Which has better earnings & valuation, IQE or OXIG?

Oxford Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than IQE. IQE is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio IQE £97.30M 6.72 -£23.85M -£3.77 N/A Oxford Instruments £423.20M 3.85 £50.60M £23.70 124.39

Is IQE or OXIG more profitable?

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to IQE's net margin of -37.71%. Oxford Instruments' return on equity of 13.94% beat IQE's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets IQE -37.71% -37.49% -3.31% Oxford Instruments 11.39% 13.94% 6.47%

Does the media favor IQE or OXIG?

In the previous week, IQE and IQE both had 1 articles in the media. IQE's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Oxford Instruments' score of 0.00 indicating that IQE is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment IQE 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Oxford Instruments 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend NANO or OXIG?

Oxford Instruments has a consensus price target of GBX 2,781.67, suggesting a potential downside of 5.64%. Given Oxford Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Oxford Instruments is more favorable than Nanoco Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Nanoco Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Oxford Instruments 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Which has higher valuation and earnings, NANO or OXIG?

Oxford Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than Nanoco Group. Nanoco Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Nanoco Group £11.87M 0.46 -£819.79K £0.50 6.00 Oxford Instruments £423.20M 3.85 £50.60M £23.70 124.39

Does the media prefer NANO or OXIG?

In the previous week, Nanoco Group and Nanoco Group both had 1 articles in the media. Oxford Instruments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Nanoco Group's score of -0.50 indicating that Oxford Instruments is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Nanoco Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Oxford Instruments 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, OXIG or CCC?

Computacenter has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Instruments. Computacenter is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Oxford Instruments £423.20M 3.85 £50.60M £23.70 124.39 Computacenter £9.19B 0.49 £158.49M £145.50 29.21

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, OXIG or SXS?

Spectris has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Instruments. Spectris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Oxford Instruments £423.20M 3.85 £50.60M £23.70 124.39 Spectris £1.35B 3.06 £270.93M £57.60 71.91

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, OXIG or RSW?

Renishaw has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Instruments. Renishaw is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Oxford Instruments £423.20M 3.85 £50.60M £23.70 124.39 Renishaw £737.26M 5.01 £96.00M £101.90 49.84

Oxford Instruments (OXIG) Competitors

GBX 2,948 -100.00 (-3.28%)

As of 12:14 PM Eastern

Compare

OXIG vs. IQE, NANO, CCC, SXS, and RSW

Should you buy Oxford Instruments stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Oxford Instruments with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Oxford Instruments include IQE (IQE), Nanoco Group (NANO), Computacenter (CCC), Spectris (SXS), and Renishaw (RSW). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does Oxford Instruments compare to IQE?

IQE (LON:IQE) and Oxford Instruments (LON:OXIG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

IQE currently has a consensus price target of GBX 60, indicating a potential upside of 20.48%. Oxford Instruments has a consensus price target of GBX 2,781.67, indicating a potential downside of 5.64%. Given IQE's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe IQE is more favorable than Oxford Instruments.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
IQE	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Oxford Instruments	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, IQE and IQE both had 1 articles in the media. IQE's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Oxford Instruments' score of 0.00 indicating that IQE is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
IQE	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Oxford Instruments	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to IQE's net margin of -37.71%. Oxford Instruments' return on equity of 13.94% beat IQE's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
IQE	-37.71%	-37.49%	-3.31%
Oxford Instruments	11.39%	13.94%	6.47%

52.0% of IQE shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.7% of Oxford Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of IQE shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Oxford Instruments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

IQE has a beta of 2.252, meaning that its share price is 125% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.086, meaning that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Oxford Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than IQE. IQE is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
IQE	£97.30M	6.72	-£23.85M	-£3.77	N/A
Oxford Instruments	£423.20M	3.85	£50.60M	£23.70	124.39

Summary

Oxford Instruments beats IQE on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Nanoco Group?

Nanoco Group (LON:NANO) and Oxford Instruments (LON:OXIG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Oxford Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than Nanoco Group. Nanoco Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nanoco Group	£11.87M	0.46	-£819.79K	£0.50	6.00
Oxford Instruments	£423.20M	3.85	£50.60M	£23.70	124.39

Oxford Instruments has a consensus price target of GBX 2,781.67, suggesting a potential downside of 5.64%. Given Oxford Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Oxford Instruments is more favorable than Nanoco Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nanoco Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Oxford Instruments	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Nanoco Group has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.086, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nanoco Group and Nanoco Group both had 1 articles in the media. Oxford Instruments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Nanoco Group's score of -0.50 indicating that Oxford Instruments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Nanoco Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Oxford Instruments	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to Nanoco Group's net margin of 9.21%. Oxford Instruments' return on equity of 13.94% beat Nanoco Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nanoco Group	9.21%	-5.96%	-74.97%
Oxford Instruments	11.39%	13.94%	6.47%

0.0% of Nanoco Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.7% of Oxford Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Nanoco Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Oxford Instruments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Oxford Instruments beats Nanoco Group on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Computacenter?

Oxford Instruments (LON:OXIG) and Computacenter (LON:CCC) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Oxford Instruments pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Computacenter pays an annual dividend of GBX 71 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Oxford Instruments pays out 93.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Computacenter pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Computacenter is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.086, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computacenter has a beta of 0.934, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Computacenter has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Instruments. Computacenter is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Instruments	£423.20M	3.85	£50.60M	£23.70	124.39
Computacenter	£9.19B	0.49	£158.49M	£145.50	29.21

In the previous week, Oxford Instruments had 1 more articles in the media than Computacenter. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Oxford Instruments and 0 mentions for Computacenter. Computacenter's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Oxford Instruments' score of 0.00 indicating that Computacenter is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Oxford Instruments	Neutral
Computacenter	Neutral

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to Computacenter's net margin of 1.79%. Computacenter's return on equity of 14.84% beat Oxford Instruments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oxford Instruments	11.39%	13.94%	6.47%
Computacenter	1.79%	14.84%	4.83%

66.7% of Oxford Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.0% of Computacenter shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Oxford Instruments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.8% of Computacenter shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Oxford Instruments currently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,781.67, indicating a potential downside of 5.64%. Computacenter has a consensus target price of GBX 4,012.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.59%. Given Computacenter's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Computacenter is more favorable than Oxford Instruments.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oxford Instruments	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Computacenter	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

Computacenter beats Oxford Instruments on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Spectris?

Oxford Instruments (LON:OXIG) and Spectris (LON:SXS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.086, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Spectris has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Spectris has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Instruments. Spectris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Instruments	£423.20M	3.85	£50.60M	£23.70	124.39
Spectris	£1.35B	3.06	£270.93M	£57.60	71.91

Oxford Instruments presently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,781.67, suggesting a potential downside of 5.64%. Spectris has a consensus price target of GBX 4,147, suggesting a potential upside of 0.12%. Given Spectris' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Spectris is more favorable than Oxford Instruments.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oxford Instruments	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Spectris	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Oxford Instruments pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Spectris pays an annual dividend of GBX 83.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Oxford Instruments pays out 93.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Spectris pays out 144.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Oxford Instruments had 1 more articles in the media than Spectris. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Oxford Instruments and 0 mentions for Spectris. Oxford Instruments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Spectris'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Oxford Instruments	Neutral
Spectris	Neutral

66.7% of Oxford Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of Spectris shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Oxford Instruments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Spectris shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to Spectris' net margin of 4.31%. Oxford Instruments' return on equity of 13.94% beat Spectris' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oxford Instruments	11.39%	13.94%	6.47%
Spectris	4.31%	4.30%	5.42%

Summary

Oxford Instruments beats Spectris on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Renishaw?

Oxford Instruments (LON:OXIG) and Renishaw (LON:RSW) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Oxford Instruments currently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,781.67, suggesting a potential downside of 5.64%. Renishaw has a consensus target price of GBX 3,763.33, suggesting a potential downside of 25.90%. Given Oxford Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Oxford Instruments is more favorable than Renishaw.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oxford Instruments	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Renishaw	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Oxford Instruments pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Renishaw pays an annual dividend of GBX 78.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Oxford Instruments pays out 93.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Renishaw pays out 76.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Renishaw is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

66.7% of Oxford Instruments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.3% of Renishaw shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Oxford Instruments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.9% of Renishaw shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Oxford Instruments had 1 more articles in the media than Renishaw. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Oxford Instruments and 0 mentions for Renishaw. Renishaw's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Oxford Instruments' score of 0.00 indicating that Renishaw is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Oxford Instruments	Neutral
Renishaw	Very Positive

Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.086, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Renishaw has a beta of 1.146, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Renishaw has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Instruments. Renishaw is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Instruments	£423.20M	3.85	£50.60M	£23.70	124.39
Renishaw	£737.26M	5.01	£96.00M	£101.90	49.84

Oxford Instruments has a net margin of 11.39% compared to Renishaw's net margin of 10.06%. Oxford Instruments' return on equity of 13.94% beat Renishaw's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oxford Instruments	11.39%	13.94%	6.47%
Renishaw	10.06%	8.06%	6.85%

Summary

Renishaw beats Oxford Instruments on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Oxford Instruments News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OXIG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

OXIG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Oxford Instruments	Semiconductor Equipment & Materials Industry	Computer Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£1.63B	£8.48B	£39.41B	£2.78B
Dividend Yield	0.77%	2.69%	3.27%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	124.39	27.74	169.90	365.72
Price / Sales	3.85	142.71	625.41	86,253.69
Price / Cash	10.66	17.27	48.53	27.85
Price / Book	4.67	5.15	9.58	7.92
Net Income	£50.60M	£90.57M	£1.07B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.01%	1.84%	-1.41%	-0.87%
1 Month Performance	-6.53%	2.96%	0.99%	-0.76%
1 Year Performance	66.18%	172.39%	159.21%	70.67%

Oxford Instruments Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
OXIG Oxford Instruments	0.5935 of 5 stars	GBX 2,948 -3.3%	GBX 2,781.67 -5.6%	+69.8%	£1.63B	£423.20M	124.39	2,000	Gap Down
IQE IQE	1.7952 of 5 stars	GBX 55.90 flat	GBX 60 +7.3%	+409.0%	£733.74M	£97.30M	N/A	577
NANO Nanoco Group	N/A	GBX 2.90 flat	N/A	-71.5%	£5.29M	£11.87M	5.80	46	Gap Down High Trading Volume
CCC Computacenter	2.0373 of 5 stars	GBX 4,176 flat	GBX 4,012.50 -3.9%	+69.0%	£4.38B	£9.19B	28.70	20,022
SXS Spectris	N/A	GBX 4,142 flat	GBX 4,147 +0.1%	+23.7%	£4.12B	£1.35B	71.91	7,266

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:OXIG) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Oxford Instruments (OXIG) Competitors

OXIG vs. IQE, NANO, CCC, SXS, and RSW

How does Oxford Instruments compare to IQE?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Nanoco Group?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Computacenter?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Spectris?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Renishaw?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

OXIG vs. The Competition

Oxford Instruments Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Oxford Instruments (OXIG) Competitors

OXIG vs. IQE, NANO, CCC, SXS, and RSW

How does Oxford Instruments compare to IQE?

Do analysts prefer IQE or OXIG?

Does the media favor IQE or OXIG?

Is IQE or OXIG more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of IQE or OXIG?

Which has more volatility and risk, IQE or OXIG?

Which has better earnings & valuation, IQE or OXIG?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Nanoco Group?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, NANO or OXIG?

Do analysts recommend NANO or OXIG?

Which has more volatility and risk, NANO or OXIG?

Does the media prefer NANO or OXIG?

Is NANO or OXIG more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of NANO or OXIG?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Computacenter?

Is OXIG or CCC a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, OXIG or CCC?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, OXIG or CCC?

Does the media favor OXIG or CCC?

Is OXIG or CCC more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in OXIG or CCC?

Do analysts rate OXIG or CCC?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Spectris?

Which has more volatility & risk, OXIG or SXS?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, OXIG or SXS?

Do analysts recommend OXIG or SXS?

Is OXIG or SXS a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer OXIG or SXS?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of OXIG or SXS?

Is OXIG or SXS more profitable?

Summary

How does Oxford Instruments compare to Renishaw?

Do analysts prefer OXIG or RSW?

Is OXIG or RSW a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in OXIG or RSW?

Does the media favor OXIG or RSW?

Which has more volatility & risk, OXIG or RSW?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, OXIG or RSW?

Is OXIG or RSW more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

OXIG vs. The Competition

Oxford Instruments Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools