Go Pro
→ Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free MPL Stock Alerts

Mercantile Ports & Logistics (MPL) Competitors

Mercantile Ports & Logistics logo
GBX 2.04 -0.21 (-9.16%)
As of 06/26/2026 12:11 PM Eastern
Compare

MPL vs. CKN, ICGC, OCN, FSJ, and GPH

Should you buy Mercantile Ports & Logistics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mercantile Ports & Logistics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mercantile Ports & Logistics include Clarkson (CKN), Irish Continental Group (ICGC), Ocean Wilsons (OCN), James Fisher and Sons (FSJ), and Global Ports (GPH). These companies are all part of the "marine shipping" industry.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to Clarkson?

Clarkson (LON:CKN) and Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Clarkson has a beta of 0.691, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mercantile Ports & Logistics had 2 more articles in the media than Clarkson. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Mercantile Ports & Logistics and 0 mentions for Clarkson. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' score of 0.38 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clarkson Very Positive
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral

Clarkson currently has a consensus price target of GBX 4,775, indicating a potential upside of 12.25%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Mercantile Ports & Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clarkson
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clarkson£631.40M2.07£82.85M£212.9019.98
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.70-£21.86M-£8.50N/A

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Mercantile Ports & Logistics' net margin of 0.00%. Clarkson's return on equity of 12.93% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clarkson10.41% 12.93% 7.79%
Mercantile Ports & Logistics N/A -27.50%-2.36%

72.0% of Clarkson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.3% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Clarkson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Clarkson beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to Irish Continental Group?

Irish Continental Group (LON:ICGC) and Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Irish Continental Group has a net margin of 11.23% compared to Mercantile Ports & Logistics' net margin of 0.00%. Irish Continental Group's return on equity of 25.50% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Irish Continental Group11.23% 25.50% 6.96%
Mercantile Ports & Logistics N/A -27.50%-2.36%

23.8% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.3% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.6% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Irish Continental Group has a beta of 0.383, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Irish Continental Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Irish Continental Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Irish Continental Group£666.70M1.22£74.00M£45.8012.01
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.70-£21.86M-£8.50N/A

In the previous week, Mercantile Ports & Logistics had 2 more articles in the media than Irish Continental Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Mercantile Ports & Logistics and 0 mentions for Irish Continental Group. Mercantile Ports & Logistics' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Irish Continental Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Mercantile Ports & Logistics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Irish Continental Group Neutral
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral

Summary

Irish Continental Group beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) and Ocean Wilsons (LON:OCN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

18.3% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Ocean Wilsons shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Ocean Wilsons shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ocean Wilsons has higher revenue and earnings than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ocean Wilsons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.70-£21.86M-£8.50N/A
Ocean Wilsons£26.66M12.52£76.94M£916.601.29

In the previous week, Mercantile Ports & Logistics had 2 more articles in the media than Ocean Wilsons. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Mercantile Ports & Logistics and 0 mentions for Ocean Wilsons. Mercantile Ports & Logistics' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Ocean Wilsons' score of 0.00 indicating that Mercantile Ports & Logistics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral
Ocean Wilsons Neutral

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ocean Wilsons' net margin of -134.00%. Ocean Wilsons' return on equity of 41.24% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mercantile Ports & LogisticsN/A -27.50% -2.36%
Ocean Wilsons -134.00%41.24%6.02%

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ocean Wilsons has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ocean Wilsons beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to James Fisher and Sons?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercantile Ports & Logistics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.60-£52.66M-£8.70N/A
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.70-£21.86M-£8.50N/A

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.804, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

James Fisher and Sons currently has a consensus target price of GBX 690, indicating a potential upside of 48.07%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Mercantile Ports & Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Mercantile Ports & Logistics had 2 more articles in the media than James Fisher and Sons. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Mercantile Ports & Logistics and 0 mentions for James Fisher and Sons. Mercantile Ports & Logistics' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat James Fisher and Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Mercantile Ports & Logistics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons Neutral
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral

40.0% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.3% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. James Fisher and Sons' return on equity of -2.37% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons-1.12% -2.37% 2.84%
Mercantile Ports & Logistics N/A -27.50%-2.36%

Summary

James Fisher and Sons and Mercantile Ports & Logistics tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to Global Ports?

Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) and Global Ports (LON:GPH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and profitability.

Global Ports has higher revenue and earnings than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Ports, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.70-£21.86M-£8.50N/A
Global Ports£193.58M0.00-£19.81M£0.01N/A

Global Ports has a net margin of 0.46% compared to Mercantile Ports & Logistics' net margin of 0.00%. Global Ports' return on equity of 34.36% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mercantile Ports & LogisticsN/A -27.50% -2.36%
Global Ports 0.46%34.36%3.88%

18.3% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Global Ports shares are held by institutional investors. 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 78.0% of Global Ports shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ports has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mercantile Ports & Logistics had 2 more articles in the media than Global Ports. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Mercantile Ports & Logistics and 0 mentions for Global Ports. Mercantile Ports & Logistics' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Global Ports' score of 0.00 indicating that Mercantile Ports & Logistics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral
Global Ports Neutral

Summary

Global Ports beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mercantile Ports & Logistics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MPL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MPL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMercantile Ports & LogisticsMarine Shipping IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£7.28M£5.11B£9.61B£2.79B
Dividend YieldN/A2.57%3.54%6.16%
P/E Ratio-0.2418.2425.65366.66
Price / Sales1.70187.804,851.7286,088.44
Price / Cash0.805.1327.9827.87
Price / Book0.111.674.587.79
Net Income-£21.86M£180.25M£792.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance42.94%-0.62%0.13%-0.61%
1 Month Performance7.52%-2.74%-0.86%-1.14%
1 Year Performance127.11%24.02%21.54%65.93%

Mercantile Ports & Logistics Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MPL
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
N/AGBX 2.04
-9.2%		N/A+115.2%£7.28M£4.28MN/A44
CKN
Clarkson
3.0173 of 5 stars		GBX 4,488
-0.8%		GBX 4,775
+6.4%		+30.5%£1.38B£631.40M21.082,024
ICGC
Irish Continental Group
N/AGBX 545
-2.7%		N/A+17.3%£808.96M£666.70M11.90288
OCN
Ocean Wilsons
N/AGBX 1,180
flat		N/A-21.1%£333.82M£26.66M1.2974,200
FSJ
James Fisher and Sons
N/AGBX 504.40
+2.7%		GBX 690
+36.8%		+28.7%£254.65M£394.40MN/A2,041

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MPL) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX is offering you shares. Don't take them.
SpaceX is reserving 30% of its IPO shares for retail investors through Robinhood, Fidelity, and Schwab. At a $...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump just signed it
A recent policy development is drawing attention from income-focused investors. According to one analyst, c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Better than SpaceX? Grab this ticker instead.
Larry Benedict generated $274 million for his clients by finding the trades most investors missed. Now he says...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel