Free Trial

Chesterfield Resources (CHF) Competitors

Chesterfield Resources logo
GBX 1.30 +0.13 (+10.64%)
As of 11:06 AM Eastern

CHF vs. THR, BMN, LND, URU, and VAST

Should you buy Chesterfield Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chesterfield Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chesterfield Resources include Thor Energy (THR), Bushveld Minerals (BMN), Landore Resources (LND), URU Metals (URU), and Vast Resources (VAST). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Thor Energy?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Chesterfield Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Chesterfield Resources. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.054, suggesting that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.1210.83

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Thor Energy on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Bushveld Minerals?

Bushveld Minerals (LON:BMN) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Bushveld Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bushveld Minerals Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

Bushveld Minerals has a beta of 2.06, meaning that its share price is 106% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Chesterfield Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bushveld Minerals. Bushveld Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bushveld Minerals£107.92M0.00-£116.82M-£0.06N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.1210.83

Chesterfield Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Bushveld Minerals' net margin of -124.94%. Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Bushveld Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bushveld Minerals-124.94% -625.85% -13.14%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

21.1% of Bushveld Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.3% of Bushveld Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Bushveld Minerals and Chesterfield Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Landore Resources?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and Landore Resources (LON:LND) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Landore Resources has a beta of -0.15, meaning that its share price is 115% less volatile than the broader market.

Landore Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.1210.83
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.1910.68

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
Landore Resources N/A -177.58%-106.31%

10.6% of Landore Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Landore Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Chesterfield Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Landore Resources and 0 mentions for Chesterfield Resources. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Landore Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources Neutral
Landore Resources Neutral

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Landore Resources on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to URU Metals?

URU Metals (LON:URU) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

URU Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.002.98
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.1210.83

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
URU MetalsN/A -42.52% -16.40%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

In the previous week, URU Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Chesterfield Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for URU Metals and 0 mentions for Chesterfield Resources. URU Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
URU Metals Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

0.0% of URU Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 65.0% of URU Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

URU Metals beats Chesterfield Resources on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Vast Resources?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and Vast Resources (LON:VAST) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Chesterfield Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vast Resources. Vast Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.1210.83
Vast Resources£273K0.22-£9.95M-£0.22N/A

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Vast Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources Neutral
Vast Resources Neutral

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vast Resources has a beta of 2.56, indicating that its stock price is 156% more volatile than the broader market.

Chesterfield Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vast Resources' net margin of -278.08%. Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Vast Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
Vast Resources -278.08%-339.02%-24.18%

1.4% of Vast Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Vast Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Vast Resources on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chesterfield Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHF vs. The Competition

MetricChesterfield ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.44M£1.67B£4.90B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%4.95%6.12%
P/E Ratio10.8330.3723.40364.57
Price / SalesN/A59,427.277,062.0987,497.12
Price / Cash3.5024.6327.4327.85
Price / Book2.345.859.487.74
Net Income-£3.18M£70.60M£156.62M£5.89B
7 Day Performance23.81%0.79%-0.33%0.23%
1 Month PerformanceN/AN/A19.90%N/A
1 Year Performance97.87%113.13%68.90%74.69%

Chesterfield Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHF
Chesterfield Resources
N/AGBX 1.30
+10.6%
N/A+36.4%£2.44MN/A10.837
THR
Thor Energy
N/AGBX 0.75
+11.1%
N/A+7.2%£7.73MN/AN/A1,083
BMN
Bushveld Minerals
N/AN/AN/AN/A£7.07M£107.92MN/A758
LND
Landore Resources
N/AGBX 1.80
-5.3%
N/A-46.5%£6.69MN/A9.476
URU
URU Metals
N/AGBX 6.40
+3.2%
N/A-1.8%£6.21MN/A3.20N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CHF) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners