Do analysts rate MJH or MANO?

Manolete Partners has a consensus price target of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 229.11%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than MJ Hudson Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MJ Hudson Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Manolete Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts rate SECN or MANO?

Manolete Partners has a consensus target price of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 229.11%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than SEC Newgate. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score SEC Newgate 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Manolete Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts rate DRV or MANO?

Manolete Partners has a consensus target price of GBX 130, indicating a potential upside of 229.11%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than Driver Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Driver Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Manolete Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, DRV or MANO?

Manolete Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Driver Group. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Driver Group £42.63M 0.00 -£2.40M N/A N/A Manolete Partners £28.79M 0.60 £40.35M £1.41 28.01

Do analysts prefer MANO or AQSG?

Manolete Partners presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, indicating a potential upside of 229.11%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than Aquila Services Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Manolete Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Aquila Services Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer MANO or CCAP?

Manolete Partners presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 229.11%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than Conduity Capital. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Manolete Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Conduity Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Manolete Partners (MANO) Competitors

GBX 39.50 +0.50 (+1.28%)

As of 06/10/2026 10:15 AM Eastern

Compare

MANO vs. MJH, SECN, DRV, AQSG, and CCAP

Should you buy Manolete Partners stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Manolete Partners with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Manolete Partners include MJ Hudson Group (MJH), SEC Newgate (SECN), Driver Group (DRV), Aquila Services Group (AQSG), and Conduity Capital (CCAP). These companies are all part of the "consulting services" industry.

How does Manolete Partners compare to MJ Hudson Group?

MJ Hudson Group (LON:MJH) and Manolete Partners (LON:MANO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

Manolete Partners has a net margin of 2.23% compared to MJ Hudson Group's net margin of -12.31%. Manolete Partners' return on equity of 1.54% beat MJ Hudson Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MJ Hudson Group	-12.31%	-16.06%	-0.86%
Manolete Partners	2.23%	1.54%	2.33%

Manolete Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MJ Hudson Group. MJ Hudson Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manolete Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MJ Hudson Group	£47.45M	0.00	-£5.84M	-£0.03	N/A
Manolete Partners	£28.79M	0.60	£40.35M	£1.41	28.01

28.1% of MJ Hudson Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.7% of MJ Hudson Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.7% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Manolete Partners has a consensus price target of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 229.11%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than MJ Hudson Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MJ Hudson Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Manolete Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, MJ Hudson Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Manolete Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MJ Hudson Group	Neutral
Manolete Partners	Neutral

MJ Hudson Group has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manolete Partners has a beta of 0.603, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Manolete Partners beats MJ Hudson Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manolete Partners compare to SEC Newgate?

SEC Newgate (LON:SECN) and Manolete Partners (LON:MANO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

2.4% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.7% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, SEC Newgate's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Manolete Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
SEC Newgate	Neutral
Manolete Partners	Neutral

Manolete Partners has a consensus target price of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 229.11%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than SEC Newgate.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SEC Newgate	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Manolete Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Manolete Partners has a net margin of 2.23% compared to SEC Newgate's net margin of 0.00%. Manolete Partners' return on equity of 1.54% beat SEC Newgate's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SEC Newgate	N/A	N/A	N/A
Manolete Partners	2.23%	1.54%	2.33%

Manolete Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SEC Newgate. SEC Newgate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manolete Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SEC Newgate	£70.13M	0.00	N/A	£3.30	N/A
Manolete Partners	£28.79M	0.60	£40.35M	£1.41	28.01

Summary

Manolete Partners beats SEC Newgate on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manolete Partners compare to Driver Group?

Driver Group (LON:DRV) and Manolete Partners (LON:MANO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Manolete Partners has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Driver Group's net margin of -0.79%. Manolete Partners' return on equity of 1.54% beat Driver Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Driver Group	-0.79%	0.77%	1.50%
Manolete Partners	2.23%	1.54%	2.33%

Driver Group has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manolete Partners has a beta of 0.603, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Manolete Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Driver Group.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Driver Group	£42.63M	0.00	-£2.40M	N/A	N/A
Manolete Partners	£28.79M	0.60	£40.35M	£1.41	28.01

In the previous week, Driver Group's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Manolete Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Driver Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Driver Group	Very Positive
Manolete Partners	Neutral

60.0% of Driver Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.7% of Driver Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.7% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Manolete Partners has a consensus target price of GBX 130, indicating a potential upside of 229.11%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than Driver Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Driver Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Manolete Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Manolete Partners beats Driver Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manolete Partners compare to Aquila Services Group?

Manolete Partners (LON:MANO) and Aquila Services Group (LON:AQSG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Manolete Partners has a beta of 0.603, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aquila Services Group has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

2.4% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Aquila Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.7% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 80.6% of Aquila Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Aquila Services Group has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Manolete Partners' net margin of 2.23%. Aquila Services Group's return on equity of 5.46% beat Manolete Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manolete Partners	2.23%	1.54%	2.33%
Aquila Services Group	2.78%	5.46%	4.15%

Manolete Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Aquila Services Group. Aquila Services Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manolete Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manolete Partners	£28.79M	0.60	£40.35M	£1.41	28.01
Aquila Services Group	£12.30M	0.00	N/A	£0.01	N/A

In the previous week, Manolete Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aquila Services Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manolete Partners	Neutral
Aquila Services Group	Neutral

Manolete Partners presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, indicating a potential upside of 229.11%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than Aquila Services Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Manolete Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Aquila Services Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Manolete Partners beats Aquila Services Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manolete Partners compare to Conduity Capital?

Manolete Partners (LON:MANO) and Conduity Capital (LON:CCAP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

2.4% of Manolete Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 11.7% of Manolete Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Manolete Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Conduity Capital. Conduity Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manolete Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manolete Partners	£28.79M	0.60	£40.35M	£1.41	28.01
Conduity Capital	£5.51M	0.00	N/A	-£0.20	N/A

Manolete Partners has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Conduity Capital's net margin of 0.00%. Manolete Partners' return on equity of 1.54% beat Conduity Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manolete Partners	2.23%	1.54%	2.33%
Conduity Capital	N/A	N/A	N/A

Manolete Partners presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 229.11%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than Conduity Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Manolete Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Conduity Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Manolete Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Conduity Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manolete Partners	Neutral
Conduity Capital	Neutral

Summary

Manolete Partners beats Conduity Capital on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Manolete Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MANO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Manolete Partners	Consulting Services Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£17.31M	£2.51B	£9.33B	£2.72B
Dividend Yield	0.37%	3.62%	3.55%	6.13%
P/E Ratio	28.01	103.10	24.88	366.60
Price / Sales	0.60	146.75	5,188.38	86,640.49
Price / Cash	5.07	31.83	27.65	27.87
Price / Book	0.43	2.99	4.69	7.62
Net Income	£40.35M	£155.55M	£793.53M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	3.95%	-1.35%	-2.13%	-1.28%
1 Month Performance	6.76%	-2.19%	-1.55%	0.45%
1 Year Performance	-52.98%	-14.18%	22.84%	69.80%

Manolete Partners Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MANO Manolete Partners	N/A	GBX 39.50 +1.3%	GBX 130 +229.1%	-53.0%	£17.31M	£28.79M	28.01	29
MJH MJ Hudson Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£26.69M	£47.45M	N/A	232
SECN SEC Newgate	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£25.24M	£70.13M	33.64	580	High Trading Volume
DRV Driver Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£13.80M	£42.63M	N/A	277	News Coverage Gap Down
AQSG Aquila Services Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£2.60M	£12.30M	650.00	108	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MANO) was last updated on 6/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Manolete Partners (MANO) Competitors

MANO vs. MJH, SECN, DRV, AQSG, and CCAP

How does Manolete Partners compare to MJ Hudson Group?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to SEC Newgate?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to Driver Group?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to Aquila Services Group?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to Conduity Capital?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

MANO vs. The Competition

Manolete Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Manolete Partners (MANO) Competitors

MANO vs. MJH, SECN, DRV, AQSG, and CCAP

How does Manolete Partners compare to MJ Hudson Group?

Is MJH or MANO more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MJH or MANO?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MJH or MANO?

Do analysts rate MJH or MANO?

Does the media favor MJH or MANO?

Which has more volatility & risk, MJH or MANO?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to SEC Newgate?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in SECN or MANO?

Does the media prefer SECN or MANO?

Do analysts rate SECN or MANO?

Is SECN or MANO more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, SECN or MANO?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to Driver Group?

Is DRV or MANO more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, DRV or MANO?

Which has better valuation & earnings, DRV or MANO?

Does the media refer more to DRV or MANO?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in DRV or MANO?

Do analysts rate DRV or MANO?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to Aquila Services Group?

Which has more risk & volatility, MANO or AQSG?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in MANO or AQSG?

Is MANO or AQSG more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MANO or AQSG?

Does the media prefer MANO or AQSG?

Do analysts prefer MANO or AQSG?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to Conduity Capital?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MANO or CCAP?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MANO or CCAP?

Is MANO or CCAP more profitable?

Do analysts prefer MANO or CCAP?

Does the media refer more to MANO or CCAP?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

MANO vs. The Competition

Manolete Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools