Clarkson (CKN) Competitors

Clarkson pays an annual dividend of GBX 110 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Ocean Wilsons pays an annual dividend of GBX 181.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.4%. Clarkson pays out 51.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ocean Wilsons pays out 19.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ocean Wilsons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

72.0% of Clarkson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Ocean Wilsons shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Clarkson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Ocean Wilsons shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Clarkson currently has a consensus price target of GBX 4,775, suggesting a potential upside of 12.25%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Ocean Wilsons.

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Ocean Wilsons. Ocean Wilsons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Clarkson has a beta of 0.691, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ocean Wilsons has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Ocean Wilsons' net margin of -134.00%. Ocean Wilsons' return on equity of 41.24% beat Clarkson's return on equity.

In the previous week, Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Ocean Wilsons' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

In the previous week, Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat James Fisher and Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.41% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Clarkson's return on equity of 12.93% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.804, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clarkson has a beta of 0.691, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

40.0% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Clarkson shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Clarkson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

James Fisher and Sons presently has a consensus target price of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 48.07%. Clarkson has a consensus target price of GBX 4,775, suggesting a potential upside of 12.25%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Clarkson.

Global Ports has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clarkson has a beta of 0.691, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Clarkson has a consensus price target of GBX 4,775, indicating a potential upside of 12.25%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Global Ports.

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Global Ports. Global Ports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

9.3% of Global Ports shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Clarkson shares are held by institutional investors. 78.0% of Global Ports shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Clarkson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Global Ports pays an annual dividend of GBX 37 per share. Clarkson pays an annual dividend of GBX 110 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Global Ports pays out 370,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Clarkson pays out 51.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Clarkson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Global Ports' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Global Ports' net margin of 0.46%. Global Ports' return on equity of 34.36% beat Clarkson's return on equity.

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Braemar. Clarkson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Braemar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Braemar had 1 more articles in the media than Clarkson. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Braemar and 0 mentions for Clarkson. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Braemar's score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Braemar currently has a consensus price target of GBX 320, indicating a potential upside of 34.45%. Clarkson has a consensus price target of GBX 4,775, indicating a potential upside of 12.25%. Given Braemar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Braemar is more favorable than Clarkson.

14.0% of Braemar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Clarkson shares are held by institutional investors. 16.5% of Braemar shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Clarkson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Braemar's net margin of 1.68%. Clarkson's return on equity of 12.93% beat Braemar's return on equity.

Braemar pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Clarkson pays an annual dividend of GBX 110 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Braemar pays out 78.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Clarkson pays out 51.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Clarkson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Braemar has a beta of 0.459, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clarkson has a beta of 0.691, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.