Go Pro

Chesterfield Resources (CHF) Competitors

Chesterfield Resources logo
GBX 0.85 -0.05 (-5.56%)
As of 11:28 AM Eastern

CHF vs. PGM, CGNR, TM1, THR, and GCAT

Should you buy Chesterfield Resources stock or one of its competitors? Chesterfield Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Phoenix Global Mining (PGM), Conroy Gold and Natural Resources (CGNR), Technology Minerals (TM1), Thor Energy (THR), and Caracal Gold (GCAT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Phoenix Global Mining?

Phoenix Global Mining (LON:PGM) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Phoenix Global Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phoenix Global MiningN/A N/A N/A
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

Phoenix Global Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phoenix Global MiningN/AN/AN/A-£5.80N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.08

In the previous week, Phoenix Global Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Phoenix Global Mining Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Phoenix Global Mining on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Conroy Gold and Natural Resources?

Conroy Gold and Natural Resources (LON:CGNR) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Conroy Gold and Natural Resources has a beta of 1.618, meaning that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Conroy Gold and Natural Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Conroy Gold and Natural ResourcesN/A -0.55% -1.37%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

In the previous week, Conroy Gold and Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Conroy Gold and Natural Resources Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

Conroy Gold and Natural Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Conroy Gold and Natural ResourcesN/AN/A-£499.39K-£0.27N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.08

Summary

Conroy Gold and Natural Resources and Chesterfield Resources tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Technology Minerals?

Technology Minerals (LON:TM1) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Technology Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Technology MineralsN/A -22.75% -10.63%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

Technology Minerals has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Technology Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Chesterfield Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Technology Minerals and 0 mentions for Chesterfield Resources. Technology Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Chesterfield Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Technology Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Technology Minerals Positive
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

Chesterfield Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Technology Minerals. Technology Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Technology Minerals£2.30M2.82-£4.70M-£0.60N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.08

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Technology Minerals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Thor Energy?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.08

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.127, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Chesterfield Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Chesterfield Resources. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Chesterfield Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Positive
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Thor Energy and Chesterfield Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Caracal Gold?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and Caracal Gold (LON:GCAT) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Chesterfield Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Caracal Gold. Caracal Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.08
Caracal Gold£4.23M0.00-£5.22M-£0.01N/A

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Caracal Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources Neutral
Caracal Gold Neutral

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.215, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caracal Gold has a beta of 0.13, indicating that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Chesterfield Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Caracal Gold's net margin of -123.29%. Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Caracal Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
Caracal Gold -123.29%N/A -43.02%

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Caracal Gold on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chesterfield Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHF vs. The Competition

MetricChesterfield ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.60M£4.14B£5.15B£2.91B
Dividend YieldN/A5.17%4.68%6.17%
P/E Ratio7.0826.0226.68367.36
Price / SalesN/A8,205.564,876.3083,550.18
Price / Cash3.5029.8727.2327.89
Price / Book1.5310.769.106.89
Net Income-£3.18M£122.92M£154.63M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.93%11.33%8.57%0.77%
1 Month Performance-29.17%24.86%19.19%3.00%
1 Year Performance20.40%67.06%52.01%22.61%

Chesterfield Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHF
Chesterfield Resources
N/AGBX 0.85
-5.6%
N/A+14.4%£1.60MN/A7.087
PGM
Phoenix Global Mining
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.42MN/AN/AN/A
CGNR
Conroy Gold and Natural Resources
N/AGBX 8.14
+1.8%
N/A+69.6%£6.26MN/AN/A8
TM1
Technology Minerals
N/AGBX 0.05
-5.7%
N/A-38.2%£6.25M£2.30MN/A5
THR
Thor Energy
N/AGBX 0.60
flat
N/A+23.9%£6.18MN/AN/A1,083

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CHF) was last updated on 8/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners