Go Pro
→ Your $29.97 book is free today (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free PRN Stock Alerts

Princes Group (PRN) Competitors

GBX 321.52 -1.48 (-0.46%)
As of 08:13 AM Eastern
Compare

PRN vs. CWK, TATE, GNC, PFD, and BAKK

Should you buy Princes Group stock or one of its competitors? Princes Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Cranswick (CWK), Tate & Lyle (TATE), Greencore Group (GNC), Premier Foods (PFD), and Bakkavor Group (BAKK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Princes Group compare to Cranswick?

Princes Group (LON:PRN) and Cranswick (LON:CWK) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Cranswick had 3 more articles in the media than Princes Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Cranswick and 0 mentions for Princes Group. Cranswick's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Princes Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Cranswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Princes Group Neutral
Cranswick Neutral

3.6% of Princes Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Cranswick shares are held by institutional investors. 87.5% of Princes Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Cranswick shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cranswick has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Princes Group's net margin of 0.00%. Cranswick's return on equity of 14.99% beat Princes Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Princes GroupN/A N/A N/A
Cranswick 5.31%14.99%8.26%

Princes Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 625, indicating a potential upside of 94.39%. Cranswick has a consensus price target of GBX 5,974, indicating a potential upside of 13.79%. Given Princes Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Princes Group is more favorable than Cranswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Princes Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cranswick
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than Princes Group. Princes Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Princes Group£1.87B0.42N/A£37.008.69
Cranswick£2.98B0.94£113.74M£290.2018.09

Summary

Cranswick beats Princes Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Princes Group compare to Tate & Lyle?

Princes Group (LON:PRN) and Tate & Lyle (LON:TATE) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Princes Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tate & Lyle'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Princes Group Neutral
Tate & Lyle Neutral

Princes Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 625, indicating a potential upside of 94.39%. Tate & Lyle has a consensus target price of GBX 516, indicating a potential downside of 6.86%. Given Princes Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Princes Group is more favorable than Tate & Lyle.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Princes Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Tate & Lyle
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

3.6% of Princes Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.5% of Tate & Lyle shares are held by institutional investors. 87.5% of Princes Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Tate & Lyle shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tate & Lyle has higher revenue and earnings than Princes Group. Princes Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tate & Lyle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Princes Group£1.87B0.42N/A£37.008.69
Tate & Lyle£2.01B1.22£206.63M£21.7025.53

Tate & Lyle has a net margin of 4.84% compared to Princes Group's net margin of 0.00%. Tate & Lyle's return on equity of 6.17% beat Princes Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Princes GroupN/A N/A N/A
Tate & Lyle 4.84%6.17%6.03%

Summary

Tate & Lyle beats Princes Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Princes Group compare to Greencore Group?

Greencore Group (LON:GNC) and Princes Group (LON:PRN) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

Greencore Group has a net margin of 0.30% compared to Princes Group's net margin of 0.00%. Greencore Group's return on equity of 0.73% beat Princes Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greencore Group0.30% 0.73% 4.43%
Princes Group N/A N/A N/A

Greencore Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 301.50, indicating a potential upside of 15.52%. Princes Group has a consensus price target of GBX 625, indicating a potential upside of 94.39%. Given Princes Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Princes Group is more favorable than Greencore Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greencore Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Princes Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Greencore Group has higher revenue and earnings than Princes Group. Princes Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greencore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greencore Group£2.34B0.88£48.48M£2.8093.21
Princes Group£1.87B0.42N/A£37.008.69

In the previous week, Greencore Group had 2 more articles in the media than Princes Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greencore Group and 0 mentions for Princes Group. Greencore Group's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Princes Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Greencore Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greencore Group Neutral
Princes Group Neutral

30.1% of Greencore Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Princes Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Greencore Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 87.5% of Princes Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Greencore Group beats Princes Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Princes Group compare to Premier Foods?

Princes Group (LON:PRN) and Premier Foods (LON:PFD) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Premier Foods had 1 more articles in the media than Princes Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Premier Foods and 0 mentions for Princes Group. Premier Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Princes Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Premier Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Princes Group Neutral
Premier Foods Positive

Premier Foods has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Princes Group. Princes Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premier Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Princes Group£1.87B0.42N/A£37.008.69
Premier Foods£1.18B1.41£112.38M£15.5012.45

3.6% of Princes Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.0% of Premier Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 87.5% of Princes Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Premier Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Premier Foods has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Princes Group's net margin of 0.00%. Premier Foods' return on equity of 9.74% beat Princes Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Princes GroupN/A N/A N/A
Premier Foods 11.62%9.74%4.78%

Princes Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 625, suggesting a potential upside of 94.39%. Premier Foods has a consensus price target of GBX 242, suggesting a potential upside of 25.39%. Given Princes Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Princes Group is more favorable than Premier Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Princes Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Premier Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Summary

Premier Foods beats Princes Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Princes Group compare to Bakkavor Group?

Bakkavor Group (LON:BAKK) and Princes Group (LON:PRN) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Bakkavor Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Princes Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bakkavor Group Neutral
Princes Group Neutral

Bakkavor Group has higher revenue and earnings than Princes Group. Princes Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bakkavor Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bakkavor Group£2.30B0.63£64.74M£6.3040.00
Princes Group£1.87B0.42N/A£37.008.69

Princes Group has a consensus target price of GBX 625, suggesting a potential upside of 94.39%. Given Princes Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Princes Group is more favorable than Bakkavor Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bakkavor Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Princes Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

13.4% of Bakkavor Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Princes Group shares are held by institutional investors. 48.9% of Bakkavor Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 87.5% of Princes Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Bakkavor Group has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Princes Group's net margin of 0.00%. Bakkavor Group's return on equity of 9.10% beat Princes Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bakkavor Group2.43% 9.10% 4.54%
Princes Group N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Bakkavor Group beats Princes Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Princes Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PRN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PRN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PRN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPrinces GroupFood Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£786.78M£5.79B£16.09B£2.87B
Dividend YieldN/A3.13%3.19%6.10%
P/E Ratio8.6911.7713.29368.04
Price / Sales0.4284.45263,621.8183,202.45
Price / CashN/A112.0256.1927.89
Price / BookN/A4.155.047.05
Net IncomeN/A£766.88M£834.02M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.02%0.48%-0.17%0.43%
1 Month Performance0.48%1.83%0.56%3.04%
1 Year PerformanceN/A39.47%12.37%64.35%

Princes Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PRN
Princes Group
N/AGBX 321.53
-0.5%		GBX 625
+94.4%		N/A£786.78M£1.87B8.69N/A
CWK
Cranswick
3.5025 of 5 stars		GBX 5,223
-0.1%		GBX 5,974
+14.4%		-0.6%£2.79B£2.98B18.0052,000
TATE
Tate & Lyle
N/AGBX 554
+0.1%		GBX 516
-6.9%		+4.9%£2.45B£2.01B25.533,604
GNC
Greencore Group
4.0039 of 5 stars		GBX 265.20
+0.6%		GBX 301.50
+13.7%		+3.4%£2.10B£2.34B94.7113,602
PFD
Premier Foods
3.7248 of 5 stars		GBX 195
+0.2%		GBX 242
+24.1%		+2.7%£1.68B£1.18B12.584,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PRN) was last updated on 8/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon's Terrifying Warning: America Is "1,000% Going Bankrupt"
The national debt just crossed $39 trillion, and Elon Musk - former head of the Department of Government Effic...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
Three oil giants buried the same discovery for 50 years
In 1976, Chevron tapped an energy source with no fuel costs, no carbon, and no supply chain - then killed the ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War: What Happened at 1:11 P.M. Outside D.C.?
A source with ties to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the U.S. State Department revealed details of a potential 7 t...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Currency Reset
Trump is launching a new $250 bill - but that may be a distraction. Behind the scenes, Executive Order 14241 i...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
19 Factories. One AI Brain. One Hidden Stock.
A little-known aerospace manufacturer has linked 19 factories worldwide into a single AI-ready data system, dr...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
A Dark Day Is Coming to America
Keith Kaplan, CEO of TradeSmith, has spent more than $17 million studying AI since 2022. He says a major shift...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel