Go Pro

Trifast (TRI) Competitors

Trifast logo
GBX 68 +0.80 (+1.19%)
As of 06/26/2026 12:26 PM Eastern

TRI vs. PSON, MCON, HYVE, RST, and ELIX

Should you buy Trifast stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Trifast with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Trifast include Pearson (PSON), Mincon Group (MCON), Hyve Group (HYVE), Restore (RST), and Elixirr International (ELIX).

How does Trifast compare to Pearson?

Pearson (LON:PSON) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Pearson has a net margin of 9.37% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. Pearson's return on equity of 9.26% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pearson9.37% 9.26% 4.85%
Trifast 0.54%0.95%2.47%

Pearson has a beta of 0.34266028, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trifast has a beta of 0.684, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

56.5% of Pearson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Pearson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of Trifast shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pearson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,254.33, indicating a potential upside of 6.57%. Trifast has a consensus price target of GBX 135, indicating a potential upside of 98.53%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Pearson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pearson
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Trifast
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Pearson has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. Pearson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pearson£3.58B1.98£346.29M£50.7023.21
Trifast£215.42M0.43-£4.55M£0.8778.16

Pearson pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Pearson pays out 48.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Pearson and Pearson both had 1 articles in the media. Pearson's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trifast'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pearson
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Trifast
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Pearson beats Trifast on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Mincon Group?

Mincon Group (LON:MCON) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Trifast has a consensus price target of GBX 135, indicating a potential upside of 98.53%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Mincon Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mincon Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trifast
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Mincon Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Mincon Group. Mincon Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trifast'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mincon Group Neutral
Trifast Neutral

Mincon Group has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. Mincon Group's return on equity of 3.74% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mincon Group3.71% 3.74% 1.34%
Trifast 0.54%0.95%2.47%

Mincon Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Mincon Group pays out 83.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mincon Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

15.8% of Mincon Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Trifast shares are owned by institutional investors. 61.7% of Mincon Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of Trifast shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mincon Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trifast. Mincon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mincon Group£148.72M0.83£2.01M£2.5123.05
Trifast£215.42M0.43-£4.55M£0.8778.16

Mincon Group has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trifast has a beta of 0.684, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Trifast beats Mincon Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Hyve Group?

Hyve Group (LON:HYVE) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

Hyve Group has a beta of 2.17, indicating that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trifast has a beta of 0.684, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Hyve Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Hyve Group. Hyve Group's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Hyve Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hyve Group Neutral
Trifast Neutral

Trifast has higher revenue and earnings than Hyve Group. Hyve Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hyve Group£122.47M0.00-£24.70M-£0.09N/A
Trifast£215.42M0.43-£4.55M£0.8778.16

Trifast has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Hyve Group's net margin of -47.45%. Trifast's return on equity of 0.95% beat Hyve Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hyve Group-47.45% -14.66% -3.67%
Trifast 0.54%0.95%2.47%

88.1% of Hyve Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. 7.6% of Hyve Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of Trifast shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trifast has a consensus price target of GBX 135, suggesting a potential upside of 98.53%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trifast is more favorable than Hyve Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hyve Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trifast
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Trifast beats Hyve Group on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Restore?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Restore (LON:RST) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Trifast currently has a consensus price target of GBX 135, indicating a potential upside of 98.53%. Restore has a consensus price target of GBX 367.33, indicating a potential upside of 39.14%. Given Trifast's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trifast is more favorable than Restore.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trifast
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Restore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Trifast has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Restore's net margin of 0.43%. Trifast's return on equity of 0.95% beat Restore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trifast0.54% 0.95% 2.47%
Restore 0.43%0.58%3.37%

Restore has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. Restore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trifast£215.42M0.43-£4.55M£0.8778.16
Restore£304.70M1.16£3.74M-£4.70N/A

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Restore pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restore pays out -127.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Restore had 1 more articles in the media than Trifast. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Restore and 1 mentions for Trifast. Restore's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Restore is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Trifast
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Restore
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Trifast has a beta of 0.684, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restore has a beta of 0.122, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

35.8% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.2% of Restore shares are held by institutional investors. 21.7% of Trifast shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of Restore shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Trifast beats Restore on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Elixirr International?

Elixirr International (LON:ELIX) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Elixirr International has a net margin of 13.17% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. Elixirr International's return on equity of 15.00% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Elixirr International13.17% 15.00% 9.88%
Trifast 0.54%0.95%2.47%

21.2% of Elixirr International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. 33.0% of Elixirr International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of Trifast shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Elixirr International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trifast. Elixirr International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Elixirr International£149.60M2.29£17.20M£37.1818.56
Trifast£215.42M0.43-£4.55M£0.8778.16

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Elixirr International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Elixirr International. Elixirr International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trifast'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Elixirr International Neutral
Trifast Neutral

Elixirr International presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,060, indicating a potential upside of 53.62%. Trifast has a consensus price target of GBX 135, indicating a potential upside of 98.53%. Given Trifast's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Elixirr International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Elixirr International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Trifast
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Elixirr International pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Elixirr International pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Elixirr International has a beta of 0.663, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trifast has a beta of 0.684, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Elixirr International and Trifast tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trifast News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRI vs. The Competition

MetricTrifastTools & Accessories IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£91.78M£5.54B£9.61B£2.79B
Dividend Yield2.57%3.54%3.54%6.16%
P/E Ratio78.1643.8025.65366.66
Price / Sales0.4335.894,851.7286,088.44
Price / Cash2.759.6327.9827.87
Price / Book0.741.364.587.79
Net Income-£4.55M£57.13M£792.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.49%-1.63%0.13%-0.61%
1 Month Performance6.25%0.13%-0.86%-1.14%
1 Year Performance-2.86%20.39%21.54%65.93%

Trifast Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRI
Trifast
3.0762 of 5 stars
GBX 68
+1.2%
GBX 135
+98.5%
-2.9%£91.78M£215.42M78.1624,400
PSON
Pearson
1.6981 of 5 stars
GBX 1,128
-1.1%
GBX 1,254.33
+11.2%
+11.9%£6.77B£3.58B22.2521,400
MCON
Mincon Group
N/AGBX 57.50
+0.1%
N/A+60.7%£122.17M£148.72M22.91604
HYVE
Hyve Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£351.72M£122.47MN/A772
RST
Restore
3.7813 of 5 stars
GBX 263
+0.8%
GBX 367.33
+39.7%
+2.7%£351.44M£304.70MN/A2,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TRI) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners