Go Pro

Public Policy (PPHC) Competitors

Public Policy logo
GBX 630 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/13/2026 12:28 PM Eastern

PPHC vs. AFM, DATA, ELIX, YOU, and RCDO

Should you buy Public Policy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Public Policy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Public Policy include Alpha Financial Markets Consulting (AFM), GlobalData (DATA), Elixirr International (ELIX), YouGov (YOU), and Ricardo (RCDO). These companies are all part of the "consulting services" industry.

How does Public Policy compare to Alpha Financial Markets Consulting?

Public Policy (LON:PPHC) and Alpha Financial Markets Consulting (LON:AFM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Public Policy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alpha Financial Markets Consulting'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Public Policy Neutral
Alpha Financial Markets Consulting Neutral

17.3% of Public Policy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.8% of Alpha Financial Markets Consulting shares are held by institutional investors. 17.7% of Public Policy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Alpha Financial Markets Consulting shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Public Policy pays an annual dividend of GBX 35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Alpha Financial Markets Consulting pays an annual dividend of GBX 14 per share. Public Policy pays out -15.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alpha Financial Markets Consulting pays out 10,769.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Public Policy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Public Policy presently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,350, suggesting a potential upside of 114.29%. Given Public Policy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Alpha Financial Markets Consulting.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Public Policy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Alpha Financial Markets Consulting
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Alpha Financial Markets Consulting has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -20.91%. Alpha Financial Markets Consulting's return on equity of 10.64% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Public Policy-20.91% -49.98% -1.69%
Alpha Financial Markets Consulting 6.78%10.64%7.51%

Alpha Financial Markets Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy. Public Policy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alpha Financial Markets Consulting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Public Policy£197.35M0.96-£28.26M-£223.00N/A
Alpha Financial Markets Consulting£233.62M0.00£15.85M£0.13N/A

Summary

Alpha Financial Markets Consulting beats Public Policy on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to GlobalData?

GlobalData (LON:DATA) and Public Policy (LON:PPHC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

GlobalData has a net margin of 10.28% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -20.91%. GlobalData's return on equity of 9.94% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GlobalData10.28% 9.94% 7.91%
Public Policy -20.91%-49.98%-1.69%

GlobalData pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Public Policy pays an annual dividend of GBX 35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. GlobalData pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Public Policy pays out -15.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Public Policy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, GlobalData had 5 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for GlobalData and 0 mentions for Public Policy. GlobalData's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Public Policy's score of 0.00 indicating that GlobalData is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GlobalData Neutral
Public Policy Neutral

22.0% of GlobalData shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Public Policy shares are held by institutional investors. 66.3% of GlobalData shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.7% of Public Policy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

GlobalData presently has a consensus target price of GBX 195, indicating a potential upside of 158.96%. Public Policy has a consensus target price of GBX 1,350, indicating a potential upside of 114.29%. Given GlobalData's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe GlobalData is more favorable than Public Policy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GlobalData
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Public Policy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

GlobalData has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy. Public Policy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GlobalData, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GlobalData£322.10M1.62£33.17M£4.4017.11
Public Policy£197.35M0.96-£28.26M-£223.00N/A

Summary

GlobalData beats Public Policy on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to Elixirr International?

Elixirr International (LON:ELIX) and Public Policy (LON:PPHC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Elixirr International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Public Policy. Public Policy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Elixirr International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Elixirr International£149.60M2.20£17.20M£37.1817.89
Public Policy£197.35M0.96-£28.26M-£223.00N/A

21.6% of Elixirr International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Public Policy shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.0% of Elixirr International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.7% of Public Policy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Elixirr International has a net margin of 13.17% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -20.91%. Elixirr International's return on equity of 15.00% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Elixirr International13.17% 15.00% 9.88%
Public Policy -20.91%-49.98%-1.69%

In the previous week, Elixirr International had 2 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Elixirr International and 0 mentions for Public Policy. Elixirr International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Public Policy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Elixirr International Neutral
Public Policy Neutral

Elixirr International pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Public Policy pays an annual dividend of GBX 35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Elixirr International pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Public Policy pays out -15.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Public Policy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Elixirr International presently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,060, indicating a potential upside of 59.40%. Public Policy has a consensus target price of GBX 1,350, indicating a potential upside of 114.29%. Given Public Policy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Elixirr International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Elixirr International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Public Policy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Elixirr International beats Public Policy on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to YouGov?

Public Policy (LON:PPHC) and YouGov (LON:YOU) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, YouGov had 3 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for YouGov and 0 mentions for Public Policy. YouGov's average media sentiment score of 0.06 beat Public Policy's score of 0.00 indicating that YouGov is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Public Policy Neutral
YouGov Neutral

Public Policy pays an annual dividend of GBX 35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. YouGov pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Public Policy pays out -15.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. YouGov pays out 88.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Public Policy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

17.3% of Public Policy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.1% of YouGov shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.7% of Public Policy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.6% of YouGov shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

YouGov has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy. Public Policy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than YouGov, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Public Policy£197.35M0.96-£28.26M-£223.00N/A
YouGov£392M0.75-£2.30M£10.4023.98

YouGov has a net margin of 3.11% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -20.91%. YouGov's return on equity of 6.46% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Public Policy-20.91% -49.98% -1.69%
YouGov 3.11%6.46%4.89%

Public Policy currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,350, indicating a potential upside of 114.29%. YouGov has a consensus target price of GBX 411, indicating a potential upside of 64.80%. Given Public Policy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Public Policy is more favorable than YouGov.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Public Policy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
YouGov
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

YouGov beats Public Policy on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to Ricardo?

Public Policy (LON:PPHC) and Ricardo (LON:RCDO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Public Policy pays an annual dividend of GBX 35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Ricardo pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Public Policy pays out -15.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ricardo pays out 25.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Public Policy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Ricardo had 2 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ricardo and 0 mentions for Public Policy. Ricardo's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Public Policy's score of 0.00 indicating that Ricardo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Public Policy Neutral
Ricardo Positive

17.3% of Public Policy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Ricardo shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.7% of Public Policy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ricardo shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ricardo has a net margin of 0.15% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -20.91%. Ricardo's return on equity of 0.41% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Public Policy-20.91% -49.98% -1.69%
Ricardo 0.15%0.41%4.91%

Public Policy currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,350, indicating a potential upside of 114.29%. Ricardo has a consensus target price of GBX 430, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Given Public Policy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Ricardo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Public Policy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ricardo
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Ricardo has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy. Public Policy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ricardo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Public Policy£197.35M0.96-£28.26M-£223.00N/A
Ricardo£476.20M0.56£693.06K£0.50861.72

Summary

Ricardo beats Public Policy on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Public Policy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PPHC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PPHC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PPHC vs. The Competition

MetricPublic PolicyConsulting Services IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£189.04M£2.53B£9.48B£2.85B
Dividend Yield4.37%3.85%3.54%6.16%
P/E Ratio-2.83106.4426.74368.21
Price / Sales0.96142.712,079.4484,612.73
Price / Cash8.7131.8327.2827.87
Price / Book8.742.774.467.49
Net Income-£28.26M£155.55M£791.21M£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.61%0.75%-0.79%-0.19%
1 Month Performance-19.75%-1.09%0.16%-0.99%
1 Year Performance-24.55%-16.24%15.23%61.68%

Public Policy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PPHC
Public Policy
N/AGBX 630
flat
GBX 1,350
+114.3%
-22.2%£189.04M£197.35MN/A367
AFM
Alpha Financial Markets Consulting
N/AN/AN/AN/A£591.19M£233.62M3,876.921,051
DATA
GlobalData
3.1297 of 5 stars
GBX 79.83
-1.3%
GBX 195
+144.3%
-46.2%£556.58M£322.10M18.143,532
ELIX
Elixirr International
2.8218 of 5 stars
GBX 690
-1.2%
GBX 1,060
+53.6%
-9.3%£341.98M£149.60M18.56484
YOU
YouGov
4.5646 of 5 stars
GBX 234.80
-0.9%
GBX 411
+75.0%
-35.7%£275.09M£392M22.581,820

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PPHC) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners