Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ Firm That Predicted 2008, 2020, 2022: Right Now Looks Worse (From TradeSmith) (Ad)tc pixel Free CHF Stock Alerts

Chesterfield Resources (CHF) Competitors

Chesterfield Resources logo
GBX 1.15 +0.10 (+9.52%)
As of 10:18 AM Eastern
Compare

CHF vs. BMN, LND, FRG, THR, and URU

Should you buy Chesterfield Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chesterfield Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chesterfield Resources include Bushveld Minerals (BMN), Landore Resources (LND), Firering Strategic Minerals (FRG), Thor Energy (THR), and URU Metals (URU). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Bushveld Minerals?

Bushveld Minerals (LON:BMN) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Chesterfield Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bushveld Minerals. Bushveld Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bushveld Minerals£107.92M0.00-£116.82M-£0.06N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.129.58

Chesterfield Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Bushveld Minerals' net margin of -124.94%. Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Bushveld Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bushveld Minerals-124.94% -625.85% -13.14%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Bushveld Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for Bushveld Minerals. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Bushveld Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Chesterfield Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bushveld Minerals Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Positive

Bushveld Minerals has a beta of 2.06, indicating that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.212, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

21.1% of Bushveld Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.3% of Bushveld Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Bushveld Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Landore Resources?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and Landore Resources (LON:LND) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
Landore Resources N/A -207.28%-106.31%

10.6% of Landore Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.212, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Landore Resources has a beta of -0.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% less volatile than the broader market.

Chesterfield Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landore Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.129.58
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.199.84

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Landore Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for Landore Resources. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Landore Resources' score of 0.75 indicating that Chesterfield Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources Positive
Landore Resources Positive

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Landore Resources on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Firering Strategic Minerals?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Firering Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 1 mentions for Firering Strategic Minerals. Firering Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Chesterfield Resources' score of 0.76 indicating that Firering Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Firering Strategic Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
Firering Strategic Minerals N/A -35.24%-16.22%

Firering Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.129.58
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A

8.4% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.212, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Firering Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.778, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Thor Energy?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Thor Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for Thor Energy. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Thor Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Chesterfield Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Positive

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.129.58

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.113, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.212, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Thor Energy on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to URU Metals?

URU Metals (LON:URU) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.212, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of URU Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 65.0% of URU Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 2 more articles in the media than URU Metals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for URU Metals. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat URU Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Chesterfield Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
URU Metals Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Positive

URU Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.002.65
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.129.58

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
URU MetalsN/A -42.52% -16.40%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats URU Metals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chesterfield Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricChesterfield ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.16M£1.49B£4.64B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%5.02%6.16%
P/E Ratio9.5826.7622.02366.61
Price / SalesN/A44,965.815,474.6586,103.13
Price / Cash3.5024.6326.9027.87
Price / Book2.075.258.717.85
Net Income-£3.18M£70.60M£157.26M£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.55%-5.15%-4.58%-0.97%
1 Month Performance9.52%-6.96%-5.61%-0.79%
1 Year Performance43.75%85.16%48.79%68.88%

Chesterfield Resources Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHF
Chesterfield Resources
N/AGBX 1.15
+9.5%		N/A+35.3%£2.16MN/A9.587
BMN
Bushveld Minerals
N/AN/AN/AN/A£7.07M£107.92MN/A758
LND
Landore Resources
N/AGBX 1.74
-6.2%		N/A-36.4%£6.44MN/A9.136
FRG
Firering Strategic Minerals
N/AGBX 0.94
+1.6%		N/A-62.3%£6.41MN/AN/AN/A
THR
Thor Energy
N/AGBX 0.60
flat		N/A+23.6%£6.18MN/AN/A1,083

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CHF) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Firm That Predicted 2008, 2020, 2022: Right Now Looks Worse
The firm that predicted the dot-com crash, the 2008 financial crisis, the 2020 COVID crash, and the 2022 bear ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
VWAV: An Under-the-Radar Defense Play
VisionWave Holdings (NASDAQ: VWAV) is developing a multi-domain defense platform combining AI-powered analytic...
Equiscreen | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Treasury just bought its own debt
On April 16th, the U.S. Treasury executed a $15 billion buyback of its own debt - the largest in history - whi...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon’s message for America
Elon Musk bought Super Bowl ad time at $266,000 per second - something he has never done before. 125 million A...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
PH: Do THESE 4 things to your bank account now …
In a few short months, the US government could gain unprecedented powers over personal bank accounts - includi...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel