Go Pro

Pulsar Group (PULS) Competitors

GBX 34 -2.00 (-5.56%)
As of 08/10/2026 11:54 AM Eastern

PULS vs. DOTD, AOM, EYE, TRB, and GHT

Should you buy Pulsar Group stock or one of its competitors? Pulsar Group's main competitors and comparable companies include dotdigital Group (DOTD), ActiveOps (AOM), Eagle Eye Solutions Group (EYE), Tribal Group (TRB), and Gresham Technologies (GHT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does Pulsar Group compare to dotdigital Group?

dotdigital Group (LON:DOTD) and Pulsar Group (LON:PULS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

24.7% of dotdigital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Pulsar Group shares are held by institutional investors. 18.4% of dotdigital Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 44.6% of Pulsar Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

dotdigital Group has a net margin of 10.76% compared to Pulsar Group's net margin of -11.97%. dotdigital Group's return on equity of 8.80% beat Pulsar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
dotdigital Group10.76% 8.80% 8.64%
Pulsar Group -11.97%-21.57%0.02%

dotdigital Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pulsar Group. Pulsar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than dotdigital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
dotdigital Group£85.75M1.79£11.03M£2.9417.21
Pulsar Group£64.07M0.72-£6.53M-£5.44N/A

dotdigital Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 122.50, indicating a potential upside of 142.09%. Given dotdigital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe dotdigital Group is more favorable than Pulsar Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
dotdigital Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pulsar Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

dotdigital Group has a beta of 1.459, indicating that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulsar Group has a beta of 0.105, indicating that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, dotdigital Group had 1 more articles in the media than Pulsar Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for dotdigital Group and 0 mentions for Pulsar Group. dotdigital Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Pulsar Group's score of 0.00 indicating that dotdigital Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
dotdigital Group Positive
Pulsar Group Neutral

Summary

dotdigital Group beats Pulsar Group on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulsar Group compare to ActiveOps?

ActiveOps (LON:AOM) and Pulsar Group (LON:PULS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, ActiveOps had 1 more articles in the media than Pulsar Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ActiveOps and 0 mentions for Pulsar Group. ActiveOps' average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Pulsar Group's score of 0.00 indicating that ActiveOps is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ActiveOps Neutral
Pulsar Group Neutral

39.4% of ActiveOps shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Pulsar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.0% of ActiveOps shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.6% of Pulsar Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ActiveOps presently has a consensus price target of GBX 355, suggesting a potential upside of 69.05%. Given ActiveOps' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ActiveOps is more favorable than Pulsar Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ActiveOps
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pulsar Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

ActiveOps has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pulsar Group. ActiveOps is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulsar Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ActiveOps£45.00M3.33£820.59K-£3.23N/A
Pulsar Group£64.07M0.72-£6.53M-£5.44N/A

ActiveOps has a beta of 0.827, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulsar Group has a beta of 0.105, indicating that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

ActiveOps has a net margin of -4.02% compared to Pulsar Group's net margin of -11.97%. Pulsar Group's return on equity of -21.57% beat ActiveOps' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ActiveOps-4.02% -29.18% 2.27%
Pulsar Group -11.97%-21.57%0.02%

Summary

ActiveOps beats Pulsar Group on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulsar Group compare to Eagle Eye Solutions Group?

Pulsar Group (LON:PULS) and Eagle Eye Solutions Group (LON:EYE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

28.7% of Pulsar Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of Eagle Eye Solutions Group shares are held by institutional investors. 44.6% of Pulsar Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.9% of Eagle Eye Solutions Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Eagle Eye Solutions Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pulsar Group. Eagle Eye Solutions Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulsar Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pulsar Group£64.07M0.72-£6.53M-£5.44N/A
Eagle Eye Solutions Group£47.08M3.07£5.75M-£0.34N/A

Eagle Eye Solutions Group has a net margin of 0.22% compared to Pulsar Group's net margin of -11.97%. Eagle Eye Solutions Group's return on equity of 0.31% beat Pulsar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pulsar Group-11.97% -21.57% 0.02%
Eagle Eye Solutions Group 0.22%0.31%1.05%

Pulsar Group has a beta of 0.105, indicating that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eagle Eye Solutions Group has a beta of 0.638, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Eagle Eye Solutions Group has a consensus target price of GBX 675, suggesting a potential upside of 41.20%. Given Eagle Eye Solutions Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Eagle Eye Solutions Group is more favorable than Pulsar Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pulsar Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Eagle Eye Solutions Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Eagle Eye Solutions Group had 1 more articles in the media than Pulsar Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Eagle Eye Solutions Group and 0 mentions for Pulsar Group. Eagle Eye Solutions Group's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Pulsar Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Eagle Eye Solutions Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pulsar Group Neutral
Eagle Eye Solutions Group Positive

Summary

Eagle Eye Solutions Group beats Pulsar Group on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulsar Group compare to Tribal Group?

Tribal Group (LON:TRB) and Pulsar Group (LON:PULS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Tribal Group has a net margin of 9.65% compared to Pulsar Group's net margin of -11.97%. Tribal Group's return on equity of 15.55% beat Pulsar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tribal Group9.65% 15.55% 4.00%
Pulsar Group -11.97%-21.57%0.02%

In the previous week, Tribal Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pulsar Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tribal Group Neutral
Pulsar Group Neutral

Tribal Group has a beta of 0.228, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulsar Group has a beta of 0.105, meaning that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

Tribal Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pulsar Group. Pulsar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tribal Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tribal Group£92.51M1.47£2.01M£4.1015.46
Pulsar Group£64.07M0.72-£6.53M-£5.44N/A

25.2% of Tribal Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Pulsar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.6% of Tribal Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.6% of Pulsar Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Tribal Group beats Pulsar Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulsar Group compare to Gresham Technologies?

Gresham Technologies (LON:GHT) and Pulsar Group (LON:PULS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Gresham Technologies has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Pulsar Group's net margin of -11.97%. Gresham Technologies' return on equity of 6.19% beat Pulsar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham Technologies6.28% 6.19% 2.85%
Pulsar Group -11.97%-21.57%0.02%

69.5% of Gresham Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Pulsar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Gresham Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.6% of Pulsar Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gresham Technologies has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulsar Group has a beta of 0.105, indicating that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

Gresham Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pulsar Group. Pulsar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham Technologies£49.01M0.00£3.08M£0.04N/A
Pulsar Group£64.07M0.72-£6.53M-£5.44N/A

In the previous week, Gresham Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pulsar Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham Technologies Neutral
Pulsar Group Neutral

Summary

Gresham Technologies beats Pulsar Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pulsar Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PULS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PULS vs. The Competition

MetricPulsar GroupSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£47.46M£15.75B£30.06B£2.89B
Dividend YieldN/A3.42%2.73%6.09%
P/E Ratio-6.25127.0274.79368.29
Price / Sales0.721,306.16600.4283,647.94
Price / CashN/A43.9150.5127.89
Price / Book0.948.518.157.22
Net Income-£6.53M£437.06M£679.03M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-8.11%0.82%0.82%1.29%
1 Month Performance-8.11%1.90%0.16%2.22%
1 Year Performance-15.00%9.19%196.92%73.69%

Pulsar Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PULS
Pulsar Group
N/AGBX 34
-5.6%
N/A-19.0%£47.46M£64.07MN/A1,101
DOTD
dotdigital Group
3.3463 of 5 stars
GBX 50.60
-1.4%
GBX 122.50
+142.1%
-27.7%£155.56M£85.75M17.21400
AOM
ActiveOps
1.7451 of 5 stars
GBX 210
+4.5%
GBX 355
+69.0%
+29.6%£150.06M£45.00MN/A180
EYE
Eagle Eye Solutions Group
2.6419 of 5 stars
GBX 487
-0.6%
GBX 675
+38.6%
+102.7%£149.92M£47.08MN/A257
TRB
Tribal Group
N/AGBX 65
+3.2%
N/A+15.8%£139.35M£92.51M15.85882

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PULS) was last updated on 8/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners