Do analysts rate MANO or MJH?

Manolete Partners presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 238.81%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than MJ Hudson Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Manolete Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 MJ Hudson Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer MANO or SECN?

Manolete Partners currently has a consensus target price of GBX 130, indicating a potential upside of 238.81%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than SEC Newgate. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Manolete Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 SEC Newgate 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer MANO or DRV?

Manolete Partners currently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 238.81%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than Driver Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Manolete Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Driver Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MANO or DRV?

Manolete Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Driver Group. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Manolete Partners £28.79M 0.58 £40.35M £1.41 27.21 Driver Group £42.63M 0.00 -£2.40M N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer MANO or AQSG?

Manolete Partners presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, indicating a potential upside of 238.81%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than Aquila Services Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Manolete Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Aquila Services Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer CCAP or MANO?

Manolete Partners has a consensus target price of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 238.81%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than Conduity Capital. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Conduity Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Manolete Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Manolete Partners (MANO) Competitors

GBX 38.37 -0.63 (-1.62%)

As of 04:39 AM Eastern

Compare

MANO vs. MJH, SECN, DRV, AQSG, and CCAP

Should you buy Manolete Partners stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Manolete Partners with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Manolete Partners include MJ Hudson Group (MJH), SEC Newgate (SECN), Driver Group (DRV), Aquila Services Group (AQSG), and Conduity Capital (CCAP). These companies are all part of the "consulting services" industry.

How does Manolete Partners compare to MJ Hudson Group?

Manolete Partners (LON:MANO) and MJ Hudson Group (LON:MJH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

2.4% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.1% of MJ Hudson Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.7% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.7% of MJ Hudson Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Manolete Partners presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 238.81%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than MJ Hudson Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Manolete Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
MJ Hudson Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Manolete Partners has a net margin of 2.23% compared to MJ Hudson Group's net margin of -12.31%. Manolete Partners' return on equity of 1.54% beat MJ Hudson Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manolete Partners	2.23%	1.54%	2.33%
MJ Hudson Group	-12.31%	-16.06%	-0.86%

Manolete Partners has a beta of 0.603, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MJ Hudson Group has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Manolete Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled MJ Hudson Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manolete Partners	Neutral
MJ Hudson Group	Neutral

Manolete Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MJ Hudson Group. MJ Hudson Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manolete Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manolete Partners	£28.79M	0.58	£40.35M	£1.41	27.21
MJ Hudson Group	£47.45M	0.00	-£5.84M	-£0.03	N/A

Summary

Manolete Partners beats MJ Hudson Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manolete Partners compare to SEC Newgate?

Manolete Partners (LON:MANO) and SEC Newgate (LON:SECN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Manolete Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled SEC Newgate'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manolete Partners	Neutral
SEC Newgate	Neutral

2.4% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.7% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Manolete Partners currently has a consensus target price of GBX 130, indicating a potential upside of 238.81%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than SEC Newgate.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Manolete Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
SEC Newgate	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Manolete Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SEC Newgate. SEC Newgate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manolete Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manolete Partners	£28.79M	0.58	£40.35M	£1.41	27.21
SEC Newgate	£70.13M	0.00	N/A	£3.30	N/A

Manolete Partners has a net margin of 2.23% compared to SEC Newgate's net margin of 0.00%. Manolete Partners' return on equity of 1.54% beat SEC Newgate's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manolete Partners	2.23%	1.54%	2.33%
SEC Newgate	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Manolete Partners beats SEC Newgate on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manolete Partners compare to Driver Group?

Manolete Partners (LON:MANO) and Driver Group (LON:DRV) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and risk.

Manolete Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Driver Group.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manolete Partners	£28.79M	0.58	£40.35M	£1.41	27.21
Driver Group	£42.63M	0.00	-£2.40M	N/A	N/A

Manolete Partners has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Driver Group's net margin of -0.79%. Manolete Partners' return on equity of 1.54% beat Driver Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manolete Partners	2.23%	1.54%	2.33%
Driver Group	-0.79%	0.77%	1.50%

In the previous week, Driver Group's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Manolete Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Driver Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manolete Partners	Neutral
Driver Group	Very Positive

Manolete Partners currently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 238.81%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than Driver Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Manolete Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Driver Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Manolete Partners has a beta of 0.603, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Driver Group has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

2.4% of Manolete Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.0% of Driver Group shares are held by institutional investors. 11.7% of Manolete Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of Driver Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Manolete Partners beats Driver Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manolete Partners compare to Aquila Services Group?

Manolete Partners (LON:MANO) and Aquila Services Group (LON:AQSG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Aquila Services Group has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Manolete Partners' net margin of 2.23%. Aquila Services Group's return on equity of 5.46% beat Manolete Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manolete Partners	2.23%	1.54%	2.33%
Aquila Services Group	2.78%	5.46%	4.15%

In the previous week, Manolete Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aquila Services Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manolete Partners	Neutral
Aquila Services Group	Neutral

Manolete Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Aquila Services Group. Aquila Services Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manolete Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manolete Partners	£28.79M	0.58	£40.35M	£1.41	27.21
Aquila Services Group	£12.30M	0.00	N/A	£0.01	N/A

Manolete Partners presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, indicating a potential upside of 238.81%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than Aquila Services Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Manolete Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Aquila Services Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Manolete Partners has a beta of 0.603, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aquila Services Group has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

2.4% of Manolete Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Aquila Services Group shares are held by institutional investors. 11.7% of Manolete Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 80.6% of Aquila Services Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Manolete Partners beats Aquila Services Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manolete Partners compare to Conduity Capital?

Conduity Capital (LON:CCAP) and Manolete Partners (LON:MANO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Manolete Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Conduity Capital. Conduity Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manolete Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Conduity Capital	£5.51M	0.00	N/A	-£0.20	N/A
Manolete Partners	£28.79M	0.58	£40.35M	£1.41	27.21

2.4% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.7% of Manolete Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Manolete Partners has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Conduity Capital's net margin of 0.00%. Manolete Partners' return on equity of 1.54% beat Conduity Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Conduity Capital	N/A	N/A	N/A
Manolete Partners	2.23%	1.54%	2.33%

In the previous week, Conduity Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Manolete Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Conduity Capital	Neutral
Manolete Partners	Neutral

Manolete Partners has a consensus target price of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 238.81%. Given Manolete Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Manolete Partners is more favorable than Conduity Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Conduity Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Manolete Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Manolete Partners beats Conduity Capital on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Manolete Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MANO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Manolete Partners	Consulting Services Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£16.81M	£2.49B	£9.32B	£2.73B
Dividend Yield	0.37%	3.62%	3.55%	6.13%
P/E Ratio	27.21	103.08	24.96	366.66
Price / Sales	0.58	146.60	5,198.39	86,643.90
Price / Cash	5.07	31.83	27.65	27.87
Price / Book	0.42	2.99	4.69	7.64
Net Income	£40.35M	£155.55M	£793.53M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.97%	-1.44%	-2.13%	-1.30%
1 Month Performance	3.70%	-2.29%	-1.54%	0.48%
1 Year Performance	-54.32%	-14.25%	22.82%	69.92%

Manolete Partners Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MANO Manolete Partners	N/A	GBX 38.37 -1.6%	GBX 130 +238.8%	-53.0%	£16.81M	£28.79M	27.21	29
MJH MJ Hudson Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£26.69M	£47.45M	N/A	232
SECN SEC Newgate	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£25.24M	£70.13M	33.64	580	High Trading Volume
DRV Driver Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£13.80M	£42.63M	N/A	277	News Coverage Gap Down
AQSG Aquila Services Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£2.60M	£12.30M	650.00	108	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MANO) was last updated on 6/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Manolete Partners (MANO) Competitors

MANO vs. MJH, SECN, DRV, AQSG, and CCAP

How does Manolete Partners compare to MJ Hudson Group?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to SEC Newgate?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to Driver Group?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to Aquila Services Group?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to Conduity Capital?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

MANO vs. The Competition

Manolete Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Manolete Partners (MANO) Competitors

MANO vs. MJH, SECN, DRV, AQSG, and CCAP

How does Manolete Partners compare to MJ Hudson Group?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MANO or MJH?

Do analysts rate MANO or MJH?

Is MANO or MJH more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, MANO or MJH?

Does the media favor MANO or MJH?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MANO or MJH?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to SEC Newgate?

Does the media refer more to MANO or SECN?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MANO or SECN?

Do analysts prefer MANO or SECN?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MANO or SECN?

Is MANO or SECN more profitable?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to Driver Group?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MANO or DRV?

Is MANO or DRV more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MANO or DRV?

Do analysts prefer MANO or DRV?

Which has more risk and volatility, MANO or DRV?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MANO or DRV?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to Aquila Services Group?

Is MANO or AQSG more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MANO or AQSG?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MANO or AQSG?

Do analysts prefer MANO or AQSG?

Which has more risk & volatility, MANO or AQSG?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in MANO or AQSG?

Summary

How does Manolete Partners compare to Conduity Capital?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CCAP or MANO?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CCAP or MANO?

Is CCAP or MANO more profitable?

Does the media favor CCAP or MANO?

Do analysts prefer CCAP or MANO?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

MANO vs. The Competition

Manolete Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools