Do analysts prefer GSF or OSEC?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Octopus AIM VCT 2 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (OSEC) Competitors

GBX 30.40 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 10/6/2026

Compare

OSEC vs. BGLF, JMC, CLIG, RECI, and GSF

Should you buy Octopus AIM VCT 2 stock or one of its competitors? Octopus AIM VCT 2's main competitors and comparable companies include Blackstone Loan Financing (BGLF), JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust (JMC), City of London Investment Group (CLIG), Real Estate Credit Investments (RECI), and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (GSF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Blackstone Loan Financing?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and Blackstone Loan Financing (LON:BGLF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Blackstone Loan Financing pays an annual dividend of GBX 9 per share. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Loan Financing pays out 3,235.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Octopus AIM VCT 2 is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Loan Financing has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

51.5% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT 2's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Blackstone Loan Financing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2	Neutral
Blackstone Loan Financing	Neutral

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to Blackstone Loan Financing's net margin of 96.70%. Blackstone Loan Financing's return on equity of 19.06% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2	366.39%	3.00%	-10.46%
Blackstone Loan Financing	96.70%	19.06%	11.82%

Blackstone Loan Financing has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Blackstone Loan Financing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2	£2.92M	22.86	-£1.34M	£1.07	28.36
Blackstone Loan Financing	£7.00B	0.00	£6.86B	£0.28	N/A

Summary

Blackstone Loan Financing beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust?

JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust (LON:JMC) and Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Octopus AIM VCT 2. JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust	-£151K	0.00	N/A	-£11.60	N/A
Octopus AIM VCT 2	£2.92M	22.86	-£1.34M	£1.07	28.36

JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust pays out -0.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Octopus AIM VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust	Neutral
Octopus AIM VCT 2	Neutral

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity of 3.00% beat JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
Octopus AIM VCT 2	366.39%	3.00%	-10.46%

Summary

Octopus AIM VCT 2 beats JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to City of London Investment Group?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

City of London Investment Group has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. City of London Investment Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2	£2.92M	22.86	-£1.34M	£1.07	28.36
City of London Investment Group	£80.08M	3.17	£15.02M	£49.00	10.52

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 44.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. City of London Investment Group pays out 90.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London Investment Group has a beta of 0.327, suggesting that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, City of London Investment Group had 1 more articles in the media than Octopus AIM VCT 2. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for City of London Investment Group and 0 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT 2. City of London Investment Group's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's score of 0.00 indicating that City of London Investment Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2	Neutral
City of London Investment Group	Positive

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to City of London Investment Group's net margin of 30.30%. City of London Investment Group's return on equity of 15.69% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2	366.39%	3.00%	-10.46%
City of London Investment Group	30.30%	15.69%	7.65%

Summary

City of London Investment Group beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Real Estate Credit Investments?

Real Estate Credit Investments (LON:RECI) and Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Real Estate Credit Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Octopus AIM VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Real Estate Credit Investments	Neutral
Octopus AIM VCT 2	Neutral

Real Estate Credit Investments has a beta of 0.195, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to Real Estate Credit Investments' net margin of 58.16%. Real Estate Credit Investments' return on equity of 4.90% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Real Estate Credit Investments	58.16%	4.90%	4.07%
Octopus AIM VCT 2	366.39%	3.00%	-10.46%

34.3% of Real Estate Credit Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Real Estate Credit Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Real Estate Credit Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Real Estate Credit Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Real Estate Credit Investments	£21.49M	11.63	£233.91M	£6.90	16.38
Octopus AIM VCT 2	£2.92M	22.86	-£1.34M	£1.07	28.36

Real Estate Credit Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 12 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Real Estate Credit Investments pays out 173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Real Estate Credit Investments beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Gore Street Energy Storage Fund?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

16.6% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.342, suggesting that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 5 more articles in the media than Octopus AIM VCT 2. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 0 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT 2. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's score of 0.00 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	Positive
Octopus AIM VCT 2	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Octopus AIM VCT 2	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's net margin of 102.56%. Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity of 3.00% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	102.56%	-28.75%	-0.64%
Octopus AIM VCT 2	366.39%	3.00%	-10.46%

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	-£116.82M	-2.12	-£5.96M	-£23.72	N/A
Octopus AIM VCT 2	£2.92M	22.86	-£1.34M	£1.07	28.36

Summary

Octopus AIM VCT 2 beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Octopus AIM VCT 2 News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OSEC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

OSEC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Octopus AIM VCT 2	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£66.49M	£5.11B	£13.26B	£2.77B
Dividend Yield	9.54%	7.60%	6.07%	6.21%
P/E Ratio	28.36	27.72	22.59	366.94
Price / Sales	22.80	1,195.06	485.24	88,666.76
Price / Cash	3.33	47.59	43.45	27.89
Price / Book	0.67	3.48	2.70	6.80
Net Income	-£1.34M	£415.67M	£1.32B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	N/A	-0.62%	-0.41%	-0.62%
1 Month Performance	N/A	-2.97%	-3.24%	-1.47%
1 Year Performance	N/A	9.59%	9.68%	22.21%

Octopus AIM VCT 2 Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
OSEC Octopus AIM VCT 2	N/A	GBX 30.40 flat	N/A	N/A	£66.49M	£2.92M	28.36	N/A
BGLF Blackstone Loan Financing	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£262.12M	£7.00B	3.19	N/A
JMC JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£255.55M	-£151K	N/A	N/A	Gap Up
CLIG City of London Investment Group	N/A	GBX 511.60 +1.5%	N/A	+35.8%	£252.59M	£80.08M	12.15	120	High Trading Volume
RECI Real Estate Credit Investments	N/A	GBX 114 -0.4%	N/A	-9.6%	£251.99M	£21.49M	16.52	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:OSEC) was last updated on 10/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (OSEC) Competitors

OSEC vs. BGLF, JMC, CLIG, RECI, and GSF

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Blackstone Loan Financing?

Summary

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust?

Summary

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to City of London Investment Group?

Summary

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Real Estate Credit Investments?

Summary

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Gore Street Energy Storage Fund?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

OSEC vs. The Competition

Octopus AIM VCT 2 Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (OSEC) Competitors

OSEC vs. BGLF, JMC, CLIG, RECI, and GSF

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Blackstone Loan Financing?

Is OSEC or BGLF a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, OSEC or BGLF?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in OSEC or BGLF?

Does the media favor OSEC or BGLF?

Is OSEC or BGLF more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, OSEC or BGLF?

Summary

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, JMC or OSEC?

Is JMC or OSEC a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to JMC or OSEC?

Is JMC or OSEC more profitable?

Summary

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to City of London Investment Group?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, OSEC or CLIG?

Is OSEC or CLIG a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, OSEC or CLIG?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in OSEC or CLIG?

Does the media prefer OSEC or CLIG?

Is OSEC or CLIG more profitable?

Summary

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Real Estate Credit Investments?

Does the media prefer RECI or OSEC?

Which has more risk and volatility, RECI or OSEC?

Is RECI or OSEC more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in RECI or OSEC?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, RECI or OSEC?

Is RECI or OSEC a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Gore Street Energy Storage Fund?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GSF or OSEC?

Which has more risk and volatility, GSF or OSEC?

Does the media prefer GSF or OSEC?

Do analysts prefer GSF or OSEC?

Is GSF or OSEC a better dividend stock?

Is GSF or OSEC more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, GSF or OSEC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

OSEC vs. The Competition

Octopus AIM VCT 2 Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools