Go Pro

Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LTI) Competitors

Lindsell Train Investment Trust logo
GBX 5.62 -0.06 (-1.06%)
As of 11:46 AM Eastern

LTI vs. BHGU, HTCF, TRE, VOX, and OXF

Should you buy Lindsell Train Investment Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lindsell Train Investment Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lindsell Train Investment Trust include BH Global (BHGU), Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund (HTCF), First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc (TRE), Vox Valor Capital (VOX), and Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust (OXF).

How does Lindsell Train Investment Trust compare to BH Global?

Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LON:LTI) and BH Global (LON:BHGU) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BH Global. Lindsell Train Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lindsell Train Investment Trust-£38.09M-0.03£772.36M-£194.00N/A
BH Global£837K0.00N/A£5.22N/A

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has a net margin of 104.34% compared to BH Global's net margin of 0.00%. BH Global's return on equity of 0.00% beat Lindsell Train Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lindsell Train Investment Trust104.34% -24.37% 1.29%
BH Global N/A N/A N/A

2.5% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lindsell Train Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BH Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lindsell Train Investment Trust Neutral
BH Global Neutral

Summary

Lindsell Train Investment Trust and BH Global tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lindsell Train Investment Trust compare to Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund?

Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund (LON:HTCF) and Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LON:LTI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lindsell Train Investment Trust has a beta of 0.398, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund. Lindsell Train Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund£705.37K0.00£2.75M£0.31N/A
Lindsell Train Investment Trust-£38.09M-0.03£772.36M-£194.00N/A

3,352.4% of Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund has a net margin of 389.30% compared to Lindsell Train Investment Trust's net margin of 104.34%. Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund's return on equity of 0.00% beat Lindsell Train Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund389.30% N/A N/A
Lindsell Train Investment Trust 104.34%-24.37%1.29%

In the previous week, Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lindsell Train Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund Neutral
Lindsell Train Investment Trust Neutral

Summary

Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund beats Lindsell Train Investment Trust on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lindsell Train Investment Trust compare to First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc?

Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LON:LTI) and First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc (LON:TRE) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

2.5% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has a net margin of 104.34% compared to First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc's net margin of 0.00%. First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc's return on equity of 0.00% beat Lindsell Train Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lindsell Train Investment Trust104.34% -24.37% 1.29%
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Lindsell Train Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc'saverage media sentiment score.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lindsell Train Investment Trust-£38.09M-0.03£772.36M-£194.00N/A
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD AccN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Lindsell Train Investment Trust beats First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lindsell Train Investment Trust compare to Vox Valor Capital?

Vox Valor Capital (LON:VOX) and Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LON:LTI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Vox Valor Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lindsell Train Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vox Valor Capital Neutral
Lindsell Train Investment Trust Neutral

2.5% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.1% of Vox Valor Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vox Valor Capital. Vox Valor Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsell Train Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vox Valor Capital£12.09M0.35-£15.39K-£0.04N/A
Lindsell Train Investment Trust-£38.09M-0.03£772.36M-£194.00N/A

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has a net margin of 104.34% compared to Vox Valor Capital's net margin of -8.72%. Vox Valor Capital's return on equity of -12.30% beat Lindsell Train Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vox Valor Capital-8.72% -12.30% 0.29%
Lindsell Train Investment Trust 104.34%-24.37%1.29%

Summary

Vox Valor Capital and Lindsell Train Investment Trust tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lindsell Train Investment Trust compare to Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust?

Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LON:LTI) and Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust (LON:OXF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

2.5% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has a net margin of 104.34% compared to Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Lindsell Train Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lindsell Train Investment Trust104.34% -24.37% 1.29%
Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Lindsell Train Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust. Lindsell Train Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lindsell Train Investment Trust-£38.09M-0.03£772.36M-£194.00N/A
Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust£1.62M0.00N/A£0.13N/A

Summary

Lindsell Train Investment Trust and Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lindsell Train Investment Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LTI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LTI vs. The Competition

MetricLindsell Train Investment TrustCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.12M£5.56B£14.04B£3.02B
Dividend Yield4.79%7.47%5.92%6.13%
P/E Ratio-0.0337.1728.97368.68
Price / Sales-0.031,149.83475.6483,704.62
Price / Cash0.7148.2238.6127.89
Price / Book0.003.713.737.07
Net Income£772.36M£417.17M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.77%1.13%0.91%0.54%
1 Month Performance0.36%-0.15%1.29%0.25%
1 Year Performance-99.33%7.20%13.80%64.64%

Lindsell Train Investment Trust Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LTI
Lindsell Train Investment Trust
N/AGBX 5.62
-1.1%
N/A-99.3%£1.12M-£38.09MN/AN/A
BHGU
BH Global
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.60M£837K3.81N/A
HTCF
Highbridge Tactical Credit Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.59M£705.37K1,370.97N/A
TRE
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc
N/AGBX 22.19
-1.4%
N/A+12.1%£4.39MN/AN/A147,000
VOX
Vox Valor Capital
N/AGBX 0.18
flat
N/AN/A£4.18M£12.09MN/A5

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:LTI) was last updated on 8/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners