Go Pro
→ Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free ICGC Stock Alerts

Irish Continental Group (ICGC) Competitors

Irish Continental Group logo
GBX 615 -12.50 (-1.99%)
As of 08/26/2026 11:50 AM Eastern
Compare

ICGC vs. CKN, OCN, FSJ, GPH, and BMS

Should you buy Irish Continental Group stock or one of its competitors? Irish Continental Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Clarkson (CKN), Ocean Wilsons (OCN), James Fisher and Sons (FSJ), Global Ports (GPH), and Braemar (BMS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "marine transportation" industry.

How does Irish Continental Group compare to Clarkson?

Clarkson (LON:CKN) and Irish Continental Group (LON:ICGC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.40% compared to Irish Continental Group's net margin of 10.34%. Irish Continental Group's return on equity of 26.12% beat Clarkson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clarkson10.40% 14.50% 7.79%
Irish Continental Group 10.34%26.12%6.96%

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than Irish Continental Group. Irish Continental Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clarkson£747.10M2.06£82.85M£250.4019.99
Irish Continental Group£716.70M1.27£74.00M£45.8013.43

Clarkson has a beta of 0.702, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Irish Continental Group has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Clarkson pays an annual dividend of GBX 112 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Irish Continental Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Clarkson pays out 44.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Irish Continental Group pays out 34.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Irish Continental Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

72.0% of Clarkson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of Clarkson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.6% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Irish Continental Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clarkson Positive
Irish Continental Group Neutral

Clarkson currently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,031.25, indicating a potential upside of 0.52%. Given Clarkson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Clarkson is more favorable than Irish Continental Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clarkson
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Irish Continental Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Clarkson beats Irish Continental Group on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Irish Continental Group compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Ocean Wilsons (LON:OCN) and Irish Continental Group (LON:ICGC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Ocean Wilsons has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Irish Continental Group has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ocean Wilsons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Irish Continental Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ocean Wilsons Neutral
Irish Continental Group Neutral

Ocean Wilsons pays an annual dividend of GBX 181.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.4%. Irish Continental Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Ocean Wilsons pays out 19.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Irish Continental Group pays out 34.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ocean Wilsons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

12.1% of Ocean Wilsons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of Irish Continental Group shares are held by institutional investors. 31.2% of Ocean Wilsons shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.6% of Irish Continental Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ocean Wilsons has a net margin of 350.28% compared to Irish Continental Group's net margin of 10.34%. Irish Continental Group's return on equity of 26.12% beat Ocean Wilsons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ocean Wilsons350.28% 11.66% 6.02%
Irish Continental Group 10.34%26.12%6.96%

Ocean Wilsons has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Irish Continental Group. Ocean Wilsons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Irish Continental Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ocean Wilsons£26.66M12.52£76.94M£916.601.29
Irish Continental Group£716.70M1.27£74.00M£45.8013.43

Summary

Ocean Wilsons beats Irish Continental Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Irish Continental Group compare to James Fisher and Sons?

Irish Continental Group (LON:ICGC) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Irish Continental Group has a net margin of 10.34% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Irish Continental Group's return on equity of 26.12% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Irish Continental Group10.34% 26.12% 6.96%
James Fisher and Sons -1.12%-2.37%2.84%

James Fisher and Sons has a consensus target price of GBX 690, indicating a potential upside of 58.26%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Irish Continental Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Irish Continental Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

24.4% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.6% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Irish Continental Group has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.794, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons had 1 more articles in the media than Irish Continental Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Fisher and Sons and 0 mentions for Irish Continental Group. Irish Continental Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Fisher and Sons'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Irish Continental Group Neutral
James Fisher and Sons Neutral

Irish Continental Group has higher revenue and earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Irish Continental Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Irish Continental Group£716.70M1.27£74.00M£45.8013.43
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.56-£52.66M-£8.70N/A

Summary

Irish Continental Group beats James Fisher and Sons on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Irish Continental Group compare to Global Ports?

Global Ports (LON:GPH) and Irish Continental Group (LON:ICGC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Irish Continental Group has higher revenue and earnings than Global Ports. Global Ports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Irish Continental Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Ports£193.58M0.00-£19.81M£0.01N/A
Irish Continental Group£716.70M1.27£74.00M£45.8013.43

9.3% of Global Ports shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 78.0% of Global Ports shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.6% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Global Ports pays an annual dividend of GBX 37 per share. Irish Continental Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Global Ports pays out 370,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Irish Continental Group pays out 34.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Irish Continental Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Irish Continental Group has a net margin of 10.34% compared to Global Ports' net margin of 0.46%. Global Ports' return on equity of 34.36% beat Irish Continental Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Ports0.46% 34.36% 3.88%
Irish Continental Group 10.34%26.12%6.96%

Global Ports has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Irish Continental Group has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Global Ports' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Irish Continental Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Global Ports Neutral
Irish Continental Group Neutral

Summary

Irish Continental Group beats Global Ports on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Irish Continental Group compare to Braemar?

Braemar (LON:BMS) and Irish Continental Group (LON:ICGC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Irish Continental Group has a net margin of 10.34% compared to Braemar's net margin of 1.68%. Irish Continental Group's return on equity of 26.12% beat Braemar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Braemar1.68% 2.74% 7.09%
Irish Continental Group 10.34%26.12%6.96%

14.0% of Braemar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of Irish Continental Group shares are held by institutional investors. 16.5% of Braemar shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.6% of Irish Continental Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Irish Continental Group has higher revenue and earnings than Braemar. Irish Continental Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Braemar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Braemar£135.61M0.54£5.01M£6.3635.69
Irish Continental Group£716.70M1.27£74.00M£45.8013.43

In the previous week, Braemar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Irish Continental Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Braemar Neutral
Irish Continental Group Neutral

Braemar presently has a consensus target price of GBX 320, suggesting a potential upside of 40.97%. Given Braemar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Braemar is more favorable than Irish Continental Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Braemar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Irish Continental Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Braemar pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Irish Continental Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Braemar pays out 78.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Irish Continental Group pays out 34.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Irish Continental Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Braemar has a beta of 0.501, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Irish Continental Group has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Irish Continental Group beats Braemar on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Irish Continental Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ICGC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ICGC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricIrish Continental GroupMarine Transportation IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£912.86M£4.84B£10.68B£2.91B
Dividend Yield2.27%3.56%97.24%6.17%
P/E Ratio13.4313.9023.63367.36
Price / Sales1.2748.28357.2283,550.18
Price / Cash16.906.2124.4927.89
Price / Book3.671.134.496.89
Net Income£74.00M£358.06M£611.08M£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.50%1.84%0.16%0.77%
1 Month Performance-9.05%9.99%1.90%3.00%
1 Year Performance26.54%39.94%11.17%22.61%

Irish Continental Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ICGC
Irish Continental Group
N/AGBX 615
-2.0%		N/A+26.0%£912.86M£716.70M13.43288
CKN
Clarkson
1.9679 of 5 stars		GBX 5,045
+0.4%		GBX 5,031.25
-0.3%		+37.5%£1.55B£747.10M20.152,024
OCN
Ocean Wilsons
N/AGBX 1,180
flat		N/A-2.1%£333.82M£26.66M1.2974,200
FSJ
James Fisher and Sons
1.8495 of 5 stars		GBX 459
-0.2%		GBX 690
+50.3%		+31.7%£231.73M£394.40MN/A2,041
GPH
Global Ports
N/AN/AN/AN/A£231.21M£193.58M30,000.0020

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:ICGC) was last updated on 8/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel