Go Pro

Thungela Resources (TGA) Competitors

Thungela Resources logo
GBX 468.50 +13.50 (+2.97%)
As of 07/21/2026 12:18 PM Eastern

TGA vs. MCM, GCM, ORCP, BISI, and EDL

Should you buy Thungela Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Thungela Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Thungela Resources include MC Mining (MCM), GCM Resources (GCM), Oracle Power (ORCP), Bisichi (BISI), and Edenville Energy (EDL). These companies are all part of the "thermal coal" industry.

How does Thungela Resources compare to MC Mining?

Thungela Resources (LON:TGA) and MC Mining (LON:MCM) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Thungela Resources has higher revenue and earnings than MC Mining. Thungela Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MC Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thungela Resources£29.60B0.02£76.75B-£5.46 thousandN/A
MC Mining£55.97M0.00-£8.84M-£0.02N/A

In the previous week, Thungela Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled MC Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thungela Resources Neutral
MC Mining Neutral

Thungela Resources has a beta of -0.87, suggesting that its share price is 187% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MC Mining has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

35.6% of Thungela Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.5% of MC Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of Thungela Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.2% of MC Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MC Mining has a net margin of -15.80% compared to Thungela Resources' net margin of -23.86%. MC Mining's return on equity of -9.93% beat Thungela Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thungela Resources-23.86% -35.45% 6.02%
MC Mining -15.80%-9.93%-4.65%

Summary

Thungela Resources and MC Mining tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thungela Resources compare to GCM Resources?

Thungela Resources (LON:TGA) and GCM Resources (LON:GCM) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Thungela Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled GCM Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thungela Resources Neutral
GCM Resources Neutral

GCM Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Thungela Resources' net margin of -23.86%. GCM Resources' return on equity of -4.93% beat Thungela Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thungela Resources-23.86% -35.45% 6.02%
GCM Resources N/A -4.93%-1.21%

Thungela Resources has higher revenue and earnings than GCM Resources. GCM Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thungela Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thungela Resources£29.60B0.02£76.75B-£5.46 thousandN/A
GCM ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.14M-£0.50N/A

Thungela Resources has a beta of -0.87, indicating that its stock price is 187% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GCM Resources has a beta of 0.723, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

35.6% of Thungela Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.3% of GCM Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Thungela Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of GCM Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Thungela Resources beats GCM Resources on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thungela Resources compare to Oracle Power?

Oracle Power (LON:ORCP) and Thungela Resources (LON:TGA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings and risk.

Oracle Power has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Thungela Resources' net margin of -23.86%. Oracle Power's return on equity of -6.91% beat Thungela Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oracle PowerN/A -6.91% -4.81%
Thungela Resources -23.86%-35.45%6.02%

1.5% of Oracle Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.6% of Thungela Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Oracle Power shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Thungela Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Thungela Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Oracle Power. Oracle Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thungela Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oracle PowerN/AN/A-£1.55M-£0.00N/A
Thungela Resources£29.60B0.02£76.75B-£5.46 thousandN/A

In the previous week, Oracle Power had 1 more articles in the media than Thungela Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Oracle Power and 0 mentions for Thungela Resources. Oracle Power's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Thungela Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oracle Power Neutral
Thungela Resources Neutral

Oracle Power has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thungela Resources has a beta of -0.87, indicating that its share price is 187% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Thungela Resources beats Oracle Power on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thungela Resources compare to Bisichi?

Thungela Resources (LON:TGA) and Bisichi (LON:BISI) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Thungela Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Bisichi. Bisichi is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thungela Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thungela Resources£29.60B0.02£76.75B-£5.46 thousandN/A
Bisichi£53.66M0.11£2.57M-£17.25N/A

35.6% of Thungela Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Bisichi shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of Thungela Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.8% of Bisichi shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Thungela Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 1,350.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 288.3%. Bisichi pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.7%. Thungela Resources pays out -24.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bisichi pays out -40.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Bisichi had 1 more articles in the media than Thungela Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Bisichi and 0 mentions for Thungela Resources. Thungela Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Bisichi'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thungela Resources Neutral
Bisichi Neutral

Bisichi has a net margin of 2.14% compared to Thungela Resources' net margin of -23.86%. Bisichi's return on equity of 3.48% beat Thungela Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thungela Resources-23.86% -35.45% 6.02%
Bisichi 2.14%3.48%5.19%

Thungela Resources has a beta of -0.87, indicating that its share price is 187% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bisichi has a beta of -0.1, indicating that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Bisichi beats Thungela Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thungela Resources compare to Edenville Energy?

Edenville Energy (LON:EDL) and Thungela Resources (LON:TGA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Edenville Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Thungela Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Edenville Energy Neutral
Thungela Resources Neutral

Edenville Energy has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thungela Resources has a beta of -0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 187% less volatile than the broader market.

Thungela Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Edenville Energy. Thungela Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Edenville Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Edenville Energy£133.62K0.00-£1.75M-£0.08N/A
Thungela Resources£29.60B0.02£76.75B-£5.46 thousandN/A

20.5% of Edenville Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.6% of Thungela Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 52.3% of Edenville Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Thungela Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Edenville Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Thungela Resources' net margin of -23.86%. Edenville Energy's return on equity of -25.91% beat Thungela Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Edenville EnergyN/A -25.91% -15.07%
Thungela Resources -23.86%-35.45%6.02%

Summary

Edenville Energy and Thungela Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thungela Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TGA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TGA vs. The Competition

MetricThungela ResourcesThermal Coal IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£596.33M£124.97M£10.12B£2.79B
Dividend Yield3.90%3.95%11.38%6.16%
P/E Ratio-0.0914.7819.64368.25
Price / Sales0.026.48390.4084,392.87
Price / Cash0.1112.0036.7927.89
Price / Book0.030.114.127.59
Net Income£76.75B£19.19B£4.25B£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.46%2.07%0.98%0.16%
1 Month Performance-12.76%-5.88%-0.12%-0.87%
1 Year Performance6.96%4.85%30.56%62.65%

Thungela Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TGA
Thungela Resources
N/AGBX 468.50
+3.0%
N/A+12.9%£596.33M£29.60BN/AN/A
MCM
MC Mining
N/AN/AN/AN/A£31.10M£55.97MN/AN/A
GCM
GCM Resources
N/AGBX 3.24
+4.5%
N/A-45.3%£12.15MN/AN/A17
ORCP
Oracle Power
N/AGBX 0.05
+4.7%
N/A+221.4%£7.08MN/AN/A7
BISI
Bisichi
N/AGBX 55
-21.4%
N/A-46.3%£5.87M£53.66MN/A243

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TGA) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners