Go Pro

CT Automotive Group (CTA) Competitors

CT Automotive Group logo
GBX 53.80 +0.36 (+0.67%)
As of 06:24 AM Eastern

CTA vs. CAR, AUTG, TRT, STG, and SCE

Should you buy CT Automotive Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CT Automotive Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CT Automotive Group include Carclo (CAR), Autins Group (AUTG), Transense Technologies (TRT), Strip Tinning (STG), and Surface Transforms (SCE).

How does CT Automotive Group compare to Carclo?

CT Automotive Group (LON:CTA) and Carclo (LON:CAR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

CT Automotive Group has a beta of 0.565, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carclo has a beta of 0.593, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Automotive Group has higher revenue and earnings than Carclo. CT Automotive Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carclo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Automotive Group£114.83M0.34£11.82M£10.904.94
Carclo£114.21M0.25-£3.30M£3.6010.83

3.0% of CT Automotive Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.2% of Carclo shares are held by institutional investors. 32.1% of CT Automotive Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Carclo shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CT Automotive Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Carclo'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Automotive Group Neutral
Carclo Neutral

CT Automotive Group has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Carclo's net margin of 2.36%. CT Automotive Group's return on equity of 28.74% beat Carclo's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Automotive Group7.26% 28.74% 8.52%
Carclo 2.36%-29.78%2.73%

Summary

CT Automotive Group beats Carclo on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Automotive Group compare to Autins Group?

CT Automotive Group (LON:CTA) and Autins Group (LON:AUTG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

CT Automotive Group has higher revenue and earnings than Autins Group. CT Automotive Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autins Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Automotive Group£114.83M0.34£11.82M£10.904.94
Autins Group£17.63M0.56-£2.79M£0.3059.73

CT Automotive Group has a beta of 0.565, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Autins Group has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CT Automotive Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Autins Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Automotive Group Neutral
Autins Group Neutral

CT Automotive Group has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Autins Group's net margin of -2.00%. CT Automotive Group's return on equity of 28.74% beat Autins Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Automotive Group7.26% 28.74% 8.52%
Autins Group -2.00%-4.44%-0.43%

3.0% of CT Automotive Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.5% of Autins Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.1% of CT Automotive Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Autins Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CT Automotive Group beats Autins Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Automotive Group compare to Transense Technologies?

Transense Technologies (LON:TRT) and CT Automotive Group (LON:CTA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

11.1% of Transense Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of CT Automotive Group shares are held by institutional investors. 46.4% of Transense Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 32.1% of CT Automotive Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Transense Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Automotive Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Transense Technologies Neutral
CT Automotive Group Neutral

Transense Technologies has a net margin of 16.10% compared to CT Automotive Group's net margin of 7.26%. CT Automotive Group's return on equity of 28.74% beat Transense Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Transense Technologies16.10% 12.05% 14.52%
CT Automotive Group 7.26%28.74%8.52%

CT Automotive Group has higher revenue and earnings than Transense Technologies. CT Automotive Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Transense Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Transense Technologies£4.92M1.49£1.51M£5.448.87
CT Automotive Group£114.83M0.34£11.82M£10.904.94

Transense Technologies has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Automotive Group has a beta of 0.565, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Transense Technologies beats CT Automotive Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Automotive Group compare to Strip Tinning?

Strip Tinning (LON:STG) and CT Automotive Group (LON:CTA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

CT Automotive Group has higher revenue and earnings than Strip Tinning. Strip Tinning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Automotive Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strip Tinning£8.59M0.42-£2.99M-£11.60N/A
CT Automotive Group£114.83M0.34£11.82M£10.904.94

In the previous week, Strip Tinning's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Automotive Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Strip Tinning Neutral
CT Automotive Group Neutral

Strip Tinning has a beta of 0.437, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Automotive Group has a beta of 0.565, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Automotive Group has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Strip Tinning's net margin of -24.52%. CT Automotive Group's return on equity of 28.74% beat Strip Tinning's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strip Tinning-24.52% -387.32% -12.65%
CT Automotive Group 7.26%28.74%8.52%

2.1% of Strip Tinning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of CT Automotive Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 49.1% of Strip Tinning shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.1% of CT Automotive Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CT Automotive Group beats Strip Tinning on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Automotive Group compare to Surface Transforms?

Surface Transforms (LON:SCE) and CT Automotive Group (LON:CTA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Surface Transforms had 1 more articles in the media than CT Automotive Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Surface Transforms and 0 mentions for CT Automotive Group. Surface Transforms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat CT Automotive Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Surface Transforms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Surface Transforms Positive
CT Automotive Group Neutral

CT Automotive Group has higher revenue and earnings than Surface Transforms. Surface Transforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Automotive Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Surface Transforms£11.71M0.13-£5.00B-£1.42N/A
CT Automotive Group£114.83M0.34£11.82M£10.904.94

CT Automotive Group has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Surface Transforms' net margin of -271.13%. CT Automotive Group's return on equity of 28.74% beat Surface Transforms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Surface Transforms-271.13% -131.28% -22.15%
CT Automotive Group 7.26%28.74%8.52%

Surface Transforms has a beta of 0.706, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Automotive Group has a beta of 0.565, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

8.4% of Surface Transforms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of CT Automotive Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Surface Transforms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 32.1% of CT Automotive Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CT Automotive Group beats Surface Transforms on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CT Automotive Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CTA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CTA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CTA vs. The Competition

MetricCT Automotive GroupAutomobile Components IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£39.60M£5.15B£13.05B£2.82B
Dividend YieldN/A2.23%53.33%6.15%
P/E Ratio4.9411.3247.49368.45
Price / Sales0.3422.9191.2183,500.12
Price / Cash8.7011.2418.9327.89
Price / Book2.331.844.517.06
Net Income£11.82M£72.14M£444.15M£5.89B
7 Day Performance12.08%0.47%1.53%6.48%
1 Month Performance68.65%2.06%0.51%0.22%
1 Year Performance58.24%13.86%3.30%64.32%

CT Automotive Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CTA
CT Automotive Group
N/AGBX 53.80
+0.7%
N/A+57.2%£39.60M£114.83M4.942,721
CAR
Carclo
N/AGBX 33
flat
N/A-21.7%£24.23M£114.21M9.171,059
AUTG
Autins Group
N/AGBX 15.41
-3.7%
N/A+69.5%£8.42M£17.63M51.37156
TRT
Transense Technologies
N/AGBX 49.38
-1.2%
N/A-64.0%£7.52M£4.92M9.08740
STG
Strip Tinning
N/AGBX 17.66
-4.5%
N/A-28.3%£3.22M£8.59MN/A4,060

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CTA) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners