Trifast (TRI) Competitors

GBX 64 +0.40 (+0.63%)

As of 12:33 PM Eastern

TRI vs. PSON, MCON, RWS, ELIX, and DWF

Should you buy Trifast stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Trifast with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Trifast include Pearson (PSON), Mincon Group (MCON), RWS (RWS), Elixirr International (ELIX), and DWF Group (DWF).

How does Trifast compare to Pearson?

Pearson (LON:PSON) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

Pearson has a beta of 0.34266028, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trifast has a beta of 0.729, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

56.5% of Pearson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.4% of Trifast shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Pearson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.6% of Trifast shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pearson has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. Pearson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pearson	£3.58B	1.86	£346.29M	£50.70	21.69
Trifast	£215.42M	0.40	-£4.55M	£0.87	73.56

Pearson has a net margin of 9.37% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. Pearson's return on equity of 9.26% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pearson	9.37%	9.26%	4.85%
Trifast	0.54%	0.95%	2.47%

Pearson pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Pearson pays out 48.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Pearson currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,254.33, suggesting a potential upside of 14.08%. Trifast has a consensus target price of GBX 135, suggesting a potential upside of 110.94%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trifast is more favorable than Pearson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pearson	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Pearson and Pearson both had 1 articles in the media. Pearson's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Trifast's score of 0.00 indicating that Pearson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pearson	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Trifast	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Pearson beats Trifast on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Mincon Group?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and Mincon Group (LON:MCON) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Mincon Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Mincon Group. Trifast's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mincon Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	Neutral
Mincon Group	Neutral

Trifast currently has a consensus price target of GBX 135, suggesting a potential upside of 110.94%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Trifast is more favorable than Mincon Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Mincon Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Mincon Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trifast. Mincon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£215.42M	0.40	-£4.55M	£0.87	73.56
Mincon Group	£148.72M	0.86	£2.01M	£2.51	23.90

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Mincon Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mincon Group pays out 83.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mincon Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

36.4% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.4% of Mincon Group shares are held by institutional investors. 20.6% of Trifast shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 61.7% of Mincon Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mincon Group has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. Mincon Group's return on equity of 3.74% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	0.54%	0.95%	2.47%
Mincon Group	3.71%	3.74%	1.34%

Trifast has a beta of 0.729, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mincon Group has a beta of 0.098, indicating that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Trifast beats Mincon Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to RWS?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and RWS (LON:RWS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

36.4% of Trifast shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.5% of RWS shares are held by institutional investors. 20.6% of Trifast shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.7% of RWS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trifast has a beta of 0.729, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RWS has a beta of 0.422, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Trifast has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RWS. RWS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£215.42M	0.40	-£4.55M	£0.87	73.56
RWS	£690.10M	0.50	-£36.98M	-£27.00	N/A

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. RWS pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.4%. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. RWS pays out -46.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RWS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Trifast currently has a consensus price target of GBX 135, suggesting a potential upside of 110.94%. RWS has a consensus price target of GBX 172.50, suggesting a potential upside of 85.38%. Given Trifast's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than RWS.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
RWS	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Trifast has a net margin of 0.54% compared to RWS's net margin of -14.46%. Trifast's return on equity of 0.95% beat RWS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	0.54%	0.95%	2.47%
RWS	-14.46%	-12.22%	3.42%

In the previous week, Trifast and Trifast both had 1 articles in the media. Trifast's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled RWS'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
RWS	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

RWS beats Trifast on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to Elixirr International?

Elixirr International (LON:ELIX) and Trifast (LON:TRI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than Elixirr International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for Elixirr International. Elixirr International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trifast'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Elixirr International	Neutral
Trifast	Neutral

Elixirr International has a beta of 0.667, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trifast has a beta of 0.729, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Elixirr International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trifast. Elixirr International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Elixirr International	£149.60M	2.33	£17.20M	£37.18	19.20
Trifast	£215.42M	0.40	-£4.55M	£0.87	73.56

20.8% of Elixirr International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.4% of Trifast shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.6% of Elixirr International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.6% of Trifast shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Elixirr International presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,060, indicating a potential upside of 48.46%. Trifast has a consensus price target of GBX 135, indicating a potential upside of 110.94%. Given Trifast's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than Elixirr International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Elixirr International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Elixirr International has a net margin of 13.17% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. Elixirr International's return on equity of 15.00% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Elixirr International	13.17%	15.00%	9.88%
Trifast	0.54%	0.95%	2.47%

Elixirr International pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Elixirr International pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Elixirr International and Trifast tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trifast compare to DWF Group?

Trifast (LON:TRI) and DWF Group (LON:DWF) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Trifast has a beta of 0.729, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DWF Group has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Trifast pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. DWF Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share. Trifast pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DWF Group pays out 12,500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Trifast is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Trifast currently has a consensus price target of GBX 135, indicating a potential upside of 110.94%. Given Trifast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Trifast is more favorable than DWF Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trifast	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
DWF Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

DWF Group has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Trifast's net margin of 0.54%. DWF Group's return on equity of 19.89% beat Trifast's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trifast	0.54%	0.95%	2.47%
DWF Group	2.76%	19.89%	5.74%

36.4% of Trifast shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.2% of DWF Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.6% of Trifast shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.9% of DWF Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Trifast had 1 more articles in the media than DWF Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trifast and 0 mentions for DWF Group. Trifast's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled DWF Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trifast	Neutral
DWF Group	Neutral

DWF Group has higher revenue and earnings than Trifast. DWF Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trifast	£215.42M	0.40	-£4.55M	£0.87	73.56
DWF Group	£451.64M	0.00	£12.45M	£0.04	N/A

Summary

Trifast beats DWF Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trifast News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TRI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Trifast	Tools & Accessories Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£86.38M	£5.40B	£9.23B	£2.75B
Dividend Yield	2.84%	3.50%	3.56%	6.07%
P/E Ratio	73.56	42.64	24.97	365.90
Price / Sales	0.40	35.93	4,994.59	88,017.01
Price / Cash	2.75	9.63	27.92	27.89
Price / Book	0.70	1.35	4.85	7.74
Net Income	-£4.55M	£57.13M	£792.39M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	1.59%	-1.20%	2,644.76%	0.27%
1 Month Performance	-9.86%	2.15%	2.51%	2.05%
1 Year Performance	-7.25%	18.15%	36.91%	86.43%

Trifast Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TRI Trifast	3.3 of 5 stars	GBX 64 +0.6%	GBX 135 +110.9%	-9.1%	£86.38M	£215.42M	73.56	24,400
PSON Pearson	2.7842 of 5 stars	GBX 1,114.50 -1.2%	GBX 1,254.33 +12.5%	-6.4%	£6.84B	£3.58B	21.98	21,400
MCON Mincon Group	N/A	GBX 62 +3.3%	N/A	+69.5%	£131.73M	£148.72M	24.70	604
RWS RWS	2.5726 of 5 stars	GBX 93.65 -2.7%	GBX 172.50 +84.2%	+11.7%	£347.59M	£690.10M	N/A	7,040	Gap Up
ELIX Elixirr International	N/A	GBX 704 flat	GBX 1,060 +50.6%	-17.6%	£343.12M	£149.60M	18.93	484	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TRI) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trifast (TRI) Competitors