Do analysts prefer AWE or OXIG?

Oxford Instruments has a consensus target price of GBX 2,883.33, suggesting a potential downside of 7.05%. Given Oxford Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Oxford Instruments is more favorable than Alphawave IP Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Alphawave IP Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Oxford Instruments 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, IQE or OXIG?

Oxford Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than IQE. IQE is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio IQE £116.60M 6.26 -£23.85M -£3.77 N/A Oxford Instruments £423.20M 4.02 £50.60M £83.70 37.06

Is IQE or OXIG more profitable?

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to IQE's net margin of -20.21%. Oxford Instruments' return on equity of 13.94% beat IQE's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets IQE -20.21% -19.81% -3.31% Oxford Instruments 11.39% 13.94% 6.47%

Does the media prefer IQE or OXIG?

In the previous week, Oxford Instruments had 2 more articles in the media than IQE. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oxford Instruments and 2 mentions for IQE. IQE's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Oxford Instruments' score of 0.96 indicating that IQE is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment IQE 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Oxford Instruments 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate OXIG or ENSI?

Oxford Instruments presently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,883.33, indicating a potential downside of 7.05%. Given Oxford Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Oxford Instruments is more favorable than EnSilica. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Oxford Instruments 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 EnSilica 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, OXIG or ENSI?

Oxford Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than EnSilica. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Oxford Instruments £423.20M 4.02 £50.60M £83.70 37.06 EnSilica £21.64M 4.62 -£221.97K -£2.34 N/A

Does the media favor OXIG or ENSI?

In the previous week, Oxford Instruments had 3 more articles in the media than EnSilica. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oxford Instruments and 1 mentions for EnSilica. Oxford Instruments' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat EnSilica's score of 0.44 indicating that Oxford Instruments is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Oxford Instruments 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive EnSilica 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor OXIG or CML?

In the previous week, Oxford Instruments had 2 more articles in the media than CML Microsystems. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oxford Instruments and 2 mentions for CML Microsystems. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Oxford Instruments' score of 0.96 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Oxford Instruments 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive CML Microsystems 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer OXIG or FST?

Oxford Instruments currently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,883.33, indicating a potential downside of 7.05%. Given Frontier Smart Technologies Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Frontier Smart Technologies Group is more favorable than Oxford Instruments. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Oxford Instruments 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Frontier Smart Technologies Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Oxford Instruments (OXIG) Competitors

GBX 3,102 +88.00 (+2.92%)

As of 10/2/2026 12:00 PM Eastern

Compare

OXIG vs. AWE, IQE, ENSI, CML, and FST

Should you buy Oxford Instruments stock or one of its competitors? Oxford Instruments's main competitors and comparable companies include Alphawave IP Group (AWE), IQE (IQE), EnSilica (ENSI), CML Microsystems (CML), and Frontier Smart Technologies Group (FST). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "semiconductors & semiconductor equipment" industry.

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Alphawave IP Group?

Alphawave IP Group (LON:AWE) and Oxford Instruments (LON:OXIG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Oxford Instruments has a consensus target price of GBX 2,883.33, suggesting a potential downside of 7.05%. Given Oxford Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Oxford Instruments is more favorable than Alphawave IP Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alphawave IP Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Oxford Instruments	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

13.3% of Alphawave IP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.7% of Oxford Instruments shares are owned by institutional investors. 42.1% of Alphawave IP Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Oxford Instruments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Oxford Instruments had 4 more articles in the media than Alphawave IP Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oxford Instruments and 0 mentions for Alphawave IP Group. Oxford Instruments' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Alphawave IP Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Oxford Instruments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Alphawave IP Group	Neutral
Oxford Instruments	Positive

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to Alphawave IP Group's net margin of -13.82%. Oxford Instruments' return on equity of 13.94% beat Alphawave IP Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alphawave IP Group	-13.82%	-8.87%	-3.94%
Oxford Instruments	11.39%	13.94%	6.47%

Alphawave IP Group has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.093, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Oxford Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than Alphawave IP Group. Alphawave IP Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alphawave IP Group	£319.58M	4.59	-£99.26M	-£22.99	N/A
Oxford Instruments	£423.20M	4.02	£50.60M	£83.70	37.06

Summary

Oxford Instruments beats Alphawave IP Group on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Instruments compare to IQE?

IQE (LON:IQE) and Oxford Instruments (LON:OXIG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

52.0% of IQE shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.7% of Oxford Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of IQE shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Oxford Instruments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to IQE's net margin of -20.21%. Oxford Instruments' return on equity of 13.94% beat IQE's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
IQE	-20.21%	-19.81%	-3.31%
Oxford Instruments	11.39%	13.94%	6.47%

Oxford Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than IQE. IQE is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
IQE	£116.60M	6.26	-£23.85M	-£3.77	N/A
Oxford Instruments	£423.20M	4.02	£50.60M	£83.70	37.06

IQE currently has a consensus price target of GBX 60, indicating a potential upside of 9.49%. Oxford Instruments has a consensus price target of GBX 2,883.33, indicating a potential downside of 7.05%. Given IQE's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe IQE is more favorable than Oxford Instruments.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
IQE	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Oxford Instruments	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

IQE has a beta of 2.226, indicating that its share price is 123% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.093, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Oxford Instruments had 2 more articles in the media than IQE. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oxford Instruments and 2 mentions for IQE. IQE's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Oxford Instruments' score of 0.96 indicating that IQE is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
IQE	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Oxford Instruments	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Oxford Instruments beats IQE on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Instruments compare to EnSilica?

Oxford Instruments (LON:OXIG) and EnSilica (LON:ENSI) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Oxford Instruments had 3 more articles in the media than EnSilica. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oxford Instruments and 1 mentions for EnSilica. Oxford Instruments' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat EnSilica's score of 0.44 indicating that Oxford Instruments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Oxford Instruments	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
EnSilica	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.093, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EnSilica has a beta of 0.912, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Oxford Instruments presently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,883.33, indicating a potential downside of 7.05%. Given Oxford Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Oxford Instruments is more favorable than EnSilica.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oxford Instruments	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
EnSilica	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. Oxford Instruments' return on equity of 13.94% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oxford Instruments	11.39%	13.94%	6.47%
EnSilica	-9.36%	-9.80%	1.78%

Oxford Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than EnSilica. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Instruments	£423.20M	4.02	£50.60M	£83.70	37.06
EnSilica	£21.64M	4.62	-£221.97K	-£2.34	N/A

66.7% of Oxford Instruments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of EnSilica shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Oxford Instruments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of EnSilica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Oxford Instruments beats EnSilica on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Instruments compare to CML Microsystems?

Oxford Instruments (LON:OXIG) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.093, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.273, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

66.7% of Oxford Instruments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.9% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Oxford Instruments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Oxford Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than CML Microsystems. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Instruments	£423.20M	4.02	£50.60M	£83.70	37.06
CML Microsystems	£20.45M	2.63	£2.05M	-£0.33	N/A

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to CML Microsystems' net margin of -0.26%. Oxford Instruments' return on equity of 13.94% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oxford Instruments	11.39%	13.94%	6.47%
CML Microsystems	-0.26%	-0.11%	1.87%

Oxford Instruments pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. CML Microsystems pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Oxford Instruments pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CML Microsystems pays out -3,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CML Microsystems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Oxford Instruments presently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,883.33, indicating a potential downside of 7.05%. CML Microsystems has a consensus target price of GBX 223, indicating a potential downside of 30.85%. Given Oxford Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Oxford Instruments is more favorable than CML Microsystems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oxford Instruments	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
CML Microsystems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Oxford Instruments had 2 more articles in the media than CML Microsystems. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oxford Instruments and 2 mentions for CML Microsystems. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Oxford Instruments' score of 0.96 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Oxford Instruments	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
CML Microsystems	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Oxford Instruments beats CML Microsystems on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Frontier Smart Technologies Group?

Oxford Instruments (LON:OXIG) and Frontier Smart Technologies Group (LON:FST) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Oxford Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. Frontier Smart Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Instruments	£423.20M	4.02	£50.60M	£83.70	37.06
Frontier Smart Technologies Group	£38.88M	0.00	N/A	-£4.20	N/A

Oxford Instruments currently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,883.33, indicating a potential downside of 7.05%. Given Frontier Smart Technologies Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Frontier Smart Technologies Group is more favorable than Oxford Instruments.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oxford Instruments	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Frontier Smart Technologies Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to Frontier Smart Technologies Group's net margin of 0.00%. Oxford Instruments' return on equity of 13.94% beat Frontier Smart Technologies Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oxford Instruments	11.39%	13.94%	6.47%
Frontier Smart Technologies Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Oxford Instruments had 4 more articles in the media than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oxford Instruments and 0 mentions for Frontier Smart Technologies Group. Oxford Instruments' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Frontier Smart Technologies Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Oxford Instruments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Oxford Instruments	Positive
Frontier Smart Technologies Group	Neutral

66.7% of Oxford Instruments shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Oxford Instruments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Oxford Instruments beats Frontier Smart Technologies Group on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Oxford Instruments News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OXIG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

OXIG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Oxford Instruments	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry	Technology Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£1.70B	£119.31B	£31.69B	£2.81B
Dividend Yield	0.82%	1.61%	2.75%	6.18%
P/E Ratio	37.06	94.00	81.43	366.16
Price / Sales	4.02	78.76	585.78	89,437.04
Price / Cash	10.66	66.75	50.07	27.89
Price / Book	4.91	10.95	8.11	6.83
Net Income	£50.60M	£2.05B	£704.44M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	5.87%	3.68%	114.80%	-0.73%
1 Month Performance	15.14%	11.54%	73.50%	16.59%
1 Year Performance	54.33%	76.58%	167.51%	23.09%

Oxford Instruments Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
OXIG Oxford Instruments	2.0556 of 5 stars	GBX 3,102 +2.9%	GBX 2,883.33 -7.0%	+58.4%	£1.70B	£423.20M	37.06	1,807	News Coverage Positive News Gap Down
AWE Alphawave IP Group	N/A	GBX 185 flat	N/A	-1.8%	£1.47B	£319.58M	N/A	829
IQE IQE	1.2644 of 5 stars	GBX 46.07 -1.8%	GBX 60 +30.2%	+640.5%	£613.18M	£116.60M	N/A	577
ENSI EnSilica	N/A	GBX 79 +1.9%	N/A	+49.0%	£106.05M	£21.64M	N/A	168	News Coverage
CML CML Microsystems	N/A	GBX 309 +3.0%	GBX 223 -27.8%	+25.7%	£51.48M	£20.45M	N/A	139	News Coverage Insider Trade Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:OXIG) was last updated on 10/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Oxford Instruments (OXIG) Competitors

OXIG vs. AWE, IQE, ENSI, CML, and FST

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Alphawave IP Group?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to IQE?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to EnSilica?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to CML Microsystems?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Frontier Smart Technologies Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

OXIG vs. The Competition

Oxford Instruments Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Oxford Instruments (OXIG) Competitors

OXIG vs. AWE, IQE, ENSI, CML, and FST

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Alphawave IP Group?

Do analysts prefer AWE or OXIG?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AWE or OXIG?

Does the media favor AWE or OXIG?

Is AWE or OXIG more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, AWE or OXIG?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, AWE or OXIG?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to IQE?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of IQE or OXIG?

Is IQE or OXIG more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, IQE or OXIG?

Do analysts prefer IQE or OXIG?

Which has more volatility and risk, IQE or OXIG?

Does the media prefer IQE or OXIG?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to EnSilica?

Does the media favor OXIG or ENSI?

Which has more volatility and risk, OXIG or ENSI?

Do analysts rate OXIG or ENSI?

Is OXIG or ENSI more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, OXIG or ENSI?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in OXIG or ENSI?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to CML Microsystems?

Which has more volatility & risk, OXIG or CML?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of OXIG or CML?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, OXIG or CML?

Is OXIG or CML more profitable?

Is OXIG or CML a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend OXIG or CML?

Does the media favor OXIG or CML?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Frontier Smart Technologies Group?

Which has better valuation and earnings, OXIG or FST?

Do analysts prefer OXIG or FST?

Is OXIG or FST more profitable?

Does the media favor OXIG or FST?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in OXIG or FST?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

OXIG vs. The Competition

Oxford Instruments Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools