Go Pro

Critical Metals (CRTM) Competitors

Critical Metals logo
GBX 7 +0.50 (+7.69%)
As of 06:45 AM Eastern

CRTM vs. FAR, KEN, RMR, GSP, and CMET

Should you buy Critical Metals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Critical Metals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Critical Metals include Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR), Kendrick Resources (KEN), Rome Resources (RMR), Gensource Potash (GSP), and Capital Metals (CMET).

How does Critical Metals compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation and earnings.

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.841, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.287, meaning that its stock price is 129% more volatile than the broader market.

Critical Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M4.80-£9.69M-£1.70N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.05

1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ferro-Alloy Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Critical Metals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources and 0 mentions for Critical Metals. Critical Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' score of -0.18 indicating that Critical Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

Ferro-Alloy Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 710.81%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Critical Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Critical Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a net margin of -185.72% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Critical Metals' return on equity of 602.92% beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferro-Alloy Resources-185.72% 283.86% -21.47%
Critical Metals -27,222.85%602.92%-40.21%

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Critical Metals on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Kendrick Resources?

Kendrick Resources (LON:KEN) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Kendrick Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kendrick Resources Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

Kendrick Resources has a beta of 1.501, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.287, indicating that its share price is 129% more volatile than the broader market.

0.6% of Kendrick Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.1% of Kendrick Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Critical Metals has a net margin of -27,222.85% compared to Kendrick Resources' net margin of -227,572.12%. Kendrick Resources' return on equity of 9,279.39% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kendrick Resources-227,572.12% 9,279.39% -12.85%
Critical Metals -27,222.85%602.92%-40.21%

Kendrick Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kendrick ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.15M-£0.91N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.05

Summary

Kendrick Resources beats Critical Metals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Rome Resources?

Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) and Rome Resources (LON:RMR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

0.3% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of Rome Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of Rome Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Rome Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Critical Metals' return on equity of 602.92% beat Rome Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Metals-27,222.85% 602.92% -40.21%
Rome Resources N/A -9.76%-3.97%

Critical Metals has a beta of 2.287, indicating that its share price is 129% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rome Resources has a beta of 0.568, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Rome Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.05
Rome ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£2.04N/A

In the previous week, Critical Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Rome Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Metals Neutral
Rome Resources Neutral

Summary

Critical Metals and Rome Resources tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Gensource Potash?

Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) and Gensource Potash (LON:GSP) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Critical Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gensource Potash'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Metals Neutral
Gensource Potash Neutral

0.3% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Gensource Potash shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Critical Metals has a beta of 2.287, meaning that its stock price is 129% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gensource Potash has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Gensource Potash is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.05
Gensource PotashN/AN/A-£6.58M-£0.01N/A

Gensource Potash has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Critical Metals' return on equity of 602.92% beat Gensource Potash's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Metals-27,222.85% 602.92% -40.21%
Gensource Potash N/A -45.96%-10.31%

Summary

Critical Metals beats Gensource Potash on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Capital Metals?

Capital Metals (LON:CMET) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Capital Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Metals Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

1.9% of Capital Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of Capital Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Capital Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital MetalsN/AN/A-£1.24M-£0.24N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.05

Capital Metals has a beta of 0.6379217, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.287, meaning that its stock price is 129% more volatile than the broader market.

Capital Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Critical Metals' return on equity of 602.92% beat Capital Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital MetalsN/A -21.08% -8.47%
Critical Metals -27,222.85%602.92%-40.21%

Summary

Critical Metals beats Capital Metals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Critical Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRTM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRTM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRTM vs. The Competition

MetricCritical MetalsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£7.12M£3.75B£4.82B£2.86B
Dividend YieldN/A5.29%4.76%6.13%
P/E Ratio0.0522.7721.13368.57
Price / SalesN/A7,894.364,692.9883,546.77
Price / Cash15.5828.9326.4727.89
Price / Book-238.1910.428.787.14
Net Income-£1.44M£122.62M£155.10M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A6.07%5.08%1.00%
1 Month Performance-17.65%0.17%0.49%0.67%
1 Year PerformanceN/A51.45%41.27%74.90%

Critical Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRTM
Critical Metals
N/AGBX 7
+7.7%
N/A+1,447.6%£7.12MN/A0.053
FAR
Ferro-Alloy Resources
1.6511 of 5 stars
GBX 4.54
+0.9%
GBX 30
+560.8%
-45.6%£26.68M£4.53MN/A1,000
KEN
Kendrick Resources
N/AGBX 5.75
+4.9%
N/A+2,165.0%£24.25MN/AN/A230
RMR
Rome Resources
N/AGBX 0.31
-0.3%
N/A+17.1%£24.11MN/AN/AN/A
GSP
Gensource Potash
N/AN/AN/AN/A£23.61MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CRTM) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners