Do analysts prefer FSJ or GPH?

James Fisher and Sons presently has a consensus target price of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 43.45%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Global Ports. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score James Fisher and Sons 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Global Ports 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media favor BMS or FSJ?

In the previous week, Braemar and Braemar both had 1 articles in the media. Braemar's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat James Fisher and Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Braemar is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Braemar 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive James Fisher and Sons 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer MPL or FSJ?

James Fisher and Sons has a consensus target price of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 43.45%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mercantile Ports & Logistics 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 James Fisher and Sons 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor CKN or FSJ?

In the previous week, Clarkson had 8 more articles in the media than James Fisher and Sons. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Clarkson and 1 mentions for James Fisher and Sons. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat James Fisher and Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Clarkson 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive James Fisher and Sons 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

James Fisher and Sons (FSJ) Competitors

GBX 481 +1.00 (+0.21%)

As of 11:57 AM Eastern

Compare

FSJ vs. OCN, GPH, BMS, MPL, and CKN

Should you buy James Fisher and Sons stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares James Fisher and Sons with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with James Fisher and Sons include Ocean Wilsons (OCN), Global Ports (GPH), Braemar (BMS), Mercantile Ports & Logistics (MPL), and Clarkson (CKN). These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Ocean Wilsons?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Ocean Wilsons (LON:OCN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

James Fisher and Sons currently has a consensus price target of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 43.45%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Ocean Wilsons.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Ocean Wilsons	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.803, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ocean Wilsons has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Ocean Wilsons has a net margin of 350.28% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Ocean Wilsons' return on equity of 11.66% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons	-1.12%	-2.37%	2.84%
Ocean Wilsons	350.28%	11.66%	6.02%

39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Ocean Wilsons shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Ocean Wilsons shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ocean Wilsons has lower revenue, but higher earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ocean Wilsons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons	£394.40M	0.62	-£52.66M	-£8.70	N/A
Ocean Wilsons	£26.66M	12.52	£76.94M	£916.60	1.29

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons had 1 more articles in the media than Ocean Wilsons. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Fisher and Sons and 0 mentions for Ocean Wilsons. James Fisher and Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ocean Wilsons'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons	Neutral
Ocean Wilsons	Neutral

Summary

Ocean Wilsons beats James Fisher and Sons on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Global Ports?

James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Global Ports (LON:GPH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Global Ports has lower revenue, but higher earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Ports, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
James Fisher and Sons	£394.40M	0.62	-£52.66M	-£8.70	N/A
Global Ports	£193.58M	0.00	-£19.81M	£0.01	N/A

James Fisher and Sons presently has a consensus target price of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 43.45%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Global Ports.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
James Fisher and Sons	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Global Ports	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Global Ports shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 78.0% of Global Ports shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons had 1 more articles in the media than Global Ports. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Fisher and Sons and 0 mentions for Global Ports. James Fisher and Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Global Ports'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
James Fisher and Sons	Neutral
Global Ports	Neutral

James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.803, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ports has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

Global Ports has a net margin of 0.46% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Global Ports' return on equity of 34.36% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
James Fisher and Sons	-1.12%	-2.37%	2.84%
Global Ports	0.46%	34.36%	3.88%

Summary

Global Ports beats James Fisher and Sons on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Braemar?

Braemar (LON:BMS) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Braemar and Braemar both had 1 articles in the media. Braemar's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat James Fisher and Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Braemar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Braemar	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
James Fisher and Sons	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Braemar currently has a consensus price target of GBX 320, suggesting a potential upside of 42.22%. James Fisher and Sons has a consensus price target of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 43.45%. Given James Fisher and Sons' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Braemar.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Braemar	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
James Fisher and Sons	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

14.0% of Braemar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. 16.5% of Braemar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Braemar has a beta of 0.504, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.803, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Braemar has a net margin of 1.68% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Braemar's return on equity of 2.74% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Braemar	1.68%	2.74%	7.09%
James Fisher and Sons	-1.12%	-2.37%	2.84%

Braemar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Braemar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Braemar	£135.61M	0.53	£5.01M	£6.36	35.38
James Fisher and Sons	£394.40M	0.62	-£52.66M	-£8.70	N/A

Summary

Braemar beats James Fisher and Sons on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Mercantile Ports & Logistics?

Mercantile Ports & Logistics (LON:MPL) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mercantile Ports & Logistics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mercantile Ports & Logistics	£1.40M	3.52	-£21.86M	-£8.10	N/A
James Fisher and Sons	£394.40M	0.62	-£52.66M	-£8.70	N/A

James Fisher and Sons has a consensus target price of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 43.45%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Mercantile Ports & Logistics.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mercantile Ports & Logistics	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
James Fisher and Sons	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons had 1 more articles in the media than Mercantile Ports & Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for James Fisher and Sons and 0 mentions for Mercantile Ports & Logistics. Mercantile Ports & Logistics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled James Fisher and Sons'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mercantile Ports & Logistics	Neutral
James Fisher and Sons	Neutral

10.0% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. 44.5% of Mercantile Ports & Logistics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.803, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Mercantile Ports & Logistics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. James Fisher and Sons' return on equity of -2.37% beat Mercantile Ports & Logistics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mercantile Ports & Logistics	N/A	-27.50%	-2.36%
James Fisher and Sons	-1.12%	-2.37%	2.84%

Summary

James Fisher and Sons beats Mercantile Ports & Logistics on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Clarkson?

Clarkson (LON:CKN) and James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Clarkson currently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,031.25, suggesting a potential upside of 3.95%. James Fisher and Sons has a consensus price target of GBX 690, suggesting a potential upside of 43.45%. Given James Fisher and Sons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Clarkson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Clarkson	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
James Fisher and Sons	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Clarkson has higher revenue and earnings than James Fisher and Sons. James Fisher and Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clarkson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Clarkson	£747.10M	1.99	£82.85M	£250.40	19.33
James Fisher and Sons	£394.40M	0.62	-£52.66M	-£8.70	N/A

Clarkson has a net margin of 10.40% compared to James Fisher and Sons' net margin of -1.12%. Clarkson's return on equity of 14.50% beat James Fisher and Sons' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Clarkson	10.40%	14.50%	7.79%
James Fisher and Sons	-1.12%	-2.37%	2.84%

72.0% of Clarkson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.8% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by institutional investors. 5.4% of Clarkson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of James Fisher and Sons shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Clarkson had 8 more articles in the media than James Fisher and Sons. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Clarkson and 1 mentions for James Fisher and Sons. Clarkson's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat James Fisher and Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Clarkson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Clarkson	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
James Fisher and Sons	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Clarkson has a beta of 0.702, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.803, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Clarkson beats James Fisher and Sons on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get James Fisher and Sons News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FSJ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FSJ vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	James Fisher and Sons	Marine Transportation Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£242.83M	£4.80B	£10.86B	£2.89B
Dividend Yield	1.57%	3.24%	120.50%	6.11%
P/E Ratio	-55.29	14.72	28.59	368.42
Price / Sales	0.62	48.44	348.69	83,683.37
Price / Cash	3.12	5.66	24.91	27.89
Price / Book	1.56	1.10	4.55	7.28
Net Income	-£52.66M	£356.70M	£608.43M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	8.58%	1.34%	3.63%	2.11%
1 Month Performance	3.66%	5.73%	1.09%	1.79%
1 Year Performance	35.49%	31.55%	14.65%	74.55%

James Fisher and Sons Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FSJ James Fisher and Sons	1.8327 of 5 stars	GBX 481 +0.2%	GBX 690 +43.5%	+33.3%	£242.83M	£394.40M	N/A	2,041
OCN Ocean Wilsons	N/A	GBX 1,180 flat	N/A	+4.9%	£333.82M	£26.66M	1.29	74,200
GPH Global Ports	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£231.21M	£193.58M	30,000.00	20
BMS Braemar	3.2162 of 5 stars	GBX 229 +3.6%	GBX 320 +39.7%	-10.6%	£73.25M	£135.61M	36.01	400
MPL Mercantile Ports & Logistics	N/A	GBX 1.25 -1.0%	N/A	+9.5%	£4.44M	£4.28M	N/A	44	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FSJ) was last updated on 8/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

James Fisher and Sons (FSJ) Competitors

FSJ vs. OCN, GPH, BMS, MPL, and CKN

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Summary

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Global Ports?

Summary

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Braemar?

Summary

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Mercantile Ports & Logistics?

Summary

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Clarkson?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FSJ vs. The Competition

James Fisher and Sons Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

James Fisher and Sons (FSJ) Competitors

FSJ vs. OCN, GPH, BMS, MPL, and CKN

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Ocean Wilsons?

Do analysts recommend FSJ or OCN?

Which has more volatility & risk, FSJ or OCN?

Is FSJ or OCN more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FSJ or OCN?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, FSJ or OCN?

Does the media prefer FSJ or OCN?

Summary

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Global Ports?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FSJ or GPH?

Do analysts prefer FSJ or GPH?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FSJ or GPH?

Does the media favor FSJ or GPH?

Which has more volatility & risk, FSJ or GPH?

Is FSJ or GPH more profitable?

Summary

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Braemar?

Does the media favor BMS or FSJ?

Do analysts prefer BMS or FSJ?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of BMS or FSJ?

Which has more risk and volatility, BMS or FSJ?

Is BMS or FSJ more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, BMS or FSJ?

Summary

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Mercantile Ports & Logistics?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MPL or FSJ?

Do analysts prefer MPL or FSJ?

Does the media favor MPL or FSJ?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MPL or FSJ?

Which has more risk & volatility, MPL or FSJ?

Is MPL or FSJ more profitable?

Summary

How does James Fisher and Sons compare to Clarkson?

Do analysts prefer CKN or FSJ?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, CKN or FSJ?

Is CKN or FSJ more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CKN or FSJ?

Does the media favor CKN or FSJ?

Which has more volatility & risk, CKN or FSJ?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FSJ vs. The Competition

James Fisher and Sons Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools