Free Trial

Sorted Group (SORT) Competitors

GBX 7.24 -3.76 (-34.18%)
As of 05/14/2026 05:59 AM Eastern

SORT vs. AMOI, SYME, MBT, RDT, and LOOP

Should you buy Sorted Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sorted Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sorted Group include Anemoi International (AMOI), Supply@ME Capital (SYME), Mobile Tornado Group (MBT), Rosslyn Data Technologies (RDT), and LoopUp Group (LOOP). These companies are all part of the "software - application" industry.

How does Sorted Group compare to Anemoi International?

Anemoi International (LON:AMOI) and Sorted Group (LON:SORT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Anemoi International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sorted Group's net margin of -50.73%. Anemoi International's return on equity of -15.64% beat Sorted Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Anemoi InternationalN/A -15.64% -5.93%
Sorted Group -50.73%-719.81%23.34%

Anemoi International has a beta of -0.29, meaning that its stock price is 129% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sorted Group has a beta of 0.517, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Anemoi International had 1 more articles in the media than Sorted Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Anemoi International and 0 mentions for Sorted Group. Sorted Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Anemoi International's score of -0.54 indicating that Sorted Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Anemoi International Negative
Sorted Group Neutral

0.9% of Sorted Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of Anemoi International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 33.3% of Sorted Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Anemoi International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sorted Group. Anemoi International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sorted Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Anemoi International£76.59K30.76N/A-£0.11N/A
Sorted Group£5.30M0.10-£5.61M-£23.60N/A

Summary

Sorted Group beats Anemoi International on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sorted Group compare to Supply@ME Capital?

Sorted Group (LON:SORT) and Supply@ME Capital (LON:SYME) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Sorted Group has a beta of 0.517, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Supply@ME Capital has a beta of 4.56, suggesting that its share price is 356% more volatile than the broader market.

Supply@ME Capital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sorted Group's net margin of -50.73%. Supply@ME Capital's return on equity of 0.00% beat Sorted Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sorted Group-50.73% -719.81% 23.34%
Supply@ME Capital N/A N/A -67.84%

In the previous week, Sorted Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Supply@ME Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sorted Group Neutral
Supply@ME Capital Neutral

Supply@ME Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sorted Group. Supply@ME Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sorted Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sorted Group£5.30M0.10-£5.61M-£23.60N/A
Supply@ME Capital£177K10.54-£3.15M-£0.00N/A

0.9% of Sorted Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Supply@ME Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.3% of Sorted Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.4% of Supply@ME Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Supply@ME Capital beats Sorted Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sorted Group compare to Mobile Tornado Group?

Sorted Group (LON:SORT) and Mobile Tornado Group (LON:MBT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Mobile Tornado Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sorted Group. Mobile Tornado Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sorted Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sorted Group£5.30M0.10-£5.61M-£23.60N/A
Mobile Tornado Group£2.03M0.82-£1.12M-£0.00N/A

0.9% of Sorted Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of Mobile Tornado Group shares are held by institutional investors. 33.3% of Sorted Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.0% of Mobile Tornado Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Mobile Tornado Group had 1 more articles in the media than Sorted Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mobile Tornado Group and 0 mentions for Sorted Group. Mobile Tornado Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Sorted Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Mobile Tornado Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sorted Group Neutral
Mobile Tornado Group Positive

Sorted Group has a beta of 0.517, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mobile Tornado Group has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the broader market.

Sorted Group has a net margin of -50.73% compared to Mobile Tornado Group's net margin of -76.88%. Mobile Tornado Group's return on equity of 9.82% beat Sorted Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sorted Group-50.73% -719.81% 23.34%
Mobile Tornado Group -76.88%9.82%-12.24%

Summary

Mobile Tornado Group beats Sorted Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sorted Group compare to Rosslyn Data Technologies?

Sorted Group (LON:SORT) and Rosslyn Data Technologies (LON:RDT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Sorted Group has a beta of 0.517, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rosslyn Data Technologies has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

0.9% of Sorted Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.6% of Rosslyn Data Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.3% of Sorted Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 64.0% of Rosslyn Data Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sorted Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Rosslyn Data Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sorted Group Neutral
Rosslyn Data Technologies Neutral

Sorted Group has higher revenue and earnings than Rosslyn Data Technologies. Sorted Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rosslyn Data Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sorted Group£5.30M0.10-£5.61M-£23.60N/A
Rosslyn Data Technologies£3.13M0.68-£18.48M£0.306.00

Sorted Group has a net margin of -50.73% compared to Rosslyn Data Technologies' net margin of -87.74%. Rosslyn Data Technologies' return on equity of -586.74% beat Sorted Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sorted Group-50.73% -719.81% 23.34%
Rosslyn Data Technologies -87.74%-586.74%-34.47%

Summary

Rosslyn Data Technologies beats Sorted Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sorted Group compare to LoopUp Group?

Sorted Group (LON:SORT) and LoopUp Group (LON:LOOP) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

0.9% of Sorted Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.2% of LoopUp Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.3% of Sorted Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 64.7% of LoopUp Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sorted Group has a net margin of -50.73% compared to LoopUp Group's net margin of -73.76%. LoopUp Group's return on equity of -41.98% beat Sorted Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sorted Group-50.73% -719.81% 23.34%
LoopUp Group -73.76%-41.98%-6.17%

Sorted Group has a beta of 0.517, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LoopUp Group has a beta of -0.04, suggesting that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

Sorted Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LoopUp Group. Sorted Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LoopUp Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sorted Group£5.30M0.10-£5.61M-£23.60N/A
LoopUp Group£22.07M0.00-£16.28M-£0.12N/A

In the previous week, Sorted Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LoopUp Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sorted Group Neutral
LoopUp Group Neutral

Summary

Sorted Group and LoopUp Group tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sorted Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SORT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SORT vs. The Competition

MetricSorted GroupSoftware IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£553K£4.78B£38.84B£2.75B
Dividend YieldN/A3.98%3.20%6.07%
P/E Ratio-0.3126.14165.39365.80
Price / Sales0.10256.66628.0188,017.08
Price / CashN/A17.1549.4927.89
Price / Book0.304.2210.487.72
Net Income-£5.61M£22.26M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.43%-2.18%-1.54%0.30%
1 Month Performance-34.18%2.04%6.73%2.05%
1 Year Performance-67.09%-7.24%161.84%86.32%

Sorted Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SORT
Sorted Group
N/AGBX 7.24
-34.2%
N/A-67.1%£553K£5.30MN/A2
AMOI
Anemoi International
N/AGBX 1.30
flat
N/A+190.7%£2.04M£76.59KN/AN/A
SYME
Supply@ME Capital
N/AGBX 0
flat
N/AN/A£1.87M£177KN/A26
MBT
Mobile Tornado Group
N/AGBX 0.38
+0.8%
N/A-64.9%£1.66M£2.03MN/A18
RDT
Rosslyn Data Technologies
N/AGBX 1.80
flat
N/A-52.6%£1.47M£3.13M6.0051

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SORT) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners