Go Pro
→ Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free MPL Stock Alerts

Mercantile Ports & Logistics (MPL) Competitors

Mercantile Ports & Logistics logo
GBX 1.40 +0.20 (+16.67%)
As of 11:41 AM Eastern
Compare

MPL vs. CKN, ICGC, OCN, GPH, and FSJ

Should you buy Mercantile Ports & Logistics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mercantile Ports & Logistics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mercantile Ports & Logistics include Clarkson (CKN), Irish Continental Group (ICGC), Ocean Wilsons (OCN), Global Ports (GPH), and James Fisher and Sons (FSJ). These companies are all part of the "marine shipping" industry.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to Clarkson?

Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) and Clarkson (LON:CKN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

10.0% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of Clarkson shares are held by institutional investors. 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of Clarkson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clarkson has a beta of 0.703, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Mercantile Ports & Logistics' net margin of 0.00%. Clarkson's return on equity of 12.93% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mercantile Ports & LogisticsN/A -27.50% -2.36%
Clarkson 10.41%12.93%7.79%

In the previous week, Clarkson had 1 more articles in the media than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Clarkson and 0 mentions for Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral
Clarkson Positive

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.17-£21.86M-£8.50N/A
Clarkson£631.40M2.29£82.85M£212.9022.10

Clarkson has a consensus price target of GBX 4,775, indicating a potential upside of 1.50%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Mercantile Ports & Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Clarkson
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Summary

Clarkson beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to Irish Continental Group?

Irish Continental Group (LON:ICGC) and Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Irish Continental Group has a beta of 0.378, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

24.4% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.0% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.6% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Irish Continental Group has a net margin of 11.23% compared to Mercantile Ports & Logistics' net margin of 0.00%. Irish Continental Group's return on equity of 25.50% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Irish Continental Group11.23% 25.50% 6.96%
Mercantile Ports & Logistics N/A -27.50%-2.36%

In the previous week, Irish Continental Group had 1 more articles in the media than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Irish Continental Group and 0 mentions for Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Irish Continental Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' score of 0.00 indicating that Irish Continental Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Irish Continental Group Positive
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral

Irish Continental Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Irish Continental Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Irish Continental Group£666.70M1.21£74.00M£45.8011.86
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.17-£21.86M-£8.50N/A

Summary

Irish Continental Group beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) and Ocean Wilsons (LON:OCN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and risk.

Ocean Wilsons has higher revenue and earnings than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ocean Wilsons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.17-£21.86M-£8.50N/A
Ocean Wilsons£26.66M12.52£76.94M£916.601.29

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ocean Wilsons has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

10.0% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Ocean Wilsons shares are held by institutional investors. 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Ocean Wilsons shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ocean Wilsons has a net margin of 350.28% compared to Mercantile Ports & Logistics' net margin of 0.00%. Ocean Wilsons' return on equity of 11.66% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mercantile Ports & LogisticsN/A -27.50% -2.36%
Ocean Wilsons 350.28%11.66%6.02%

In the previous week, Mercantile Ports & Logistics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ocean Wilsons'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral
Ocean Wilsons Neutral

Summary

Ocean Wilsons beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to Global Ports?

Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) and Global Ports (LON:GPH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ports has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

Global Ports has a net margin of 0.46% compared to Mercantile Ports & Logistics' net margin of 0.00%. Global Ports' return on equity of 34.36% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mercantile Ports & LogisticsN/A -27.50% -2.36%
Global Ports 0.46%34.36%3.88%

10.0% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Global Ports shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 78.0% of Global Ports shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mercantile Ports & Logistics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Global Ports'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral
Global Ports Neutral

Global Ports has higher revenue and earnings than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Ports, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.17-£21.86M-£8.50N/A
Global Ports£193.58M0.00-£19.81M£0.01N/A

Summary

Global Ports beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to James Fisher and Sons?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and profitability.

James Fisher and Sons currently has a consensus price target of GBX 690, indicating a potential upside of 49.03%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Mercantile Ports & Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.803, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.0% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercantile Ports & Logistics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.59-£52.66M-£8.70N/A
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.17-£21.86M-£8.50N/A

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. James Fisher and Sons' return on equity of -2.37% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons-1.12% -2.37% 2.84%
Mercantile Ports & Logistics N/A -27.50%-2.36%

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mercantile Ports & Logistics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons Neutral
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral

Summary

James Fisher and Sons beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mercantile Ports & Logistics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MPL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MPL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMercantile Ports & LogisticsMarine Shipping IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.99M£5.70B£9.39B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A2.52%3.52%6.15%
P/E Ratio-0.1619.1026.58368.16
Price / Sales1.17184.521,962.3384,554.80
Price / Cash0.805.1327.4227.89
Price / Book0.071.764.407.53
Net Income-£21.86M£180.25M£791.21M£5.89B
7 Day Performance12.72%1.92%-0.18%5.85%
1 Month Performance-11.17%-0.24%-0.50%4.48%
1 Year Performance-3.45%22.18%14.53%62.28%

Mercantile Ports & Logistics Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MPL
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
N/AGBX 1.40
+16.7%		N/A-14.5%£4.99M£4.28MN/A44
CKN
Clarkson
2.0224 of 5 stars		GBX 4,392
-1.3%		GBX 4,775
+8.7%		+40.7%£1.35B£631.40M20.632,024
ICGC
Irish Continental Group
N/AGBX 555
+2.3%		N/A+12.5%£823.80M£666.70M12.12288
OCN
Ocean Wilsons
N/AGBX 1,180
flat		N/A-20.0%£333.82M£26.66M1.2974,200
GPH
Global Ports
N/AN/AN/AN/A£231.21M£193.58M30,000.0020

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MPL) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel