Go Pro
→ Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free FSJ Stock Alerts

James Fisher and Sons (FSJ) Competitors

James Fisher and Sons logo
GBX 434 -2.00 (-0.46%)
As of 12:27 PM Eastern
Compare

FSJ vs. OCN, GPH, BMS, MPL, and GPRT

Should you buy James Fisher and Sons stock or one of its competitors? James Fisher and Sons's main competitors and comparable companies include Ocean Wilsons (OCN), Global Ports (GPH), Braemar (BMS), Mercantile Ports & Logistics (MPL), and Goldenport (GPRT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "marine transportation" industry.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Ocean Wilsons (LON:OCN) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Ocean Wilsons has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ocean Wilsons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ocean Wilsons£26.66M12.52£76.94M£916.601.29
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.56-£52.66M-£8.70N/A

James Fisher and Sons has a consensus price target of GBX 682.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.26%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Ocean Wilsons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ocean Wilsons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Ocean Wilsons' score of 0.00 indicating that James Fisher and Sons is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ocean Wilsons Neutral
James Fisher and Sons Neutral

Ocean Wilsons has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.793, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

12.1% of Ocean Wilsons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.2% of Ocean Wilsons shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ocean Wilsons has a net margin of 350.28% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -0.73%. Ocean Wilsons' return on equity of 11.66% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ocean Wilsons350.28% 11.66% 6.02%
James Fisher and Sons -0.73%-1.54%2.84%

Summary

Ocean Wilsons beats James Fisher and Sons on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Global Ports?

Global Ports (LON:GPH) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Global Ports has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Ports, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Ports£193.58M0.00-£19.81M£0.01N/A
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.56-£52.66M-£8.70N/A

In the previous week, Global Ports' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat James Fisher and Sons' score of 0.10 indicating that Global Ports is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Global Ports Neutral
James Fisher and Sons Neutral

Global Ports has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.793, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Ports has a net margin of 0.46% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -0.73%. Global Ports' return on equity of 34.36% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Ports0.46% 34.36% 3.88%
James Fisher and Sons -0.73%-1.54%2.84%

9.3% of Global Ports shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. 78.0% of Global Ports shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

James Fisher and Sons has a consensus price target of GBX 682.50, suggesting a potential upside of 57.26%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Global Ports.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Ports
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Global Ports beats James Fisher and Sons on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Braemar?

Braemar (LON:BMS) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Braemar had 1 more articles in the media than James Fisher and Sons. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Braemar and 0 mentions for James Fisher and Sons. Braemar's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat James Fisher and Sons' score of 0.10 indicating that Braemar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Braemar Neutral
James Fisher and Sons Neutral

Braemar currently has a consensus target price of GBX 320, indicating a potential upside of 44.14%. James Fisher and Sons has a consensus target price of GBX 682.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.26%. Given James Fisher and Sons' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Braemar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Braemar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Braemar has a net margin of 1.68% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -0.73%. Braemar's return on equity of 2.74% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Braemar1.68% 2.74% 7.09%
James Fisher and Sons -0.73%-1.54%2.84%

Braemar has a beta of 0.501, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.793, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

14.0% of Braemar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of Braemar shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Braemar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Braemar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Braemar£135.61M0.52£5.01M£6.3634.91
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.56-£52.66M-£8.70N/A

Summary

Braemar beats James Fisher and Sons on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Mercantile Ports & Logistics?

Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -0.73%. James Fisher and Sons' return on equity of -1.54% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mercantile Ports & LogisticsN/A -27.50% -2.36%
James Fisher and Sons -0.73%-1.54%2.84%

James Fisher and Sons has a consensus price target of GBX 682.50, suggesting a potential upside of 57.26%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Mercantile Ports & Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.793, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' score of 0.00 indicating that James Fisher and Sons is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Neutral
James Fisher and Sons Neutral

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercantile Ports & Logistics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£1.40M3.54-£21.86M-£8.10N/A
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.56-£52.66M-£8.70N/A

10.0% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

James Fisher and Sons beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Goldenport?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Goldenport (LON:GPRT) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Goldenport has lower revenue, but higher earnings than James Fisher and Sons.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.56-£52.66M-£8.70N/A
GoldenportN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

39.9% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

James Fisher and Sons presently has a consensus target price of GBX 682.50, suggesting a potential upside of 57.26%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Goldenport.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Goldenport
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Goldenport's score of 0.00 indicating that James Fisher and Sons is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons Neutral
Goldenport Neutral

Goldenport has a net margin of 0.00% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -0.73%. Goldenport's return on equity of 0.00% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons-0.73% -1.54% 2.84%
Goldenport N/A N/A N/A

Summary

James Fisher and Sons beats Goldenport on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get James Fisher and Sons News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FSJ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FSJ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FSJ vs. The Competition

Export
MetricJames Fisher and SonsMarine Transportation IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£219.11M£5.54B£10.24B£2.90B
Dividend Yield1.57%3.55%97.16%6.26%
P/E Ratio-49.8913.7225.48366.76
Price / Sales0.5648.39278.8390,229.50
Price / Cash3.126.7223.6727.89
Price / Book1.411.264.816.38
Net Income-£52.66M£367.90M£613.19M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.93%50.03%1.26%0.38%
1 Month Performance-6.67%12.08%-4.41%0.00%
1 Year Performance24.00%45.66%5.02%20.10%

James Fisher and Sons Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FSJ
James Fisher and Sons
1.8359 of 5 stars		GBX 434
-0.5%		GBX 682.50
+57.3%		+24.6%£219.11M£394.40MN/A2,041
OCN
Ocean Wilsons
N/AGBX 1,180
flat		N/A-3.3%£333.82M£26.66M1.2974,200
GPH
Global Ports
N/AN/AN/AN/A£231.21M£193.58M30,000.0020
BMS
Braemar
2.9288 of 5 stars		GBX 227
+2.3%		GBX 320
+41.0%		-9.4%£72.61M£135.61M35.69400
MPL
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
N/AGBX 1.40
+3.7%		N/A+40.3%£4.99M£1.40MN/A44

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FSJ) was last updated on 9/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel