Go Pro

Chesterfield Resources (CHF) Competitors

Chesterfield Resources logo
GBX 0.90 -0.08 (-7.69%)
As of 08/4/2026 06:27 AM Eastern

CHF vs. BHL, PREM, GROC, JAN, and CRTX

Should you buy Chesterfield Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chesterfield Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chesterfield Resources include Bradda Head Lithium (BHL), Premier African Minerals (PREM), GreenRoc Mining (GROC), Jangada Mines (JAN), and CRISM Therapeutics (CRTX).

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Bradda Head Lithium?

Bradda Head Lithium (LON:BHL) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Bradda Head Lithium had 6 more articles in the media than Chesterfield Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Bradda Head Lithium and 0 mentions for Chesterfield Resources. Bradda Head Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.08 beat Chesterfield Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Bradda Head Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bradda Head Lithium Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

Bradda Head Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bradda Head LithiumN/AN/A£3.63M-£0.21N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50

Bradda Head Lithium has a beta of 0.437, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

0.5% of Bradda Head Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 20.4% of Bradda Head Lithium shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Bradda Head Lithium's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bradda Head LithiumN/A 6.73% -13.61%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

Summary

Bradda Head Lithium beats Chesterfield Resources on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Premier African Minerals?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and Premier African Minerals (LON:PREM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Premier African Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
Premier African Minerals N/A -60.32%-17.62%

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premier African Minerals has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Premier African Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Premier African Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Premier African Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50
Premier African MineralsN/AN/A-£41.89M-£0.42N/A

In the previous week, Premier African Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Chesterfield Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Premier African Minerals and 0 mentions for Chesterfield Resources. Premier African Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Chesterfield Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Premier African Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources Neutral
Premier African Minerals Neutral

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Premier African Minerals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to GreenRoc Mining?

GreenRoc Mining (LON:GROC) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

GreenRoc Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GreenRoc MiningN/AN/A-£1.48M-£0.33N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat GreenRoc Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GreenRoc MiningN/A -8.87% -5.36%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

GreenRoc Mining has a beta of 0.265, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, GreenRoc Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
GreenRoc Mining Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats GreenRoc Mining on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Jangada Mines?

Jangada Mines (LON:JAN) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Jangada Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jangada MinesN/AN/A-£835.63-£0.43N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50

In the previous week, Jangada Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jangada Mines Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

0.0% of Jangada Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.5% of Jangada Mines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Jangada Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jangada MinesN/A -39.67% -14.48%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

Jangada Mines has a beta of 2.1530259, suggesting that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Jangada Mines beats Chesterfield Resources on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to CRISM Therapeutics?

CRISM Therapeutics (LON:CRTX) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

CRISM Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than Chesterfield Resources. CRISM Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISM Therapeutics£231K33.25-£792.20K-£5.10N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50

In the previous week, CRISM Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CRISM Therapeutics Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

CRISM Therapeutics has a beta of 0.599, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat CRISM Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISM TherapeuticsN/A -139.63% -26.77%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

0.3% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 50.5% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CRISM Therapeutics beats Chesterfield Resources on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chesterfield Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHF vs. The Competition

MetricChesterfield ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.69M£3.74B£4.81B£2.86B
Dividend YieldN/A5.29%4.76%6.13%
P/E Ratio7.5022.7321.10368.57
Price / SalesN/A7,894.694,693.1983,546.84
Price / Cash3.5028.9326.4727.89
Price / Book1.6210.418.777.18
Net Income-£3.18M£122.62M£155.10M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-14.29%5.88%4.92%1.00%
1 Month Performance-5.76%-0.01%0.35%0.68%
1 Year Performance45.16%51.06%40.98%74.91%

Chesterfield Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHF
Chesterfield Resources
N/AGBX 0.90
-7.7%
N/A+50.0%£1.69MN/A7.507
BHL
Bradda Head Lithium
N/AGBX 2.27
-1.2%
N/A+143.9%£8.88MN/AN/AN/A
PREM
Premier African Minerals
N/AGBX 0.02
+5.6%
N/A-53.3%£8.23MN/AN/A19
GROC
GreenRoc Mining
N/AGBX 2.81
-4.9%
N/A+16.9%£7.96MN/AN/A6
JAN
Jangada Mines
N/AGBX 0.90
+2.9%
N/A+35.7%£7.72MN/AN/A1

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CHF) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners