Go Pro

Chesterfield Resources (CHF) Competitors

Chesterfield Resources logo
GBX 0.90 -0.15 (-14.29%)
As of 07/15/2026 03:56 AM Eastern

CHF vs. TGR, CRTM, CRTX, PREM, and BMN

Should you buy Chesterfield Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chesterfield Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chesterfield Resources include Tirupati Graphite (TGR), Critical Metals (CRTM), CRISM Therapeutics (CRTX), Premier African Minerals (PREM), and Bushveld Minerals (BMN). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Tirupati Graphite?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and Tirupati Graphite (LON:TGR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Chesterfield Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tirupati Graphite. Tirupati Graphite is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50
Tirupati Graphite£1.87M4.14-£3.59M-£5.45N/A

Chesterfield Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tirupati Graphite's net margin of -0.27%. Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Tirupati Graphite's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
Tirupati Graphite -0.27%-0.07%-5.46%

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Tirupati Graphite. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for Tirupati Graphite. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Tirupati Graphite's score of 0.00 indicating that Chesterfield Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources Positive
Tirupati Graphite Neutral

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tirupati Graphite has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

2.1% of Tirupati Graphite shares are held by institutional investors. 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Tirupati Graphite shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Tirupati Graphite on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Critical Metals?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.271, indicating that its share price is 127% more volatile than the broader market.

Chesterfield Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Critical Metals' return on equity of 602.92% beat Chesterfield Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
Critical Metals -27,222.85%602.92%-40.21%

Critical Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.06

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Critical Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for Critical Metals. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Critical Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Chesterfield Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources Positive
Critical Metals Neutral

0.3% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Critical Metals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to CRISM Therapeutics?

CRISM Therapeutics (LON:CRTX) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

0.3% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.5% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than CRISM Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for CRISM Therapeutics. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat CRISM Therapeutics' score of 0.00 indicating that Chesterfield Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CRISM Therapeutics Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Positive

CRISM Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than Chesterfield Resources. CRISM Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISM Therapeutics£231K35.99-£792.20K-£5.10N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat CRISM Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISM TherapeuticsN/A -139.63% -26.77%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

CRISM Therapeutics has a beta of 0.599, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats CRISM Therapeutics on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Premier African Minerals?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and Premier African Minerals (LON:PREM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premier African Minerals has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Premier African Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50
Premier African MineralsN/AN/A-£41.89M-£0.42N/A

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Premier African Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for Premier African Minerals. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Premier African Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Chesterfield Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources Positive
Premier African Minerals Neutral

0.0% of Premier African Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Premier African Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Premier African Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
Premier African Minerals N/A -60.32%-17.62%

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Premier African Minerals on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Bushveld Minerals?

Bushveld Minerals (LON:BMN) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.

21.1% of Bushveld Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 48.3% of Bushveld Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Bushveld Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for Bushveld Minerals. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Bushveld Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Chesterfield Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bushveld Minerals Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Positive

Chesterfield Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bushveld Minerals. Bushveld Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bushveld Minerals£107.92M0.00-£116.82M-£0.06N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50

Bushveld Minerals has a beta of 2.06, suggesting that its share price is 106% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Chesterfield Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Bushveld Minerals' net margin of -124.94%. Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Bushveld Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bushveld Minerals-124.94% -625.85% -13.14%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Bushveld Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chesterfield Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHF vs. The Competition

MetricChesterfield ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.69M£1.47B£4.56B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A6.57%5.03%6.12%
P/E Ratio7.5017.8620.94368.65
Price / SalesN/A53,565.136,457.9784,796.79
Price / Cash3.5024.6326.5727.87
Price / Book1.625.488.777.77
Net Income-£3.18M£70.60M£157.11M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-25.00%-1.35%-0.61%1.14%
1 Month Performance-18.99%-8.30%-5.72%-0.31%
1 Year Performance28.57%66.33%38.88%62.92%

Chesterfield Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHF
Chesterfield Resources
N/AGBX 0.90
-14.3%
N/A+12.5%£1.69MN/A7.507
TGR
Tirupati Graphite
N/AGBX 1.17
flat
N/AN/A£8.92M£1.87MN/A36,000
CRTM
Critical Metals
N/AGBX 8.26
-2.8%
N/A+1,103.0%£8.41MN/A0.063
CRTX
CRISM Therapeutics
N/AGBX 10.09
-1.6%
N/A-2.8%£7.99M£231KN/A4
PREM
Premier African Minerals
N/AGBX 0.02
-5.6%
N/A-26.1%£7.36MN/AN/A19

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CHF) was last updated on 7/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners