Do analysts rate AVG or TRI?

Trifast has a consensus price target of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 60.92%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Avingtrans. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Avingtrans 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Trifast 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AVG or TRI?

Avingtrans has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Avingtrans £155.49M 1.75 £3.46M £21.10 34.93 Trifast £208.37M 0.56 -£4.55M -£0.73 N/A

Is AVG or TRI more profitable?

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Trifast's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Avingtrans 4.54% 6.13% 2.06% Trifast -0.47% -0.82% 2.47%

Do analysts rate RNO or TRI?

Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 60.92%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trifast is more favorable than Renold. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Renold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Trifast 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has better earnings and valuation, RNO or TRI?

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Renold £245.10M 0.66 £19.85M £6.60 12.39 Trifast £208.37M 0.56 -£4.55M -£0.73 N/A

Is RNO or TRI more profitable?

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Trifast's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Renold 6.16% 25.68% 6.89% Trifast -0.47% -0.82% 2.47%

Which has better earnings and valuation, TRI or CGS?

Castings has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Trifast £208.37M 0.56 -£4.55M -£0.73 N/A Castings £173.23M 0.77 £16.81M £17.25 17.86

Is TRI or CGS more profitable?

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Trifast's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Trifast -0.47% -0.82% 2.47% Castings 4.36% 5.98% 7.09%

Does the media favor TRI or CGS?

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Castings. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 1 mentions for Castings. Trifast's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Castings' score of 0.00 indicating that Trifast is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Trifast 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Castings 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate TRI or SOM?

Trifast currently has a consensus target price of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 60.92%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Somero Enterprises. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Trifast 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Somero Enterprises 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media refer more to TRI or SOM?

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Somero Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 1 mentions for Somero Enterprises. Somero Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Trifast's score of 0.38 indicating that Somero Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Trifast 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Somero Enterprises 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer TRI or LOAD?

Trifast currently has a consensus price target of GBX 140, suggesting a potential upside of 60.92%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Trifast is more favorable than Crestchic. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Trifast 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Crestchic 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Is TRI or LOAD more profitable?

Trifast has a net margin of -0.47% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Trifast's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Trifast -0.47% -0.82% 2.47% Crestchic -4.95% 18.18% 8.17%

Trifast (TRI) Competitors

GBX 87 -1.00 (-1.14%)

As of 12:12 PM Eastern

Compare

TRI vs. AVG, RNO, CGS, SOM, and LOAD

Should you buy Trifast stock or one of its competitors? Trifast's main competitors and comparable companies include Avingtrans (AVG), Renold (RNO), Castings (CGS), Somero Enterprises (SOM), and Crestchic (LOAD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "machinery" industry.

How does Trifast compare to Avingtrans?

Avingtrans (LON:AVG) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out -246.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trifast is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Avingtrans has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avingtrans	£155.49M	1.75	£3.46M	£21.10	34.93
Trifast	£208.37M	0.56	-£4.55M	-£0.73	N/A

Trifast has a consensus price target of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 60.92%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Avingtrans.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Avingtrans	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.5% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. 13.6% of Avingtrans shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.5% of Trifast shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.565, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trifast has a beta of 0.683, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avingtrans	4.54%	6.13%	2.06%
Trifast	-0.47%	-0.82%	2.47%

In the previous week, Trifast had 2 more articles in the media than Avingtrans. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Avingtrans. Trifast's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Avingtrans' score of 0.00 indicating that Trifast is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Avingtrans	Neutral
Trifast	Neutral

Summary

Trifast beats Avingtrans on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Renold?

Renold (LON:RNO) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Trifast had 2 more articles in the media than Renold. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Renold. Trifast's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Renold's score of 0.00 indicating that Trifast is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Renold	Neutral
Trifast	Neutral

48.7% of Renold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.5% of Trifast shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Renold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.5% of Trifast shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Renold	£245.10M	0.66	£19.85M	£6.60	12.39
Trifast	£208.37M	0.56	-£4.55M	-£0.73	N/A

Renold has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trifast has a beta of 0.683, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Renold pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Renold pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out -246.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trifast is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 60.92%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trifast is more favorable than Renold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Renold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Renold	6.16%	25.68%	6.89%
Trifast	-0.47%	-0.82%	2.47%

Summary

Renold beats Trifast on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Castings?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Castings. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 1 mentions for Castings. Trifast's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Castings' score of 0.00 indicating that Trifast is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Castings	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

35.5% of Trifast shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.3% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.5% of Trifast shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Trifast has a beta of 0.683, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.432, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Trifast pays out -246.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Castings pays out 106.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Trifast presently has a consensus price target of GBX 140, suggesting a potential upside of 60.92%. Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 26.62%. Given Trifast's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Castings.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Castings has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£208.37M	0.56	-£4.55M	-£0.73	N/A
Castings	£173.23M	0.77	£16.81M	£17.25	17.86

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	-0.47%	-0.82%	2.47%
Castings	4.36%	5.98%	7.09%

Summary

Castings beats Trifast on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Somero Enterprises?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Somero Enterprises (LON:SOM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Somero Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 1 mentions for Somero Enterprises. Somero Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Trifast's score of 0.38 indicating that Somero Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Somero Enterprises	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Trifast has a beta of 0.683, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Somero Enterprises has a beta of 0.591, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

35.5% of Trifast shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Somero Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.5% of Trifast shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Somero Enterprises shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trifast currently has a consensus target price of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 60.92%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Somero Enterprises.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Somero Enterprises	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Somero Enterprises has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Somero Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£208.37M	0.56	-£4.55M	-£0.73	N/A
Somero Enterprises	£88.86M	1.45	£29.27M	£18.00	13.80

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Somero Enterprises pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.99 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Trifast pays out -246.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Somero Enterprises pays out 94.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Somero Enterprises has a net margin of 11.51% compared to Trifast's net margin of -0.47%. Somero Enterprises' return on equity of 12.71% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	-0.47%	-0.82%	2.47%
Somero Enterprises	11.51%	12.71%	19.35%

Summary

Trifast and Somero Enterprises tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Crestchic?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Crestchic (LON:LOAD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and risk.

Crestchic has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trifast. Trifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crestchic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£208.37M	0.56	-£4.55M	-£0.73	N/A
Crestchic	£34.97M	0.00	£4.86M	£0.17	N/A

Trifast currently has a consensus price target of GBX 140, suggesting a potential upside of 60.92%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Trifast is more favorable than Crestchic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Crestchic	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Trifast has a beta of 0.683, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crestchic has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

35.5% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.3% of Crestchic shares are held by institutional investors. 24.5% of Trifast shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.5% of Crestchic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Trifast has a net margin of -0.47% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	-0.47%	-0.82%	2.47%
Crestchic	-4.95%	18.18%	8.17%

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Crestchic pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Trifast pays out -246.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crestchic pays out 1,176.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Trifast is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Trifast had 2 more articles in the media than Crestchic. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Crestchic. Trifast's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Crestchic's score of 0.00 indicating that Trifast is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	Neutral
Crestchic	Neutral

Summary

Trifast beats Crestchic on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trifast News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TRI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Trifast	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£117.49M	£11.54B	£10.65B	£2.92B
Dividend Yield	2.07%	2.18%	97.24%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	-119.18	20.85	26.34	367.32
Price / Sales	0.56	64.10	359.73	83,333.28
Price / Cash	2.75	23.35	24.58	27.89
Price / Book	0.95	4.08	4.43	6.97
Net Income	-£4.55M	£357.41M	£611.08M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.69%	-0.01%	-0.84%	0.74%
1 Month Performance	12.99%	1.38%	1.47%	3.34%
1 Year Performance	7.41%	10.66%	10.20%	23.04%

Trifast Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TRI Trifast	3.7131 of 5 stars	GBX 87 -1.1%	GBX 140 +60.9%	+10.0%	£117.49M	£208.37M	N/A	24,400	News Coverage
AVG Avingtrans	N/A	GBX 710 -1.4%	N/A	+70.1%	£262.21M	£155.49M	33.65	732
RNO Renold	N/A	GBX 81.80 flat	N/A	+1.5%	£162.96M	£245.10M	12.39	1,824
CGS Castings	2.8499 of 5 stars	GBX 312 +4.0%	GBX 390 +25.0%	+18.1%	£135.65M	£173.23M	18.09	1,251
SOM Somero Enterprises	N/A	GBX 243 +0.2%	N/A	+8.5%	£125.82M	£88.86M	13.50	216	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TRI) was last updated on 8/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trifast (TRI) Competitors