Free Trial

Keras Resources (KRS) Competitors

GBX 1.97 +0.12 (+6.49%)
As of 11:42 AM Eastern

KRS vs. GROC, JAN, TGR, BMN, and THR

Should you buy Keras Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Keras Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Keras Resources include GreenRoc Mining (GROC), Jangada Mines (JAN), Tirupati Graphite (TGR), Bushveld Minerals (BMN), and Thor Energy (THR). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Keras Resources compare to GreenRoc Mining?

GreenRoc Mining (LON:GROC) and Keras Resources (LON:KRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

GreenRoc Mining has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, GreenRoc Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Keras Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
GreenRoc Mining Neutral
Keras Resources Neutral

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of GreenRoc Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

GreenRoc Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -64.57%. GreenRoc Mining's return on equity of -8.87% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GreenRoc MiningN/A -8.87% -5.36%
Keras Resources -64.57%-25.31%-3.15%

Keras Resources has higher revenue and earnings than GreenRoc Mining. GreenRoc Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GreenRoc MiningN/AN/A-£1.48M-£0.33N/A
Keras Resources£978K3.16-£775.08K-£88.82N/A

Summary

Keras Resources beats GreenRoc Mining on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Jangada Mines?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and Jangada Mines (LON:JAN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and risk.

Jangada Mines has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -64.57%. Keras Resources' return on equity of -25.31% beat Jangada Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-64.57% -25.31% -3.15%
Jangada Mines N/A -37.79%-14.48%

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Jangada Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of Jangada Mines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Jangada Mines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Keras Resources. Jangada Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£978K3.16-£775.08K-£88.82N/A
Jangada MinesN/AN/A-£835.63-£0.51N/A

Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jangada Mines has a beta of 1.739, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Jangada Mines had 2 more articles in the media than Keras Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Jangada Mines and 0 mentions for Keras Resources. Keras Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jangada Mines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
Jangada Mines Neutral

Summary

Jangada Mines beats Keras Resources on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Tirupati Graphite?

Tirupati Graphite (LON:TGR) and Keras Resources (LON:KRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

Tirupati Graphite has a net margin of -0.27% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -64.57%. Tirupati Graphite's return on equity of -0.07% beat Keras Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tirupati Graphite-0.27% -0.07% -5.46%
Keras Resources -64.57%-25.31%-3.15%

In the previous week, Tirupati Graphite's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Keras Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tirupati Graphite Neutral
Keras Resources Neutral

Keras Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tirupati Graphite. Tirupati Graphite is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tirupati Graphite£1.87M4.90-£3.59M-£5.45N/A
Keras Resources£978K3.16-£775.08K-£88.82N/A

2.1% of Tirupati Graphite shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Keras Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Tirupati Graphite shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tirupati Graphite has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tirupati Graphite beats Keras Resources on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Bushveld Minerals?

Keras Resources (LON:KRS) and Bushveld Minerals (LON:BMN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bushveld Minerals has a beta of 2.06, meaning that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

Keras Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bushveld Minerals. Keras Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bushveld Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Keras Resources£978K3.16-£775.08K-£88.82N/A
Bushveld Minerals£107.92M0.00-£116.82M-£0.06N/A

Keras Resources has a net margin of -64.57% compared to Bushveld Minerals' net margin of -124.94%. Keras Resources' return on equity of -25.31% beat Bushveld Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keras Resources-64.57% -25.31% -3.15%
Bushveld Minerals -124.94%-625.85%-13.14%

In the previous week, Keras Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Bushveld Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keras Resources Neutral
Bushveld Minerals Neutral

0.2% of Keras Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.1% of Bushveld Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 48.3% of Bushveld Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Keras Resources and Bushveld Minerals tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Keras Resources compare to Thor Energy?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Keras Resources (LON:KRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Keras Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Keras Resources. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Keras Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Positive
Keras Resources Neutral

Keras Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Thor Energy. Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keras Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Keras Resources£978K3.16-£775.08K-£88.82N/A

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.113, suggesting that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keras Resources has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Keras Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Keras Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Thor Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Keras Resources' net margin of -64.57%. Keras Resources' return on equity of -25.31% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Keras Resources -64.57%-25.31%-3.15%

Summary

Keras Resources beats Thor Energy on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Keras Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KRS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KRS vs. The Competition

MetricKeras ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.09M£1.57B£4.61B£2.73B
Dividend YieldN/A6.56%5.02%6.13%
P/E Ratio-0.0227.9521.95366.48
Price / Sales3.1649,363.936,006.1586,600.07
Price / Cash5.0024.6326.5827.87
Price / Book0.515.428.877.62
Net Income-£775.08K£70.60M£156.92M£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.68%-5.95%-4.84%-1.35%
1 Month Performance9.44%-7.22%-7.01%0.48%
1 Year Performance51.54%96.87%55.90%69.72%

Keras Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KRS
Keras Resources
N/AGBX 1.97
+6.5%
N/A+30.8%£3.09M£978KN/A5
GROC
GreenRoc Mining
N/AGBX 3.42
-7.3%
N/A+17.2%£9.70MN/AN/A6
JAN
Jangada Mines
N/AGBX 1.11
-3.5%
N/A+2.4%£9.36MN/AN/A1
TGR
Tirupati Graphite
N/AGBX 1.21
-2.2%
N/AN/A£9.25M£1.87MN/A36,000
BMN
Bushveld Minerals
N/AN/AN/AN/A£7.07M£107.92MN/A758

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:KRS) was last updated on 6/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners