Free Trial

Keras Resources (KRS) Competitors

GBX 1.73 -0.12 (-6.49%)
As of 06/12/2026 10:40 AM Eastern

KRS vs. GROC, TGR, PREM, LND, and BMN

Should you buy Keras Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Keras Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Keras Resources include GreenRoc Mining (GROC), Tirupati Graphite (TGR), Premier African Minerals (PREM), Landore Resources (LND), and Bushveld Minerals (BMN). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Keras Resources compare to GreenRoc Mining?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and GreenRoc Mining (LON:GROC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

GreenRoc Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -64.57%. GreenRoc Mining's return on equity of -8.87% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-64.57% -25.31% -3.15%
GreenRoc Mining N/A -8.87%-5.36%

Keras Resources has higher revenue and earnings than GreenRoc Mining. GreenRoc Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£978K2.77-£775.08K-£88.82N/A
GreenRoc MiningN/AN/A-£1.48M-£0.33N/A

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of GreenRoc Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GreenRoc Mining has a beta of 0.26, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Keras Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled GreenRoc Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
GreenRoc Mining Neutral

Summary

Keras Resources beats GreenRoc Mining on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Tirupati Graphite?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and Tirupati Graphite (LON:TGR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Keras Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tirupati Graphite. Tirupati Graphite is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£978K2.77-£775.08K-£88.82N/A
Tirupati Graphite£1.87M4.78-£3.59M-£5.45N/A

In the previous week, Keras Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tirupati Graphite'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
Tirupati Graphite Neutral

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Tirupati Graphite shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Tirupati Graphite shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tirupati Graphite has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Tirupati Graphite has a net margin of -0.27% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -64.57%. Tirupati Graphite's return on equity of -0.07% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-64.57% -25.31% -3.15%
Tirupati Graphite -0.27%-0.07%-5.46%

Summary

Tirupati Graphite beats Keras Resources on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Premier African Minerals?

Premier African Minerals (LON:PREM) and Keras Resources (LON:KRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Premier African Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -64.57%. Premier African Minerals' return on equity of -0.07% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premier African MineralsN/A -0.07% -17.62%
Keras Resources -64.57%-25.31%-3.15%

Keras Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Premier African Minerals. Premier African Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premier African MineralsN/AN/A-£41.89M-£0.42N/A
Keras Resources£978K2.77-£775.08K-£88.82N/A

0.0% of Premier African Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Keras Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.8% of Premier African Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Premier African Minerals had 5 more articles in the media than Keras Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Premier African Minerals and 0 mentions for Keras Resources. Premier African Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Keras Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Premier African Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premier African Minerals Neutral
Keras Resources Neutral

Premier African Minerals has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Keras Resources beats Premier African Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Landore Resources?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and Landore Resources (LON:LND) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Landore Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Keras Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Landore Resources and 0 mentions for Keras Resources. Landore Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat Keras Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Landore Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
Landore Resources Neutral

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of Landore Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Landore Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Landore Resources has a beta of -0.15, indicating that its share price is 115% less volatile than the broader market.

Landore Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -64.57%. Keras Resources' return on equity of -25.31% beat Landore Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-64.57% -25.31% -3.15%
Landore Resources N/A -207.28%-106.31%

Keras Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Landore Resources. Keras Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Landore Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£978K2.77-£775.08K-£88.82N/A
Landore ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.77M£0.1910.00

Summary

Keras Resources and Landore Resources tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Bushveld Minerals?

Bushveld Minerals (LON:BMN) and Keras Resources (LON:KRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Bushveld Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Keras Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bushveld Minerals Neutral
Keras Resources Neutral

Keras Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bushveld Minerals. Keras Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bushveld Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bushveld Minerals£107.92M0.00-£116.82M-£0.06N/A
Keras Resources£978K2.77-£775.08K-£88.82N/A

Bushveld Minerals has a beta of 2.06, suggesting that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Keras Resources has a net margin of -64.57% compared to Bushveld Minerals' net margin of -124.94%. Keras Resources' return on equity of -25.31% beat Bushveld Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bushveld Minerals-124.94% -625.85% -13.14%
Keras Resources -64.57%-25.31%-3.15%

21.1% of Bushveld Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Keras Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.3% of Bushveld Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Bushveld Minerals and Keras Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Keras Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KRS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KRS vs. The Competition

MetricKeras ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.90M£1.59B£4.81B£3.00B
Dividend YieldN/A6.56%5.00%6.18%
P/E Ratio-0.0228.3423.29366.78
Price / Sales2.7750,029.226,082.9986,623.82
Price / Cash5.0024.6326.9427.87
Price / Book0.455.579.067.85
Net Income-£775.08K£70.60M£156.92M£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.53%-0.57%0.25%-0.06%
1 Month Performance3.84%-5.81%-5.57%0.95%
1 Year Performance41.22%96.79%57.50%75.33%

Keras Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KRS
Keras Resources
N/AGBX 1.73
-6.5%
N/A+41.2%£2.90M£978KN/A5
GROC
GreenRoc Mining
N/AGBX 3.50
flat
N/A-1.0%£9.93MN/AN/A6
TGR
Tirupati Graphite
N/AGBX 1.25
-2.3%
N/AN/A£9.53M£1.87MN/A36,000
PREM
Premier African Minerals
N/AGBX 0.02
+4.8%
N/A+91.7%£8.65MN/AN/A19
LND
Landore Resources
N/AGBX 1.93
flat
N/A-45.7%£7.15MN/A10.136

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:KRS) was last updated on 6/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners