Free Trial

Critical Metals (CRTM) Competitors

Critical Metals logo
GBX 27.60 +1.60 (+6.15%)
As of 12:32 PM Eastern

CRTM vs. ZNWD, AAU, CTL, BHL, and ERIS

Should you buy Critical Metals stock or one of its competitors? Critical Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include Zinnwald Lithium (ZNWD), Ariana Resources (AAU), CleanTech Lithium (CTL), Bradda Head Lithium (BHL), and Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) (ERIS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified metals & mining" industry.

How does Critical Metals compare to Zinnwald Lithium?

Zinnwald Lithium (LON:ZNWD) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Critical Metals had 3 more articles in the media than Zinnwald Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Critical Metals and 0 mentions for Zinnwald Lithium. Zinnwald Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Critical Metals' score of -0.34 indicating that Zinnwald Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zinnwald Lithium Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

Critical Metals has a net margin of 27,276.84% compared to Zinnwald Lithium's net margin of 0.00%. Zinnwald Lithium's return on equity of 0.38% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zinnwald LithiumN/A 0.38% -4.46%
Critical Metals 27,276.84%-76.30%-40.21%

Zinnwald Lithium has a beta of 0.452, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.262, suggesting that its share price is 126% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Zinnwald Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Zinnwald Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Zinnwald Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zinnwald LithiumN/AN/A-£3.03K-£0.56N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.19

Summary

Critical Metals beats Zinnwald Lithium on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Ariana Resources?

Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) and Ariana Resources (LON:AAU) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Critical Metals has a net margin of 27,276.84% compared to Ariana Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Ariana Resources' return on equity of -12.69% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Metals27,276.84% -76.30% -40.21%
Ariana Resources N/A -12.69%-5.54%

Critical Metals has a beta of 2.262, suggesting that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ariana Resources has a beta of 0.848, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Ariana Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.19
Ariana ResourcesN/AN/A£537.40-£0.01N/A

0.7% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Ariana Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Ariana Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ariana Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Critical Metals. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ariana Resources and 3 mentions for Critical Metals. Ariana Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Critical Metals' score of -0.34 indicating that Ariana Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Critical Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ariana Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Ariana Resources beats Critical Metals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to CleanTech Lithium?

CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

CleanTech Lithium currently has a consensus price target of GBX 17, indicating a potential upside of 142.86%. Given CleanTech Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Critical Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CleanTech Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Critical Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

0.9% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Critical Metals had 3 more articles in the media than CleanTech Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Critical Metals and 0 mentions for CleanTech Lithium. CleanTech Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Critical Metals' score of -0.34 indicating that CleanTech Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CleanTech Lithium Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 179% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.262, suggesting that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the broader market.

CleanTech Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CleanTech LithiumN/AN/A-£2.19M-£2.20N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.19

Critical Metals has a net margin of 27,276.84% compared to CleanTech Lithium's net margin of 0.00%. CleanTech Lithium's return on equity of -22.32% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CleanTech LithiumN/A -22.32% -13.50%
Critical Metals 27,276.84%-76.30%-40.21%

Summary

CleanTech Lithium and Critical Metals tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Bradda Head Lithium?

Bradda Head Lithium (LON:BHL) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

Critical Metals has a net margin of 27,276.84% compared to Bradda Head Lithium's net margin of 0.00%. Bradda Head Lithium's return on equity of -19.28% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bradda Head LithiumN/A -19.28% -13.61%
Critical Metals 27,276.84%-76.30%-40.21%

Bradda Head Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bradda Head LithiumN/AN/A£3.63M-£0.75N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.19

1.0% of Bradda Head Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 16.2% of Bradda Head Lithium shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Bradda Head Lithium has a beta of 0.457, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.262, suggesting that its share price is 126% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Critical Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Bradda Head Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Critical Metals and 1 mentions for Bradda Head Lithium. Bradda Head Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Critical Metals' score of -0.34 indicating that Bradda Head Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bradda Head Lithium
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Critical Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Bradda Head Lithium beats Critical Metals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L)?

Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) (LON:ERIS) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L)N/AN/AN/A-£2.90N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.19

0.7% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Critical Metals has a net margin of 27,276.84% compared to Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L)N/A N/A N/A
Critical Metals 27,276.84%-76.30%-40.21%

In the previous week, Critical Metals had 3 more articles in the media than Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L). MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Critical Metals and 0 mentions for Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L). Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Critical Metals' score of -0.34 indicating that Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

Summary

Critical Metals beats Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Critical Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRTM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRTM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRTM vs. The Competition

MetricCritical MetalsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£28.09M£3.76B£4.72B£2.81B
Dividend YieldN/A5.24%4.76%6.26%
P/E Ratio0.2025.2925.07366.69
Price / SalesN/A27,163.4616,186.2889,148.58
Price / Cash15.5826.3824.3927.89
Price / Book-939.1411.389.496.98
Net Income-£1.44M£127.14M£159.30M£5.89B
7 Day Performance13.11%-1.49%-1.37%-0.76%
1 Month Performance245.00%-5.21%-4.97%-1.14%
1 Year Performance180.20%19.93%16.99%22.91%

Critical Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRTM
Critical Metals
N/AGBX 27.60
+6.2%
N/A+164.0%£28.09MN/A0.203
ZNWD
Zinnwald Lithium
N/AGBX 8.65
flat
N/AN/A£41.05MN/AN/A23
AAU
Ariana Resources
N/AGBX 1.45
-4.9%
N/A-6.5%£39.04MN/AN/A8
CTL
CleanTech Lithium
N/AGBX 6.50
-7.1%
GBX 17
+161.5%
+45.8%£23.74MN/AN/A20
BHL
Bradda Head Lithium
N/AGBX 1.60
-8.6%
N/A+50.0%£9.12MN/AN/A61

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CRTM) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners