Thor Energy (THR) Competitors

Thor Energy logo
GBX 0.55 -0.05 (-8.33%)
As of 06/26/2026 11:43 AM Eastern

THR vs. ARCM, MET1, GWMO, FCM, and POW

Should you buy Thor Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Thor Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Thor Energy include Arc Minerals (ARCM), Metals One (MET1), Great Western Mining (GWMO), First Class Metals (FCM), and Power Metal Resources (POW). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Thor Energy compare to Arc Minerals?

Arc Minerals (LON:ARCM) and Thor Energy (LON:THR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Arc Minerals and Arc Minerals both had 1 articles in the media. Arc Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Thor Energy's score of 0.71 indicating that Arc Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Arc Minerals Positive
Thor Energy Positive

Arc Minerals' return on equity of -28.44% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Arc MineralsN/A -28.44% -5.85%
Thor Energy N/A -94.46%-11.48%

Arc Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arc MineralsN/AN/A£9.42M-£0.25N/A
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A

Arc Minerals has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thor Energy has a beta of 0.113, suggesting that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

3.2% of Arc Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 16.2% of Arc Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Arc Minerals beats Thor Energy on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Metals One?

Metals One (LON:MET1) and Thor Energy (LON:THR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, Metals One had 1 more articles in the media than Thor Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Metals One and 1 mentions for Thor Energy. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Metals One's score of 0.31 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Metals One
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Thor Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Metals One's return on equity of -2.94% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Metals OneN/A -2.94% -112.94%
Thor Energy N/A -94.46%-11.48%

Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metals One, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Metals OneN/AN/A-£375.04K-£4.97N/A
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A

1.3% of Metals One shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Thor Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Metals One shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Metals One beats Thor Energy on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Great Western Mining?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Great Western Mining (LON:GWMO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Great Western Mining's return on equity of -9.48% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Great Western Mining N/A -9.48%-5.92%

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Great Western Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Great Western Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Western Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Great Western MiningN/AN/AN/A-£0.01N/A

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Great Western Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Great Western Mining. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Great Western Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Positive
Great Western Mining Neutral

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.113, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Western Mining has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Great Western Mining beats Thor Energy on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to First Class Metals?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and First Class Metals (LON:FCM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

First Class Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
First Class MetalsN/AN/A-£2.20M-£0.61N/A

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than First Class Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for First Class Metals. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat First Class Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Positive
First Class Metals Neutral

First Class Metals' return on equity of -55.27% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
First Class Metals N/A -55.27%N/A

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.6% of First Class Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of First Class Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.113, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Class Metals has a beta of 0.01640514, suggesting that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Thor Energy and First Class Metals tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Power Metal Resources?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Power Metal Resources (LON:POW) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Power Metal Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Thor Energy. Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Power Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Power Metal Resources£76K179.77N/A£3.053.97

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Power Metal Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Power Metal Resources. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Power Metal Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Positive
Power Metal Resources Neutral

Power Metal Resources has a net margin of 4,665.79% compared to Thor Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Power Metal Resources' return on equity of 13.20% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Power Metal Resources 4,665.79%13.20%-12.56%

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.6% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.113, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Power Metal Resources has a beta of 0.293, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Power Metal Resources beats Thor Energy on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thor Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for THR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding THR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

THR vs. The Competition

MetricThor EnergyOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.67M£1.49B£4.60B£2.78B
Dividend Yield4.50%6.56%5.03%6.16%
P/E Ratio-0.6027.3022.88366.66
Price / SalesN/A46,620.375,657.5986,088.44
Price / Cash3.0024.6326.8327.87
Price / Book0.165.288.787.79
Net Income-£3.12M£70.60M£157.40M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-9.54%-4.70%-3.15%-0.61%
1 Month Performance-26.67%-7.66%-6.25%-1.14%
1 Year Performance10.44%81.75%48.80%65.93%

Thor Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
THR
Thor Energy
N/AGBX 0.55
-8.3%
N/A+10.4%£5.67MN/AN/A1,083
ARCM
Arc Minerals
N/AGBX 0.75
+11.1%
N/A-42.1%£18.45MN/AN/A35
MET1
Metals One
N/AGBX 1.38
-6.8%
N/A-92.2%£15.59MN/AN/A3
GWMO
Great Western Mining
N/AGBX 3.43
-6.0%
N/A+254.2%£14.86MN/AN/A9
FCM
First Class Metals
N/AGBX 3.81
+3.0%
N/A+98.0%£14.73MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:THR) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners