Free Trial

Pulsar Group (PULS) Competitors

GBX 40 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/15/2026 12:06 PM Eastern

PULS vs. NET, AOM, DOTD, GHT, and APTD

Should you buy Pulsar Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pulsar Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pulsar Group include Netcall (NET), ActiveOps (AOM), dotdigital Group (DOTD), Gresham Technologies (GHT), and Aptitude Software Group (APTD). These companies are all part of the "software - application" industry.

How does Pulsar Group compare to Netcall?

Netcall (LON:NET) and Pulsar Group (LON:PULS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

16.5% of Netcall shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.9% of Pulsar Group shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Netcall shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 44.6% of Pulsar Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Netcall had 3 more articles in the media than Pulsar Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Netcall and 0 mentions for Pulsar Group. Pulsar Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Netcall's score of -0.15 indicating that Pulsar Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Netcall Neutral
Pulsar Group Neutral

Netcall has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pulsar Group. Pulsar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Netcall, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Netcall£51.39M4.12£5.87M£1.4287.32
Pulsar Group£61.18M0.89-£6.53M-£7.07N/A

Netcall presently has a consensus price target of GBX 162.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.05%. Given Netcall's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Netcall is more favorable than Pulsar Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Netcall
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pulsar Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Netcall has a beta of 0.091, meaning that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulsar Group has a beta of 0.129, meaning that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Netcall has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Pulsar Group's net margin of -15.76%. Netcall's return on equity of 5.23% beat Pulsar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Netcall4.67% 5.23% 4.62%
Pulsar Group -15.76%-25.90%0.02%

Summary

Netcall beats Pulsar Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulsar Group compare to ActiveOps?

Pulsar Group (LON:PULS) and ActiveOps (LON:AOM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

ActiveOps has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pulsar Group. ActiveOps is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulsar Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pulsar Group£61.18M0.89-£6.53M-£7.07N/A
ActiveOps£36.97M4.25£820.59K-£0.33N/A

Pulsar Group has a beta of 0.129, meaning that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ActiveOps has a beta of 0.788, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

ActiveOps has a consensus price target of GBX 355, indicating a potential upside of 61.36%. Given ActiveOps' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ActiveOps is more favorable than Pulsar Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pulsar Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
ActiveOps
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

ActiveOps has a net margin of -0.55% compared to Pulsar Group's net margin of -15.76%. ActiveOps' return on equity of -2.11% beat Pulsar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pulsar Group-15.76% -25.90% 0.02%
ActiveOps -0.55%-2.11%2.27%

28.9% of Pulsar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.1% of ActiveOps shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.6% of Pulsar Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.0% of ActiveOps shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ActiveOps had 1 more articles in the media than Pulsar Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ActiveOps and 0 mentions for Pulsar Group. Pulsar Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled ActiveOps'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pulsar Group Neutral
ActiveOps Neutral

Summary

ActiveOps beats Pulsar Group on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulsar Group compare to dotdigital Group?

dotdigital Group (LON:DOTD) and Pulsar Group (LON:PULS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

dotdigital Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 171.97%. Given dotdigital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe dotdigital Group is more favorable than Pulsar Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
dotdigital Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pulsar Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

dotdigital Group has a net margin of 10.76% compared to Pulsar Group's net margin of -15.76%. dotdigital Group's return on equity of 8.80% beat Pulsar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
dotdigital Group10.76% 8.80% 8.64%
Pulsar Group -15.76%-25.90%0.02%

dotdigital Group has a beta of 1.449, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulsar Group has a beta of 0.129, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, dotdigital Group had 1 more articles in the media than Pulsar Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for dotdigital Group and 0 mentions for Pulsar Group. dotdigital Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pulsar Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
dotdigital Group Neutral
Pulsar Group Neutral

26.4% of dotdigital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.9% of Pulsar Group shares are held by institutional investors. 18.3% of dotdigital Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.6% of Pulsar Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

dotdigital Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pulsar Group. Pulsar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than dotdigital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
dotdigital Group£85.75M1.69£11.03M£2.9416.26
Pulsar Group£61.18M0.89-£6.53M-£7.07N/A

Summary

dotdigital Group beats Pulsar Group on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulsar Group compare to Gresham Technologies?

Gresham Technologies (LON:GHT) and Pulsar Group (LON:PULS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Gresham Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pulsar Group. Pulsar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham Technologies£49.01M0.00£3.08M£0.04N/A
Pulsar Group£61.18M0.89-£6.53M-£7.07N/A

69.5% of Gresham Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.9% of Pulsar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Gresham Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.6% of Pulsar Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gresham Technologies has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulsar Group has a beta of 0.129, indicating that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Gresham Technologies has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Pulsar Group's net margin of -15.76%. Gresham Technologies' return on equity of 6.19% beat Pulsar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham Technologies6.28% 6.19% 2.85%
Pulsar Group -15.76%-25.90%0.02%

In the previous week, Gresham Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pulsar Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham Technologies Neutral
Pulsar Group Neutral

Summary

Gresham Technologies beats Pulsar Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulsar Group compare to Aptitude Software Group?

Aptitude Software Group (LON:APTD) and Pulsar Group (LON:PULS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Aptitude Software Group has a net margin of 6.20% compared to Pulsar Group's net margin of -15.76%. Aptitude Software Group's return on equity of 7.38% beat Pulsar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aptitude Software Group6.20% 7.38% 3.49%
Pulsar Group -15.76%-25.90%0.02%

Aptitude Software Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 445, suggesting a potential upside of 96.90%. Given Aptitude Software Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Aptitude Software Group is more favorable than Pulsar Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aptitude Software Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pulsar Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

61.7% of Aptitude Software Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.9% of Pulsar Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Aptitude Software Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 44.6% of Pulsar Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Aptitude Software Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pulsar Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aptitude Software Group Neutral
Pulsar Group Neutral

Aptitude Software Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pulsar Group. Pulsar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aptitude Software Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aptitude Software Group£64.95M1.84£4.65M£7.1031.83
Pulsar Group£61.18M0.89-£6.53M-£7.07N/A

Aptitude Software Group has a beta of 0.316, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulsar Group has a beta of 0.129, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Aptitude Software Group beats Pulsar Group on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pulsar Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PULS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PULS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PULS vs. The Competition

MetricPulsar GroupSoftware IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£54.24M£4.86B£39.52B£2.60B
Dividend YieldN/A4.00%3.21%6.15%
P/E Ratio-5.6626.13167.67365.91
Price / Sales0.89257.17633.7188,030.08
Price / CashN/A17.1448.7027.89
Price / Book1.114.2210.257.74
Net Income-£6.53M£22.26M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.52%-2.08%-1.50%0.21%
1 Month Performance-4.76%1.75%5.40%1.56%
1 Year Performance-0.62%-8.83%161.29%77.95%

Pulsar Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PULS
Pulsar Group
N/AGBX 40
flat
N/A-3.4%£54.24M£61.18MN/A1,101
NET
Netcall
2.9257 of 5 stars
GBX 124.10
+0.1%
GBX 162.50
+30.9%
+9.0%£211.71M£51.39M87.393,220
AOM
ActiveOps
1.7915 of 5 stars
GBX 208.50
+0.2%
GBX 355
+70.3%
+84.9%£148.97M£36.97MN/A180
DOTD
dotdigital Group
3.6857 of 5 stars
GBX 46.80
-2.8%
GBX 130
+177.8%
-46.3%£141.92M£85.75M15.92400
GHT
Gresham Technologies
N/AN/AN/AN/A£136.21M£49.01M4,062.50216

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PULS) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners