LON:TRITrifast Competitors & Alternatives

ITE Group (LON:ITE) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for ITE Group and Trifast, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

ITE Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 115, suggesting a potential upside of ∞. Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 208, suggesting a potential upside of 76.27%. Given ITE Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe ITE Group is more favorable than Trifast.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ITE Group and Trifast's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ITE Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares ITE Group and Trifast's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

ITE Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.02 per share. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. ITE Group pays out -2.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

ITE Group beats Trifast on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Biffa (LON:BIFF) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Biffa pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Trifast pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Biffa pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Biffa is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Trifast and Biffa's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Biffa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Trifast and Biffa's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Trifast and Biffa, as reported by MarketBeat.

Trifast currently has a consensus price target of GBX 208, suggesting a potential upside of 76.27%. Biffa has a consensus price target of GBX 241, suggesting a potential upside of 23.97%. Given Trifast's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Biffa.

Summary

Biffa beats Trifast on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trifast (LON:TRI) and General Electric (LON:GEC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trifast and General Electric's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

General Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Trifast and General Electric's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Trifast and General Electric, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Trifast presently has a consensus price target of GBX 208, suggesting a potential upside of 76.27%. Given Trifast's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than General Electric.

Dividends

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. General Electric pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 59.7%. Trifast pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. General Electric pays out -1,230.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. General Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Trifast beats General Electric on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Morgan Sindall Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Morgan Sindall Group and Trifast's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Morgan Sindall Group and Trifast, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Morgan Sindall Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,481.25, indicating a potential upside of 18.88%. Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 208, indicating a potential upside of 76.27%. Given Trifast's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Morgan Sindall Group.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Morgan Sindall Group and Trifast's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Morgan Sindall Group beats Trifast on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Equiniti Group (LON:EQN) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Equiniti Group and Trifast's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equiniti Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Equiniti Group and Trifast's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Equiniti Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Equiniti Group pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Equiniti Group and Trifast, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Equiniti Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 225, indicating a potential upside of 54.96%. Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 208, indicating a potential upside of 76.27%. Given Trifast's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Equiniti Group.

Summary

Equiniti Group beats Trifast on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Restore (LON:RST) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Trifast and Restore, as provided by MarketBeat.

Trifast presently has a consensus target price of GBX 208, indicating a potential upside of 76.27%. Restore has a consensus target price of GBX 495, indicating a potential upside of 26.92%. Given Trifast's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Trifast is more favorable than Restore.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trifast and Restore's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Restore pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Trifast pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restore pays out 0.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trifast is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Trifast and Restore's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Restore beats Trifast on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.