LIV vs. HAN, HANA, AEMC, CTUK, FEET, BCI, BPET, SJG, LWI, and NCYF
Should you be buying Livermore Investments Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Livermore Investments Group include Hansa Investment (HAN), Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' (HANA), Aberdeen Emerging Markets Investment (AEMC), CT UK Capital And Income Investment Trust (CTUK), Fundsmith Emerging Equities Trust (FEET), BMO Capital and Income Investment Trust (BCI), BMO Private Equity Trust (BPET), Schroder Japan Trust (SJG), Lowland (LWI), and CQS New City High Yield (NCYF). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Livermore Investments Group vs. Its Competitors
Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) and Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.
Hansa Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Livermore Investments Group. Livermore Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hansa Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Livermore Investments Group pays out 104.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hansa Investment pays out 37.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.
Livermore Investments Group has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Hansa Investment has a net margin of 95.67% compared to Livermore Investments Group's net margin of 82.54%. Hansa Investment's return on equity of 19.42% beat Livermore Investments Group's return on equity.
1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of Hansa Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
In the previous week, Livermore Investments Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hansa Investment'saverage media sentiment score.
Summary
Hansa Investment beats Livermore Investments Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Livermore Investments Group News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Livermore Investments Group Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:LIV) was last updated on 9/17/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
Free LIV Stock Alerts