Critical Metals (CRTM) Competitors

Critical Metals logo
GBX 11 +0.50 (+4.76%)
As of 06:51 AM Eastern

CRTM vs. 80M, ZNWD, BRES, EMH, and KAV

Should you buy Critical Metals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Critical Metals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Critical Metals include 80 Mile (80M), Zinnwald Lithium (ZNWD), Blencowe Resources (BRES), European Metals (EMH), and Kavango Resources (KAV). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Critical Metals compare to 80 Mile?

Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) and 80 Mile (LON:80M) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

0.3% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of 80 Mile shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.3% of 80 Mile shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

80 Mile has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. 80 Mile's return on equity of 0.00% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Metals-27,222.85% -76.15% -40.21%
80 Mile N/A N/A N/A

80 Mile is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.08
80 MileN/AN/AN/A-£0.33N/A

In the previous week, 80 Mile had 1 more articles in the media than Critical Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for 80 Mile and 0 mentions for Critical Metals. 80 Mile's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Critical Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that 80 Mile is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Metals Neutral
80 Mile Positive

Summary

80 Mile beats Critical Metals on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Zinnwald Lithium?

Zinnwald Lithium (LON:ZNWD) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Zinnwald Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Zinnwald Lithium's return on equity of -1.64% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zinnwald LithiumN/A -1.64% -4.46%
Critical Metals -27,222.85%-76.15%-40.21%

0.0% of Zinnwald Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Zinnwald Lithium shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Zinnwald Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zinnwald LithiumN/AN/A-£3.03K-£0.56N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.08

Zinnwald Lithium has a beta of 0.384, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.271, meaning that its stock price is 127% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Zinnwald Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zinnwald Lithium Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

Summary

Critical Metals beats Zinnwald Lithium on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Blencowe Resources?

Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) and Blencowe Resources (LON:BRES) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Blencowe Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.08
Blencowe ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.28M-£0.76N/A

Blencowe Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Blencowe Resources' return on equity of -19.76% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Metals-27,222.85% -76.15% -40.21%
Blencowe Resources N/A -19.76%-13.34%

Critical Metals has a beta of 2.271, suggesting that its stock price is 127% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blencowe Resources has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

0.3% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Blencowe Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Blencowe Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Blencowe Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Critical Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Blencowe Resources and 0 mentions for Critical Metals. Blencowe Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Critical Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Blencowe Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Metals Neutral
Blencowe Resources Positive

Summary

Blencowe Resources beats Critical Metals on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to European Metals?

European Metals (LON:EMH) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

1.9% of European Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Critical Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of European Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

European Metals has a beta of 0.256, suggesting that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.271, suggesting that its stock price is 127% more volatile than the broader market.

European Metals has a net margin of -287.87% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. European Metals' return on equity of -24.66% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
European Metals-287.87% -24.66% -2.47%
Critical Metals -27,222.85%-76.15%-40.21%

In the previous week, European Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Critical Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for European Metals and 0 mentions for Critical Metals. European Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Critical Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that European Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
European Metals Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

European Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
European MetalsN/AN/A-£2.30M-£3.81N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.08

Summary

European Metals beats Critical Metals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Metals compare to Kavango Resources?

Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) and Kavango Resources (LON:KAV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Kavango Resources has a net margin of -869.55% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Kavango Resources' return on equity of -68.85% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Metals-27,222.85% -76.15% -40.21%
Kavango Resources -869.55%-68.85%-14.06%

Kavango Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Critical Metals. Kavango Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.08
Kavango Resources£1.72M17.81-£5.48K-£0.48N/A

0.3% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.9% of Kavango Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Critical Metals has a beta of 2.271, indicating that its share price is 127% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kavango Resources has a beta of 0.22, indicating that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Critical Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kavango Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Metals Neutral
Kavango Resources Neutral

Summary

Critical Metals and Kavango Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Critical Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRTM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRTM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRTM vs. The Competition

MetricCritical MetalsOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£11.19M£1.49B£4.59B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%5.00%6.16%
P/E Ratio0.0827.0622.59366.61
Price / SalesN/A44,965.815,473.8786,103.13
Price / Cash15.5824.6327.0527.87
Price / Book-374.305.258.717.85
Net Income-£1.44M£70.60M£157.26M£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.76%-5.15%-4.58%-0.97%
1 Month Performance-15.38%-6.96%-5.61%-0.79%
1 Year Performance1,122.22%85.16%48.79%68.88%

Critical Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRTM
Critical Metals
N/AGBX 11
+4.8%
N/A+1,066.7%£11.19MN/A0.083
80M
80 Mile
N/AGBX 0.82
+2.8%
N/A+271.4%£41.93MN/AN/AN/A
ZNWD
Zinnwald Lithium
N/AGBX 8.67
flat
N/A+70.4%£41.14MN/AN/A23
BRES
Blencowe Resources
N/AGBX 7.67
-3.9%
N/A+111.0%£37.71MN/AN/A3
EMH
European Metals
N/AGBX 15.40
-0.3%
N/A+92.5%£36.59MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CRTM) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners