Go Pro

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (OSEC) Competitors

GBX 30 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/15/2026

OSEC vs. BGLF, EGL, RECI, STS, and JMC

Should you buy Octopus AIM VCT 2 stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Octopus AIM VCT 2 with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Octopus AIM VCT 2 include Blackstone Loan Financing (BGLF), Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust (EGL), Real Estate Credit Investments (RECI), STS Global Income & Growth Trust (STS), and JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust (JMC). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Blackstone Loan Financing?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and Blackstone Loan Financing (LON:BGLF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Blackstone Loan Financing pays an annual dividend of GBX 9 per share. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 3,598.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Loan Financing pays out 3,235.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Loan Financing has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Blackstone Loan Financing has a net margin of 96.70% compared to Octopus AIM VCT 2's net margin of -13.92%. Blackstone Loan Financing's return on equity of 19.06% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2-13.92% 0.21% -10.46%
Blackstone Loan Financing 96.70%19.06%11.82%

Blackstone Loan Financing has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Blackstone Loan Financing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£687K96.29-£1.34M£0.10310.88
Blackstone Loan Financing£7.00B0.00£6.86B£0.28N/A

51.5% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT 2's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Blackstone Loan Financing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
Blackstone Loan Financing Neutral

Summary

Blackstone Loan Financing beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust?

Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust (LON:EGL) and Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust has a net margin of 271.70% compared to Octopus AIM VCT 2's net margin of -13.92%. Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust's return on equity of 25.45% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust271.70% 25.45% -4.86%
Octopus AIM VCT 2 -13.92%0.21%-10.46%

11.2% of Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.63 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust pays out 13.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 3,598.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust has a beta of 1.0356379, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust. Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust£68.02M3.73-£9.63M£64.924.25
Octopus AIM VCT 2£687K96.29-£1.34M£0.10310.88

In the previous week, Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Octopus AIM VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust Neutral
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral

Summary

Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Real Estate Credit Investments?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and Real Estate Credit Investments (LON:RECI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Real Estate Credit Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 12 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 3,598.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Real Estate Credit Investments pays out 173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Real Estate Credit Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Octopus AIM VCT 2. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Real Estate Credit Investments and 0 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT 2. Real Estate Credit Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's score of 0.00 indicating that Real Estate Credit Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
Real Estate Credit Investments Positive

34.5% of Real Estate Credit Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Real Estate Credit Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Real Estate Credit Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Real Estate Credit Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£687K96.29-£1.34M£0.10310.88
Real Estate Credit Investments£21.49M11.93£233.91M£6.9016.81

Real Estate Credit Investments has a net margin of 58.16% compared to Octopus AIM VCT 2's net margin of -13.92%. Real Estate Credit Investments' return on equity of 4.90% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2-13.92% 0.21% -10.46%
Real Estate Credit Investments 58.16%4.90%4.07%

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Real Estate Credit Investments has a beta of 0.199, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Real Estate Credit Investments beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to STS Global Income & Growth Trust?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and STS Global Income & Growth Trust (LON:STS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a net margin of 142.51% compared to Octopus AIM VCT 2's net margin of -13.92%. Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity of 0.21% beat STS Global Income & Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2-13.92% 0.21% -10.46%
STS Global Income & Growth Trust 142.51%-4.38%2.28%

7.4% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.91 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 3,598.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays out -98.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. STS Global Income & Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£687K96.29-£1.34M£0.10310.88
STS Global Income & Growth Trust-£10.37M-24.13£18.28M-£10.03N/A

In the previous week, STS Global Income & Growth Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Octopus AIM VCT 2. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for STS Global Income & Growth Trust and 0 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT 2. STS Global Income & Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's score of 0.00 indicating that STS Global Income & Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
STS Global Income & Growth Trust Very Positive

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a beta of 0.54745287, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

STS Global Income & Growth Trust beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust (LON:JMC) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 3,598.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust pays out -0.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Octopus AIM VCT 2's net margin of -13.92%. Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity of 0.21% beat JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2-13.92% 0.21% -10.46%
JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT 2's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust Neutral

JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£687K96.29-£1.34M£0.10310.88
JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust-£151K0.00N/A-£11.60N/A

Summary

Octopus AIM VCT 2 beats JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Octopus AIM VCT 2 News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OSEC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OSEC vs. The Competition

MetricOctopus AIM VCT 2Asset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£66.15M£2.49B£6.21B£2.78B
Dividend Yield12.00%6.00%5.24%6.12%
P/E Ratio310.8862.7429.67368.15
Price / Sales96.291,838.211,177.0584,741.05
Price / Cash3.3360.50117.4027.89
Price / Book0.661.326.567.52
Net Income-£1.34M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.36%-0.14%0.16%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-0.04%0.19%-1.21%
1 Year Performance-19.14%7.39%15.15%62.26%

Octopus AIM VCT 2 Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OSEC
Octopus AIM VCT 2
N/AGBX 30
flat
N/AN/A£66.15M£687K310.88N/A
BGLF
Blackstone Loan Financing
N/AN/AN/AN/A£262.12M£7.00B3.19N/A
EGL
Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust
N/AGBX 280
flat
N/A+27.3%£257.13M£68.02M4.318,700
RECI
Real Estate Credit Investments
N/AGBX 116
flat
N/A-9.1%£256.41M£21.49M16.81N/A
STS
STS Global Income & Growth Trust
N/AGBX 230
flat
N/A-7.0%£256.21M-£10.37MN/A6

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:OSEC) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners