Free Trial
Memorial Day Savings! Save $100 on MarketBeat All Access
Claim Your Discount
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Keras Resources (KRS) Competitors

GBX 2 +0.20 (+11.11%)
As of 10:01 AM Eastern
Compare

KRS vs. ARV, BHL, TGR, GLR, and CRTM

Should you buy Keras Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Keras Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Keras Resources include Artemis Resources (ARV), Bradda Head Lithium (BHL), Tirupati Graphite (TGR), Galileo Resources (GLR), and Critical Metals (CRTM). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Keras Resources compare to Artemis Resources?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and Artemis Resources (LON:ARV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Artemis Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Keras Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Artemis Resources and 0 mentions for Keras Resources. Keras Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Artemis Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
Artemis Resources Neutral

Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Artemis Resources has a beta of 0.18, indicating that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.1% of Artemis Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.0% of Artemis Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Keras Resources has a net margin of -64.57% compared to Artemis Resources' net margin of -6,902.37%. Artemis Resources' return on equity of -20.60% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-64.57% -25.31% -3.15%
Artemis Resources -6,902.37%-20.60%-1.79%

Keras Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Artemis Resources. Artemis Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£978K3.21-£775.08K-£88.82N/A
Artemis Resources£25.65K438.15-£43.80M-£0.29N/A

Summary

Keras Resources and Artemis Resources tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Bradda Head Lithium?

Bradda Head Lithium (LON:BHL) and Keras Resources (LON:KRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Bradda Head Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Keras Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Bradda Head Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bradda Head Lithium Positive
Keras Resources Neutral

0.5% of Bradda Head Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Keras Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 20.4% of Bradda Head Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bradda Head Lithium has a beta of 0.196, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Bradda Head Lithium has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Keras Resources. Bradda Head Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bradda Head LithiumN/AN/A£3.63M-£0.21N/A
Keras Resources£978K3.21-£775.08K-£88.82N/A

Bradda Head Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -64.57%. Bradda Head Lithium's return on equity of -6.46% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bradda Head LithiumN/A -6.46% -13.61%
Keras Resources -64.57%-25.31%-3.15%

Summary

Bradda Head Lithium beats Keras Resources on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Tirupati Graphite?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and Tirupati Graphite (LON:TGR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tirupati Graphite has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Tirupati Graphite shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 33.5% of Tirupati Graphite shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Keras Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tirupati Graphite. Tirupati Graphite is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£978K3.21-£775.08K-£88.82N/A
Tirupati Graphite£1.87M5.22-£3.59M-£5.45N/A

Tirupati Graphite has a net margin of -0.27% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -64.57%. Tirupati Graphite's return on equity of -0.07% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-64.57% -25.31% -3.15%
Tirupati Graphite -0.27%-0.07%-5.46%

In the previous week, Keras Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tirupati Graphite'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
Tirupati Graphite Neutral

Summary

Tirupati Graphite beats Keras Resources on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Galileo Resources?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and Galileo Resources (LON:GLR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of Galileo Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Galileo Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Keras Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Galileo Resources. Galileo Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£978K3.21-£775.08K-£88.82N/A
Galileo ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.05M-£0.11N/A

Galileo Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -64.57%. Galileo Resources' return on equity of -10.01% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-64.57% -25.31% -3.15%
Galileo Resources N/A -10.01%-4.51%

In the previous week, Keras Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Galileo Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
Galileo Resources Neutral

Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galileo Resources has a beta of 0.462, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Keras Resources beats Galileo Resources on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Critical Metals?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Metals has a beta of 2.197, suggesting that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

Keras Resources has a net margin of -64.57% compared to Critical Metals' net margin of -27,222.85%. Keras Resources' return on equity of -25.31% beat Critical Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-64.57% -25.31% -3.15%
Critical Metals -27,222.85%-76.15%-40.21%

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Keras Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
Critical Metals Neutral

Keras Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Critical Metals. Keras Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£978K3.21-£775.08K-£88.82N/A
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.10

Summary

Keras Resources beats Critical Metals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Keras Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KRS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KRS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricKeras ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.14M£1.58B£4.73B£2.80B
Dividend YieldN/A6.56%5.03%6.16%
P/E Ratio-0.0229.7322.71365.58
Price / Sales3.2156,685.636,692.0387,559.45
Price / Cash5.0024.6327.0027.89
Price / Book0.525.806.657.61
Net Income-£775.08K£70.60M£157.11M£5.89B
7 Day Performance20.05%-3.47%-3.90%-0.11%
1 Month Performance66.67%0.15%-1.70%0.98%
1 Year Performance48.15%119.01%74.32%85.03%

Keras Resources Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KRS
Keras Resources
N/AGBX 2
+11.1%		N/A+18.5%£3.14M£978KN/A5
ARV
Artemis Resources
N/AGBX 0.30
-0.7%		N/A-11.8%£11.24M£25.65KN/AN/A
BHL
Bradda Head Lithium
N/AGBX 2.67
+17.4%		N/A+190.3%£10.41MN/AN/AN/A
TGR
Tirupati Graphite
N/AGBX 1.35
-0.7%		N/AN/A£10.30M£1.87MN/A36,000
GLR
Galileo Resources
N/AGBX 0.75
+1.9%		N/A-12.0%£10.29MN/AN/A1

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:KRS) was last updated on 5/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SpaceX eyes a 1.75 trillion valuation - here's what to know
Elon Musk's team has quietly filed confidential paperwork with the SEC for what Bloomberg estimates could be a...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
$30 stock to buy before Starlink goes public (WATCH NOW!)
In the next 3 minutes… James Altucher – legendary investor and venture capitalist… And someone who’s kno...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why this tiny stock may move before the SpaceX IPO drops
The projected SpaceX and xAI S-1 filing hits the SEC on June 1st - and analyst Dylan Jovine says $1.75 trillio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX IPO hides a much bigger story
The SpaceX IPO could be the biggest in history at $1.75 trillion - but the real story isn't the IPO itself. ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Satellite Images Spot Potential $10 Trillion Discovery
'Dark Energy': Elon Musk's Next Potential $10 Trillion Move A highly secure site in West Texas now houses a...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel