Free Trial
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free MPL Stock Alerts

Mercantile Ports & Logistics (MPL) Competitors

Mercantile Ports & Logistics logo
GBX 1.35 -0.20 (-12.90%)
As of 12:41 PM Eastern
Compare

MPL vs. CKN, ICGC, OCN, FSJ, and GPH

Should you buy Mercantile Ports & Logistics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mercantile Ports & Logistics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mercantile Ports & Logistics include Clarkson (CKN), Irish Continental Group (ICGC), Ocean Wilsons (OCN), James Fisher and Sons (FSJ), and Global Ports (GPH). These companies are all part of the "marine shipping" industry.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to Clarkson?

Clarkson (LON:CKN) and Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Mercantile Ports & Logistics' net margin of 0.00%. Clarkson's return on equity of 12.93% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clarkson10.41% 12.93% 7.79%
Mercantile Ports & Logistics N/A -27.50%-2.36%

Clarkson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 4,775, suggesting a potential upside of 2.07%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Mercantile Ports & Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clarkson
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

72.0% of Clarkson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Clarkson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Clarkson has a beta of 0.699, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clarkson£631.40M2.28£82.85M£212.9021.97
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.12-£21.86M-£8.50N/A

In the previous week, Clarkson had 2 more articles in the media than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Clarkson and 0 mentions for Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clarkson Positive
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral

Summary

Clarkson beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to Irish Continental Group?

Irish Continental Group (LON:ICGC) and Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Irish Continental Group has a net margin of 11.23% compared to Mercantile Ports & Logistics' net margin of 0.00%. Irish Continental Group's return on equity of 25.50% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Irish Continental Group11.23% 25.50% 6.96%
Mercantile Ports & Logistics N/A -27.50%-2.36%

23.9% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.4% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Irish Continental Group has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Irish Continental Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Irish Continental Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Irish Continental Group£666.70M1.20£74.00M£45.8011.80
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.12-£21.86M-£8.50N/A

In the previous week, Irish Continental Group had 1 more articles in the media than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Irish Continental Group and 0 mentions for Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Irish Continental Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' score of 0.00 indicating that Irish Continental Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Irish Continental Group Positive
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral

Summary

Irish Continental Group beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Ocean Wilsons (LON:OCN) and Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Ocean Wilsons has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Ocean Wilsons has higher revenue and earnings than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ocean Wilsons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ocean Wilsons£26.66M12.52£76.94M£916.601.29
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.12-£21.86M-£8.50N/A

In the previous week, Ocean Wilsons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mercantile Ports & Logistics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ocean Wilsons Neutral
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral

12.1% of Ocean Wilsons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. 31.2% of Ocean Wilsons shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ocean Wilsons' net margin of -134.00%. Ocean Wilsons' return on equity of 41.24% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ocean Wilsons-134.00% 41.24% 6.02%
Mercantile Ports & Logistics N/A -27.50%-2.36%

Summary

Ocean Wilsons beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to James Fisher and Sons?

Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.773, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. James Fisher and Sons' return on equity of -2.37% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mercantile Ports & LogisticsN/A -27.50% -2.36%
James Fisher and Sons -1.12%-2.37%2.84%

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercantile Ports & Logistics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.12-£21.86M-£8.50N/A
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.66-£52.66M-£8.70N/A

James Fisher and Sons has a consensus price target of GBX 660, suggesting a potential upside of 28.40%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Mercantile Ports & Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

18.7% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.6% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mercantile Ports & Logistics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Fisher and Sons'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral
James Fisher and Sons Neutral

Summary

James Fisher and Sons beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercantile Ports & Logistics compare to Global Ports?

Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) and Global Ports (LON:GPH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Mercantile Ports & Logistics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Global Ports'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral
Global Ports Neutral

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ports has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

Global Ports has higher revenue and earnings than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Ports, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.12-£21.86M-£8.50N/A
Global Ports£193.58M0.00-£19.81M£0.01N/A

Global Ports has a net margin of 0.46% compared to Mercantile Ports & Logistics' net margin of 0.00%. Global Ports' return on equity of 34.36% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mercantile Ports & LogisticsN/A -27.50% -2.36%
Global Ports 0.46%34.36%3.88%

18.7% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Global Ports shares are held by institutional investors. 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 78.0% of Global Ports shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Global Ports beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mercantile Ports & Logistics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MPL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MPL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMercantile Ports & LogisticsMarine Shipping IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.81M£5.39B£9.43B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A2.54%3.53%6.12%
P/E Ratio-0.1618.6124.92365.54
Price / Sales1.12184.415,034.5987,173.10
Price / Cash0.805.1328.0427.85
Price / Book0.071.744.887.68
Net Income-£21.86M£180.25M£794.09M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-17.33%0.67%-1.41%-0.55%
1 Month Performance204.74%11.63%1.08%3.15%
1 Year Performance35.00%28.86%27.47%73.57%

Mercantile Ports & Logistics Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MPL
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
N/AGBX 1.35
-12.9%		N/A+50.0%£4.81M£4.28MN/A44
CKN
Clarkson
2.4701 of 5 stars		GBX 4,821.21
+0.4%		GBX 4,775
-1.0%		+39.2%£1.48B£631.40M22.652,024
ICGC
Irish Continental Group
N/AGBX 550
-1.8%		N/A+22.7%£816.38M£666.70M12.01288
OCN
Ocean Wilsons
N/AGBX 1,180
flat		N/A-17.2%£333.82M£26.66M1.2974,200
FSJ
James Fisher and Sons
N/AGBX 477
+1.7%		GBX 660
+38.4%		+55.1%£240.81M£394.40MN/A2,041

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MPL) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
$30 stock to buy before Starlink goes public (WATCH NOW!)
In the next 3 minutes… James Altucher – legendary investor and venture capitalist… And someone who’s kno...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
June 12: $100 Turns Into $100,000?
The SpaceX IPO is scheduled for June 12, and former tech executive Jeff Brown - who identified Bitcoin, Tesla,...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX just filed. The clock is ticking.
Reuters reports Elon Musk filed secretly. Barron's says it's being finalized behind closed doors. CNBC just re...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX will mint billionaires. You won't be one of them.
By the time a company goes public, 95% of profits have already been made. Insiders bought SpaceX at $20 billio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX IPO hides a much bigger story
The SpaceX IPO could be the biggest in history at $1.75 trillion - but the real story isn't the IPO itself. ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Hey, it's Jon Najarian. The SpaceX IPO is right around the corner. But I discovered Elon may have something BIGGER planned. Check this out before June 9th...
After being invited to the SpaceX launch headquarters in Cape Canaveral from one of Elon's top lobbyists… Hall...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel