Go Pro

Nanoco Group (NANO) Competitors

Nanoco Group logo
GBX 2.70 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/13/2026 12:27 PM Eastern

NANO vs. OXIG, IQE, CPX, KBT, and RMS

Should you buy Nanoco Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Nanoco Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Nanoco Group include Oxford Instruments (OXIG), IQE (IQE), CAP-XX (CPX), K3 Business Technology Group (KBT), and Remote Monitored Systems (RMS). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does Nanoco Group compare to Oxford Instruments?

Oxford Instruments (LON:OXIG) and Nanoco Group (LON:NANO) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Oxford Instruments currently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,781.67, suggesting a potential downside of 3.88%. Given Oxford Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Oxford Instruments is more favorable than Nanoco Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Oxford Instruments
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Nanoco Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to Nanoco Group's net margin of 9.21%. Oxford Instruments' return on equity of 13.94% beat Nanoco Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oxford Instruments11.39% 13.94% 6.47%
Nanoco Group 9.21%-5.96%-74.97%

66.7% of Oxford Instruments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Nanoco Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Oxford Instruments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Nanoco Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Oxford Instruments and Oxford Instruments both had 1 articles in the media. Oxford Instruments' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Nanoco Group's score of 0.67 indicating that Oxford Instruments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Oxford Instruments
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Nanoco Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nanoco Group has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Oxford Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than Nanoco Group. Nanoco Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Instruments£423.20M3.77£50.60M£83.7034.58
Nanoco Group£11.87M0.41-£819.79K£0.505.40

Summary

Oxford Instruments beats Nanoco Group on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nanoco Group compare to IQE?

Nanoco Group (LON:NANO) and IQE (LON:IQE) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Nanoco Group had 1 more articles in the media than IQE. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Nanoco Group and 0 mentions for IQE. Nanoco Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat IQE's score of 0.00 indicating that Nanoco Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nanoco Group Positive
IQE Neutral

IQE has a consensus price target of GBX 60, indicating a potential upside of 46.70%. Given IQE's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe IQE is more favorable than Nanoco Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nanoco Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
IQE
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.0% of Nanoco Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.0% of IQE shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Nanoco Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of IQE shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nanoco Group has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IQE has a beta of 2.238, suggesting that its share price is 124% more volatile than the broader market.

Nanoco Group has a net margin of 9.21% compared to IQE's net margin of -37.71%. Nanoco Group's return on equity of -5.96% beat IQE's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nanoco Group9.21% -5.96% -74.97%
IQE -37.71%-37.49%-3.31%

Nanoco Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than IQE. IQE is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nanoco Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nanoco Group£11.87M0.41-£819.79K£0.505.40
IQE£97.30M5.59-£23.85M-£3.77N/A

Summary

Nanoco Group and IQE tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nanoco Group compare to CAP-XX?

CAP-XX (LON:CPX) and Nanoco Group (LON:NANO) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Nanoco Group had 1 more articles in the media than CAP-XX. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Nanoco Group and 0 mentions for CAP-XX. Nanoco Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat CAP-XX's score of 0.00 indicating that Nanoco Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CAP-XX Neutral
Nanoco Group Positive

Nanoco Group has a net margin of 9.21% compared to CAP-XX's net margin of -74.36%. Nanoco Group's return on equity of -5.96% beat CAP-XX's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CAP-XX-74.36% -63.48% -54.80%
Nanoco Group 9.21%-5.96%-74.97%

6.7% of CAP-XX shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Nanoco Group shares are held by institutional investors. 12.3% of CAP-XX shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Nanoco Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Nanoco Group has higher revenue and earnings than CAP-XX. CAP-XX is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nanoco Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CAP-XX£4.94M3.52-£88.46M-£0.08N/A
Nanoco Group£11.87M0.41-£819.79K£0.505.40

CAP-XX has a beta of 1.444, suggesting that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nanoco Group has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Nanoco Group beats CAP-XX on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nanoco Group compare to K3 Business Technology Group?

Nanoco Group (LON:NANO) and K3 Business Technology Group (LON:KBT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

0.0% of Nanoco Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.5% of K3 Business Technology Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.5% of Nanoco Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of K3 Business Technology Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Nanoco Group has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K3 Business Technology Group has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nanoco Group and Nanoco Group both had 1 articles in the media. K3 Business Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Nanoco Group's score of 0.67 indicating that K3 Business Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nanoco Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
K3 Business Technology Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Nanoco Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than K3 Business Technology Group. K3 Business Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nanoco Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nanoco Group£11.87M0.41-£819.79K£0.505.40
K3 Business Technology Group£39.51M0.45-£2.47M-£5.53N/A

Nanoco Group has a net margin of 9.21% compared to K3 Business Technology Group's net margin of 2.47%. K3 Business Technology Group's return on equity of 2.10% beat Nanoco Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nanoco Group9.21% -5.96% -74.97%
K3 Business Technology Group 2.47%2.10%5.02%

Summary

K3 Business Technology Group beats Nanoco Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nanoco Group compare to Remote Monitored Systems?

Nanoco Group (LON:NANO) and Remote Monitored Systems (LON:RMS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Remote Monitored Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nanoco Group. Remote Monitored Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nanoco Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nanoco Group£11.87M0.41-£819.79K£0.505.40
Remote Monitored Systems£104.31K0.00N/A-£0.20N/A

Nanoco Group has a net margin of 9.21% compared to Remote Monitored Systems' net margin of 0.00%. Remote Monitored Systems' return on equity of 0.00% beat Nanoco Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nanoco Group9.21% -5.96% -74.97%
Remote Monitored Systems N/A N/A N/A

0.0% of Nanoco Group shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Nanoco Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Nanoco Group had 1 more articles in the media than Remote Monitored Systems. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Nanoco Group and 0 mentions for Remote Monitored Systems. Remote Monitored Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Nanoco Group's score of 0.67 indicating that Remote Monitored Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nanoco Group Positive
Remote Monitored Systems Positive

Summary

Nanoco Group beats Remote Monitored Systems on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nanoco Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NANO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NANO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NANO vs. The Competition

MetricNanoco GroupSemiconductor Equipment & Materials IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.93M£7.19B£39.25B£2.77B
Dividend Yield2.39%2.71%3.19%6.16%
P/E Ratio5.4019.4478.52368.13
Price / Sales0.41126.37597.7684,621.88
Price / Cash17.8616.3945.8227.87
Price / Book-0.464.669.497.51
Net Income-£819.79K£90.57M£1.07B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.27%0.64%-0.47%-0.27%
1 Month Performance3.05%-1.14%-1.35%-1.09%
1 Year Performance-79.70%127.83%140.15%61.67%

Nanoco Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NANO
Nanoco Group
N/AGBX 2.70
flat
N/A-78.4%£4.93M£11.87M5.4046
OXIG
Oxford Instruments
1.8123 of 5 stars
GBX 2,876
flat
GBX 2,781.67
-3.3%
+45.3%£1.58B£423.20M34.362,000
IQE
IQE
1.5936 of 5 stars
GBX 40.80
flat
GBX 60
+47.1%
+297.8%£543.06M£97.30MN/A577
CPX
CAP-XX
N/AGBX 0.31
+5.1%
N/A+19.5%£17.97M£4.94MN/AN/A
KBT
K3 Business Technology Group
N/AGBX 40
-20.0%
N/A-49.2%£17.87M£39.51MN/A322

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:NANO) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners