Go Pro

Thor Energy (THR) Competitors

Thor Energy logo
GBX 0.60 +0.05 (+9.09%)
As of 09/25/2026 12:38 PM Eastern

THR vs. CRTM, KDNC, GWMO, CMET, and PALM

Should you buy Thor Energy stock or one of its competitors? Thor Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Critical Metals (CRTM), Cadence Minerals (KDNC), Great Western Mining (GWMO), Capital Metals (CMET), and Panther Metals (PALM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Thor Energy compare to Critical Metals?

Critical Metals (LON:CRTM) and Thor Energy (LON:THR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Critical Metals has a net margin of 27,276.84% compared to Thor Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Critical Metals' return on equity of -76.30% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Metals27,276.84% -76.30% -40.21%
Thor Energy N/A -94.46%-11.48%

Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical MetalsN/AN/A-£1.44M£138.170.18
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A

0.7% of Critical Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Thor Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.6% of Critical Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Critical Metals and Critical Metals both had 1 articles in the media. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Critical Metals' score of -0.52 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Critical Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Thor Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Critical Metals has a beta of 2.262, suggesting that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thor Energy has a beta of 0.127, suggesting that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Critical Metals beats Thor Energy on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Cadence Minerals?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Cadence Minerals (LON:KDNC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.127, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Minerals has a beta of 1.817, suggesting that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

Cadence Minerals has a net margin of 875.38% compared to Thor Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Cadence Minerals' return on equity of -9.74% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Cadence Minerals 875.38%-9.74%-3.99%

Cadence Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Cadence MineralsN/AN/A-£5.72M-£0.53N/A

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Cadence Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Cadence Minerals. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Cadence Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Positive
Cadence Minerals Neutral

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Cadence Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Cadence Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cadence Minerals beats Thor Energy on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Great Western Mining?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Great Western Mining (LON:GWMO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Great Western Mining's return on equity of -9.48% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Great Western Mining N/A -9.48%-5.92%

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.127, meaning that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Western Mining has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Great Western Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Great Western Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Great Western Mining had 3 more articles in the media than Thor Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Great Western Mining and 1 mentions for Thor Energy. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Great Western Mining's score of 0.23 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Great Western Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Great Western Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Great Western MiningN/AN/AN/A-£0.01N/A

Summary

Great Western Mining beats Thor Energy on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Capital Metals?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Capital Metals (LON:CMET) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Capital Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Capital MetalsN/AN/A-£1.24M-£0.24N/A

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.127, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Metals has a beta of 0.568, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of Capital Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of Capital Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Capital Metals. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Capital Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Positive
Capital Metals Neutral

Capital Metals' return on equity of -20.18% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Capital Metals N/A -20.18%-8.47%

Summary

Capital Metals beats Thor Energy on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Panther Metals?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Panther Metals (LON:PALM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Panther Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Panther Metals. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Panther Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Positive
Panther Metals Neutral

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Panther Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Panther Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Panther Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Panther MetalsN/AN/A-£1.69K-£24.85N/A

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.127, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Panther Metals has a beta of 0.607, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Panther Metals' return on equity of -62.33% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Panther Metals N/A -62.33%-10.72%

Summary

Panther Metals beats Thor Energy on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thor Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for THR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding THR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

THR vs. The Competition

MetricThor EnergyMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.67M£3.85B£4.83B£2.89B
Dividend Yield4.50%5.22%4.72%6.21%
P/E Ratio-0.6525.5325.78366.48
Price / SalesN/A28,981.0417,217.1489,848.70
Price / Cash3.0029.2126.6627.89
Price / Book0.1711.989.976.35
Net Income-£3.12M£127.53M£158.14M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.32%0.01%0.28%
1 Month Performance4.35%-2.91%-2.95%5.69%
1 Year Performance1.69%28.18%23.66%18.81%

Thor Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
THR
Thor Energy
N/AGBX 0.60
+9.1%
N/A+0.0%£5.67MN/AN/A1,083
CRTM
Critical Metals
N/AGBX 21
flat
N/A+143.9%£21.37MN/A0.153
KDNC
Cadence Minerals
N/AGBX 5.15
+1.0%
N/A+9.5%£21.29MN/AN/A6
GWMO
Great Western Mining
N/AGBX 3.96
-1.1%
N/A+115.7%£17.34MN/AN/A9
CMET
Capital Metals
N/AGBX 3.50
-6.7%
N/A-10.1%£17.23MN/AN/A22

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:THR) was last updated on 9/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners