Free Trial
→ June 12: $100 Turns Into $100,000? (From Brownstone Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free CRTM Stock Alerts

Critical Metals (CRTM) Competitors

Critical Metals logo
GBX 11.50 +0.25 (+2.22%)
As of 11:15 AM Eastern
Compare

CRTM vs. ARS, EMH, 80M, ZNWD, and KEN

Should you buy Critical Metals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Critical Metals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Critical Metals include Asiamet Resources (ARS), European Metals (EMH), 80 Mile (80M), Zinnwald Lithium (ZNWD), and Kendrick Resources (KEN). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Critical Metals compare to Asiamet Resources?

Asiamet Resources (LON:ARS) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Asiamet Resources has a beta of 0.972, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.197, suggesting that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Asiamet Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Asiamet Resources Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

Asiamet Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Critical Metals' return on equity of -76.15% beat Asiamet Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Asiamet ResourcesN/A -476.74% -129.94%
Critical Metals -27,222.85%-76.15%-40.21%

0.1% of Asiamet Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.4% of Asiamet Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Asiamet Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Asiamet ResourcesN/AN/A-£7.70M-£0.16N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.08

Summary

Critical Metals beats Asiamet Resources on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to European Metals?

European Metals (LON:EMH) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

European Metals has a beta of 0.217, indicating that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.197, indicating that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

European Metals has a net margin of -287.87% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. European Metals' return on equity of -24.66% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
European Metals-287.87% -24.66% -2.47%
Critical Metals -27,222.85%-76.15%-40.21%

1.9% of European Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of European Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

European Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
European MetalsN/AN/A-£2.30M-£3.81N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.08

In the previous week, European Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Critical Metals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for European Metals and 0 mentions for Critical Metals. European Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Critical Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that European Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
European Metals Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

Summary

European Metals beats Critical Metals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to 80 Mile?

80 Mile (LON:80M) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, risk, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, 80 Mile had 1 more articles in the media than Critical Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for 80 Mile and 0 mentions for Critical Metals. 80 Mile's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Critical Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that 80 Mile is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
80 Mile Positive
Critical Metals Neutral

80 Mile is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
80 MileN/AN/AN/A-£0.33N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.08

1.3% of 80 Mile shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.3% of 80 Mile shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

80 Mile has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. 80 Mile's return on equity of 0.00% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
80 MileN/A N/A N/A
Critical Metals -27,222.85%-76.15%-40.21%

Summary

80 Mile beats Critical Metals on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Zinnwald Lithium?

Zinnwald Lithium (LON:ZNWD) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Zinnwald Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Zinnwald Lithium's return on equity of 0.25% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zinnwald LithiumN/A 0.25% -4.46%
Critical Metals -27,222.85%-76.15%-40.21%

Zinnwald Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zinnwald LithiumN/AN/A-£3.03K-£0.56N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.08

Zinnwald Lithium has a beta of 0.309, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.197, meaning that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Zinnwald Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Zinnwald Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Zinnwald Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zinnwald Lithium Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

Summary

Critical Metals beats Zinnwald Lithium on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Kendrick Resources?

Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) and Kendrick Resources (LON:KEN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Critical Metals has a net margin of -27,222.85% compared to Kendrick Resources' net margin of -227,572.12%. Kendrick Resources' return on equity of 9,279.39% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Metals-27,222.85% -76.15% -40.21%
Kendrick Resources -227,572.12%9,279.39%-12.85%

0.2% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Kendrick Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Kendrick Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Critical Metals has a beta of 2.197, meaning that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kendrick Resources has a beta of 1.084, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Kendrick Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.08
Kendrick ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.15M-£0.91N/A

In the previous week, Kendrick Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Critical Metals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kendrick Resources and 0 mentions for Critical Metals. Critical Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kendrick Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Metals Neutral
Kendrick Resources Neutral

Summary

Critical Metals and Kendrick Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Critical Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRTM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRTM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRTM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCritical MetalsOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£11.70M£1.67B£4.90B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%4.95%6.12%
P/E Ratio0.0830.3523.38364.34
Price / SalesN/A59,217.627,042.1487,480.01
Price / Cash15.5824.6327.4327.85
Price / Book-391.315.849.487.74
Net Income-£1.44M£70.60M£156.62M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-5.74%0.63%-0.36%0.21%
1 Month PerformanceN/AN/A18.40%N/A
1 Year Performance1,115.64%112.73%68.77%74.70%

Critical Metals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRTM
Critical Metals
N/AGBX 11.50
+2.2%		N/A+1,060.3%£11.70MN/A0.083
ARS
Asiamet Resources
N/AGBX 1.42
-0.6%		N/A+63.5%£48.09MN/AN/AN/A
EMH
European Metals
N/AGBX 17.93
+3.9%		N/A+70.6%£42.58MN/AN/AN/A
80M
80 Mile
N/AGBX 0.87
-6.3%		N/A+212.9%£42.37MN/AN/AN/A
ZNWD
Zinnwald Lithium
N/AGBX 8.91
+1.8%		N/A+51.7%£42.28MN/AN/A23

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CRTM) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
"You'll own nothing and be happy" (it's not a theory anymore)
Since 1913, the evidence is clear… Once they force everyone onto CBDCs, there will be no escape. Every tran...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Skip the Line Opportunity: The SpaceX IPO
Former tech executive and angel investor Jeff Brown - who identified Bitcoin, Tesla, and Nvidia before their h...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s secret China deal
Trump just returned from Beijing with the most powerful business delegation in American history - Elon Musk, J...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
June 4: The day smart money moves (not June 12)
Everyone is watching June 12 - the SpaceX listing date. The real deadline is June 4, when Goldman Sachs, Morga...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
AI breakthrough hidden inside SpaceX exposed on June 11
On June 11, SpaceX is hosting a major investor event - and growth investor Louis Navellier believes Elon Musk ...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Jon Najarian’s Important SpaceX PREDICTION
Most investors are focused on SpaceX's projected June 12 IPO date - but they may be missing the bigger story h...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel