Which has higher earnings and valuation, TRI or PSON?

Pearson has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. Pearson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Trifast £215.42M 0.42 -£4.55M £0.87 77.70 Pearson £3.58B 1.96 £346.29M £50.70 22.87

Is TRI or PSON more profitable?

Pearson has a net margin of 9.37% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. Pearson's return on equity of 9.26% beat Trifast's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Trifast 0.54% 0.95% 2.47% Pearson 9.37% 9.26% 4.85%

Do analysts prefer MCON or TRI?

Trifast has a consensus price target of GBX 135, indicating a potential upside of 99.70%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Mincon Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mincon Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Trifast 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MCON or TRI?

Mincon Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trifast. Mincon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Mincon Group £148.72M 0.80 £2.01M £2.51 22.31 Trifast £215.42M 0.42 -£4.55M £0.87 77.70

Is MCON or TRI more profitable?

Mincon Group has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. Mincon Group's return on equity of 3.74% beat Trifast's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Mincon Group 3.71% 3.74% 1.34% Trifast 0.54% 0.95% 2.47%

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TRI or RST?

Restore has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. Restore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Trifast £215.42M 0.42 -£4.55M £0.87 77.70 Restore £304.70M 1.12 £3.74M -£4.70 N/A

Is TRI or RST more profitable?

Trifast has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Restore's net margin of 0.43%. Trifast's return on equity of 0.95% beat Restore's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Trifast 0.54% 0.95% 2.47% Restore 0.43% 0.58% 3.37%

Does the media refer more to TRI or RST?

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Restore. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 1 mentions for Restore. Restore's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Restore is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Trifast 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Restore 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend TRI or DWF?

Trifast presently has a consensus price target of GBX 135, indicating a potential upside of 99.70%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than DWF Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Trifast 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 DWF Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TRI or DWF?

DWF Group has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. DWF Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Trifast £215.42M 0.42 -£4.55M £0.87 77.70 DWF Group £451.64M 0.00 £12.45M £0.04 N/A

Is TRI or DWF more profitable?

DWF Group has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. DWF Group's return on equity of 19.89% beat Trifast's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Trifast 0.54% 0.95% 2.47% DWF Group 2.76% 19.89% 5.74%

Does the media refer more to TRI or DWF?

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than DWF Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 1 mentions for DWF Group. Trifast's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled DWF Group'saverage media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Trifast 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral DWF Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer TRI or ABBY?

Trifast presently has a consensus price target of GBX 135, suggesting a potential upside of 99.70%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Abbey. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Trifast 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Abbey 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, TRI or ABBY?

Abbey has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trifast. Abbey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Trifast £215.42M 0.42 -£4.55M £0.87 77.70 Abbey £192.13M 0.00 N/A £125.10 N/A

Is TRI or ABBY more profitable?

Trifast has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Abbey's net margin of 0.00%. Trifast's return on equity of 0.95% beat Abbey's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Trifast 0.54% 0.95% 2.47% Abbey N/A N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to TRI or ABBY?

In the previous week, Abbey had 6 more articles in the media than Trifast. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Abbey and 2 mentions for Trifast. Abbey's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Abbey is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Trifast 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Abbey 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Trifast (TRI) Competitors

GBX 67.60 +2.20 (+3.36%)

As of 06/5/2026 12:00 PM Eastern

Compare

TRI vs. PSON, MCON, RST, DWF, and ABBY

Should you buy Trifast stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Trifast with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Trifast include Pearson (PSON), Mincon Group (MCON), Restore (RST), DWF Group (DWF), and Abbey (ABBY).

How does Trifast compare to Pearson?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Pearson (LON:PSON) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Trifast had 2 more articles in the media than Pearson. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Pearson. Pearson's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Pearson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	Neutral
Pearson	Neutral

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Pearson pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pearson pays out 48.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Pearson has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. Pearson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£215.42M	0.42	-£4.55M	£0.87	77.70
Pearson	£3.58B	1.96	£346.29M	£50.70	22.87

Trifast has a beta of 0.664, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pearson has a beta of 0.34266028, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Trifast presently has a consensus price target of GBX 135, suggesting a potential upside of 99.70%. Pearson has a consensus price target of GBX 1,254.33, suggesting a potential upside of 8.18%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Pearson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pearson	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Pearson has a net margin of 9.37% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. Pearson's return on equity of 9.26% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	0.54%	0.95%	2.47%
Pearson	9.37%	9.26%	4.85%

36.4% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.5% of Pearson shares are held by institutional investors. 20.6% of Trifast shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Pearson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Pearson beats Trifast on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Mincon Group?

Mincon Group (LON:MCON) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Mincon Group has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. Mincon Group's return on equity of 3.74% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mincon Group	3.71%	3.74%	1.34%
Trifast	0.54%	0.95%	2.47%

Mincon Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Mincon Group pays out 83.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mincon Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Mincon Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trifast. Mincon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mincon Group	£148.72M	0.80	£2.01M	£2.51	22.31
Trifast	£215.42M	0.42	-£4.55M	£0.87	77.70

16.4% of Mincon Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.4% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. 61.7% of Mincon Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.6% of Trifast shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Trifast had 2 more articles in the media than Mincon Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Mincon Group. Mincon Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trifast'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mincon Group	Neutral
Trifast	Neutral

Trifast has a consensus price target of GBX 135, indicating a potential upside of 99.70%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Mincon Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mincon Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Mincon Group has a beta of 0.112, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trifast has a beta of 0.664, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Trifast beats Mincon Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Restore?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Restore (LON:RST) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk and valuation.

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Restore pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restore pays out -127.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Restore. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 1 mentions for Restore. Restore's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Restore is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Restore	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Trifast currently has a consensus target price of GBX 135, indicating a potential upside of 99.70%. Restore has a consensus target price of GBX 367.33, indicating a potential upside of 44.79%. Given Trifast's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Restore.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Restore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

36.4% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.6% of Restore shares are held by institutional investors. 20.6% of Trifast shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of Restore shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Trifast has a beta of 0.664, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restore has a beta of 0.122, indicating that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Trifast has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Restore's net margin of 0.43%. Trifast's return on equity of 0.95% beat Restore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	0.54%	0.95%	2.47%
Restore	0.43%	0.58%	3.37%

Restore has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. Restore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£215.42M	0.42	-£4.55M	£0.87	77.70
Restore	£304.70M	1.12	£3.74M	-£4.70	N/A

Summary

Trifast beats Restore on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to DWF Group?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and DWF Group (LON:DWF) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

DWF Group has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. DWF Group's return on equity of 19.89% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	0.54%	0.95%	2.47%
DWF Group	2.76%	19.89%	5.74%

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. DWF Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DWF Group pays out 12,500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Trifast is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than DWF Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 1 mentions for DWF Group. Trifast's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled DWF Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
DWF Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

36.4% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.2% of DWF Group shares are held by institutional investors. 20.6% of Trifast shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 54.9% of DWF Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

DWF Group has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. DWF Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£215.42M	0.42	-£4.55M	£0.87	77.70
DWF Group	£451.64M	0.00	£12.45M	£0.04	N/A

Trifast has a beta of 0.664, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DWF Group has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Trifast presently has a consensus price target of GBX 135, indicating a potential upside of 99.70%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than DWF Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
DWF Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Trifast beats DWF Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Abbey?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Abbey (LON:ABBY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Abbey has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trifast. Abbey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£215.42M	0.42	-£4.55M	£0.87	77.70
Abbey	£192.13M	0.00	N/A	£125.10	N/A

Trifast has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Abbey's net margin of 0.00%. Trifast's return on equity of 0.95% beat Abbey's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	0.54%	0.95%	2.47%
Abbey	N/A	N/A	N/A

Trifast presently has a consensus price target of GBX 135, suggesting a potential upside of 99.70%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Abbey.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Abbey	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

36.4% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. 20.6% of Trifast shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Abbey had 6 more articles in the media than Trifast. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Abbey and 2 mentions for Trifast. Abbey's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Abbey is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Abbey	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Trifast beats Abbey on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trifast News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TRI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Trifast	Tools & Accessories Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£91.24M	£5.25B	£9.38B	£2.79B
Dividend Yield	2.73%	3.47%	3.53%	6.12%
P/E Ratio	77.70	41.76	24.74	365.23
Price / Sales	0.42	34.91	5,040.66	87,121.98
Price / Cash	2.75	9.63	27.88	27.85
Price / Book	0.73	1.34	4.79	7.68
Net Income	-£4.55M	£57.13M	£794.09M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-2.03%	-0.69%	1.67%	-0.50%
1 Month Performance	4.00%	-1.58%	3.91%	2.10%
1 Year Performance	-0.59%	18.90%	29.90%	72.87%

Trifast Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TRI Trifast	3.0049 of 5 stars	GBX 67.60 +3.4%	GBX 135 +99.7%	-1.7%	£91.24M	£215.42M	77.70	24,400	Gap Up
PSON Pearson	2.1691 of 5 stars	GBX 1,123.50 -0.2%	GBX 1,254.33 +11.6%	+4.6%	£6.79B	£3.58B	22.16	21,400	News Coverage
MCON Mincon Group	N/A	GBX 61.75 +1.2%	N/A	+49.3%	£131.20M	£148.72M	24.60	604	Gap Down High Trading Volume
RST Restore	3.6178 of 5 stars	GBX 260 +0.8%	GBX 367.33 +41.3%	-0.5%	£348.55M	£304.70M	N/A	2,700	Positive News
DWF DWF Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£340.61M	£451.64M	2,490.00	4,340

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TRI) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trifast (TRI) Competitors