Free Trial

Chesterfield Resources (CHF) Competitors

Chesterfield Resources logo
GBX 0.90 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/14/2026 12:00 PM Eastern

CHF vs. FCM, CRTX, URU, AFP, and ALBA

Should you buy Chesterfield Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chesterfield Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chesterfield Resources include First Class Metals (FCM), CRISM Therapeutics (CRTX), URU Metals (URU), African Pioneer (AFP), and Alba Mineral Resources (ALBA). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to First Class Metals?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and First Class Metals (LON:FCM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than First Class Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for First Class Metals. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled First Class Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources Neutral
First Class Metals Neutral

First Class Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50
First Class MetalsN/AN/A-£2.20M-£1.38N/A

5.6% of First Class Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of First Class Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat First Class Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
First Class Metals N/A -55.27%N/A

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Class Metals has a beta of 0.014458477, indicating that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats First Class Metals on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to CRISM Therapeutics?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and CRISM Therapeutics (LON:CRTX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than CRISM Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for CRISM Therapeutics. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CRISM Therapeutics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources Neutral
CRISM Therapeutics Neutral

CRISM Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than Chesterfield Resources. CRISM Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50
CRISM Therapeutics£25K241.09-£792.20K-£4.40N/A

3.7% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 77.3% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat CRISM Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
CRISM Therapeutics N/A -78.00%-26.77%

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CRISM Therapeutics has a beta of 0.598, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chesterfield Resources and CRISM Therapeutics tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to URU Metals?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and URU Metals (LON:URU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

0.0% of URU Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 65.0% of URU Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

URU Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.003.08

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
URU Metals N/A -42.52%-16.40%

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources and Chesterfield Resources both had 1 articles in the media. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled URU Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
URU Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Chesterfield Resources and URU Metals tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to African Pioneer?

African Pioneer (LON:AFP) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than African Pioneer. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for African Pioneer. African Pioneer's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
African Pioneer Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

African Pioneer has a beta of 0.693, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

African Pioneer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
African PioneerN/AN/A-£711.79K-£0.28N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50

3.8% of African Pioneer shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.4% of African Pioneer shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Chesterfield Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to African Pioneer's net margin of -2,039.11%. Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat African Pioneer's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
African Pioneer-2,039.11% -15.66% -7.36%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats African Pioneer on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Alba Mineral Resources?

Alba Mineral Resources (LON:ALBA) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Alba Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for Alba Mineral Resources. Alba Mineral Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alba Mineral Resources Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

Alba Mineral Resources has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Alba Mineral Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alba Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.94M-£0.04N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.127.50

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Alba Mineral Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alba Mineral ResourcesN/A -28.14% -4.17%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Alba Mineral Resources on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chesterfield Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHF vs. The Competition

MetricChesterfield ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.69M£1.62B£5.00B£2.75B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%4.97%6.07%
P/E Ratio7.5031.9323.66365.85
Price / SalesN/A56,751.336,738.7988,036.58
Price / Cash3.5024.6327.6927.89
Price / Book1.625.767.007.68
Net Income-£3.18M£70.60M£159.01M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-6.74%1.45%0.99%0.34%
1 Month PerformanceN/A5.22%2.67%2.10%
1 Year Performance28.57%134.99%86.60%86.82%

Chesterfield Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHF
Chesterfield Resources
N/AGBX 0.90
flat
N/A+28.6%£1.69MN/A7.507
FCM
First Class Metals
N/AGBX 1.71
flat
N/A+52.0%£6.29MN/AN/AN/A
CRTX
CRISM Therapeutics
N/AGBX 11.60
-3.3%
N/A-45.3%£6.00M£25KN/A4
URU
URU Metals
N/AGBX 6.15
+3.4%
N/A+40.4%£5.96MN/A3.08N/A
AFP
African Pioneer
N/AGBX 1.02
+2.3%
N/A+56.2%£5.36MN/AN/A5

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CHF) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners