Go Pro
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free FSJ Stock Alerts

James Fisher and Sons (FSJ) Competitors

James Fisher and Sons logo
GBX 436 -5.00 (-1.13%)
As of 12:33 PM Eastern
Compare

FSJ vs. ICGC, OCN, GPH, BMS, and MPL

Should you buy James Fisher and Sons stock or one of its competitors? James Fisher and Sons's main competitors and comparable companies include Irish Continental Group (ICGC), Ocean Wilsons (OCN), Global Ports (GPH), Braemar (BMS), and Mercantile Ports & Logistics (MPL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "marine transportation" industry.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Irish Continental Group?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Irish Continental Group (LON:ICGC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

Irish Continental Group has a net margin of 10.34% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Irish Continental Group's return on equity of 26.12% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons-1.12% -2.37% 2.84%
Irish Continental Group 10.34%26.12%6.96%

39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.6% of Irish Continental Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Irish Continental Group has higher revenue and earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Irish Continental Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.56-£52.66M-£8.70N/A
Irish Continental Group£716.70M1.27£74.00M£45.8013.43

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons had 1 more articles in the media than Irish Continental Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Fisher and Sons and 0 mentions for Irish Continental Group. James Fisher and Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Irish Continental Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons Neutral
Irish Continental Group Neutral

James Fisher and Sons presently has a consensus target price of GBX 690, indicating a potential upside of 58.26%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Irish Continental Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Irish Continental Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.794, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Irish Continental Group has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Irish Continental Group beats James Fisher and Sons on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Ocean Wilsons (LON:OCN) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Ocean Wilsons has a net margin of 350.28% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Ocean Wilsons' return on equity of 11.66% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ocean Wilsons350.28% 11.66% 6.02%
James Fisher and Sons -1.12%-2.37%2.84%

Ocean Wilsons has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ocean Wilsons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ocean Wilsons£26.66M12.52£76.94M£916.601.29
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.56-£52.66M-£8.70N/A

Ocean Wilsons has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.794, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

James Fisher and Sons has a consensus price target of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 58.26%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Ocean Wilsons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ocean Wilsons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons had 1 more articles in the media than Ocean Wilsons. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Fisher and Sons and 0 mentions for Ocean Wilsons. Ocean Wilsons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Fisher and Sons'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ocean Wilsons Neutral
James Fisher and Sons Neutral

12.1% of Ocean Wilsons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.2% of Ocean Wilsons shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ocean Wilsons beats James Fisher and Sons on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Global Ports?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Global Ports (LON:GPH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Global Ports has lower revenue, but higher earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Ports, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.56-£52.66M-£8.70N/A
Global Ports£193.58M0.00-£19.81M£0.01N/A

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.794, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ports has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Global Ports shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 78.0% of Global Ports shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Ports has a net margin of 0.46% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Global Ports' return on equity of 34.36% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons-1.12% -2.37% 2.84%
Global Ports 0.46%34.36%3.88%

James Fisher and Sons presently has a consensus target price of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 58.26%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Global Ports.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Global Ports
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons had 1 more articles in the media than Global Ports. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Fisher and Sons and 0 mentions for Global Ports. James Fisher and Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Global Ports'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons Neutral
Global Ports Neutral

Summary

Global Ports beats James Fisher and Sons on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Braemar?

Braemar (LON:BMS) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

Braemar has a beta of 0.501, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.794, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Braemar presently has a consensus price target of GBX 320, suggesting a potential upside of 40.97%. James Fisher and Sons has a consensus price target of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 58.26%. Given James Fisher and Sons' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Braemar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Braemar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

14.0% of Braemar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. 16.5% of Braemar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons had 1 more articles in the media than Braemar. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Fisher and Sons and 0 mentions for Braemar. Braemar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Fisher and Sons'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Braemar Neutral
James Fisher and Sons Neutral

Braemar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Braemar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Braemar£135.61M0.54£5.01M£6.3635.69
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.56-£52.66M-£8.70N/A

Braemar has a net margin of 1.68% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Braemar's return on equity of 2.74% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Braemar1.68% 2.74% 7.09%
James Fisher and Sons -1.12%-2.37%2.84%

Summary

Braemar beats James Fisher and Sons on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Mercantile Ports & Logistics?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. James Fisher and Sons' return on equity of -2.37% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons-1.12% -2.37% 2.84%
Mercantile Ports & Logistics N/A -27.50%-2.36%

James Fisher and Sons presently has a consensus price target of GBX 690, indicating a potential upside of 58.26%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Mercantile Ports & Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.0% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.794, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercantile Ports & Logistics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons£394.40M0.56-£52.66M-£8.70N/A
Mercantile Ports & Logistics£1.40M4.14-£21.86M-£8.10N/A

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons and James Fisher and Sons both had 1 articles in the media. James Fisher and Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mercantile Ports & Logistics'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

James Fisher and Sons beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get James Fisher and Sons News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FSJ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FSJ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FSJ vs. The Competition

Export
MetricJames Fisher and SonsMarine Transportation IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£220.12M£4.84B£10.68B£2.91B
Dividend Yield1.57%3.56%97.24%6.17%
P/E Ratio-50.1113.9023.63367.36
Price / Sales0.5648.28357.2283,550.18
Price / Cash3.126.2124.4927.89
Price / Book1.421.134.496.89
Net Income-£52.66M£358.06M£611.08M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-6.24%1.84%0.16%0.77%
1 Month Performance-7.63%9.99%1.90%3.00%
1 Year Performance28.99%39.94%11.17%22.61%

James Fisher and Sons Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FSJ
James Fisher and Sons
1.8495 of 5 stars		GBX 436
-1.1%		GBX 690
+58.3%		+31.7%£220.12M£394.40MN/A2,041
ICGC
Irish Continental Group
N/AGBX 600
-9.1%		N/A+26.0%£890.60M£666.70M13.10288
OCN
Ocean Wilsons
N/AGBX 1,180
flat		N/A-2.1%£333.82M£26.66M1.2974,200
GPH
Global Ports
N/AN/AN/AN/A£231.21M£193.58M30,000.0020
BMS
Braemar
2.3996 of 5 stars		GBX 227
flat		GBX 320
+41.0%		-6.0%£72.61M£135.61M35.69400

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FSJ) was last updated on 8/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel