Do analysts recommend AVG or TRI?

Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 140, suggesting a potential upside of 72.84%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trifast is more favorable than Avingtrans. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Avingtrans 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Trifast 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has higher valuation & earnings, AVG or TRI?

Avingtrans has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Avingtrans £155.49M 1.73 £3.46M £21.10 34.43 Trifast £208.37M 0.52 -£4.55M -£0.73 N/A

Is AVG or TRI more profitable?

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Trifast's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Avingtrans 4.54% 6.13% 2.06% Trifast -0.47% -0.82% 2.47%

Does the media favor AVG or TRI?

In the previous week, Avingtrans and Avingtrans both had 1 articles in the media. Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Avingtrans is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Avingtrans 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Trifast 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate TRI or RNO?

Trifast presently has a consensus target price of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 72.84%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Renold. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Trifast 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Renold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, TRI or RNO?

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Trifast £208.37M 0.52 -£4.55M -£0.73 N/A Renold £245.10M 0.66 £19.85M £6.60 12.39

Is TRI or RNO more profitable?

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Trifast's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Trifast -0.47% -0.82% 2.47% Renold 6.16% 25.68% 6.89%

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TRI or CGS?

Castings has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Trifast £208.37M 0.52 -£4.55M -£0.73 N/A Castings £173.23M 0.70 £16.81M £17.25 16.06

Is TRI or CGS more profitable?

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Trifast's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Trifast -0.47% -0.82% 2.47% Castings 4.36% 5.98% 7.09%

Do analysts rate SOM or TRI?

Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 72.84%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Somero Enterprises. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Somero Enterprises 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Trifast 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor SOM or TRI?

In the previous week, Somero Enterprises had 2 more articles in the media than Trifast. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Somero Enterprises and 1 mentions for Trifast. Somero Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Somero Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Somero Enterprises 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Trifast 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate TRI or LOAD?

Trifast currently has a consensus target price of GBX 140, suggesting a potential upside of 72.84%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Crestchic. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Trifast 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Crestchic 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Is TRI or LOAD more profitable?

Trifast has a net margin of -0.47% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Trifast's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Trifast -0.47% -0.82% 2.47% Crestchic -4.95% 18.18% 8.17%

Trifast (TRI) Competitors

GBX 81 +1.00 (+1.25%)

As of 12:02 PM Eastern

Compare

TRI vs. AVG, RNO, CGS, SOM, and LOAD

Should you buy Trifast stock or one of its competitors? Trifast's main competitors and comparable companies include Avingtrans (AVG), Renold (RNO), Castings (CGS), Somero Enterprises (SOM), and Crestchic (LOAD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "machinery" industry.

How does Trifast compare to Avingtrans?

Avingtrans (LON:AVG) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.3% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. 13.6% of Avingtrans shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.5% of Trifast shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 140, suggesting a potential upside of 72.84%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trifast is more favorable than Avingtrans.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Avingtrans	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.566, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trifast has a beta of 0.691, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avingtrans	4.54%	6.13%	2.06%
Trifast	-0.47%	-0.82%	2.47%

Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out -246.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trifast is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Avingtrans and Avingtrans both had 1 articles in the media. Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Avingtrans is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Avingtrans	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Trifast	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Avingtrans has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avingtrans	£155.49M	1.73	£3.46M	£21.10	34.43
Trifast	£208.37M	0.52	-£4.55M	-£0.73	N/A

Summary

Trifast beats Avingtrans on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Renold?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Renold (LON:RNO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	-0.47%	-0.82%	2.47%
Renold	6.16%	25.68%	6.89%

34.3% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Renold shares are held by institutional investors. 24.5% of Trifast shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Renold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£208.37M	0.52	-£4.55M	-£0.73	N/A
Renold	£245.10M	0.66	£19.85M	£6.60	12.39

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Renold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Renold. Trifast's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Renold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	Neutral
Renold	Neutral

Trifast presently has a consensus target price of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 72.84%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Renold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Renold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Renold pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Trifast pays out -246.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Renold pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trifast is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Trifast has a beta of 0.691, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Renold has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Renold beats Trifast on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Castings?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

Trifast currently has a consensus target price of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 72.84%. Castings has a consensus target price of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 40.79%. Given Trifast's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Castings.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Trifast pays out -246.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Castings pays out 106.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	-0.47%	-0.82%	2.47%
Castings	4.36%	5.98%	7.09%

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Castings. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Castings. Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	Neutral
Castings	Positive

Castings has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£208.37M	0.52	-£4.55M	-£0.73	N/A
Castings	£173.23M	0.70	£16.81M	£17.25	16.06

34.3% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.1% of Castings shares are held by institutional investors. 24.5% of Trifast shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trifast has a beta of 0.691, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.437, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Castings beats Trifast on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Somero Enterprises?

Somero Enterprises (LON:SOM) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

20.8% of Somero Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.3% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Somero Enterprises shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.5% of Trifast shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Somero Enterprises has a net margin of 11.51% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Somero Enterprises' return on equity of 12.65% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Somero Enterprises	11.51%	12.65%	19.35%
Trifast	-0.47%	-0.82%	2.47%

In the previous week, Somero Enterprises had 2 more articles in the media than Trifast. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Somero Enterprises and 1 mentions for Trifast. Somero Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Somero Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Somero Enterprises	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Trifast	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Somero Enterprises pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.99 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Somero Enterprises pays out 94.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Trifast pays out -246.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Somero Enterprises has a beta of 0.591, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trifast has a beta of 0.691, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 72.84%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Somero Enterprises.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Somero Enterprises	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Somero Enterprises has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Somero Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Somero Enterprises	£88.86M	1.52	£29.27M	£18.00	14.50
Trifast	£208.37M	0.52	-£4.55M	-£0.73	N/A

Summary

Somero Enterprises beats Trifast on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Crestchic?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Crestchic (LON:LOAD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Trifast currently has a consensus target price of GBX 140, suggesting a potential upside of 72.84%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Crestchic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Crestchic	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

34.3% of Trifast shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.3% of Crestchic shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.5% of Trifast shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.5% of Crestchic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Crestchic pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Trifast pays out -246.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crestchic pays out 1,176.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Trifast is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Crestchic. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Crestchic. Trifast's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Crestchic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	Neutral
Crestchic	Neutral

Trifast has a net margin of -0.47% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	-0.47%	-0.82%	2.47%
Crestchic	-4.95%	18.18%	8.17%

Crestchic has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crestchic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£208.37M	0.52	-£4.55M	-£0.73	N/A
Crestchic	£34.97M	0.00	£4.86M	£0.17	N/A

Trifast has a beta of 0.691, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crestchic has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Trifast beats Crestchic on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trifast News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TRI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Trifast	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£109.39M	£11.28B	£10.34B	£2.90B
Dividend Yield	2.34%	2.28%	96.84%	6.22%
P/E Ratio	-110.96	21.61	25.70	366.53
Price / Sales	0.52	62.86	283.87	90,276.50
Price / Cash	2.75	22.82	23.78	27.89
Price / Book	0.88	4.30	4.96	6.40
Net Income	-£4.55M	£370.56M	£615.14M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	3.05%	0.87%	1.70%	1.06%
1 Month Performance	-6.25%	-2.31%	-2.45%	0.12%
1 Year Performance	1.25%	7.03%	4.49%	19.58%

Trifast Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TRI Trifast	2.9338 of 5 stars	GBX 81 +1.3%	GBX 140 +72.8%	-0.9%	£109.39M	£208.37M	N/A	24,400
AVG Avingtrans	N/A	GBX 725 flat	N/A	+57.9%	£267.75M	£155.49M	34.36	732	News Coverage
RNO Renold	N/A	GBX 81.80 flat	N/A	-0.2%	£162.96M	£245.10M	12.39	1,824
CGS Castings	4.2164 of 5 stars	GBX 303 +1.0%	GBX 390 +28.7%	+5.6%	£131.74M	£173.23M	17.57	1,251
SOM Somero Enterprises	N/A	GBX 252 -0.4%	N/A	+17.8%	£130.48M	£88.86M	14.00	216	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TRI) was last updated on 9/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trifast (TRI) Competitors