Which has stronger valuation and earnings, REC or NCYF?

Record has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. Record is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Record £40.10M 2.16 £199.77M £3.83 11.59 CQS New City High Yield £22.87M 15.31 £47.15M £3.48 14.57

Does the media prefer IBT or REC?

In the previous week, International Biotechnology and International Biotechnology both had 1 articles in the media. International Biotechnology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Record'saverage media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment International Biotechnology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Record 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Record (REC) Competitors

GBX 44.40 +1.40 (+3.26%)

As of 08/21/2026 12:05 PM Eastern

Compare

REC vs. HHI, CVCG, NCYF, IBT, and HINT

Should you buy Record stock or one of its competitors? Record's main competitors and comparable companies include Henderson High Income Trust (HHI), CVC Income & Growth GBP (CVCG), CQS New City High Yield (NCYF), International Biotechnology (IBT), and Henderson International Income (HINT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Record compare to Henderson High Income Trust?

Record (LON:REC) and Henderson High Income Trust (LON:HHI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

Record pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.5%. Henderson High Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Record pays out 121.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Henderson High Income Trust pays out 31.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Henderson High Income Trust has a net margin of 268.08% compared to Record's net margin of 19.03%. Record's return on equity of 27.84% beat Henderson High Income Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Record	19.03%	27.84%	25.14%
Henderson High Income Trust	268.08%	17.99%	7.10%

Record has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Henderson High Income Trust. Henderson High Income Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Record, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Record	£40.10M	2.16	£199.77M	£3.83	11.59
Henderson High Income Trust	£60.69M	5.75	£34.16M	£35.18	5.86

In the previous week, Record had 1 more articles in the media than Henderson High Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Record and 0 mentions for Henderson High Income Trust. Record's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Henderson High Income Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Record	Neutral
Henderson High Income Trust	Neutral

Record has a beta of 0.771, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Henderson High Income Trust has a beta of 1.268, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

10.9% of Record shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Henderson High Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 46.3% of Record shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Henderson High Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Record beats Henderson High Income Trust on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Record compare to CVC Income & Growth GBP?

CVC Income & Growth GBP (LON:CVCG) and Record (LON:REC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and valuation.

CVC Income & Growth GBP has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Record. CVC Income & Growth GBP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Record, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CVC Income & Growth GBP	£18.73M	18.83	£366.88M	-£4.94	N/A
Record	£40.10M	2.16	£199.77M	£3.83	11.59

Record has a net margin of 19.03% compared to CVC Income & Growth GBP's net margin of -20.03%. Record's return on equity of 27.84% beat CVC Income & Growth GBP's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CVC Income & Growth GBP	-20.03%	-2.10%	N/A
Record	19.03%	27.84%	25.14%

19.5% of CVC Income & Growth GBP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Record shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of CVC Income & Growth GBP shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.3% of Record shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Record had 1 more articles in the media than CVC Income & Growth GBP. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Record and 0 mentions for CVC Income & Growth GBP. CVC Income & Growth GBP's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Record'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CVC Income & Growth GBP	Neutral
Record	Neutral

CVC Income & Growth GBP has a beta of 0.204, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Record has a beta of 0.771, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

CVC Income & Growth GBP pays an annual dividend of GBX 12 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Record pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.5%. CVC Income & Growth GBP pays out -243.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Record pays out 121.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Record beats CVC Income & Growth GBP on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Record compare to CQS New City High Yield?

Record (LON:REC) and CQS New City High Yield (LON:NCYF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Record has a beta of 0.771, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS New City High Yield has a beta of 0.077, suggesting that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

Record has higher revenue and earnings than CQS New City High Yield. Record is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS New City High Yield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Record	£40.10M	2.16	£199.77M	£3.83	11.59
CQS New City High Yield	£22.87M	15.31	£47.15M	£3.48	14.57

CQS New City High Yield has a net margin of 73.82% compared to Record's net margin of 19.03%. Record's return on equity of 27.84% beat CQS New City High Yield's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Record	19.03%	27.84%	25.14%
CQS New City High Yield	73.82%	7.00%	4.54%

10.9% of Record shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by institutional investors. 46.3% of Record shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of CQS New City High Yield shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Record had 1 more articles in the media than CQS New City High Yield. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Record and 0 mentions for CQS New City High Yield. Record's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CQS New City High Yield'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Record	Neutral
CQS New City High Yield	Neutral

Record pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.5%. CQS New City High Yield pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Record pays out 121.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CQS New City High Yield pays out 129.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Record is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Record beats CQS New City High Yield on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Record compare to International Biotechnology?

International Biotechnology (LON:IBT) and Record (LON:REC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability and valuation.

Record has lower revenue, but higher earnings than International Biotechnology. International Biotechnology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Record, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
International Biotechnology	£78.01M	4.57	£37.91M	£241.73	4.63
Record	£40.10M	2.16	£199.77M	£3.83	11.59

International Biotechnology pays an annual dividend of GBX 31.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Record pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.5%. International Biotechnology pays out 13.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Record pays out 121.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

6.7% of International Biotechnology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Record shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of International Biotechnology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.3% of Record shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

International Biotechnology has a beta of 0.47368002, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Record has a beta of 0.771, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

International Biotechnology has a net margin of 82.27% compared to Record's net margin of 19.03%. Record's return on equity of 27.84% beat International Biotechnology's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
International Biotechnology	82.27%	27.35%	3.57%
Record	19.03%	27.84%	25.14%

In the previous week, International Biotechnology and International Biotechnology both had 1 articles in the media. International Biotechnology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Record'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
International Biotechnology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Record	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Record beats International Biotechnology on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Record compare to Henderson International Income?

Record (LON:REC) and Henderson International Income (LON:HINT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

Henderson International Income has a net margin of 89.72% compared to Record's net margin of 19.03%. Record's return on equity of 27.84% beat Henderson International Income's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Record	19.03%	27.84%	25.14%
Henderson International Income	89.72%	9.84%	N/A

In the previous week, Record had 1 more articles in the media than Henderson International Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Record and 0 mentions for Henderson International Income. Record's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Henderson International Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Record	Neutral
Henderson International Income	Neutral

Record has higher revenue and earnings than Henderson International Income. Henderson International Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Record, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Record	£40.10M	2.16	£199.77M	£3.83	11.59
Henderson International Income	£38.86M	8.81	£34.86M	£17.78	9.82

10.9% of Record shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.4% of Henderson International Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.3% of Record shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Henderson International Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Record pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.5%. Henderson International Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Record pays out 121.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Henderson International Income pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Record beats Henderson International Income on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Record News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding REC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

REC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Record	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£86.70M	£5.66B	£13.63B	£2.54B
Dividend Yield	8.11%	7.38%	5.89%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	11.59	39.09	29.61	367.57
Price / Sales	2.16	1,239.16	517.30	83,481.74
Price / Cash	9.35	48.31	30.71	27.89
Price / Book	2.95	3.75	2.84	7.19
Net Income	£199.77M	£417.46M	£1.31B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	1.14%	0.04%	0.05%	0.42%
1 Month Performance	-0.45%	2.13%	2.11%	3.03%
1 Year Performance	-27.69%	5.71%	9.68%	22.14%

Record Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
REC Record	N/A	GBX 44.40 +3.3%	N/A	-27.7%	£86.70M	£40.10M	11.59	97	Gap Up
HHI Henderson High Income Trust	N/A	GBX 207 flat	N/A	+9.9%	£350.90M	£60.69M	5.88	N/A
CVCG CVC Income & Growth GBP	N/A	GBX 117.50 +0.9%	N/A	-0.3%	£349.84M	£18.73M	N/A	N/A
NCYF CQS New City High Yield	N/A	GBX 50.46 +0.5%	N/A	-0.6%	£349.37M	£22.87M	14.50	N/A
IBT International Biotechnology	N/A	GBX 1,095 +0.5%	N/A	+64.2%	£348.24M	£78.01M	4.53	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:REC) was last updated on 8/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Record (REC) Competitors

REC vs. HHI, CVCG, NCYF, IBT, and HINT

How does Record compare to Henderson High Income Trust?

Summary

How does Record compare to CVC Income & Growth GBP?

Summary

How does Record compare to CQS New City High Yield?

Summary

How does Record compare to International Biotechnology?

Summary

How does Record compare to Henderson International Income?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

REC vs. The Competition

Record Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Record (REC) Competitors

REC vs. HHI, CVCG, NCYF, IBT, and HINT

How does Record compare to Henderson High Income Trust?

Is REC or HHI a better dividend stock?

Is REC or HHI more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, REC or HHI?

Does the media prefer REC or HHI?

Which has more volatility and risk, REC or HHI?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in REC or HHI?

Summary

How does Record compare to CVC Income & Growth GBP?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CVCG or REC?

Is CVCG or REC more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CVCG or REC?

Does the media favor CVCG or REC?

Which has more volatility and risk, CVCG or REC?

Is CVCG or REC a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Record compare to CQS New City High Yield?

Which has more volatility & risk, REC or NCYF?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, REC or NCYF?

Is REC or NCYF more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in REC or NCYF?

Does the media favor REC or NCYF?

Is REC or NCYF a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Record compare to International Biotechnology?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, IBT or REC?

Is IBT or REC a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in IBT or REC?

Which has more volatility & risk, IBT or REC?

Is IBT or REC more profitable?

Does the media prefer IBT or REC?

Summary

How does Record compare to Henderson International Income?

Is REC or HINT more profitable?

Does the media prefer REC or HINT?

Which has better earnings & valuation, REC or HINT?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of REC or HINT?

Is REC or HINT a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

REC vs. The Competition

Record Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools