Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free LTI Stock Alerts

Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LTI) Competitors

Lindsell Train Investment Trust logo
GBX 5.56 -0.04 (-0.71%)
As of 05:07 AM Eastern
Compare

LTI vs. TRE, VOX, OXF, BLP, and ATY

Should you buy Lindsell Train Investment Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lindsell Train Investment Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lindsell Train Investment Trust include First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc (TRE), Vox Valor Capital (VOX), Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust (OXF), Blue Planet Investment Trust (BLP), and Athelney Trust (ATY). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Lindsell Train Investment Trust compare to First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc?

First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc (LON:TRE) and Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LON:LTI) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

2.5% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has a net margin of 104.34% compared to First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc's net margin of 0.00%. First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc's return on equity of 0.00% beat Lindsell Train Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD AccN/A N/A N/A
Lindsell Train Investment Trust 104.34%-24.37%1.29%

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD AccN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Lindsell Train Investment Trust-£38.09M-0.03£772.36M-£194.00N/A

In the previous week, First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lindsell Train Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc Neutral
Lindsell Train Investment Trust Neutral

Summary

Lindsell Train Investment Trust beats First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lindsell Train Investment Trust compare to Vox Valor Capital?

Vox Valor Capital (LON:VOX) and Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LON:LTI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, earnings and dividends.

2.5% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.1% of Vox Valor Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has a net margin of 104.34% compared to Vox Valor Capital's net margin of -8.72%. Vox Valor Capital's return on equity of -12.30% beat Lindsell Train Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vox Valor Capital-8.72% -12.30% 0.29%
Lindsell Train Investment Trust 104.34%-24.37%1.29%

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vox Valor Capital. Vox Valor Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsell Train Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vox Valor Capital£12.09M0.35-£15.39K-£0.04N/A
Lindsell Train Investment Trust-£38.09M-0.03£772.36M-£194.00N/A

In the previous week, Vox Valor Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lindsell Train Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vox Valor Capital Neutral
Lindsell Train Investment Trust Neutral

Summary

Vox Valor Capital and Lindsell Train Investment Trust tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lindsell Train Investment Trust compare to Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust?

Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LON:LTI) and Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust (LON:OXF) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust. Lindsell Train Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lindsell Train Investment Trust-£38.09M-0.03£772.36M-£194.00N/A
Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust£1.62M0.00N/A£0.13N/A

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has a net margin of 104.34% compared to Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Lindsell Train Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lindsell Train Investment Trust104.34% -24.37% 1.29%
Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Lindsell Train Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lindsell Train Investment Trust Neutral
Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust Neutral

2.5% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lindsell Train Investment Trust and Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lindsell Train Investment Trust compare to Blue Planet Investment Trust?

Blue Planet Investment Trust (LON:BLP) and Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LON:LTI) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, Blue Planet Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lindsell Train Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blue Planet Investment Trust Neutral
Lindsell Train Investment Trust Neutral

Blue Planet Investment Trust has a beta of 0.22, indicating that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lindsell Train Investment Trust has a beta of 0.398, indicating that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

25.1% of Blue Planet Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 36.1% of Blue Planet Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Blue Planet Investment Trust. Lindsell Train Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Planet Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Planet Investment Trust-£8.71M0.00-£10.20M£0.05N/A
Lindsell Train Investment Trust-£38.09M-0.03£772.36M-£194.00N/A

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has a net margin of 104.34% compared to Blue Planet Investment Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Lindsell Train Investment Trust's return on equity of -24.37% beat Blue Planet Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Planet Investment TrustN/A -94.24% -39.03%
Lindsell Train Investment Trust 104.34%-24.37%1.29%

Blue Planet Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.01 per share. Lindsell Train Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 42 per share and has a dividend yield of 755.4%. Blue Planet Investment Trust pays out 10.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lindsell Train Investment Trust pays out -21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lindsell Train Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Lindsell Train Investment Trust beats Blue Planet Investment Trust on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lindsell Train Investment Trust compare to Athelney Trust?

Lindsell Train Investment Trust (LON:LTI) and Athelney Trust (LON:ATY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has a beta of 0.398, meaning that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Athelney Trust has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

2.5% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of Athelney Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lindsell Train Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of Athelney Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has a net margin of 104.34% compared to Athelney Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Athelney Trust's return on equity of -4.41% beat Lindsell Train Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lindsell Train Investment Trust104.34% -24.37% 1.29%
Athelney Trust N/A -4.41%-2.72%

Lindsell Train Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 42 per share and has a dividend yield of 755.4%. Athelney Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Lindsell Train Investment Trust pays out -21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Athelney Trust pays out -151.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Lindsell Train Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Athelney Trust. Athelney Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsell Train Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lindsell Train Investment Trust-£38.09M-0.03£772.36M-£194.00N/A
Athelney Trust-£58.31K-61.06-£2.02M-£6.60N/A

In the previous week, Lindsell Train Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Athelney Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lindsell Train Investment Trust Neutral
Athelney Trust Neutral

Summary

Lindsell Train Investment Trust beats Athelney Trust on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lindsell Train Investment Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LTI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LTI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLindsell Train Investment TrustAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.11M£2.42B£6.15B£2.76B
Dividend Yield4.93%6.01%5.23%6.16%
P/E Ratio-0.0361.8329.72368.11
Price / Sales-0.031,846.571,179.2484,635.11
Price / Cash0.7160.3388.6427.87
Price / Book0.001.396.467.47
Net Income£772.36M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.77%-0.19%-0.18%-0.36%
1 Month Performance-8.85%0.11%0.24%-1.13%
1 Year Performance-99.35%7.55%14.99%61.65%

Lindsell Train Investment Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LTI
Lindsell Train Investment Trust
N/AGBX 5.56
-0.7%		N/A-99.3%£1.11M-£38.09MN/AN/A
TRE
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF A USD Acc
N/AGBX 22.19
+2.3%		N/A+12.0%£4.39MN/AN/A147,000
VOX
Vox Valor Capital
N/AGBX 0.18
flat		N/AN/A£4.18M£12.09MN/A5
OXF
Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.92M£1.62M261.54N/A
BLP
Blue Planet Investment Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.83M-£8.71M155.00N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:LTI) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s $250 Bill – See Immediately
Former Goldman Sachs VP Dr. David Eifrig is warning that July 28 could trigger the biggest wealth reset in mod...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
When I found Rolls-Royce under $2, most people thought I was crazy
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla recommended Rolls-Royce when it traded under $2. The stock climbed more than 1,100% ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your money is changing
Porter Stansberry - who warned readers about Fannie Mae in 2006, called gold in 2008, and predicted COVID-era ...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $5 company SpaceX can’t survive without
The investors who got rich on AI didn't all buy Nvidia. Some bought ASML, the company that makes the machines ...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Set to Unleash 219-Year-Old “Super Weapon” on U.S. Soil
Four-time U.S. Presidential advisor Jim Rickards is warning of a political move he calls 'The Trump Supremacy'...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
60 years. Zero competitors.
One company has spent 60 years developing an energy source the International Energy Agency estimates at 140 ti...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel