Free Trial

Chesterfield Resources (CHF) Competitors

Chesterfield Resources logo
GBX 1.10 +0.20 (+22.22%)
As of 08:33 AM Eastern

CHF vs. FCM, CRTX, URU, AFP, and ALBA

Should you buy Chesterfield Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chesterfield Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chesterfield Resources include First Class Metals (FCM), CRISM Therapeutics (CRTX), URU Metals (URU), African Pioneer (AFP), and Alba Mineral Resources (ALBA). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to First Class Metals?

Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) and First Class Metals (LON:FCM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than First Class Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for First Class Metals. Chesterfield Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled First Class Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Resources Neutral
First Class Metals Neutral

First Class Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.129.17
First Class MetalsN/AN/A-£2.20M-£1.38N/A

5.6% of First Class Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of First Class Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Class Metals has a beta of 0.014458477, indicating that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat First Class Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield ResourcesN/A 70.40% -39.17%
First Class Metals N/A -55.27%N/A

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats First Class Metals on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to CRISM Therapeutics?

CRISM Therapeutics (LON:CRTX) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat CRISM Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISM TherapeuticsN/A -78.00% -26.77%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than CRISM Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for CRISM Therapeutics. CRISM Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CRISM Therapeutics Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

CRISM Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than Chesterfield Resources. CRISM Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISM Therapeutics£25K241.09-£792.20K-£4.40N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.129.17

CRISM Therapeutics has a beta of 0.598, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

3.7% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 77.3% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CRISM Therapeutics and Chesterfield Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to URU Metals?

URU Metals (LON:URU) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
URU MetalsN/A -42.52% -16.40%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

0.0% of URU Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 65.0% of URU Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, URU Metals and URU Metals both had 1 articles in the media. URU Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
URU Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Chesterfield Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

URU Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.002.98
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.129.17

URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

URU Metals and Chesterfield Resources tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to African Pioneer?

African Pioneer (LON:AFP) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Chesterfield Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to African Pioneer's net margin of -2,039.11%. Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat African Pioneer's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
African Pioneer-2,039.11% -15.66% -7.36%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

3.8% of African Pioneer shares are held by institutional investors. 21.4% of African Pioneer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 35.4% of Chesterfield Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than African Pioneer. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for African Pioneer. African Pioneer's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
African Pioneer Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

African Pioneer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
African PioneerN/AN/A-£711.79K-£0.28N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.129.17

African Pioneer has a beta of 0.693, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats African Pioneer on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chesterfield Resources compare to Alba Mineral Resources?

Alba Mineral Resources (LON:ALBA) and Chesterfield Resources (LON:CHF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and media sentiment.

Alba Mineral Resources has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chesterfield Resources has a beta of 1.145, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Alba Mineral Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alba Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.94M-£0.04N/A
Chesterfield ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.18M£0.129.17

In the previous week, Chesterfield Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Alba Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chesterfield Resources and 0 mentions for Alba Mineral Resources. Alba Mineral Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chesterfield Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alba Mineral Resources Neutral
Chesterfield Resources Neutral

Chesterfield Resources' return on equity of 70.40% beat Alba Mineral Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alba Mineral ResourcesN/A -28.14% -4.17%
Chesterfield Resources N/A 70.40%-39.17%

Summary

Chesterfield Resources beats Alba Mineral Resources on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chesterfield Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHF vs. The Competition

MetricChesterfield ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.06M£1.61B£5.00B£2.74B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%4.97%6.07%
P/E Ratio9.1731.3623.55365.81
Price / SalesN/A56,577.496,713.6388,010.24
Price / Cash3.5024.6327.6927.89
Price / Book1.985.756.997.63
Net Income-£3.18M£70.60M£159.01M£5.89B
7 Day Performance13.99%1.31%0.93%0.23%
1 Month Performance22.22%5.02%2.60%1.92%
1 Year Performance57.14%134.30%86.41%86.43%

Chesterfield Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHF
Chesterfield Resources
N/AGBX 1.10
+22.2%
N/A+28.6%£2.06MN/A9.177
FCM
First Class Metals
N/AGBX 1.71
flat
N/A+52.0%£6.29MN/AN/AN/A
CRTX
CRISM Therapeutics
N/AGBX 11.60
-3.3%
N/A-45.3%£6.00M£25KN/A4
URU
URU Metals
N/AGBX 6.15
+3.4%
N/A+40.4%£5.96MN/A3.08N/A
AFP
African Pioneer
N/AGBX 1.02
+2.3%
N/A+56.2%£5.36MN/AN/A5

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CHF) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners