Free Trial

Cloudbreak Discovery (CDL) Competitors

Cloudbreak Discovery logo
GBX 0.63 -0.01 (-1.40%)
As of 12:38 PM Eastern

CDL vs. BRES, ARS, 80M, ZNWD, and EMH

Should you buy Cloudbreak Discovery stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cloudbreak Discovery with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cloudbreak Discovery include Blencowe Resources (BRES), Asiamet Resources (ARS), 80 Mile (80M), Zinnwald Lithium (ZNWD), and European Metals (EMH). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Cloudbreak Discovery compare to Blencowe Resources?

Cloudbreak Discovery (LON:CDL) and Blencowe Resources (LON:BRES) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Blencowe Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cloudbreak Discovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cloudbreak DiscoveryN/AN/A-£2.87M-£0.14N/A
Blencowe ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.28M-£0.76N/A

Cloudbreak Discovery has a beta of 1.372, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blencowe Resources has a beta of 1.397, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Blencowe Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cloudbreak Discovery's net margin of -842.88%. Cloudbreak Discovery's return on equity of 576.19% beat Blencowe Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cloudbreak Discovery-842.88% 576.19% -31.77%
Blencowe Resources N/A -19.76%-13.34%

In the previous week, Blencowe Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Cloudbreak Discovery. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Blencowe Resources and 0 mentions for Cloudbreak Discovery. Blencowe Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Cloudbreak Discovery's score of 0.00 indicating that Blencowe Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cloudbreak Discovery Neutral
Blencowe Resources Positive

0.4% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Blencowe Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 41.2% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Blencowe Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Blencowe Resources beats Cloudbreak Discovery on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cloudbreak Discovery compare to Asiamet Resources?

Cloudbreak Discovery (LON:CDL) and Asiamet Resources (LON:ARS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

0.4% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of Asiamet Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.2% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.7% of Asiamet Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cloudbreak Discovery has a beta of 1.372, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Asiamet Resources has a beta of 0.972, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Asiamet Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cloudbreak Discovery's net margin of -842.88%. Cloudbreak Discovery's return on equity of 576.19% beat Asiamet Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cloudbreak Discovery-842.88% 576.19% -31.77%
Asiamet Resources N/A -476.74%-129.94%

In the previous week, Cloudbreak Discovery's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Asiamet Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cloudbreak Discovery Neutral
Asiamet Resources Neutral

Asiamet Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cloudbreak Discovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cloudbreak DiscoveryN/AN/A-£2.87M-£0.14N/A
Asiamet ResourcesN/AN/A-£7.70M-£0.16N/A

Summary

Cloudbreak Discovery beats Asiamet Resources on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cloudbreak Discovery compare to 80 Mile?

80 Mile (LON:80M) and Cloudbreak Discovery (LON:CDL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, 80 Mile's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Cloudbreak Discovery's score of 0.00 indicating that 80 Mile is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
80 Mile Positive
Cloudbreak Discovery Neutral

Cloudbreak Discovery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 80 Mile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
80 MileN/AN/AN/A-£0.33N/A
Cloudbreak DiscoveryN/AN/A-£2.87M-£0.14N/A

1.3% of 80 Mile shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are held by institutional investors. 21.3% of 80 Mile shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.2% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

80 Mile has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cloudbreak Discovery's net margin of -842.88%. Cloudbreak Discovery's return on equity of 576.19% beat 80 Mile's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
80 MileN/A N/A N/A
Cloudbreak Discovery -842.88%576.19%-31.77%

Summary

80 Mile beats Cloudbreak Discovery on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cloudbreak Discovery compare to Zinnwald Lithium?

Cloudbreak Discovery (LON:CDL) and Zinnwald Lithium (LON:ZNWD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

Cloudbreak Discovery has a beta of 1.372, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zinnwald Lithium has a beta of 0.309, indicating that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Zinnwald Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cloudbreak Discovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cloudbreak DiscoveryN/AN/A-£2.87M-£0.14N/A
Zinnwald LithiumN/AN/A-£3.03K-£0.56N/A

Zinnwald Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cloudbreak Discovery's net margin of -842.88%. Cloudbreak Discovery's return on equity of 576.19% beat Zinnwald Lithium's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cloudbreak Discovery-842.88% 576.19% -31.77%
Zinnwald Lithium N/A -1.64%-4.46%

In the previous week, Cloudbreak Discovery's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zinnwald Lithium'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cloudbreak Discovery Neutral
Zinnwald Lithium Neutral

0.4% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Zinnwald Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 41.2% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Zinnwald Lithium shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cloudbreak Discovery beats Zinnwald Lithium on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cloudbreak Discovery compare to European Metals?

European Metals (LON:EMH) and Cloudbreak Discovery (LON:CDL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

European Metals has a net margin of -287.87% compared to Cloudbreak Discovery's net margin of -842.88%. Cloudbreak Discovery's return on equity of 576.19% beat European Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
European Metals-287.87% -24.66% -2.47%
Cloudbreak Discovery -842.88%576.19%-31.77%

In the previous week, European Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Cloudbreak Discovery. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for European Metals and 0 mentions for Cloudbreak Discovery. Cloudbreak Discovery's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat European Metals' score of -0.91 indicating that Cloudbreak Discovery is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
European Metals Negative
Cloudbreak Discovery Neutral

Cloudbreak Discovery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than European Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
European MetalsN/AN/A-£2.30M-£3.81N/A
Cloudbreak DiscoveryN/AN/A-£2.87M-£0.14N/A

1.9% of European Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of European Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.2% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

European Metals has a beta of 0.217, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cloudbreak Discovery has a beta of 1.372, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

European Metals beats Cloudbreak Discovery on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cloudbreak Discovery News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CDL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CDL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CDL vs. The Competition

MetricCloudbreak DiscoveryOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£14.00M£1.58B£4.70B£2.74B
Dividend YieldN/A6.56%4.99%6.16%
P/E Ratio-4.5128.9722.17366.44
Price / SalesN/A58,984.297,028.6987,084.52
Price / Cash12.2524.6324.1827.85
Price / Book2.365.479.017.61
Net Income-£2.87M£70.60M£156.92M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.32%-4.94%-4.73%-0.95%
1 Month Performance-16.84%-4.85%-5.29%1.56%
1 Year Performance187.27%101.40%58.58%72.41%

Cloudbreak Discovery Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CDL
Cloudbreak Discovery
N/AGBX 0.63
-1.4%
N/A+191.4%£14.00MN/AN/A4
BRES
Blencowe Resources
N/AGBX 9.10
+2.0%
N/A+163.5%£49.46MN/AN/A3
ARS
Asiamet Resources
N/AGBX 1.41
+0.6%
N/A+43.2%£47.82MN/AN/AN/A
80M
80 Mile
N/AGBX 0.89
+0.2%
N/A+210.2%£43.39MN/AN/AN/A
ZNWD
Zinnwald Lithium
N/AGBX 8.98
+1.1%
N/A+51.3%£42.61MN/AN/A23

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CDL) was last updated on 6/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners