FSJ vs. GPH, BMS, OCN, SUP, AFC, PPHC, MSI, AVG, ECEL, and NXR
Should you be buying James Fisher and Sons stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of James Fisher and Sons include Global Ports (GPH), Braemar (BMS), Ocean Wilsons (OCN), Supreme (SUP), AFC Energy (AFC), Public Policy (PPHC), MS INTERNATIONAL (MSI), Avingtrans (AVG), Eurocell (ECEL), and Norcros (NXR). These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.
James Fisher and Sons (LON:FSJ) and Global Ports (LON:GPH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment and community ranking.
James Fisher and Sons has higher revenue and earnings than Global Ports. Global Ports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James Fisher and Sons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
James Fisher and Sons pays an annual dividend of GBX 16 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Global Ports pays an annual dividend of GBX 37 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.5%. James Fisher and Sons pays out 40,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Ports pays out -14,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Ports is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
James Fisher and Sons presently has a consensus target price of GBX 375, indicating a potential upside of 34.90%. Given James Fisher and Sons' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe James Fisher and Sons is more favorable than Global Ports.
James Fisher and Sons has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Ports has a beta of 1.76, meaning that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.
James Fisher and Sons has a net margin of -4.39% compared to Global Ports' net margin of -11.28%. James Fisher and Sons' return on equity of 1.03% beat Global Ports' return on equity.
52.5% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.8% of Global Ports shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.2% of James Fisher and Sons shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 67.4% of Global Ports shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
In the previous week, James Fisher and Sons and James Fisher and Sons both had 1 articles in the media. James Fisher and Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Global Ports' score of 0.00 indicating that James Fisher and Sons is being referred to more favorably in the media.
James Fisher and Sons received 21 more outperform votes than Global Ports when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 62.75% of users gave Global Ports an outperform vote while only 58.58% of users gave James Fisher and Sons an outperform vote.
Summary
James Fisher and Sons beats Global Ports on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get James Fisher and Sons News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FSJ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FSJ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
James Fisher and Sons Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
