Go Pro

Clarkson (CKN) Competitors

Clarkson logo
GBX 4,704.38 -43.62 (-0.92%)
As of 12:00 PM Eastern

CKN vs. ICGC, OCN, FSJ, GPH, and BMS

Should you buy Clarkson stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Clarkson with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Clarkson include Irish Continental Group (ICGC), Ocean Wilsons (OCN), James Fisher and Sons (FSJ), Global Ports (GPH), and Braemar (BMS). These companies are all part of the "marine shipping" industry.

How does Clarkson compare to Irish Continental Group?

Clarkson (LON:CKN) and Irish Continental Group (LON:ICGC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

Clarkson pays an annual dividend of GBX 110 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Irish Continental Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Clarkson pays out 51.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Irish Continental Group pays out 34.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Irish Continental Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

72.0% of Clarkson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of Clarkson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.6% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Clarkson and Clarkson both had 1 articles in the media. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.75 equaled Irish Continental Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Clarkson
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Irish Continental Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Clarkson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 4,775, indicating a potential upside of 1.50%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Irish Continental Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clarkson
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Irish Continental Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Clarkson has a beta of 0.703, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Irish Continental Group has a beta of 0.378, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Irish Continental Group has a net margin of 11.23% compared to Clarkson's net margin of 10.41%. Irish Continental Group's return on equity of 25.50% beat Clarkson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clarkson10.41% 12.93% 7.79%
Irish Continental Group 11.23%25.50%6.96%

Clarkson has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Irish Continental Group. Irish Continental Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clarkson£631.40M2.29£82.85M£212.9022.10
Irish Continental Group£666.70M1.21£74.00M£45.8011.86

Summary

Clarkson beats Irish Continental Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clarkson compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Ocean Wilsons (LON:OCN) and Clarkson (LON:CKN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Ocean Wilsons has a net margin of 350.28% compared to Clarkson's net margin of 10.41%. Clarkson's return on equity of 12.93% beat Ocean Wilsons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ocean Wilsons350.28% 11.66% 6.02%
Clarkson 10.41%12.93%7.79%

12.1% of Ocean Wilsons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Clarkson shares are held by institutional investors. 31.2% of Ocean Wilsons shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of Clarkson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ocean Wilsons pays an annual dividend of GBX 181.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.4%. Clarkson pays an annual dividend of GBX 110 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Ocean Wilsons pays out 19.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Clarkson pays out 51.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ocean Wilsons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Ocean Wilsons has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clarkson has a beta of 0.703, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Clarkson had 1 more articles in the media than Ocean Wilsons. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Clarkson and 0 mentions for Ocean Wilsons. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ocean Wilsons' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ocean Wilsons Neutral
Clarkson Positive

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Ocean Wilsons. Ocean Wilsons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ocean Wilsons£26.66M12.52£76.94M£916.601.29
Clarkson£631.40M2.29£82.85M£212.9022.10

Clarkson has a consensus target price of GBX 4,775, indicating a potential upside of 1.50%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Ocean Wilsons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ocean Wilsons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Clarkson
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Summary

Clarkson beats Ocean Wilsons on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clarkson compare to James Fisher and Sons?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Clarkson (LON:CKN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.59-£52.66M-£8.70N/A
Clarkson£631.40M2.29£82.85M£212.9022.10

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.803, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clarkson has a beta of 0.703, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.41% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Clarkson's return on equity of 12.93% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons-1.12% -2.37% 2.84%
Clarkson 10.41%12.93%7.79%

James Fisher and Sons presently has a consensus target price of GBX 690, indicating a potential upside of 49.03%. Clarkson has a consensus target price of GBX 4,775, indicating a potential upside of 1.50%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Clarkson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Clarkson
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

In the previous week, Clarkson had 1 more articles in the media than James Fisher and Sons. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Clarkson and 0 mentions for James Fisher and Sons. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat James Fisher and Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons Neutral
Clarkson Positive

39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Clarkson shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of Clarkson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Clarkson beats James Fisher and Sons on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clarkson compare to Global Ports?

Clarkson (LON:CKN) and Global Ports (LON:GPH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Global Ports. Global Ports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clarkson£631.40M2.29£82.85M£212.9022.10
Global Ports£193.58M0.00-£19.81M£0.01N/A

Clarkson has a beta of 0.703, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ports has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

Clarkson pays an annual dividend of GBX 110 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Global Ports pays an annual dividend of GBX 37 per share. Clarkson pays out 51.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Ports pays out 370,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Clarkson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

72.0% of Clarkson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Global Ports shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of Clarkson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 78.0% of Global Ports shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Clarkson had 1 more articles in the media than Global Ports. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Clarkson and 0 mentions for Global Ports. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Global Ports' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clarkson Positive
Global Ports Neutral

Clarkson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 4,775, indicating a potential upside of 1.50%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Global Ports.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clarkson
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Global Ports
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Global Ports' net margin of 0.46%. Global Ports' return on equity of 34.36% beat Clarkson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clarkson10.41% 12.93% 7.79%
Global Ports 0.46%34.36%3.88%

Summary

Clarkson beats Global Ports on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clarkson compare to Braemar?

Braemar (LON:BMS) and Clarkson (LON:CKN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Clarkson had 1 more articles in the media than Braemar. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Clarkson and 0 mentions for Braemar. Braemar's average media sentiment score of 0.75 equaled Clarkson'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Braemar Positive
Clarkson Positive

Braemar pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Clarkson pays an annual dividend of GBX 110 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Braemar pays out 78.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Clarkson pays out 51.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Clarkson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Braemar's net margin of 1.68%. Clarkson's return on equity of 12.93% beat Braemar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Braemar1.68% 2.74% 7.09%
Clarkson 10.41%12.93%7.79%

14.0% of Braemar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Clarkson shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of Braemar shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of Clarkson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Braemar. Clarkson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Braemar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Braemar£135.61M0.56£5.01M£6.3637.26
Clarkson£631.40M2.29£82.85M£212.9022.10

Braemar has a beta of 0.504, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clarkson has a beta of 0.703, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Braemar currently has a consensus price target of GBX 320, indicating a potential upside of 35.02%. Clarkson has a consensus price target of GBX 4,775, indicating a potential upside of 1.50%. Given Braemar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Braemar is more favorable than Clarkson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Braemar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Clarkson
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Summary

Clarkson beats Braemar on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Clarkson News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CKN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CKN vs. The Competition

MetricClarksonMarine Shipping IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.45B£5.67B£9.43B£2.77B
Dividend Yield2.42%2.52%3.53%6.15%
P/E Ratio22.1019.1026.87368.16
Price / Sales2.29184.521,962.3384,554.80
Price / Cash3.635.1327.4427.89
Price / Book3.081.764.407.53
Net Income£82.85M£180.25M£791.21M£5.89B
7 Day Performance6.29%1.92%-0.18%5.85%
1 Month Performance5.76%-0.24%-0.50%4.48%
1 Year Performance37.55%22.18%14.53%62.28%

Clarkson Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CKN
Clarkson
2.0224 of 5 stars
GBX 4,704.38
-0.9%
GBX 4,775
+1.5%
+40.7%£1.45B£631.40M22.102,024
ICGC
Irish Continental Group
N/AGBX 546.96
-1.4%
N/A+12.5%£811.87M£666.70M11.94288
OCN
Ocean Wilsons
N/AGBX 1,180
flat
N/A-20.0%£333.82M£26.66M1.2974,200
FSJ
James Fisher and Sons
N/AGBX 465
flat
GBX 690
+48.4%
+33.6%£234.76M£394.40MN/A2,041
GPH
Global Ports
N/AN/AN/AN/A£231.21M£193.58M30,000.0020

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CKN) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners