LORD vs. BRCK, SHI, FLO, BMTO, BMT, SLNG, FERG, DPLM, RS1, and GFTU
Should you be buying Lords Group Trading stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Lords Group Trading include Brickability Group (BRCK), SIG (SHI), Flowtech Fluidpower (FLO), Braime Group (BMTO), Braime Group (BMT), H C Slingsby (SLNG), Ferguson (FERG), Diploma (DPLM), RS Group (RS1), and Grafton Group (GFTU). These companies are all part of the "industrial distribution" industry.
Lords Group Trading vs. Its Competitors
Lords Group Trading (LON:LORD) and Brickability Group (LON:BRCK) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.
Lords Group Trading presently has a consensus price target of GBX 80, indicating a potential upside of 138.10%. Given Lords Group Trading's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lords Group Trading is more favorable than Brickability Group.
Lords Group Trading pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Brickability Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Lords Group Trading pays out -58.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brickability Group pays out 170.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
18.5% of Lords Group Trading shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Brickability Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.8% of Lords Group Trading shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.6% of Brickability Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
In the previous week, Brickability Group had 1 more articles in the media than Lords Group Trading. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brickability Group and 0 mentions for Lords Group Trading. Brickability Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Lords Group Trading's score of 0.00 indicating that Brickability Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Lords Group Trading has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brickability Group has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Brickability Group has higher revenue and earnings than Lords Group Trading. Lords Group Trading is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brickability Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Brickability Group has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Lords Group Trading's net margin of -0.40%. Brickability Group's return on equity of 8.24% beat Lords Group Trading's return on equity.
Summary
Brickability Group beats Lords Group Trading on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Lords Group Trading News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LORD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LORD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Lords Group Trading Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:LORD) was last updated on 10/16/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
