Free Trial

Keras Resources (KRS) Competitors

GBX 1.98 +0.12 (+6.45%)
As of 10:37 AM Eastern

KRS vs. FMET, GROC, AFP, PDL, and FME

Should you buy Keras Resources stock or one of its competitors? Keras Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Fulcrum Metals (FMET), GreenRoc Mining (GROC), African Pioneer (AFP), Petra Diamonds (PDL), and Future Metals (FME). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Keras Resources compare to Fulcrum Metals?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Keras Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Fulcrum Metals. Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£1.69M1.84-£775.08K-£2.73 thousandN/A
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.51N/A

Keras Resources has a beta of 0.139, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.146, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Fulcrum Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -228.30%. Fulcrum Metals' return on equity of -13.40% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-228.30% -490.38% -3.15%
Fulcrum Metals N/A -13.40%N/A

In the previous week, Keras Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fulcrum Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
Fulcrum Metals Neutral

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of Fulcrum Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Keras Resources and Fulcrum Metals tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to GreenRoc Mining?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and GreenRoc Mining (LON:GROC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

GreenRoc Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -228.30%. GreenRoc Mining's return on equity of -12.04% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-228.30% -490.38% -3.15%
GreenRoc Mining N/A -12.04%-5.36%

Keras Resources has higher revenue and earnings than GreenRoc Mining. GreenRoc Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£1.69M1.73-£775.08K-£2.73 thousandN/A
GreenRoc MiningN/AN/A-£1.48M-£0.38N/A

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of GreenRoc Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Keras Resources has a beta of 0.139, indicating that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GreenRoc Mining has a beta of 0.257, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Keras Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled GreenRoc Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
GreenRoc Mining Neutral

Summary

Keras Resources beats GreenRoc Mining on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to African Pioneer?

African Pioneer (LON:AFP) and Keras Resources (LON:KRS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

African Pioneer has a beta of 0.912, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keras Resources has a beta of 0.139, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

African Pioneer has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Keras Resources. African Pioneer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
African PioneerN/AN/A-£711.79K-£0.23N/A
Keras Resources£1.69M1.84-£775.08K-£2.73 thousandN/A

4.6% of African Pioneer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Keras Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 21.4% of African Pioneer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, African Pioneer's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Keras Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
African Pioneer Neutral
Keras Resources Neutral

Keras Resources has a net margin of -228.30% compared to African Pioneer's net margin of -2,039.11%. African Pioneer's return on equity of -10.64% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
African Pioneer-2,039.11% -10.64% -7.36%
Keras Resources -228.30%-490.38%-3.15%

Summary

African Pioneer and Keras Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Petra Diamonds?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and Petra Diamonds (LON:PDL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Keras Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Petra Diamonds' score of -0.45 indicating that Keras Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
Petra Diamonds Neutral

Petra Diamonds has a net margin of -104.34% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -228.30%. Petra Diamonds' return on equity of -333.85% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-228.30% -490.38% -3.15%
Petra Diamonds -104.34%-333.85%-9.26%

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.8% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Keras Resources has a beta of 0.139, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petra Diamonds has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Keras Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Petra Diamonds. Petra Diamonds is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£1.69M1.84-£775.08K-£2.73 thousandN/A
Petra Diamonds£192M0.06-£11.38M-£84.51N/A

Summary

Petra Diamonds beats Keras Resources on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Future Metals?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and Future Metals (LON:FME) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, Future Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Keras Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Future Metals and 0 mentions for Keras Resources. Keras Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Future Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
Future Metals Neutral

Keras Resources has a net margin of -228.30% compared to Future Metals' net margin of -1,051.73%. Future Metals' return on equity of -11.89% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-228.30% -490.38% -3.15%
Future Metals -1,051.73%-11.89%-11.36%

Keras Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Future Metals. Future Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£1.69M1.84-£775.08K-£2.73 thousandN/A
Future Metals£155.84K67.65-£7.83M-£0.40N/A

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Future Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Keras Resources has a beta of 0.139, indicating that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Future Metals has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Keras Resources beats Future Metals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Keras Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KRS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KRS vs. The Competition

MetricKeras ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.90M£3.82B£4.76B£2.81B
Dividend YieldN/A5.25%4.78%6.27%
P/E Ratio0.0022.6522.72367.18
Price / Sales1.8425,668.9115,288.8088,398.87
Price / Cash5.0026.3424.3527.87
Price / Book0.5111.829.827.17
Net Income-£775.08K£127.18M£159.17M£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.91%0.61%0.17%0.12%
1 Month PerformanceN/A78.66%57.54%-0.40%
1 Year Performance23.75%20.93%18.12%22.74%

Keras Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KRS
Keras Resources
N/AGBX 1.98
+6.5%
N/A+16.3%£2.90M£1.69MN/A5
FMET
Fulcrum Metals
N/AGBX 6.92
+0.7%
N/A+20.5%£10.80MN/AN/A5
GROC
GreenRoc Mining
N/AGBX 3.80
-2.6%
N/A+43.9%£10.78MN/AN/A6
AFP
African Pioneer
N/AGBX 2.01
-6.9%
N/A+53.8%£10.59MN/AN/A5
PDL
Petra Diamonds
N/AGBX 2.98
-27.0%
N/A-84.5%£10.57M£192MN/A2,870

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:KRS) was last updated on 10/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners