Do analysts recommend ICGC or CKN?

Clarkson has a consensus price target of GBX 5,031.25, indicating a potential upside of 3.18%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Irish Continental Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Irish Continental Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Clarkson 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Do analysts recommend OCN or CKN?

Clarkson has a consensus price target of GBX 5,031.25, suggesting a potential upside of 3.18%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Ocean Wilsons. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ocean Wilsons 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Clarkson 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, OCN or CKN?

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Ocean Wilsons. Ocean Wilsons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ocean Wilsons £26.66M 12.52 £76.94M £916.60 1.29 Clarkson £747.10M 2.01 £82.85M £250.40 19.47

Is OCN or CKN more profitable?

Ocean Wilsons has a net margin of 350.28% compared to Clarkson's net margin of 10.40%. Clarkson's return on equity of 14.50% beat Ocean Wilsons' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ocean Wilsons 350.28% 11.66% 6.02% Clarkson 10.40% 14.50% 7.79%

Does the media refer more to FSJ or CKN?

In the previous week, Clarkson had 8 more articles in the media than James Fisher and Sons. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Clarkson and 1 mentions for James Fisher and Sons. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat James Fisher and Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment James Fisher and Sons 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Clarkson 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer CKN or GPH?

Clarkson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,031.25, suggesting a potential upside of 3.18%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Global Ports. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Clarkson 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 Global Ports 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, CKN or GPH?

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Global Ports. Global Ports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Clarkson £747.10M 2.01 £82.85M £250.40 19.47 Global Ports £193.58M 0.00 -£19.81M £0.01 N/A

Is CKN or GPH more profitable?

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.40% compared to Global Ports' net margin of 0.46%. Global Ports' return on equity of 34.36% beat Clarkson's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Clarkson 10.40% 14.50% 7.79% Global Ports 0.46% 34.36% 3.88%

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, BMS or CKN?

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Braemar. Clarkson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Braemar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Braemar £135.61M 0.54 £5.01M £6.36 35.69 Clarkson £747.10M 2.01 £82.85M £250.40 19.47

Is BMS or CKN more profitable?

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.40% compared to Braemar's net margin of 1.68%. Clarkson's return on equity of 14.50% beat Braemar's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Braemar 1.68% 2.74% 7.09% Clarkson 10.40% 14.50% 7.79%

Does the media refer more to BMS or CKN?

In the previous week, Clarkson had 8 more articles in the media than Braemar. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Clarkson and 1 mentions for Braemar. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Braemar's score of 0.67 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Braemar 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Clarkson 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Clarkson (CKN) Competitors

GBX 4,876 -114.00 (-2.28%)

As of 11:13 AM Eastern

Compare

CKN vs. ICGC, OCN, FSJ, GPH, and BMS

Should you buy Clarkson stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Clarkson with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Clarkson include Irish Continental Group (ICGC), Ocean Wilsons (OCN), James Fisher and Sons (FSJ), Global Ports (GPH), and Braemar (BMS). These companies are all part of the "marine transportation" industry.

How does Clarkson compare to Irish Continental Group?

Irish Continental Group (LON:ICGC) and Clarkson (LON:CKN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Irish Continental Group. Irish Continental Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Irish Continental Group	£666.70M	1.51	£74.00M	£45.80	14.77
Clarkson	£747.10M	2.01	£82.85M	£250.40	19.47

Irish Continental Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Clarkson pays an annual dividend of GBX 112 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Irish Continental Group pays out 34.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Clarkson pays out 44.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Irish Continental Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Irish Continental Group has a net margin of 11.23% compared to Clarkson's net margin of 10.40%. Irish Continental Group's return on equity of 25.50% beat Clarkson's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Irish Continental Group	11.23%	25.50%	6.96%
Clarkson	10.40%	14.50%	7.79%

24.4% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Clarkson shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.6% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of Clarkson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Irish Continental Group has a beta of 0.378, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clarkson has a beta of 0.702, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Clarkson has a consensus price target of GBX 5,031.25, indicating a potential upside of 3.18%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Irish Continental Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Irish Continental Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Clarkson	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

In the previous week, Clarkson had 9 more articles in the media than Irish Continental Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Clarkson and 0 mentions for Irish Continental Group. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Irish Continental Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Irish Continental Group	Neutral
Clarkson	Positive

Summary

Clarkson beats Irish Continental Group on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clarkson compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Ocean Wilsons (LON:OCN) and Clarkson (LON:CKN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

12.1% of Ocean Wilsons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Clarkson shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.2% of Ocean Wilsons shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of Clarkson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ocean Wilsons has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clarkson has a beta of 0.702, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Ocean Wilsons pays an annual dividend of GBX 181.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.4%. Clarkson pays an annual dividend of GBX 112 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Ocean Wilsons pays out 19.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Clarkson pays out 44.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ocean Wilsons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Clarkson had 9 more articles in the media than Ocean Wilsons. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Clarkson and 0 mentions for Ocean Wilsons. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Ocean Wilsons' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ocean Wilsons	Neutral
Clarkson	Positive

Clarkson has a consensus price target of GBX 5,031.25, suggesting a potential upside of 3.18%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Ocean Wilsons.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ocean Wilsons	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Clarkson	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Ocean Wilsons. Ocean Wilsons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ocean Wilsons	£26.66M	12.52	£76.94M	£916.60	1.29
Clarkson	£747.10M	2.01	£82.85M	£250.40	19.47

Ocean Wilsons has a net margin of 350.28% compared to Clarkson's net margin of 10.40%. Clarkson's return on equity of 14.50% beat Ocean Wilsons' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ocean Wilsons	350.28%	11.66%	6.02%
Clarkson	10.40%	14.50%	7.79%

Summary

Clarkson beats Ocean Wilsons on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clarkson compare to James Fisher and Sons?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Clarkson (LON:CKN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.803, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clarkson has a beta of 0.702, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Clarkson had 8 more articles in the media than James Fisher and Sons. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Clarkson and 1 mentions for James Fisher and Sons. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat James Fisher and Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Clarkson	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Clarkson shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of Clarkson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

James Fisher and Sons presently has a consensus price target of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 45.88%. Clarkson has a consensus price target of GBX 5,031.25, suggesting a potential upside of 3.18%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Clarkson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Clarkson	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons	£394.40M	0.61	-£52.66M	-£8.70	N/A
Clarkson	£747.10M	2.01	£82.85M	£250.40	19.47

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.40% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Clarkson's return on equity of 14.50% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons	-1.12%	-2.37%	2.84%
Clarkson	10.40%	14.50%	7.79%

Summary

Clarkson beats James Fisher and Sons on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clarkson compare to Global Ports?

Clarkson (LON:CKN) and Global Ports (LON:GPH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Clarkson pays an annual dividend of GBX 112 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Global Ports pays an annual dividend of GBX 37 per share. Clarkson pays out 44.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Ports pays out 370,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Clarkson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

72.0% of Clarkson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Global Ports shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of Clarkson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 78.0% of Global Ports shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Global Ports. Global Ports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Clarkson	£747.10M	2.01	£82.85M	£250.40	19.47
Global Ports	£193.58M	0.00	-£19.81M	£0.01	N/A

In the previous week, Clarkson had 9 more articles in the media than Global Ports. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Clarkson and 0 mentions for Global Ports. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Global Ports' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Clarkson	Positive
Global Ports	Neutral

Clarkson has a beta of 0.702, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ports has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.40% compared to Global Ports' net margin of 0.46%. Global Ports' return on equity of 34.36% beat Clarkson's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Clarkson	10.40%	14.50%	7.79%
Global Ports	0.46%	34.36%	3.88%

Clarkson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,031.25, suggesting a potential upside of 3.18%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Global Ports.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Clarkson	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Global Ports	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Clarkson beats Global Ports on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clarkson compare to Braemar?

Braemar (LON:BMS) and Clarkson (LON:CKN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

14.0% of Braemar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Clarkson shares are held by institutional investors. 16.5% of Braemar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of Clarkson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Braemar has a beta of 0.504, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clarkson has a beta of 0.702, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Braemar currently has a consensus price target of GBX 320, indicating a potential upside of 40.97%. Clarkson has a consensus price target of GBX 5,031.25, indicating a potential upside of 3.18%. Given Braemar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Braemar is more favorable than Clarkson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Braemar	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Clarkson	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Braemar pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Clarkson pays an annual dividend of GBX 112 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Braemar pays out 78.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Clarkson pays out 44.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Clarkson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Clarkson had 8 more articles in the media than Braemar. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Clarkson and 1 mentions for Braemar. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Braemar's score of 0.67 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Braemar	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Clarkson	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Braemar. Clarkson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Braemar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Braemar	£135.61M	0.54	£5.01M	£6.36	35.69
Clarkson	£747.10M	2.01	£82.85M	£250.40	19.47

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.40% compared to Braemar's net margin of 1.68%. Clarkson's return on equity of 14.50% beat Braemar's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Braemar	1.68%	2.74%	7.09%
Clarkson	10.40%	14.50%	7.79%

Summary

Clarkson beats Braemar on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Clarkson News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CKN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Clarkson	Marine Transportation Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£1.50B	£4.79B	£10.85B	£2.89B
Dividend Yield	2.21%	3.24%	120.50%	6.11%
P/E Ratio	19.47	14.69	28.47	368.41
Price / Sales	2.01	50.16	319.14	83,680.67
Price / Cash	3.63	5.66	24.91	27.89
Price / Book	3.19	1.10	4.54	7.17
Net Income	£82.85M	£356.70M	£608.43M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	3.09%	1.38%	3.46%	1.95%
1 Month Performance	9.62%	5.70%	0.94%	1.62%
1 Year Performance	34.51%	31.38%	14.18%	74.53%

Clarkson Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CKN Clarkson	2.1224 of 5 stars	GBX 4,876 -2.3%	GBX 5,031.25 +3.2%	+35.5%	£1.50B	£747.10M	19.47	2,024	News Coverage Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Gap Up
ICGC Irish Continental Group	N/A	GBX 650 -2.3%	N/A	+34.7%	£964.81M	£666.70M	14.19	288
OCN Ocean Wilsons	N/A	GBX 1,180 flat	N/A	+4.9%	£333.82M	£26.66M	1.29	74,200
FSJ James Fisher and Sons	1.8327 of 5 stars	GBX 480 +0.8%	GBX 690 +43.8%	+33.3%	£242.33M	£394.40M	N/A	2,041	Gap Up
GPH Global Ports	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£231.21M	£193.58M	30,000.00	20

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CKN) was last updated on 8/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Clarkson (CKN) Competitors

CKN vs. ICGC, OCN, FSJ, GPH, and BMS

How does Clarkson compare to Irish Continental Group?

Summary

How does Clarkson compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Summary

How does Clarkson compare to James Fisher and Sons?

Summary

How does Clarkson compare to Global Ports?

Summary

How does Clarkson compare to Braemar?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

CKN vs. The Competition

Clarkson Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Clarkson (CKN) Competitors

CKN vs. ICGC, OCN, FSJ, GPH, and BMS

How does Clarkson compare to Irish Continental Group?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ICGC or CKN?

Is ICGC or CKN a better dividend stock?

Is ICGC or CKN more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ICGC or CKN?

Which has more risk and volatility, ICGC or CKN?

Do analysts recommend ICGC or CKN?

Does the media prefer ICGC or CKN?

Summary

How does Clarkson compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of OCN or CKN?

Which has more risk & volatility, OCN or CKN?

Is OCN or CKN a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor OCN or CKN?

Do analysts recommend OCN or CKN?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, OCN or CKN?

Is OCN or CKN more profitable?

Summary

How does Clarkson compare to James Fisher and Sons?

Which has more risk & volatility, FSJ or CKN?

Does the media refer more to FSJ or CKN?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in FSJ or CKN?

Do analysts prefer FSJ or CKN?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, FSJ or CKN?

Is FSJ or CKN more profitable?

Summary

How does Clarkson compare to Global Ports?

Is CKN or GPH a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CKN or GPH?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CKN or GPH?

Does the media prefer CKN or GPH?

Which has more volatility & risk, CKN or GPH?

Is CKN or GPH more profitable?

Do analysts prefer CKN or GPH?

Summary

How does Clarkson compare to Braemar?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of BMS or CKN?

Which has more volatility and risk, BMS or CKN?

Do analysts prefer BMS or CKN?

Is BMS or CKN a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to BMS or CKN?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, BMS or CKN?

Is BMS or CKN more profitable?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

CKN vs. The Competition

Clarkson Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools