Free Trial

Public Policy (PPHC) Competitors

Public Policy logo
GBX 889 -11.00 (-1.22%)
As of 12:13 PM Eastern

PPHC vs. DATA, AFM, ELIX, RCDO, and YOU

Should you buy Public Policy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Public Policy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Public Policy include GlobalData (DATA), Alpha Financial Markets Consulting (AFM), Elixirr International (ELIX), Ricardo (RCDO), and YouGov (YOU). These companies are all part of the "consulting services" industry.

How does Public Policy compare to GlobalData?

Public Policy (LON:PPHC) and GlobalData (LON:DATA) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Public Policy currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,350, suggesting a potential upside of 51.86%. GlobalData has a consensus target price of GBX 195, suggesting a potential upside of 84.66%. Given GlobalData's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GlobalData is more favorable than Public Policy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Public Policy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
GlobalData
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Public Policy pays an annual dividend of GBX 35 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. GlobalData pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Public Policy pays out -14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GlobalData pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Public Policy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

14.3% of Public Policy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.6% of GlobalData shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.1% of Public Policy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 65.3% of GlobalData shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, GlobalData had 5 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for GlobalData and 0 mentions for Public Policy. GlobalData's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Public Policy's score of 0.00 indicating that GlobalData is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Public Policy Neutral
GlobalData Positive

GlobalData has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy. Public Policy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GlobalData, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Public Policy£197.35M1.32-£28.26M-£237.00N/A
GlobalData£322.10M2.31£33.17M£4.4024.00

GlobalData has a net margin of 10.28% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -20.91%. GlobalData's return on equity of 9.94% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Public Policy-20.91% -49.98% -1.69%
GlobalData 10.28%9.94%7.91%

Summary

GlobalData beats Public Policy on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to Alpha Financial Markets Consulting?

Public Policy (LON:PPHC) and Alpha Financial Markets Consulting (LON:AFM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Alpha Financial Markets Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy. Public Policy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alpha Financial Markets Consulting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Public Policy£197.35M1.32-£28.26M-£237.00N/A
Alpha Financial Markets Consulting£233.62M0.00£15.85M£0.13N/A

14.3% of Public Policy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.8% of Alpha Financial Markets Consulting shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.1% of Public Policy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Alpha Financial Markets Consulting shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Public Policy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alpha Financial Markets Consulting'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Public Policy Neutral
Alpha Financial Markets Consulting Neutral

Public Policy pays an annual dividend of GBX 35 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Alpha Financial Markets Consulting pays an annual dividend of GBX 14 per share. Public Policy pays out -14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alpha Financial Markets Consulting pays out 10,769.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Public Policy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Public Policy currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,350, suggesting a potential upside of 51.86%. Given Public Policy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Alpha Financial Markets Consulting.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Public Policy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Alpha Financial Markets Consulting
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Alpha Financial Markets Consulting has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -20.91%. Alpha Financial Markets Consulting's return on equity of 10.64% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Public Policy-20.91% -49.98% -1.69%
Alpha Financial Markets Consulting 6.78%10.64%7.51%

Summary

Alpha Financial Markets Consulting beats Public Policy on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to Elixirr International?

Public Policy (LON:PPHC) and Elixirr International (LON:ELIX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Elixirr International had 1 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Elixirr International and 0 mentions for Public Policy. Public Policy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Elixirr International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Public Policy Neutral
Elixirr International Neutral

Public Policy currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,350, suggesting a potential upside of 51.86%. Elixirr International has a consensus target price of GBX 1,060, suggesting a potential upside of 43.65%. Given Public Policy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Elixirr International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Public Policy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Elixirr International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Elixirr International has a net margin of 13.17% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -20.91%. Elixirr International's return on equity of 15.00% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Public Policy-20.91% -49.98% -1.69%
Elixirr International 13.17%15.00%9.88%

Public Policy pays an annual dividend of GBX 35 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Elixirr International pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Public Policy pays out -14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Elixirr International pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Public Policy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Elixirr International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Public Policy. Public Policy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Elixirr International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Public Policy£197.35M1.32-£28.26M-£237.00N/A
Elixirr International£149.60M2.40£17.20M£37.1819.85

14.3% of Public Policy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.8% of Elixirr International shares are held by institutional investors. 16.1% of Public Policy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 33.6% of Elixirr International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Elixirr International beats Public Policy on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to Ricardo?

Ricardo (LON:RCDO) and Public Policy (LON:PPHC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Ricardo has a net margin of 0.15% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -20.91%. Ricardo's return on equity of 0.41% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ricardo0.15% 0.41% 4.91%
Public Policy -20.91%-49.98%-1.69%

61.1% of Ricardo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Public Policy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Ricardo shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.1% of Public Policy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ricardo has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy. Public Policy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ricardo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ricardo£476.20M0.56£693.06K£0.50861.72
Public Policy£197.35M1.32-£28.26M-£237.00N/A

Ricardo pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Public Policy pays an annual dividend of GBX 35 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Ricardo pays out 25.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Public Policy pays out -14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Public Policy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Ricardo had 1 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ricardo and 0 mentions for Public Policy. Ricardo's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Public Policy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ricardo Neutral
Public Policy Neutral

Ricardo currently has a consensus target price of GBX 430, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Public Policy has a consensus target price of GBX 1,350, indicating a potential upside of 51.86%. Given Public Policy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Ricardo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ricardo
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Public Policy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Ricardo beats Public Policy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to YouGov?

Public Policy (LON:PPHC) and YouGov (LON:YOU) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and profitability.

14.3% of Public Policy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.6% of YouGov shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.1% of Public Policy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.4% of YouGov shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Public Policy pays an annual dividend of GBX 35 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. YouGov pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Public Policy pays out -14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. YouGov pays out 88.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Public Policy currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,350, suggesting a potential upside of 51.86%. YouGov has a consensus target price of GBX 411, suggesting a potential upside of 92.60%. Given YouGov's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe YouGov is more favorable than Public Policy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Public Policy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
YouGov
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

YouGov has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy. Public Policy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than YouGov, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Public Policy£197.35M1.32-£28.26M-£237.00N/A
YouGov£392M0.64-£2.30M£10.4020.52

YouGov has a net margin of 3.11% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -20.91%. YouGov's return on equity of 6.46% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Public Policy-20.91% -49.98% -1.69%
YouGov 3.11%6.46%4.89%

In the previous week, YouGov had 2 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for YouGov and 0 mentions for Public Policy. YouGov's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Public Policy's score of 0.00 indicating that YouGov is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Public Policy Neutral
YouGov Positive

Summary

YouGov beats Public Policy on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Public Policy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PPHC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PPHC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PPHC vs. The Competition

MetricPublic PolicyConsulting Services IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£260.73M£2.54B£9.56B£2.81B
Dividend Yield2.90%3.40%3.53%6.06%
P/E Ratio-3.75103.5825.86365.78
Price / Sales1.32153.905,130.1887,760.85
Price / Cash8.7131.8328.2327.89
Price / Book12.333.155.237.79
Net Income-£28.26M£155.55M£794.13M£5.89B
7 Day Performance7.76%0.26%1.81%0.98%
1 Month Performance-9.29%1.14%4.42%11.36%
1 Year Performance28.84%-9.67%32.53%78.62%

Public Policy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PPHC
Public Policy
1.6554 of 5 stars
GBX 889
-1.2%
GBX 1,350
+51.9%
+28.7%£260.73M£197.35MN/A367
DATA
GlobalData
2.952 of 5 stars
GBX 102.40
flat
GBX 195
+90.4%
-43.4%£720.03M£322.10M23.273,532
AFM
Alpha Financial Markets Consulting
N/AN/AN/AN/A£591.19M£233.62M3,876.921,051
ELIX
Elixirr International
3.3461 of 5 stars
GBX 730
flat
GBX 1,060
+45.2%
-7.6%£355.80M£149.60M19.63484
RCDO
Ricardo
0.1424 of 5 stars
GBX 430
+0.2%
GBX 430
+51.4%£267.52M£476.20M861.722,978

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PPHC) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners