Free Trial

Thor Energy (THR) Competitors

Thor Energy logo
GBX 0.57 -0.03 (-4.17%)
As of 11:50 AM Eastern

THR vs. RMR, KDNC, CMET, KAV, and GSP

Should you buy Thor Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Thor Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Thor Energy include Rome Resources (RMR), Cadence Minerals (KDNC), Capital Metals (CMET), Kavango Resources (KAV), and Gensource Potash (GSP). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Thor Energy compare to Rome Resources?

Rome Resources (LON:RMR) and Thor Energy (LON:THR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

4.1% of Rome Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 18.0% of Rome Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Rome Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Rome Resources. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Rome Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Rome Resources Neutral
Thor Energy Positive

Rome Resources has a beta of 0.008853154, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thor Energy has a beta of 0.054, suggesting that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rome Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rome ResourcesN/AN/AN/A£0.001,755.00
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A

Rome Resources' return on equity of -32.93% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rome ResourcesN/A -32.93% -3.97%
Thor Energy N/A -94.46%-11.48%

Summary

Rome Resources beats Thor Energy on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Cadence Minerals?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Cadence Minerals (LON:KDNC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Cadence Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Cadence MineralsN/AN/A-£5.72M-£0.55N/A

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Cadence Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Cadence Minerals. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Cadence Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Positive
Cadence Minerals Neutral

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.054, indicating that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Minerals has a beta of 1.861, indicating that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Cadence Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.8% of Cadence Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cadence Minerals has a net margin of 134.07% compared to Thor Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Cadence Minerals' return on equity of -9.71% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Cadence Minerals 134.07%-9.71%-3.99%

Summary

Cadence Minerals beats Thor Energy on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Capital Metals?

Capital Metals (LON:CMET) and Thor Energy (LON:THR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Capital Metals. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Capital Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Metals Neutral
Thor Energy Positive

0.3% of Capital Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Capital Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capital Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital MetalsN/AN/A-£1.24M-£0.24N/A
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A

Capital Metals has a beta of 0.6594983, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thor Energy has a beta of 0.054, suggesting that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Metals' return on equity of -21.08% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital MetalsN/A -21.08% -8.47%
Thor Energy N/A -94.46%-11.48%

Summary

Capital Metals beats Thor Energy on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Kavango Resources?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Kavango Resources (LON:KAV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Kavango Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Kavango Resources. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Kavango Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Positive
Kavango Resources Neutral

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.054, suggesting that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kavango Resources has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Kavango Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Thor Energy. Kavango Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Kavango Resources£1.72M16.99-£5.48K-£0.68N/A

Thor Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kavango Resources' net margin of -869.55%. Kavango Resources' return on equity of -68.85% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Kavango Resources -869.55%-68.85%-14.06%

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.0% of Kavango Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Thor Energy beats Kavango Resources on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Gensource Potash?

Gensource Potash (LON:GSP) and Thor Energy (LON:THR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Gensource Potash's return on equity of -45.96% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gensource PotashN/A -45.96% -10.31%
Thor Energy N/A -94.46%-11.48%

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.2% of Gensource Potash shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Gensource Potash. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Gensource Potash. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Gensource Potash's score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gensource Potash Neutral
Thor Energy Positive

Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gensource Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gensource PotashN/AN/A-£6.58M-£0.01N/A
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A

Gensource Potash has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Thor Energy has a beta of 0.054, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Thor Energy beats Gensource Potash on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thor Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for THR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding THR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

THR vs. The Competition

MetricThor EnergyOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.92M£1.59B£4.71B£2.77B
Dividend Yield4.50%6.54%4.95%6.12%
P/E Ratio-0.6329.0722.49365.54
Price / SalesN/A58,938.237,033.1287,173.10
Price / Cash3.0024.6327.2927.85
Price / Book0.165.579.127.68
Net Income-£3.12M£70.60M£156.62M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-15.81%-3.77%-4.36%-0.55%
1 Month Performance-6.20%-0.40%-2.03%3.15%
1 Year Performance25.00%102.31%60.03%73.57%

Thor Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
THR
Thor Energy
N/AGBX 0.58
-4.2%
N/A+30.4%£5.92MN/AN/A1,083
RMR
Rome Resources
N/AGBX 0.35
-6.4%
N/A+11.2%£26.84MN/A1,750.00N/A
KDNC
Cadence Minerals
N/AGBX 6.50
-8.3%
N/A+321.6%£26.60MN/AN/A6
CMET
Capital Metals
N/AGBX 5.20
+5.5%
N/A+72.4%£25.59MN/AN/A22
KAV
Kavango Resources
N/AGBX 0.70
-22.2%
N/A-15.1%£25.44M£1.72MN/A43

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:THR) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners