Go Pro
→ Read now. Do not delete. You’ve been warned. (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free FSJ Stock Alerts

James Fisher and Sons (FSJ) Competitors

James Fisher and Sons logo
GBX 466 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/26/2026 12:03 PM Eastern
Compare

FSJ vs. ICGC, OCN, GPH, BMS, and MPL

Should you buy James Fisher and Sons stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares James Fisher and Sons with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with James Fisher and Sons include Irish Continental Group (ICGC), Ocean Wilsons (OCN), Global Ports (GPH), Braemar (BMS), and Mercantile Ports & Logistics (MPL). These companies are all part of the "marine shipping" industry.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Irish Continental Group?

Irish Continental Group (LON:ICGC) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Irish Continental Group has higher revenue and earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Irish Continental Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Irish Continental Group£666.70M1.22£74.00M£45.8012.01
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.60-£52.66M-£8.70N/A

James Fisher and Sons has a consensus target price of GBX 690, indicating a potential upside of 48.07%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Irish Continental Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Irish Continental Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Irish Continental Group has a net margin of 11.23% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Irish Continental Group's return on equity of 25.50% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Irish Continental Group11.23% 25.50% 6.96%
James Fisher and Sons -1.12%-2.37%2.84%

In the previous week, Irish Continental Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Fisher and Sons'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Irish Continental Group Neutral
James Fisher and Sons Neutral

23.8% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.0% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.6% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Irish Continental Group has a beta of 0.383, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.804, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Irish Continental Group beats James Fisher and Sons on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Ocean Wilsons (LON:OCN) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

James Fisher and Sons has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Ocean Wilsons' net margin of -134.00%. Ocean Wilsons' return on equity of 41.24% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ocean Wilsons-134.00% 41.24% 6.02%
James Fisher and Sons -1.12%-2.37%2.84%

Ocean Wilsons has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.804, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

12.1% of Ocean Wilsons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.0% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.2% of Ocean Wilsons shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

James Fisher and Sons has a consensus target price of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 48.07%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Ocean Wilsons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ocean Wilsons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Ocean Wilsons has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ocean Wilsons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ocean Wilsons£26.66M12.52£76.94M£916.601.29
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.60-£52.66M-£8.70N/A

In the previous week, Ocean Wilsons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Fisher and Sons'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ocean Wilsons Neutral
James Fisher and Sons Neutral

Summary

Ocean Wilsons beats James Fisher and Sons on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Global Ports?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Global Ports (LON:GPH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Global Ports'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons Neutral
Global Ports Neutral

Global Ports has a net margin of 0.46% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Global Ports' return on equity of 34.36% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons-1.12% -2.37% 2.84%
Global Ports 0.46%34.36%3.88%

James Fisher and Sons currently has a consensus price target of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 48.07%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Global Ports.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Global Ports
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

40.0% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Global Ports shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 78.0% of Global Ports shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Global Ports has lower revenue, but higher earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Ports, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.60-£52.66M-£8.70N/A
Global Ports£193.58M0.00-£19.81M£0.01N/A

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.804, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ports has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Global Ports beats James Fisher and Sons on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Braemar?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Braemar (LON:BMS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Braemar had 1 more articles in the media than James Fisher and Sons. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Braemar and 0 mentions for James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Braemar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons Neutral
Braemar Neutral

Braemar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Braemar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.60-£52.66M-£8.70N/A
Braemar£135.61M0.56£5.01M£6.3637.42

Braemar has a net margin of 1.68% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Braemar's return on equity of 2.74% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons-1.12% -2.37% 2.84%
Braemar 1.68%2.74%7.09%

40.0% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.0% of Braemar shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of Braemar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.804, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Braemar has a beta of 0.459, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

James Fisher and Sons currently has a consensus target price of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 48.07%. Braemar has a consensus target price of GBX 320, suggesting a potential upside of 34.45%. Given James Fisher and Sons' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Braemar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Braemar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Braemar beats James Fisher and Sons on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Mercantile Ports & Logistics?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercantile Ports & Logistics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.60-£52.66M-£8.70N/A
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£4.28M1.70-£21.86M-£8.50N/A

In the previous week, Mercantile Ports & Logistics had 2 more articles in the media than James Fisher and Sons. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Mercantile Ports & Logistics and 0 mentions for James Fisher and Sons. Mercantile Ports & Logistics' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat James Fisher and Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Mercantile Ports & Logistics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons Neutral
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. James Fisher and Sons' return on equity of -2.37% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons-1.12% -2.37% 2.84%
Mercantile Ports & Logistics N/A -27.50%-2.36%

James Fisher and Sons currently has a consensus price target of GBX 690, indicating a potential upside of 48.07%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Mercantile Ports & Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

40.0% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.3% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.804, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

James Fisher and Sons and Mercantile Ports & Logistics tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get James Fisher and Sons News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FSJ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FSJ vs. The Competition

Export
MetricJames Fisher and SonsMarine Shipping IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£235.26M£5.11B£9.64B£2.79B
Dividend Yield1.57%2.57%3.54%6.16%
P/E Ratio-53.5618.2425.65366.66
Price / Sales0.60187.804,851.7286,088.44
Price / Cash3.125.1327.9827.87
Price / Book1.511.674.587.79
Net Income-£52.66M£180.25M£792.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.64%-0.62%0.12%-0.61%
1 Month Performance-5.67%-2.74%-0.86%-1.14%
1 Year Performance29.81%24.02%21.49%65.93%

James Fisher and Sons Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FSJ
James Fisher and Sons
N/AGBX 466
flat		GBX 690
+48.1%		+28.7%£235.26M£394.40MN/A2,041
ICGC
Irish Continental Group
N/AGBX 545
flat		N/A+17.3%£808.96M£666.70M11.90288
OCN
Ocean Wilsons
N/AGBX 1,180
flat		N/A-21.1%£333.82M£26.66M1.2974,200
GPH
Global Ports
N/AN/AN/AN/A£231.21M£193.58M30,000.0020
BMS
Braemar
2.5985 of 5 stars		GBX 237
-2.1%		GBX 320
+35.0%		+7.7%£76.08M£135.61M37.26400

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FSJ) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX is offering you shares. Don't take them.
SpaceX is reserving 30% of its IPO shares for retail investors through Robinhood, Fidelity, and Schwab. At a $...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump just signed it
A recent policy development is drawing attention from income-focused investors. According to one analyst, c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Better than SpaceX? Grab this ticker instead.
Larry Benedict generated $274 million for his clients by finding the trades most investors missed. Now he says...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel