacco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

British American Tobacco beats Diageo on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tesco (LON:TSCO) and British American Tobacco (LON:BATS) are both large-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Tesco and British American Tobacco's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

British American Tobacco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tesco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Tesco pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. British American Tobacco pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Tesco pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. British American Tobacco pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. British American Tobacco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Tesco and British American Tobacco, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Tesco presently has a consensus target price of GBX 281.57, indicating a potential upside of 25.25%. British American Tobacco has a consensus target price of GBX 3,495.17, indicating a potential upside of 40.62%. Given British American Tobacco's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe British American Tobacco is more favorable than Tesco.

Profitability

This table compares Tesco and British American Tobacco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

British American Tobacco beats Tesco on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

British American Tobacco (LON:BATS) and Imperial Brands (LON:IMB) are both large-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares British American Tobacco and Imperial Brands' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Imperial Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than British American Tobacco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

British American Tobacco pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Imperial Brands pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. British American Tobacco pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Imperial Brands pays out 1.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for British American Tobacco and Imperial Brands, as reported by MarketBeat.

British American Tobacco presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,495.17, indicating a potential upside of 40.62%. Imperial Brands has a consensus price target of GBX 1,925.82, indicating a potential upside of 44.47%. Given Imperial Brands' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Imperial Brands is more favorable than British American Tobacco.

Profitability

This table compares British American Tobacco and Imperial Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

British American Tobacco beats Imperial Brands on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

British American Tobacco (LON:BATS) and Coca-Cola HBC (LON:CCH) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares British American Tobacco and Coca-Cola HBC's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

British American Tobacco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coca-Cola HBC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

British American Tobacco pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Coca-Cola HBC pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. British American Tobacco pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Coca-Cola HBC pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for British American Tobacco and Coca-Cola HBC, as reported by MarketBeat.

British American Tobacco presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,495.17, indicating a potential upside of 40.62%. Coca-Cola HBC has a consensus price target of GBX 2,402.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.35%. Given British American Tobacco's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe British American Tobacco is more favorable than Coca-Cola HBC.

Profitability

This table compares British American Tobacco and Coca-Cola HBC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

British American Tobacco beats Coca-Cola HBC on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

British American Tobacco (LON:BATS) and Tate & Lyle (LON:TATE) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares British American Tobacco and Tate & Lyle's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

British American Tobacco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tate & Lyle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

British American Tobacco pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Tate & Lyle pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. British American Tobacco pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tate & Lyle pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. British American Tobacco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for British American Tobacco and Tate & Lyle, as reported by MarketBeat.

British American Tobacco presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,495.17, indicating a potential upside of 40.62%. Tate & Lyle has a consensus price target of GBX 706.67, indicating a potential downside of 2.80%. Given British American Tobacco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe British American Tobacco is more favorable than Tate & Lyle.

Profitability

This table compares British American Tobacco and Tate & Lyle's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

British American Tobacco beats Tate & Lyle on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.