Go Pro

Critical Metals (CRTM) Competitors

Critical Metals logo
GBX 14 +2.00 (+16.67%)
As of 12:29 PM Eastern

CRTM vs. CTL, BHL, ERIS, SND, and ASA

Should you buy Critical Metals stock or one of its competitors? Critical Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include CleanTech Lithium (CTL), Bradda Head Lithium (BHL), Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) (ERIS), Sondrel (SND), and Asa Resource Group (ASA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified metals & mining" industry.

How does Critical Metals compare to CleanTech Lithium?

Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) and CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and risk.

Critical Metals has a beta of 2.262, suggesting that its share price is 126% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.79, suggesting that its share price is 179% less volatile than the broader market.

CleanTech Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.10
CleanTech LithiumN/AN/A-£2.19M-£2.20N/A

In the previous week, CleanTech Lithium had 1 more articles in the media than Critical Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CleanTech Lithium and 0 mentions for Critical Metals. Critical Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CleanTech Lithium'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Metals Neutral
CleanTech Lithium Neutral

CleanTech Lithium has a consensus price target of GBX 17, indicating a potential upside of 161.54%. Given CleanTech Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Critical Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Critical Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
CleanTech Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.7% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CleanTech Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Critical Metals' return on equity of 602.92% beat CleanTech Lithium's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Metals-27,222.85% 602.92% -40.21%
CleanTech Lithium N/A -16.51%-13.50%

Summary

CleanTech Lithium beats Critical Metals on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Bradda Head Lithium?

Bradda Head Lithium (LON:BHL) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Bradda Head Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bradda Head LithiumN/AN/A£3.63M-£0.75N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.10

1.0% of Bradda Head Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 16.2% of Bradda Head Lithium shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Bradda Head Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Critical Metals' return on equity of 602.92% beat Bradda Head Lithium's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bradda Head LithiumN/A -19.28% -13.61%
Critical Metals -27,222.85%602.92%-40.21%

Bradda Head Lithium has a beta of 0.457, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.262, meaning that its share price is 126% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Bradda Head Lithium had 2 more articles in the media than Critical Metals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bradda Head Lithium and 0 mentions for Critical Metals. Bradda Head Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bradda Head Lithium Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

Summary

Bradda Head Lithium beats Critical Metals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L)?

Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) and Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) (LON:ERIS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

0.7% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Critical Metals' return on equity of 602.92% beat Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Metals-27,222.85% 602.92% -40.21%
Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Critical Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Metals Neutral
Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) Neutral

Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.10
Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L)N/AN/AN/A-£2.90N/A

Summary

Critical Metals beats Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L) on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Sondrel?

Sondrel (LON:SND) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Critical Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sondrel. Sondrel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sondrel£9.43M0.00-£21.52M-£0.25N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.10

17.9% of Sondrel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.8% of Sondrel shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sondrel has a net margin of -228.31% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Critical Metals' return on equity of 602.92% beat Sondrel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sondrel-228.31% N/A -52.53%
Critical Metals -27,222.85%602.92%-40.21%

In the previous week, Sondrel's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sondrel Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

Summary

Critical Metals beats Sondrel on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Asa Resource Group?

Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) and Asa Resource Group (LON:ASA) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Critical Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Asa Resource Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Metals Neutral
Asa Resource Group Neutral

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.10
Asa Resource GroupN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

0.7% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Asa Resource Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Critical Metals' return on equity of 602.92% beat Asa Resource Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Metals-27,222.85% 602.92% -40.21%
Asa Resource Group N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Critical Metals beats Asa Resource Group on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Critical Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRTM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRTM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRTM vs. The Competition

MetricCritical MetalsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£14.25M£3.84B£4.83B£2.86B
Dividend YieldN/A5.18%4.69%6.26%
P/E Ratio0.1025.1525.25366.92
Price / SalesN/A28,926.7617,202.2290,001.90
Price / Cash15.5826.5724.5927.89
Price / Book-476.3811.709.756.33
Net Income-£1.44M£127.55M£158.15M£5.89B
7 Day Performance66.67%-3.70%-3.16%-0.75%
1 Month Performance132.95%7.64%5.34%-0.68%
1 Year Performance67.02%103.71%78.56%19.29%

Critical Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRTM
Critical Metals
N/AGBX 14
+16.7%
N/A+45.9%£14.25MN/A0.103
CTL
CleanTech Lithium
1.6311 of 5 stars
GBX 6
flat
GBX 17
+183.3%
+26.3%£21.78MN/AN/A20
BHL
Bradda Head Lithium
N/AGBX 2.20
flat
N/A+58.2%£8.59MN/AN/AN/A
ERIS
Zinnwald Lithium Plc (ERIS.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.46MN/AN/A9
SND
Sondrel
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.37M£9.43MN/A330

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CRTM) was last updated on 9/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners