Which has higher valuation and earnings, BEM or 80M?

Beowulf Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 80 Mile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Beowulf Mining N/A N/A -£1.90M -£3.32 N/A 80 Mile N/A N/A N/A -£0.80 N/A

Is BEM or 80M more profitable?

80 Mile's return on equity of 0.00% beat Beowulf Mining's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Beowulf Mining N/A -10.09% -7.40% 80 Mile N/A N/A N/A

Which has higher earnings & valuation, KDNC or BEM?

Cadence Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beowulf Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cadence Minerals N/A N/A -£5.72M -£0.53 N/A Beowulf Mining N/A N/A -£1.90M -£3.32 N/A

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BEM or GSP?

Beowulf Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gensource Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Beowulf Mining N/A N/A -£1.90M -£3.32 N/A Gensource Potash N/A N/A -£6.58M -£0.01 N/A

Is BEM or GSP more profitable?

Beowulf Mining's return on equity of -10.09% beat Gensource Potash's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Beowulf Mining N/A -10.09% -7.40% Gensource Potash N/A -45.96% -10.31%

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, RMR or BEM?

Rome Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beowulf Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Rome Resources N/A N/A N/A -£0.02 N/A Beowulf Mining N/A N/A -£1.90M -£3.32 N/A

Is RMR or BEM more profitable?

Rome Resources' return on equity of -9.76% beat Beowulf Mining's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Rome Resources N/A -9.76% -3.97% Beowulf Mining N/A -10.09% -7.40%

Do analysts prefer BEM or FAR?

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 721.92%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Beowulf Mining. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Beowulf Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Ferro-Alloy Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Beowulf Mining (BEM) Competitors

GBX 10.82 +0.32 (+3.03%)

As of 08/26/2026 11:26 AM Eastern

Compare

BEM vs. 80M, KDNC, GSP, RMR, and FAR

Should you buy Beowulf Mining stock or one of its competitors? Beowulf Mining's main competitors and comparable companies include 80 Mile (80M), Cadence Minerals (KDNC), Gensource Potash (GSP), Rome Resources (RMR), and Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Beowulf Mining compare to 80 Mile?

Beowulf Mining (LON:BEM) and 80 Mile (LON:80M) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

0.2% of Beowulf Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of 80 Mile shares are held by institutional investors. 32.7% of Beowulf Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of 80 Mile shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Beowulf Mining had 1 more articles in the media than 80 Mile. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Beowulf Mining and 0 mentions for 80 Mile. Beowulf Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat 80 Mile's score of 0.00 indicating that Beowulf Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Beowulf Mining	Positive
80 Mile	Neutral

Beowulf Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 80 Mile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Beowulf Mining	N/A	N/A	-£1.90M	-£3.32	N/A
80 Mile	N/A	N/A	N/A	-£0.80	N/A

80 Mile's return on equity of 0.00% beat Beowulf Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Beowulf Mining	N/A	-10.09%	-7.40%
80 Mile	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

80 Mile beats Beowulf Mining on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beowulf Mining compare to Cadence Minerals?

Cadence Minerals (LON:KDNC) and Beowulf Mining (LON:BEM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

Cadence Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beowulf Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Minerals	N/A	N/A	-£5.72M	-£0.53	N/A
Beowulf Mining	N/A	N/A	-£1.90M	-£3.32	N/A

Cadence Minerals has a net margin of 875.38% compared to Beowulf Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Cadence Minerals' return on equity of -9.74% beat Beowulf Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Minerals	875.38%	-9.74%	-3.99%
Beowulf Mining	N/A	-10.09%	-7.40%

0.0% of Cadence Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Beowulf Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Cadence Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 32.7% of Beowulf Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cadence Minerals has a beta of 1.798, indicating that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beowulf Mining has a beta of 0.947, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Beowulf Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Cadence Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Beowulf Mining and 0 mentions for Cadence Minerals. Beowulf Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Cadence Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Beowulf Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Minerals	Neutral
Beowulf Mining	Positive

Summary

Beowulf Mining beats Cadence Minerals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beowulf Mining compare to Gensource Potash?

Beowulf Mining (LON:BEM) and Gensource Potash (LON:GSP) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

0.2% of Beowulf Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.7% of Beowulf Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Gensource Potash shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Beowulf Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Gensource Potash. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Beowulf Mining and 0 mentions for Gensource Potash. Beowulf Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Gensource Potash's score of 0.00 indicating that Beowulf Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Beowulf Mining	Positive
Gensource Potash	Neutral

Beowulf Mining has a beta of 0.947, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gensource Potash has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Beowulf Mining's return on equity of -10.09% beat Gensource Potash's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Beowulf Mining	N/A	-10.09%	-7.40%
Gensource Potash	N/A	-45.96%	-10.31%

Beowulf Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gensource Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Beowulf Mining	N/A	N/A	-£1.90M	-£3.32	N/A
Gensource Potash	N/A	N/A	-£6.58M	-£0.01	N/A

Summary

Beowulf Mining beats Gensource Potash on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beowulf Mining compare to Rome Resources?

Rome Resources (LON:RMR) and Beowulf Mining (LON:BEM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

4.1% of Rome Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Beowulf Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.6% of Rome Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.7% of Beowulf Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Beowulf Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Rome Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Beowulf Mining and 0 mentions for Rome Resources. Beowulf Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Rome Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Beowulf Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Rome Resources	Neutral
Beowulf Mining	Positive

Rome Resources has a beta of 0.551, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beowulf Mining has a beta of 0.947, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Rome Resources' return on equity of -9.76% beat Beowulf Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Rome Resources	N/A	-9.76%	-3.97%
Beowulf Mining	N/A	-10.09%	-7.40%

Rome Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beowulf Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Rome Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	-£0.02	N/A
Beowulf Mining	N/A	N/A	-£1.90M	-£3.32	N/A

Summary

Beowulf Mining beats Rome Resources on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beowulf Mining compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Beowulf Mining (LON:BEM) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Beowulf Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Beowulf Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro-Alloy Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Beowulf Mining	N/A	N/A	-£1.90M	-£3.32	N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources	£4.53M	4.73	-£9.69M	-£1.70	N/A

In the previous week, Beowulf Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Ferro-Alloy Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Beowulf Mining and 0 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources. Beowulf Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Beowulf Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Beowulf Mining	Positive
Ferro-Alloy Resources	Neutral

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 721.92%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Beowulf Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Beowulf Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Beowulf Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Beowulf Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Beowulf Mining	N/A	-10.09%	-7.40%
Ferro-Alloy Resources	-185.72%	283.86%	-21.47%

0.2% of Beowulf Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.7% of Beowulf Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Beowulf Mining has a beta of 0.947, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.819, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Beowulf Mining on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Beowulf Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BEM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BEM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Beowulf Mining	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£7M	£4.18B	£5.17B	£2.92B
Dividend Yield	3.87%	5.17%	4.68%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	-3.26	25.84	26.44	367.32
Price / Sales	N/A	8,939.14	5,310.84	83,741.36
Price / Cash	13.38	30.06	27.38	27.89
Price / Book	0.24	10.76	9.10	7.02
Net Income	-£1.90M	£122.92M	£154.63M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-0.57%	10.80%	8.20%	0.69%
1 Month Performance	36.16%	24.31%	18.81%	2.87%
1 Year Performance	8.18%	66.18%	51.36%	22.47%

Beowulf Mining Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BEM Beowulf Mining	N/A	GBX 10.82 +3.0%	N/A	+8.2%	£7M	N/A	N/A	13	Gap Up
80M 80 Mile	N/A	GBX 0.52 +8.4%	N/A	+119.9%	£26.43M	N/A	N/A	N/A	Gap Down
KDNC Cadence Minerals	N/A	GBX 6.26 +2.6%	N/A	+153.4%	£25.88M	N/A	N/A	6	Gap Down
GSP Gensource Potash	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£23.61M	N/A	N/A	N/A
RMR Rome Resources	N/A	GBX 0.31 -3.2%	N/A	-10.8%	£23.41M	N/A	N/A	N/A	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BEM) was last updated on 8/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Beowulf Mining (BEM) Competitors

BEM vs. 80M, KDNC, GSP, RMR, and FAR

How does Beowulf Mining compare to 80 Mile?

Summary

How does Beowulf Mining compare to Cadence Minerals?

Summary

How does Beowulf Mining compare to Gensource Potash?

Summary

How does Beowulf Mining compare to Rome Resources?

Summary

How does Beowulf Mining compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BEM vs. The Competition

Beowulf Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Beowulf Mining (BEM) Competitors

BEM vs. 80M, KDNC, GSP, RMR, and FAR

How does Beowulf Mining compare to 80 Mile?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BEM or 80M?

Does the media favor BEM or 80M?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, BEM or 80M?

Is BEM or 80M more profitable?

Summary

How does Beowulf Mining compare to Cadence Minerals?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, KDNC or BEM?

Is KDNC or BEM more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in KDNC or BEM?

Which has more risk and volatility, KDNC or BEM?

Does the media prefer KDNC or BEM?

Summary

How does Beowulf Mining compare to Gensource Potash?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in BEM or GSP?

Does the media refer more to BEM or GSP?

Which has more risk and volatility, BEM or GSP?

Is BEM or GSP more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BEM or GSP?

Summary

How does Beowulf Mining compare to Rome Resources?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of RMR or BEM?

Does the media prefer RMR or BEM?

Which has more volatility and risk, RMR or BEM?

Is RMR or BEM more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, RMR or BEM?

Summary

How does Beowulf Mining compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Which has better valuation & earnings, BEM or FAR?

Does the media favor BEM or FAR?

Do analysts prefer BEM or FAR?

Is BEM or FAR more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BEM or FAR?

Which has more risk and volatility, BEM or FAR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BEM vs. The Competition

Beowulf Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools