Log in

LON:TRITrifast Competitors & Alternatives

GBX 118
+1.50 (+1.29 %)
(As of 07/14/2020 06:23 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
113
Now: GBX 118
118
50-Day Range
110
MA: GBX 118.97
133.50
52-Week Range
89
Now: GBX 118
226
Volume79,573 shs
Average Volume80,087 shs
Market Capitalization£160.40 million
P/E Ratio11.92
Dividend Yield3.70%
BetaN/A

Competitors

Trifast (LON:TRI) Vs. ITE, BIFF, GEC, MGNS, EQN, and RST

Should you be buying TRI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "industrials" are considered alternatives and competitors to Trifast, including ITE Group (ITE), Biffa (BIFF), General Electric (GEC), Morgan Sindall Group (MGNS), Equiniti Group (EQN), and Restore (RST).

ITE Group (LON:ITE) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for ITE Group and Trifast, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ITE Group01102.50
Trifast02102.33

ITE Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 115, suggesting a potential upside of ∞. Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 208, suggesting a potential upside of 76.27%. Given ITE Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe ITE Group is more favorable than Trifast.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ITE Group and Trifast's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ITE Group£208.10 million0.00N/AGBX (0.90)N/A
Trifast£207.08 million0.77N/AGBX 9.9011.92

ITE Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares ITE Group and Trifast's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ITE GroupN/AN/AN/A
TrifastN/AN/AN/A

Dividends

ITE Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.02 per share. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. ITE Group pays out -2.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

ITE Group beats Trifast on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Biffa (LON:BIFF) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Biffa pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Trifast pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Biffa pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Biffa is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Trifast and Biffa's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trifast£207.08 million0.77N/AGBX 9.9011.92
Biffa£1.16 billion0.51N/AGBX 17.9010.86

Biffa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Trifast and Biffa's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TrifastN/AN/AN/A
BiffaN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Trifast and Biffa, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Trifast02102.33
Biffa03202.40

Trifast currently has a consensus price target of GBX 208, suggesting a potential upside of 76.27%. Biffa has a consensus price target of GBX 241, suggesting a potential upside of 23.97%. Given Trifast's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Biffa.

Summary

Biffa beats Trifast on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trifast (LON:TRI) and General Electric (LON:GEC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trifast and General Electric's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trifast£207.08 million0.77N/AGBX 9.9011.92
General Electric£93.54 billion0.01N/AGBX (0.33)-20.60

General Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Trifast and General Electric's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TrifastN/AN/AN/A
General ElectricN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Trifast and General Electric, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Trifast02102.33
General Electric0000N/A

Trifast presently has a consensus price target of GBX 208, suggesting a potential upside of 76.27%. Given Trifast's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than General Electric.

Dividends

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. General Electric pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 59.7%. Trifast pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. General Electric pays out -1,230.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. General Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Trifast beats General Electric on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Morgan Sindall Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Morgan Sindall Group and Trifast's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Morgan Sindall GroupN/AN/AN/A
TrifastN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Morgan Sindall Group and Trifast, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Morgan Sindall Group02202.50
Trifast02102.33

Morgan Sindall Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,481.25, indicating a potential upside of 18.88%. Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 208, indicating a potential upside of 76.27%. Given Trifast's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Morgan Sindall Group.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Morgan Sindall Group and Trifast's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Morgan Sindall Group£3.07 billion0.19N/AGBX 153.108.14
Trifast£207.08 million0.77N/AGBX 9.9011.92

Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Morgan Sindall Group beats Trifast on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Equiniti Group (LON:EQN) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Equiniti Group and Trifast's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Equiniti Group£555.70 million0.95N/AGBX 8.4017.29
Trifast£207.08 million0.77N/AGBX 9.9011.92

Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equiniti Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Equiniti Group and Trifast's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Equiniti GroupN/AN/AN/A
TrifastN/AN/AN/A

Dividends

Equiniti Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Equiniti Group pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Equiniti Group and Trifast, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Equiniti Group02502.71
Trifast02102.33

Equiniti Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 225, indicating a potential upside of 54.96%. Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 208, indicating a potential upside of 76.27%. Given Trifast's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Equiniti Group.

Summary

Equiniti Group beats Trifast on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Restore (LON:RST) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Trifast and Restore, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Trifast02102.33
Restore00303.00

Trifast presently has a consensus target price of GBX 208, indicating a potential upside of 76.27%. Restore has a consensus target price of GBX 495, indicating a potential upside of 26.92%. Given Trifast's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Trifast is more favorable than Restore.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trifast and Restore's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trifast£207.08 million0.77N/AGBX 9.9011.92
Restore£215.60 million2.26N/AGBX 12.9030.23

Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Restore pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Trifast pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restore pays out 0.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trifast is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Trifast and Restore's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TrifastN/AN/AN/A
RestoreN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Restore beats Trifast on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
ITE Group logo
ITE
ITE Group
1.4N/AN/A£616.29 million£208.10 million-92.33High Trading Volume
Heavy News Reporting
Biffa logo
BIFF
Biffa
1.7$194.40+0.6%£589.03 million£1.16 billion10.86
GEC
General Electric
0.6$6.70+0.3%£583.87 million£93.54 billion-20.60High Trading Volume
Morgan Sindall Group logo
MGNS
Morgan Sindall Group
2.4$1,246.00+0.5%£569.83 million£3.07 billion8.14
Equiniti Group logo
EQN
Equiniti Group
2.2$145.20+0.6%£529.31 million£555.70 million17.29
Restore logo
RST
Restore
2.3$390.00+0.5%£487.40 million£215.60 million30.23High Trading Volume
SThree logo
STHR
SThree
2.0$341.00+100.0%£451.55 million£1.33 billion12.05High Trading Volume
Heavy News Reporting
FirstGroup logo
FGP
FirstGroup
2.0$36.40+0.9%£443.96 million£7.36 billion-1.89
Keller Group logo
KLR
Keller Group
1.3$617.00+1.0%£440.65 million£2.30 billion20.77
STEM
SThree
2.5$265.50+0.2%£350.76 million£1.35 billion8.59Upcoming Earnings
High Trading Volume
Clipper Logistics logo
CLG
Clipper Logistics
1.1$334.00+0.0%£339.63 million£486.99 million24.20Heavy News Reporting
Go-Ahead Group logo
GOG
Go-Ahead Group
2.6$695.00+3.6%£310.88 million£3.86 billion4.95Analyst Report
Heavy News Reporting
KGH
Knights Group
0.7$405.00+0.0%£307.79 million£60.78 million59.56High Trading Volume
Stagecoach Group logo
SGC
Stagecoach Group
2.0$53.10+1.1%£295.45 million£1.67 billion2.81
Charles Taylor logo
CTR
Charles Taylor
1.3N/AN/A£269.53 million£281.84 million-63.89
MRL
Marlowe
0.9$524.00+0.4%£265.40 million£161.40 million327.50
PTSG
Premier Technical Services Group
0.7$210.00+100.0%£265.16 million£69.10 million75.00
Northgate logo
NTG
Northgate
2.1$198.20+100.0%£264.07 million£729.28 million5.58
LSC
London Security
1.0$2,100.00+0.0%£251.36 million£146.92 million15.46
HYVE
Hyve Group
1.1$90.00+0.6%£238.62 million£209.19 million-0.41High Trading Volume
Ocean Wilsons logo
OCN
Ocean Wilsons
1.9$650.00+1.5%£236.93 million£406.13 million4.91High Trading Volume
SIG logo
SHI
SIG
1.5$35.96+10.7%£220.93 million£2.16 billion-1.71High Trading Volume
Ricardo logo
RCDO
Ricardo
1.8$397.00+0.8%£215.76 million£389.20 million11.64
Wincanton logo
WIN
Wincanton
2.1$166.50+2.4%£212.35 million£1.20 billion5.41
Renewi logo
RWI
Renewi
2.2$26.30+3.0%£208.04 million£1.58 billion-4.61
DWF
DWF Group
2.2$64.00+3.9%£207.72 million£338.38 million16.84Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
Eurocell logo
ECEL
Eurocell
1.9$177.50+0.0%£196.50 million£279.10 million9.24
CGEO
Georgia Capital
1.1$442.50+0.7%£184.96 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
CPS
Cpl Resources
1.1$660.00+0.0%£181.82 millionN/A10.02
Severfield logo
SFR
Severfield
2.6$58.50+0.9%£181.50 million£327.36 million8.86Insider Buying
Heavy News Reporting
MANO
Manolete Partners
1.4$410.00+18.3%£178.64 million£18.68 million24.12Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Mears Group logo
MER
Mears Group
1.6$150.00+0.3%£165.18 million£905.08 million-2.51
Gateley logo
GTLY
Gateley
1.5$138.00+0.0%£162.30 million£108.93 million11.60
ANX
Anexo Group
1.8N/AN/A£161.82 million£78.51 million7.38High Trading Volume
Costain Group logo
COST
Costain Group
1.9$62.00+6.5%£159.47 million£1.16 billion-22.96High Trading Volume
SBIZ
Simplybiz Group
1.6$152.50+3.0%£154.85 million£62.77 million16.94High Trading Volume
Kier Group logo
KIE
Kier Group
2.4$76.45+3.8%£123.94 million£3.96 billion-0.46
Begbies Traynor Group logo
BEG
Begbies Traynor Group
1.1$98.00+4.9%£121.47 million£65.86 million31.61Dividend Cut
High Trading Volume
Ryanair logo
RYA
Ryanair
1.1$10.75+2.7%£117.18 million£8.49 billion18.57
MIND
Mind Gym
1.3N/AN/A£104.47 million£48.25 million16.10High Trading Volume
KCT
Kin and Carta
0.8$59.90+0.3%£103.39 million£150.70 million-33.28High Trading Volume
John Menzies logo
MNZS
John Menzies
1.9$120.20+1.8%£101.34 million£1.33 billion9.39High Trading Volume
DX (Group) logo
DX
DX (Group)
1.8$17.00+0.0%£97.53 million£335.60 million170.00Analyst Report
D4T4
D4t4 Solutions
0.6$235.00+0.0%£94.55 million£21.75 million21.36Heavy News Reporting
FRAN
Franchise Brands
0.7$94.50+2.1%£90.46 million£44.01 million27.79
SAE
Atlantis Resources
0.6$17.70+10.2%£87.96 million£3.98 million-2.72High Trading Volume
SUR
Sureserve Group
1.4$43.50+0.0%£69.23 million£219.14 million11.15High Trading Volume
OLEE
Oleeo
0.7$4.72+100.0%£66.31 million£568.16 million-26.52High Trading Volume
NEXS
Nexus Infrastructure
1.7$157.00+0.0%£65.27 million£168.28 million12.27
RBGP
Rosenblatt Group
1.0$74.00+12.2%£63.34 million£19.94 million9.87Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
Heavy News Reporting
This page was last updated on 7/14/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.