Go Pro
→ The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month (From Investors Alley) (Ad)tc pixel Free OSEC Stock Alerts

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (OSEC) Competitors

GBX 30 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/4/2026
Compare

OSEC vs. BGLF, RECI, JMC, STS, and SCP

Should you buy Octopus AIM VCT 2 stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Octopus AIM VCT 2 with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Octopus AIM VCT 2 include Blackstone Loan Financing (BGLF), Real Estate Credit Investments (RECI), JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust (JMC), STS Global Income & Growth Trust (STS), and Schroder UK Mid Cap (SCP). These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Blackstone Loan Financing?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and Blackstone Loan Financing (LON:BGLF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Loan Financing has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to Blackstone Loan Financing's net margin of 96.70%. Blackstone Loan Financing's return on equity of 19.06% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2366.39% 3.00% -10.46%
Blackstone Loan Financing 96.70%19.06%11.82%

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT 2's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Blackstone Loan Financing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
Blackstone Loan Financing Neutral

51.5% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.8%. Blackstone Loan Financing pays an annual dividend of GBX 9 per share. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blackstone Loan Financing pays out 3,235.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Octopus AIM VCT 2 is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Blackstone Loan Financing has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Blackstone Loan Financing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£2.92M22.68-£1.34M£1.0727.99
Blackstone Loan Financing£7.00B0.00£6.86B£0.28N/A

Summary

Blackstone Loan Financing beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Real Estate Credit Investments?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and Real Estate Credit Investments (LON:RECI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Real Estate Credit Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Octopus AIM VCT 2. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Real Estate Credit Investments and 0 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT 2. Real Estate Credit Investments' average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's score of 0.00 indicating that Real Estate Credit Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
Real Estate Credit Investments Positive

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to Real Estate Credit Investments' net margin of 58.16%. Real Estate Credit Investments' return on equity of 4.90% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2366.39% 3.00% -10.46%
Real Estate Credit Investments 58.16%4.90%4.07%

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.8%. Real Estate Credit Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 12 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Real Estate Credit Investments pays out 173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Real Estate Credit Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Real Estate Credit Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£2.92M22.68-£1.34M£1.0727.99
Real Estate Credit Investments£21.49M11.98£233.91M£6.9016.88

34.5% of Real Estate Credit Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Real Estate Credit Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Real Estate Credit Investments has a beta of 0.195, meaning that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Real Estate Credit Investments beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust (LON:JMC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.8%. JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust pays out -0.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT 2's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust Neutral

JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£2.92M22.68-£1.34M£1.0727.99
JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust-£151K0.00N/A-£11.60N/A

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity of 3.00% beat JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2366.39% 3.00% -10.46%
JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Octopus AIM VCT 2 beats JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to STS Global Income & Growth Trust?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and STS Global Income & Growth Trust (LON:STS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

7.4% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a beta of 0.54745287, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.8%. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.91 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays out -98.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. STS Global Income & Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£2.92M22.68-£1.34M£1.0727.99
STS Global Income & Growth Trust-£10.37M-24.51£18.28M-£10.03N/A

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to STS Global Income & Growth Trust's net margin of 142.51%. Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity of 3.00% beat STS Global Income & Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2366.39% 3.00% -10.46%
STS Global Income & Growth Trust 142.51%-4.38%2.28%

In the previous week, STS Global Income & Growth Trust had 3 more articles in the media than Octopus AIM VCT 2. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for STS Global Income & Growth Trust and 0 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT 2. STS Global Income & Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's score of 0.00 indicating that STS Global Income & Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
STS Global Income & Growth Trust Very Positive

Summary

Octopus AIM VCT 2 beats STS Global Income & Growth Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Schroder UK Mid Cap?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and Schroder UK Mid Cap (LON:SCP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Schroder UK Mid Cap has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Schroder UK Mid Cap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£2.92M22.68-£1.34M£1.0727.99
Schroder UK Mid Cap£37.20M6.84£36.42M£105.227.32

In the previous week, Schroder UK Mid Cap had 4 more articles in the media than Octopus AIM VCT 2. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Schroder UK Mid Cap and 0 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT 2. Schroder UK Mid Cap's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder UK Mid Cap is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
Schroder UK Mid Cap Positive

8.0% of Schroder UK Mid Cap shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schroder UK Mid Cap shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to Schroder UK Mid Cap's net margin of 91.54%. Schroder UK Mid Cap's return on equity of 14.71% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2366.39% 3.00% -10.46%
Schroder UK Mid Cap 91.54%14.71%4.88%

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.8%. Schroder UK Mid Cap pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schroder UK Mid Cap pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder UK Mid Cap has a beta of 1.5083787, indicating that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Schroder UK Mid Cap beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Octopus AIM VCT 2 News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OSEC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OSEC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricOctopus AIM VCT 2Capital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£66.15M£5.55B£14.03B£2.87B
Dividend Yield9.67%7.46%5.91%6.13%
P/E Ratio27.9938.2429.34369.49
Price / Sales22.681,242.89511.8683,955.53
Price / Cash3.3348.2339.3227.89
Price / Book0.663.743.747.07
Net Income-£1.34M£417.17M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.27%1.11%1.18%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-0.46%0.46%0.90%
1 Year PerformanceN/A6.59%13.14%75.31%

Octopus AIM VCT 2 Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OSEC
Octopus AIM VCT 2
N/AGBX 30
flat		N/AN/A£66.15M£2.92M27.99N/A
BGLF
Blackstone Loan Financing
N/AN/AN/AN/A£262.12M£7.00B3.19N/A
RECI
Real Estate Credit Investments
N/AGBX 117.92
-0.1%		N/A-7.9%£260.65M£21.49M17.09N/A
JMC
JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£255.55M-£151KN/AN/A
STS
STS Global Income & Growth Trust
N/AGBX 231
+0.9%		N/A-6.1%£254.23M-£10.37MN/A6

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:OSEC) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The Starlink of Energy
A portable energy unit - already used by the U.S. Navy for decades - is now drawing serious attention from Big...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
This AI fund sends investors payouts every Thursday
CrowdStrike, Palantir, Nvidia none of them pay a real dividend. But one fund holding the biggest AI names dist...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
A Wall Street Veteran's Weekly Trade for Any Market Condition
Dave Aquino spent 25 years at Merrill Lynch and Vanguard studying one weekly options play that worked in bull,...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
He bet half his $9 billion on ONE stock
One of the most successful fund managers of the past 50 years put more than $4.5 billion - over half his fund ...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
This under $7 stock could be.
Just one mile from SpaceX's launchpad sits a small company doing something SpaceX can't - and it still trades ...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
The dollar reset no one told you about
Porter Stansberry says a dollar reset is underway - one that has happened only once before in America's 250-ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel