Free Trial
→ Nobody Understands Why Trump Is Invading Iran (here’s the answer) (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free FRG Stock Alerts

Firering Strategic Minerals (FRG) Competitors

GBX 1.10 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08:43 AM Eastern
Compare

FRG vs. CLA, REE, MET1, GROC, and CTL

Should you buy Firering Strategic Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Firering Strategic Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Firering Strategic Minerals include Celsius Resources (CLA), Altona Rare Earths (REE), Metals One (MET1), GreenRoc Mining (GROC), and CleanTech Lithium (CTL). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Firering Strategic Minerals compare to Celsius Resources?

Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) and Celsius Resources (LON:CLA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Celsius Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Firering Strategic Minerals. Celsius Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Firering Strategic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A
Celsius Resources£647.0024,145.85-£2.33M-£0.06N/A

13.3% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Celsius Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.5% of Celsius Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Celsius Resources' return on equity of -7.35% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Firering Strategic MineralsN/A -32.39% -16.22%
Celsius Resources N/A -7.35%-4.41%

In the previous week, Firering Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Celsius Resources' score of -1.01 indicating that Firering Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral
Celsius Resources Negative

Firering Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.836, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celsius Resources has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celsius Resources beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Firering Strategic Minerals compare to Altona Rare Earths?

Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) and Altona Rare Earths (LON:REE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Altona Rare Earths is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Firering Strategic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A
Altona Rare EarthsN/AN/A-£1.51M-£0.42N/A

In the previous week, Altona Rare Earths had 3 more articles in the media than Firering Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Altona Rare Earths and 0 mentions for Firering Strategic Minerals. Altona Rare Earths' average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Firering Strategic Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Altona Rare Earths is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral
Altona Rare Earths Positive

Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity of -32.39% beat Altona Rare Earths' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Firering Strategic MineralsN/A -32.39% -16.22%
Altona Rare Earths N/A -59.76%-47.19%

13.3% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of Altona Rare Earths shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.4% of Altona Rare Earths shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Firering Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.836, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Altona Rare Earths has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Altona Rare Earths beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Firering Strategic Minerals compare to Metals One?

Metals One (LON:MET1) and Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Metals One had 2 more articles in the media than Firering Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Metals One and 0 mentions for Firering Strategic Minerals. Firering Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Metals One's score of 0.00 indicating that Firering Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Metals One Neutral
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral

Metals One's return on equity of -2.94% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Metals OneN/A -2.94% -112.94%
Firering Strategic Minerals N/A -32.39%-16.22%

Firering Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metals One, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Metals OneN/AN/A-£375.04K-£4.97N/A
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A

1.2% of Metals One shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Metals One shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Firering Strategic Minerals beats Metals One on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Firering Strategic Minerals compare to GreenRoc Mining?

Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) and GreenRoc Mining (LON:GROC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Firering Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.836, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GreenRoc Mining has a beta of -0.33, indicating that its stock price is 133% less volatile than the broader market.

13.3% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of GreenRoc Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, GreenRoc Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Firering Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for GreenRoc Mining and 0 mentions for Firering Strategic Minerals. Firering Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled GreenRoc Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral
GreenRoc Mining Neutral

GreenRoc Mining's return on equity of -7.60% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Firering Strategic MineralsN/A -32.39% -16.22%
GreenRoc Mining N/A -7.60%-5.36%

GreenRoc Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Firering Strategic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A
GreenRoc MiningN/AN/A-£1.48M-£0.33N/A

Summary

GreenRoc Mining beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Firering Strategic Minerals compare to CleanTech Lithium?

Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) and CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Firering Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.836, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.79, suggesting that its share price is 179% less volatile than the broader market.

Firering Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CleanTech Lithium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A
CleanTech LithiumN/AN/A-£2.19M£0.948.16

In the previous week, CleanTech Lithium had 1 more articles in the media than Firering Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CleanTech Lithium and 0 mentions for Firering Strategic Minerals. CleanTech Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Firering Strategic Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that CleanTech Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral
CleanTech Lithium Positive

CleanTech Lithium has a consensus target price of GBX 20, indicating a potential upside of 160.59%. Given CleanTech Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Firering Strategic Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Firering Strategic Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
CleanTech Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

13.3% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of CleanTech Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of CleanTech Lithium shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity of -32.39% beat CleanTech Lithium's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Firering Strategic MineralsN/A -32.39% -16.22%
CleanTech Lithium N/A -43.43%-13.50%

Summary

CleanTech Lithium beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Firering Strategic Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FRG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FRG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFirering Strategic MineralsOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.75M£1.58B£4.80B£2.74B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%4.97%6.07%
P/E Ratio-1.1030.8923.12365.80
Price / SalesN/A56,691.356,725.2688,011.55
Price / Cash3.1324.6327.6927.89
Price / Book0.985.646.887.66
Net Income-£3.09M£70.60M£159.01M£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.76%0.37%-0.57%0.17%
1 Month Performance-15.32%4.22%1.10%1.87%
1 Year Performance-65.68%131.90%82.36%86.36%

Firering Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FRG
Firering Strategic Minerals
N/AGBX 1.10
flat		N/A-66.9%£4.75MN/AN/AN/A
CLA
Celsius Resources
N/AGBX 0.50
flat		N/A+46.2%£18.60M£647.00N/AN/A
REE
Altona Rare Earths
N/AGBX 4.20
flat		N/A+90.3%£18.02MN/AN/A270
MET1
Metals One
N/AGBX 1.57
flat		N/A-97.0%£16.56MN/AN/A3
GROC
GreenRoc Mining
N/AGBX 5.50
flat		N/A+19.8%£15.54MN/AN/A6

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FRG) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SpaceX eyes a 1.75 trillion valuation - here's what to know
Elon Musk's team has quietly filed confidential paperwork with the SEC for what Bloomberg estimates could be a...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American
Iran's Supreme Leader has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed as leverage against the U.S. - and with 40% of ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
$30 stock to buy before Starlink goes public (WATCH NOW!)
In the next 3 minutes… James Altucher – legendary investor and venture capitalist… And someone who’s kno...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why this tiny stock may move before the SpaceX IPO drops
The projected SpaceX and xAI S-1 filing hits the SEC on June 1st - and analyst Dylan Jovine says $1.75 trillio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel