Go Pro

Tertiary Minerals (TYM) Competitors

Tertiary Minerals logo
GBX 0.07 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07:53 AM Eastern

TYM vs. CTL, CLA, ARV, ARK, and CDL

Should you buy Tertiary Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tertiary Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tertiary Minerals include CleanTech Lithium (CTL), Celsius Resources (CLA), Artemis Resources (ARV), Arkle Resources (ARK), and Cloudbreak Discovery (CDL). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Tertiary Minerals compare to CleanTech Lithium?

Tertiary Minerals (LON:TYM) and CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Tertiary Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than CleanTech Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tertiary Minerals and 0 mentions for CleanTech Lithium. Tertiary Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CleanTech Lithium'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tertiary Minerals Neutral
CleanTech Lithium Neutral

CleanTech Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tertiary Minerals' net margin of -401.15%. CleanTech Lithium's return on equity of -16.51% beat Tertiary Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tertiary Minerals-401.15% -52.62% -34.97%
CleanTech Lithium N/A -16.51%-13.50%

CleanTech Lithium has a consensus target price of GBX 17, indicating a potential upside of 237.30%. Given CleanTech Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Tertiary Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tertiary Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
CleanTech Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.4% of Tertiary Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of CleanTech Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Tertiary Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of CleanTech Lithium shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tertiary Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than CleanTech Lithium. Tertiary Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CleanTech Lithium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tertiary Minerals£165.45K30.14-£947.19K-£0.01N/A
CleanTech LithiumN/AN/A-£2.19M-£2.20N/A

Tertiary Minerals has a beta of -0.5, meaning that its stock price is 150% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.79, meaning that its stock price is 179% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CleanTech Lithium beats Tertiary Minerals on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tertiary Minerals compare to Celsius Resources?

Celsius Resources (LON:CLA) and Tertiary Minerals (LON:TYM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

0.0% of Celsius Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Tertiary Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Celsius Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Tertiary Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tertiary Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius Resources. Tertiary Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius Resources£647.0020,710.89-£2.33M-£0.06N/A
Tertiary Minerals£165.45K30.14-£947.19K-£0.01N/A

In the previous week, Tertiary Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Celsius Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tertiary Minerals and 0 mentions for Celsius Resources. Celsius Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tertiary Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celsius Resources Neutral
Tertiary Minerals Neutral

Celsius Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tertiary Minerals' net margin of -401.15%. Celsius Resources' return on equity of -7.35% beat Tertiary Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celsius ResourcesN/A -7.35% -4.41%
Tertiary Minerals -401.15%-52.62%-34.97%

Celsius Resources has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tertiary Minerals has a beta of -0.5, indicating that its stock price is 150% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celsius Resources and Tertiary Minerals tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tertiary Minerals compare to Artemis Resources?

Artemis Resources (LON:ARV) and Tertiary Minerals (LON:TYM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Artemis Resources and Artemis Resources both had 1 articles in the media. Artemis Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tertiary Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Artemis Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Tertiary Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Tertiary Minerals has a net margin of -401.15% compared to Artemis Resources' net margin of -2,296.17%. Artemis Resources' return on equity of -20.00% beat Tertiary Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Artemis Resources-2,296.17% -20.00% -1.79%
Tertiary Minerals -401.15%-52.62%-34.97%

Artemis Resources has a beta of 0.18, indicating that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tertiary Minerals has a beta of -0.5, indicating that its share price is 150% less volatile than the broader market.

7.1% of Artemis Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Tertiary Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 13.0% of Artemis Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Tertiary Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tertiary Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Artemis Resources. Tertiary Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Artemis Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Artemis Resources£25.65K438.15-£43.80M-£0.29N/A
Tertiary Minerals£165.45K30.14-£947.19K-£0.01N/A

Summary

Artemis Resources beats Tertiary Minerals on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tertiary Minerals compare to Arkle Resources?

Tertiary Minerals (LON:TYM) and Arkle Resources (LON:ARK) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Tertiary Minerals has a beta of -0.5, meaning that its share price is 150% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arkle Resources has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Arkle Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tertiary Minerals' net margin of -401.15%. Arkle Resources' return on equity of -25.17% beat Tertiary Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tertiary Minerals-401.15% -52.62% -34.97%
Arkle Resources N/A -25.17%-4.49%

Arkle Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tertiary Minerals. Tertiary Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arkle Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tertiary Minerals£165.45K30.14-£947.19K-£0.01N/A
Arkle ResourcesN/AN/A-£633.70K-£8.00N/A

0.4% of Tertiary Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Arkle Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 4.2% of Tertiary Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.6% of Arkle Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Tertiary Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Arkle Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tertiary Minerals and 0 mentions for Arkle Resources. Arkle Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Tertiary Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Arkle Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tertiary Minerals Neutral
Arkle Resources Positive

Summary

Arkle Resources beats Tertiary Minerals on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tertiary Minerals compare to Cloudbreak Discovery?

Cloudbreak Discovery (LON:CDL) and Tertiary Minerals (LON:TYM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Tertiary Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Cloudbreak Discovery. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tertiary Minerals and 0 mentions for Cloudbreak Discovery. Cloudbreak Discovery's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tertiary Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cloudbreak Discovery Neutral
Tertiary Minerals Neutral

Tertiary Minerals has a net margin of -401.15% compared to Cloudbreak Discovery's net margin of -842.88%. Cloudbreak Discovery's return on equity of 576.19% beat Tertiary Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cloudbreak Discovery-842.88% 576.19% -31.77%
Tertiary Minerals -401.15%-52.62%-34.97%

Tertiary Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Cloudbreak Discovery. Tertiary Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cloudbreak Discovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cloudbreak DiscoveryN/AN/A-£2.87M-£0.14N/A
Tertiary Minerals£165.45K30.14-£947.19K-£0.01N/A

0.4% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Tertiary Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 41.2% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Tertiary Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cloudbreak Discovery has a beta of 1.415, suggesting that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tertiary Minerals has a beta of -0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 150% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tertiary Minerals beats Cloudbreak Discovery on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tertiary Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TYM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TYM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TYM vs. The Competition

MetricTertiary MineralsOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.99M£1.47B£4.56B£2.77B
Dividend Yield2.66%6.57%5.03%6.12%
P/E Ratio-7.0017.8620.93368.57
Price / Sales30.1453,599.096,443.1184,766.98
Price / Cash1.0824.6326.5727.87
Price / Book1.515.498.777.90
Net Income-£947.19K£70.60M£157.11M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-1.43%-0.61%1.26%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-8.35%-5.71%-0.16%
1 Year PerformanceN/A66.53%38.93%62.97%

Tertiary Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TYM
Tertiary Minerals
N/AGBX 0.07
flat
N/A+80.6%£4.99M£165.45KN/A5
CTL
CleanTech Lithium
1.6638 of 5 stars
GBX 6
+4.3%
GBX 17
+183.3%
-20.0%£12.25MN/AN/A20
CLA
Celsius Resources
N/AGBX 0.32
-9.1%
N/A+12.3%£11.84M£647.00N/AN/A
ARV
Artemis Resources
N/AGBX 0.30
-0.7%
N/A+15.5%£11.24M£25.65KN/AN/A
ARK
Arkle Resources
N/AGBX 0.70
+3.7%
N/A+186.6%£11.10MN/AN/A5

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TYM) was last updated on 7/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners