Go Pro

Glanbia (GLB) Competitors

Glanbia logo
GBX 24.14 -0.32 (-1.31%)
As of 12:31 PM Eastern

GLB vs. PURE, FIF, KYGA, ANP, and SIS

Should you buy Glanbia stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Glanbia with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Glanbia include PureCircle (PURE), Finsbury Food Group (FIF), Kerry Group (KYGA), Anpario (ANP), and Science in Sport (SIS). These companies are all part of the "packaged foods" industry.

How does Glanbia compare to PureCircle?

Glanbia (LON:GLB) and PureCircle (LON:PURE) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Glanbia has a net margin of 4.64% compared to PureCircle's net margin of 0.00%. Glanbia's return on equity of 9.25% beat PureCircle's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Glanbia4.64% 9.25% 6.05%
PureCircle N/A N/A N/A

29.7% of Glanbia shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Glanbia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Glanbia had 1 more articles in the media than PureCircle. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Glanbia and 0 mentions for PureCircle. Glanbia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PureCircle'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Glanbia Neutral
PureCircle Neutral

Glanbia has higher revenue and earnings than PureCircle. PureCircle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glanbia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Glanbia£3.95B0.01£12.80B£72.440.33
PureCircle£121.14M0.00N/A-£35.80N/A

Summary

Glanbia beats PureCircle on 9 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Glanbia compare to Finsbury Food Group?

Finsbury Food Group (LON:FIF) and Glanbia (LON:GLB) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Glanbia had 1 more articles in the media than Finsbury Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Glanbia and 0 mentions for Finsbury Food Group. Finsbury Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Glanbia'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Finsbury Food Group Neutral
Glanbia Neutral

Finsbury Food Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Glanbia pays an annual dividend of GBX 45.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 187.9%. Finsbury Food Group pays out 3,750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Glanbia pays out 62.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Glanbia is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

65.7% of Finsbury Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of Glanbia shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.5% of Finsbury Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Glanbia shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Glanbia has higher revenue and earnings than Finsbury Food Group. Finsbury Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glanbia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Finsbury Food Group£413.74M0.00£10.77M£0.08N/A
Glanbia£3.95B0.01£12.80B£72.440.33

Finsbury Food Group has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glanbia has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Glanbia has a net margin of 4.64% compared to Finsbury Food Group's net margin of 2.60%. Finsbury Food Group's return on equity of 9.29% beat Glanbia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Finsbury Food Group2.60% 9.29% 5.12%
Glanbia 4.64%9.25%6.05%

Summary

Glanbia beats Finsbury Food Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Glanbia compare to Kerry Group?

Kerry Group (LON:KYGA) and Glanbia (LON:GLB) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

Kerry Group has a net margin of 9.74% compared to Glanbia's net margin of 4.64%. Kerry Group's return on equity of 11.11% beat Glanbia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kerry Group9.74% 11.11% 4.77%
Glanbia 4.64%9.25%6.05%

Kerry Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 131 per share and has a dividend yield of 158.9%. Glanbia pays an annual dividend of GBX 45.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 187.9%. Kerry Group pays out 32.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Glanbia pays out 62.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Kerry Group has higher revenue and earnings than Glanbia. Kerry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glanbia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kerry Group£6.76B0.02£62.65B£399.300.21
Glanbia£3.95B0.01£12.80B£72.440.33

Kerry Group has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glanbia has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Glanbia had 1 more articles in the media than Kerry Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Glanbia and 0 mentions for Kerry Group. Kerry Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Glanbia's score of 0.00 indicating that Kerry Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kerry Group Positive
Glanbia Neutral

42.1% of Kerry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of Glanbia shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Kerry Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Glanbia shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kerry Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 99, indicating a potential upside of 20.07%. Given Kerry Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kerry Group is more favorable than Glanbia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kerry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Glanbia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Kerry Group beats Glanbia on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Glanbia compare to Anpario?

Glanbia (LON:GLB) and Anpario (LON:ANP) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Glanbia has higher revenue and earnings than Anpario. Glanbia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Anpario, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Glanbia£3.95B0.01£12.80B£72.440.33
Anpario£47.18M1.85£3.09M£37.9414.02

Glanbia pays an annual dividend of GBX 45.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 187.9%. Anpario pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Glanbia pays out 62.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Anpario pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Anpario has a net margin of 14.31% compared to Glanbia's net margin of 4.64%. Anpario's return on equity of 16.88% beat Glanbia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Glanbia4.64% 9.25% 6.05%
Anpario 14.31%16.88%5.51%

Glanbia has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Anpario has a beta of 1.077, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Anpario has a consensus price target of GBX 570, suggesting a potential upside of 7.14%. Given Anpario's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Anpario is more favorable than Glanbia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Glanbia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Anpario
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Glanbia had 1 more articles in the media than Anpario. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Glanbia and 0 mentions for Anpario. Glanbia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Anpario'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Glanbia Neutral
Anpario Neutral

29.7% of Glanbia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.2% of Anpario shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Glanbia shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Anpario shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Anpario beats Glanbia on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Glanbia compare to Science in Sport?

Science in Sport (LON:SIS) and Glanbia (LON:GLB) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Glanbia has higher revenue and earnings than Science in Sport. Science in Sport is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glanbia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Science in Sport£70.87M1.12-£13.78M-£5.66N/A
Glanbia£3.95B0.01£12.80B£72.440.33

Science in Sport has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glanbia has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Glanbia has a net margin of 4.64% compared to Science in Sport's net margin of -9.14%. Glanbia's return on equity of 9.25% beat Science in Sport's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Science in Sport-9.14% -15.33% -8.01%
Glanbia 4.64%9.25%6.05%

In the previous week, Glanbia had 1 more articles in the media than Science in Sport. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Glanbia and 0 mentions for Science in Sport. Science in Sport's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Glanbia'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Science in Sport Neutral
Glanbia Neutral

68.8% of Science in Sport shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of Glanbia shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of Science in Sport shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Glanbia shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Glanbia beats Science in Sport on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Glanbia News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GLB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GLB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GLB vs. The Competition

MetricGlanbiaPackaged Foods IndustryDefensive SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£58.34M£4.64B£8.30B£2.77B
Dividend Yield1.74%2.48%3.15%6.15%
P/E Ratio0.332,882.32891.54367.98
Price / Sales0.013,430.44992,149.7784,550.77
Price / Cash0.14119.32140.9027.87
Price / Book0.0322.509.727.68
Net Income£12.80B£2.71B£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.08%-0.37%-0.38%-0.61%
1 Month Performance13.23%1.28%0.02%-0.87%
1 Year Performance90.98%697.76%243.64%61.83%

Glanbia Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GLB
Glanbia
N/AGBX 24.14
-1.3%
N/A+100.9%£58.34M£3.95B0.335,534
PURE
PureCircle
N/AN/AN/AN/A£183.53M£121.14MN/A10
FIF
Finsbury Food Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£143.42M£413.74M1,375.00206
KYGA
Kerry Group
4.2375 of 5 stars
GBX 81.13
-0.3%
GBX 99
+22.0%
-7.9%£129.66M£6.76B0.2021,000
ANP
Anpario
N/AGBX 513.15
-1.3%
GBX 570
+11.1%
+25.4%£84.98M£47.18M13.53109

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GLB) was last updated on 7/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners