Free Trial
→ Read now. Do not delete. You’ve been warned. (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free OSEC Stock Alerts

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (OSEC) Competitors

GBX 31 +1.00 (+3.33%)
As of 06/5/2026 09:55 AM Eastern
Compare

OSEC vs. BGLF, STS, NESF, RECI, and ARR

Should you buy Octopus AIM VCT 2 stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Octopus AIM VCT 2 with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Octopus AIM VCT 2 include Blackstone Loan Financing (BGLF), STS Global Income & Growth Trust (STS), NextEnergy Solar Fund (NESF), Real Estate Credit Investments (RECI), and Aurora Investment Trust (ARR). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Blackstone Loan Financing?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and Blackstone Loan Financing (LON:BGLF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Blackstone Loan Financing pays an annual dividend of GBX 9 per share. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 3,600.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Loan Financing pays out 3,235.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Loan Financing has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

51.5% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT 2's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Blackstone Loan Financing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
Blackstone Loan Financing Neutral

Blackstone Loan Financing has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Blackstone Loan Financing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£687K99.86-£1.34M£0.10310.00
Blackstone Loan Financing£7.00B0.00£6.86B£0.28N/A

Blackstone Loan Financing has a net margin of 96.70% compared to Octopus AIM VCT 2's net margin of -13.92%. Blackstone Loan Financing's return on equity of 19.06% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2-13.92% 0.21% -10.46%
Blackstone Loan Financing 96.70%19.06%11.82%

Summary

Blackstone Loan Financing beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to STS Global Income & Growth Trust?

STS Global Income & Growth Trust (LON:STS) and Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Octopus AIM VCT 2. STS Global Income & Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
STS Global Income & Growth Trust-£10.37M-24.58£18.28M£19.8311.40
Octopus AIM VCT 2£687K99.86-£1.34M£0.10310.00

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a net margin of 142.51% compared to Octopus AIM VCT 2's net margin of -13.92%. Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity of 0.21% beat STS Global Income & Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
STS Global Income & Growth Trust142.51% -4.38% 2.28%
Octopus AIM VCT 2 -13.92%0.21%-10.46%

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a beta of 0.544717, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 3,600.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

5.1% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, STS Global Income & Growth Trust had 4 more articles in the media than Octopus AIM VCT 2. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for STS Global Income & Growth Trust and 0 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT 2. STS Global Income & Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's score of 0.00 indicating that STS Global Income & Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
STS Global Income & Growth Trust Very Positive
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral

Summary

STS Global Income & Growth Trust beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to NextEnergy Solar Fund?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and NextEnergy Solar Fund (LON:NESF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NextEnergy Solar Fund has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NextEnergy Solar Fund. NextEnergy Solar Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£687K99.86-£1.34M£0.10310.00
NextEnergy Solar Fund£6.50M41.60-£13.68M-£1.01N/A

In the previous week, NextEnergy Solar Fund had 3 more articles in the media than Octopus AIM VCT 2. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for NextEnergy Solar Fund and 0 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT 2. Octopus AIM VCT 2's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat NextEnergy Solar Fund's score of -0.13 indicating that Octopus AIM VCT 2 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
NextEnergy Solar Fund Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Octopus AIM VCT 2
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
NextEnergy Solar Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. NextEnergy Solar Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.9%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 3,600.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. NextEnergy Solar Fund pays out -834.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NextEnergy Solar Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

26.4% of NextEnergy Solar Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of NextEnergy Solar Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of -13.92% compared to NextEnergy Solar Fund's net margin of -19.62%. Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity of 0.21% beat NextEnergy Solar Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2-13.92% 0.21% -10.46%
NextEnergy Solar Fund -19.62%-1.06%-2.16%

Summary

Octopus AIM VCT 2 beats NextEnergy Solar Fund on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Real Estate Credit Investments?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and Real Estate Credit Investments (LON:RECI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Real Estate Credit Investments has a beta of 0.202, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Real Estate Credit Investments has a net margin of 75.80% compared to Octopus AIM VCT 2's net margin of -13.92%. Real Estate Credit Investments' return on equity of 7.08% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2-13.92% 0.21% -10.46%
Real Estate Credit Investments 75.80%7.08%4.07%

39.5% of Real Estate Credit Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Real Estate Credit Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Real Estate Credit Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 12 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 3,600.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Real Estate Credit Investments pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Real Estate Credit Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Real Estate Credit Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£687K99.86-£1.34M£0.10310.00
Real Estate Credit Investments£26.07M9.84£233.91M£8.6013.49

In the previous week, Real Estate Credit Investments' average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's score of 0.00 indicating that Real Estate Credit Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
Real Estate Credit Investments Positive

Summary

Real Estate Credit Investments beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Aurora Investment Trust?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and Aurora Investment Trust (LON:ARR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

15.0% of Aurora Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Aurora Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Aurora Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Aurora Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£687K99.86-£1.34M£0.10310.00
Aurora Investment Trust£48.61M5.38£50.31M£41.895.74

In the previous week, Aurora Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's score of 0.00 indicating that Aurora Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
Aurora Investment Trust Positive

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aurora Investment Trust has a beta of 1.3839667, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Aurora Investment Trust has a net margin of 97.16% compared to Octopus AIM VCT 2's net margin of -13.92%. Aurora Investment Trust's return on equity of 14.45% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2-13.92% 0.21% -10.46%
Aurora Investment Trust 97.16%14.45%18.36%

Summary

Aurora Investment Trust beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Octopus AIM VCT 2 News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OSEC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OSEC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OSEC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricOctopus AIM VCT 2Asset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£66.39M£2.51B£5.74B£2.78B
Dividend Yield12.00%6.02%5.28%6.12%
P/E Ratio310.0025.9416.38364.84
Price / Sales99.862,079.751,137.5687,121.96
Price / Cash3.3360.1591.7827.85
Price / Book0.681.376.507.68
Net Income-£1.34M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance10.71%-1.05%-0.85%-0.50%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-0.45%0.52%2.10%
1 Year PerformanceN/A10.23%18.74%72.87%

Octopus AIM VCT 2 Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OSEC
Octopus AIM VCT 2
N/AGBX 31
+3.3%		N/AN/A£66.39M£687K310.00N/A
BGLF
Blackstone Loan Financing
N/AN/AN/AN/A£262.12M£7.00B3.19N/A
STS
STS Global Income & Growth Trust
N/AGBX 234
+0.9%		N/A-6.2%£260.65M£26.16M11.806
NESF
NextEnergy Solar Fund
0.5753 of 5 stars		GBX 44.18
-1.6%		N/A-32.0%£258.26M£6.50MN/AN/A
RECI
Real Estate Credit Investments
N/AGBX 116
-0.4%		N/A-7.9%£257.52M£26.07M13.49N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:OSEC) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Pre-IPO Warning: SPCX [Watch Now!]
Tech investor James Altucher - who called Netflix, Facebook, and Bitcoin early - says the SpaceX IPO (Ticker: ...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
How to get into the SpaceX IPO before June 12
Former tech executive and angel investor Jeff Brown - who identified Bitcoin, Tesla, and Nvidia before their h...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Musk is burning $2.5 billion a quarter on AI. One company holds the key.
SpaceX's S-1 filing reveals $7.7 billion spent on AI infrastructure in a single quarter - not chips, not softw...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Micron reports June 24th and MU is in the “Hot Zone”
Micron Technology reports earnings June 24th, and right now MU is in what trader Danielle Shay calls the earni...
Simpler Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why is this free?
Simple Options Trading For Beginners normally sells for $29.97 - but right now Bill Poulos has opened a free w...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel