Go Pro
→ Porter flew 3,300 miles to investigate this system (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free FRG Stock Alerts

Firering Strategic Minerals (FRG) Competitors

GBX 0.96 +0.01 (+1.26%)
As of 07:58 AM Eastern
Compare

FRG vs. FAR, RMR, GSP, KEN, and CMET

Should you buy Firering Strategic Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Firering Strategic Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Firering Strategic Minerals include Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR), Rome Resources (RMR), Gensource Potash (GSP), Kendrick Resources (KEN), and Capital Metals (CMET).

How does Firering Strategic Minerals compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Firering Strategic Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Firering Strategic MineralsN/A -49.09% -16.22%
Ferro-Alloy Resources -185.72%283.86%-21.47%

8.4% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Firering Strategic Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Firering Strategic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M4.80-£9.69M-£1.70N/A

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 710.81%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Firering Strategic Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Firering Strategic Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Ferro-Alloy Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Firering Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources and 0 mentions for Firering Strategic Minerals. Firering Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' score of -0.18 indicating that Firering Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral

Firering Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.841, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Firering Strategic Minerals compare to Rome Resources?

Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) and Rome Resources (LON:RMR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Firering Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rome Resources has a beta of 0.568, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Firering Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rome Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A
Rome ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£2.04N/A

Rome Resources' return on equity of -9.76% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Firering Strategic MineralsN/A -49.09% -16.22%
Rome Resources N/A -9.76%-3.97%

8.4% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of Rome Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of Rome Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Firering Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Rome Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral
Rome Resources Neutral

Summary

Rome Resources beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Firering Strategic Minerals compare to Gensource Potash?

Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) and Gensource Potash (LON:GSP) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

8.4% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 8.0% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Gensource Potash shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Firering Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gensource Potash'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral
Gensource Potash Neutral

Firering Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gensource Potash has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Gensource Potash's return on equity of -45.96% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Firering Strategic MineralsN/A -49.09% -16.22%
Gensource Potash N/A -45.96%-10.31%

Firering Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gensource Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A
Gensource PotashN/AN/A-£6.58M-£0.01N/A

Summary

Firering Strategic Minerals and Gensource Potash tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Firering Strategic Minerals compare to Kendrick Resources?

Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) and Kendrick Resources (LON:KEN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Firering Strategic Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kendrick Resources' net margin of -227,572.12%. Kendrick Resources' return on equity of 9,279.39% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Firering Strategic MineralsN/A -49.09% -16.22%
Kendrick Resources -227,572.12%9,279.39%-12.85%

8.4% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Kendrick Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 8.0% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of Kendrick Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kendrick Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Firering Strategic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A
Kendrick ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.15M-£0.91N/A

In the previous week, Firering Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kendrick Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral
Kendrick Resources Neutral

Firering Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kendrick Resources has a beta of 1.501, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kendrick Resources beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Firering Strategic Minerals compare to Capital Metals?

Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) and Capital Metals (LON:CMET) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Capital Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Firering Strategic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A
Capital MetalsN/AN/A-£1.24M-£0.24N/A

In the previous week, Firering Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Capital Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral
Capital Metals Neutral

8.4% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of Capital Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of Capital Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Firering Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Metals has a beta of 0.6379217, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Metals' return on equity of -21.08% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Firering Strategic MineralsN/A -49.09% -16.22%
Capital Metals N/A -21.08%-8.47%

Summary

Firering Strategic Minerals and Capital Metals tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Firering Strategic Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FRG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FRG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFirering Strategic MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.56M£3.74B£4.81B£2.86B
Dividend YieldN/A5.29%4.76%6.13%
P/E Ratio-0.9622.7321.10368.57
Price / SalesN/A7,894.694,693.1983,546.84
Price / Cash3.1328.9326.4727.89
Price / Book0.8610.418.777.18
Net Income-£3.09M£122.62M£155.10M£5.89B
7 Day Performance6.65%5.88%4.92%1.00%
1 Month Performance11.09%-0.01%0.35%0.68%
1 Year Performance-38.17%51.06%40.98%74.91%

Firering Strategic Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FRG
Firering Strategic Minerals
N/AGBX 0.96
+1.3%		N/A-35.5%£6.56MN/AN/AN/A
FAR
Ferro-Alloy Resources
1.6511 of 5 stars		GBX 4.44
+2.1%		GBX 30
+575.7%		-45.6%£26.10M£4.53MN/A1,000
RMR
Rome Resources
N/AGBX 0.33
+4.8%		N/A+17.1%£25.33MN/AN/AN/A
GSP
Gensource Potash
N/AN/AN/AN/A£23.61MN/AN/AN/A
KEN
Kendrick Resources
N/AGBX 5.38
+4.9%		N/A+2,165.0%£22.67MN/AN/A230

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FRG) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel