Go Pro
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free OSEC Stock Alerts

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (OSEC) Competitors

GBX 30.20 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/24/2026
Compare

OSEC vs. AAEV, BGLF, RECI, SCP, and JMC

Should you buy Octopus AIM VCT 2 stock or one of its competitors? Octopus AIM VCT 2's main competitors and comparable companies include Albion Enterprise VCT (AAEV), Blackstone Loan Financing (BGLF), Real Estate Credit Investments (RECI), Schroder UK Mid Cap (SCP), and JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust (JMC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Albion Enterprise VCT?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and Albion Enterprise VCT (LON:AAEV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Albion Enterprise VCT has a beta of 0.05462167, suggesting that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Albion Enterprise VCT had 1 more articles in the media than Octopus AIM VCT 2. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Albion Enterprise VCT and 0 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT 2. Albion Enterprise VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's score of 0.00 indicating that Albion Enterprise VCT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
Albion Enterprise VCT Positive

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.7%. Albion Enterprise VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Albion Enterprise VCT pays out 343.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Octopus AIM VCT 2 is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Albion Enterprise VCT has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Octopus AIM VCT 2 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albion Enterprise VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£2.92M22.84-£1.34M£1.0728.18
Albion Enterprise VCT£4.94M52.69£252.09M£1.6760.48

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to Albion Enterprise VCT's net margin of 61.06%. Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity of 3.00% beat Albion Enterprise VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2366.39% 3.00% -10.46%
Albion Enterprise VCT 61.06%1.45%0.86%

Summary

Albion Enterprise VCT beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Blackstone Loan Financing?

Blackstone Loan Financing (LON:BGLF) and Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Blackstone Loan Financing has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

51.5% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Blackstone Loan Financing has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Blackstone Loan Financing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blackstone Loan Financing£7.00B0.00£6.86B£0.28N/A
Octopus AIM VCT 2£2.92M22.84-£1.34M£1.0728.18

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to Blackstone Loan Financing's net margin of 96.70%. Blackstone Loan Financing's return on equity of 19.06% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blackstone Loan Financing96.70% 19.06% 11.82%
Octopus AIM VCT 2 366.39%3.00%-10.46%

Blackstone Loan Financing pays an annual dividend of GBX 9 per share. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.7%. Blackstone Loan Financing pays out 3,235.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Octopus AIM VCT 2 is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Blackstone Loan Financing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Octopus AIM VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blackstone Loan Financing Neutral
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral

Summary

Blackstone Loan Financing beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Real Estate Credit Investments?

Real Estate Credit Investments (LON:RECI) and Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Real Estate Credit Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Real Estate Credit Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Real Estate Credit Investments£21.49M12.03£233.91M£6.9016.96
Octopus AIM VCT 2£2.92M22.84-£1.34M£1.0728.18

Real Estate Credit Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 12 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.7%. Real Estate Credit Investments pays out 173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Real Estate Credit Investments has a beta of 0.195, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

34.5% of Real Estate Credit Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Real Estate Credit Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Real Estate Credit Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Octopus AIM VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Real Estate Credit Investments Neutral
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to Real Estate Credit Investments' net margin of 58.16%. Real Estate Credit Investments' return on equity of 4.90% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Real Estate Credit Investments58.16% 4.90% 4.07%
Octopus AIM VCT 2 366.39%3.00%-10.46%

Summary

Real Estate Credit Investments beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to Schroder UK Mid Cap?

Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) and Schroder UK Mid Cap (LON:SCP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder UK Mid Cap has a beta of 1.514, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

8.0% of Schroder UK Mid Cap shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schroder UK Mid Cap shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to Schroder UK Mid Cap's net margin of 91.54%. Schroder UK Mid Cap's return on equity of 14.71% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT 2366.39% 3.00% -10.46%
Schroder UK Mid Cap 91.54%14.71%4.88%

Schroder UK Mid Cap has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Schroder UK Mid Cap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT 2£2.92M22.84-£1.34M£1.0728.18
Schroder UK Mid Cap£37.20M6.83£36.42M£105.227.32

Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.7%. Schroder UK Mid Cap pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schroder UK Mid Cap pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Schroder UK Mid Cap had 1 more articles in the media than Octopus AIM VCT 2. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder UK Mid Cap and 0 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT 2. Schroder UK Mid Cap's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder UK Mid Cap is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral
Schroder UK Mid Cap Very Positive

Summary

Schroder UK Mid Cap beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT 2 compare to JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust?

JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust (LON:JMC) and Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Octopus AIM VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust Neutral
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity of 3.00% beat JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JP Morgan Chinese Investment TrustN/A N/A N/A
Octopus AIM VCT 2 366.39%3.00%-10.46%

JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Octopus AIM VCT 2. JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust-£151K0.00N/A-£11.60N/A
Octopus AIM VCT 2£2.92M22.84-£1.34M£1.0728.18

JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.7%. JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust pays out -0.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Octopus AIM VCT 2 pays out 329.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Octopus AIM VCT 2 beats JP Morgan Chinese Investment Trust on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Octopus AIM VCT 2 News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OSEC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OSEC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricOctopus AIM VCT 2Capital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£66.59M£5.71B£14.06B£2.93B
Dividend Yield9.60%7.40%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio28.1832.5526.70367.32
Price / Sales22.841,229.32516.4883,741.35
Price / Cash3.3348.3338.5027.89
Price / Book0.662.132.187.02
Net Income-£1.34M£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.60%1.38%0.89%
1 Month Performance1.68%2.36%2.93%3.27%
1 Year PerformanceN/A7.75%11.49%22.28%

Octopus AIM VCT 2 Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OSEC
Octopus AIM VCT 2
N/AGBX 30.20
flat		N/AN/A£66.59M£2.92M28.18N/A
AAEV
Albion Enterprise VCT
N/AGBX 102
-2.4%		N/AN/A£262.90M£4.94M61.08N/A
BGLF
Blackstone Loan Financing
N/AN/AN/AN/A£262.12M£7.00B3.19N/A
RECI
Real Estate Credit Investments
N/AGBX 118.25
-0.2%		N/A-5.6%£261.37M£21.49M17.14N/A
SCP
Schroder UK Mid Cap
N/AGBX 781.30
+0.5%		N/A+11.2%£257.84M£37.20M7.43N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:OSEC) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Bezos… DOOMED
A single FCC filing hints Elon Musk is planning his biggest project yet - bigger than Tesla, SpaceX, and X com...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Someone just dumped the biggest gold fund.
Investors pulled 2.9 billion dollars from the world's largest gold fund in a single day this March, pushing to...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
A $382 trillion migration and the position no one is talking about
Trump just signed a law requiring America's entire $382 trillion financial system to migrate to a new money ne...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Rumors About Elon’s Next Move Are Spreading Fast
Rumors are circulating that Elon Musk is preparing to acquire three publicly traded companies. Dr. Mark Sko...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buffett's Final Warning: "The Dollar Is Going to Hell"
On May 3rd, 2025, Warren Buffett looked at his shareholders for the last time and said: "The dollar is going t...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s new dollar decree
The last time America reset its money, it minted 1,300 new millionaires a day. Porter Stansberry believes Exec...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel