Do analysts recommend THR or FAR?

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 721.92%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Thor Energy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Thor Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Ferro-Alloy Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts recommend CTL or THR?

CleanTech Lithium currently has a consensus target price of GBX 17, suggesting a potential upside of 183.33%. Given CleanTech Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Thor Energy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CleanTech Lithium 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Thor Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation and earnings, CTL or THR?

CleanTech Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CleanTech Lithium N/A N/A -£2.19M -£2.20 N/A Thor Energy N/A N/A -£3.12M -£0.92 N/A

Is CTL or THR more profitable?

CleanTech Lithium's return on equity of -16.51% beat Thor Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CleanTech Lithium N/A -16.51% -13.50% Thor Energy N/A -94.46% -11.48%

Which has better earnings and valuation, THR or GSCU?

Great Southern Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Thor Energy N/A N/A -£3.12M -£0.92 N/A Great Southern Copper N/A N/A -£2.31B -£0.41 N/A

Is THR or GSCU more profitable?

Great Southern Copper's return on equity of -74.17% beat Thor Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Thor Energy N/A -94.46% -11.48% Great Southern Copper N/A -74.17% -29.67%

Does the media prefer THR or GSCU?

In the previous week, Thor Energy and Thor Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Great Southern Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Thor Energy 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Great Southern Copper 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings and valuation, RMR or THR?

Rome Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Rome Resources N/A N/A N/A -£0.02 N/A Thor Energy N/A N/A -£3.12M -£0.92 N/A

Is RMR or THR more profitable?

Rome Resources' return on equity of -9.76% beat Thor Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Rome Resources N/A -9.76% -3.97% Thor Energy N/A -94.46% -11.48%

Is THR or PDL more profitable?

Thor Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Petra Diamonds' net margin of -104.34%. Thor Energy's return on equity of -94.46% beat Petra Diamonds' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Thor Energy N/A -94.46% -11.48% Petra Diamonds -104.34% -333.85% -9.26%

Thor Energy (THR) Competitors

GBX 0.50 -0.03 (-4.76%)

As of 09/3/2026 11:08 AM Eastern

Compare

THR vs. FAR, CTL, GSCU, RMR, and PDL

Should you buy Thor Energy stock or one of its competitors? Thor Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR), CleanTech Lithium (CTL), Great Southern Copper (GSCU), Rome Resources (RMR), and Petra Diamonds (PDL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Thor Energy compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and risk.

Thor Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thor Energy	N/A	N/A	-£3.12M	-£0.92	N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources	£4.53M	4.73	-£9.69M	-£1.70	N/A

Thor Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thor Energy	N/A	-94.46%	-11.48%
Ferro-Alloy Resources	-185.72%	283.86%	-21.47%

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Ferro-Alloy Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy	Positive
Ferro-Alloy Resources	Neutral

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.127, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.819, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 721.92%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Thor Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thor Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Thor Energy on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to CleanTech Lithium?

CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) and Thor Energy (LON:THR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

CleanTech Lithium currently has a consensus target price of GBX 17, suggesting a potential upside of 183.33%. Given CleanTech Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Thor Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CleanTech Lithium	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Thor Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than CleanTech Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for CleanTech Lithium. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat CleanTech Lithium's score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CleanTech Lithium	Neutral
Thor Energy	Positive

CleanTech Lithium's return on equity of -16.51% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CleanTech Lithium	N/A	-16.51%	-13.50%
Thor Energy	N/A	-94.46%	-11.48%

CleanTech Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CleanTech Lithium	N/A	N/A	-£2.19M	-£2.20	N/A
Thor Energy	N/A	N/A	-£3.12M	-£0.92	N/A

0.9% of CleanTech Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Thor Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of CleanTech Lithium shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 179% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thor Energy has a beta of 0.127, suggesting that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Thor Energy beats CleanTech Lithium on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Great Southern Copper?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Great Southern Copper (LON:GSCU) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Great Southern Copper's return on equity of -74.17% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thor Energy	N/A	-94.46%	-11.48%
Great Southern Copper	N/A	-74.17%	-29.67%

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Great Southern Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Great Southern Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thor Energy	N/A	N/A	-£3.12M	-£0.92	N/A
Great Southern Copper	N/A	N/A	-£2.31B	-£0.41	N/A

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.127, suggesting that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Southern Copper has a beta of -0.41, suggesting that its stock price is 141% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Thor Energy and Thor Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Great Southern Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Great Southern Copper	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Thor Energy beats Great Southern Copper on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Rome Resources?

Rome Resources (LON:RMR) and Thor Energy (LON:THR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Rome Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Rome Resources. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Rome Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Rome Resources	Neutral
Thor Energy	Positive

Rome Resources' return on equity of -9.76% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Rome Resources	N/A	-9.76%	-3.97%
Thor Energy	N/A	-94.46%	-11.48%

Rome Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Rome Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	-£0.02	N/A
Thor Energy	N/A	N/A	-£3.12M	-£0.92	N/A

4.1% of Rome Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Thor Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.6% of Rome Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Rome Resources has a beta of 0.551, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thor Energy has a beta of 0.127, meaning that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Rome Resources beats Thor Energy on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thor Energy compare to Petra Diamonds?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Petra Diamonds (LON:PDL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.127, suggesting that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petra Diamonds has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Petra Diamonds shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Petra Diamonds shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Thor Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Petra Diamonds. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Thor Energy and 0 mentions for Petra Diamonds. Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Petra Diamonds' score of 0.67 indicating that Thor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy	Positive
Petra Diamonds	Positive

Thor Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Petra Diamonds' net margin of -104.34%. Thor Energy's return on equity of -94.46% beat Petra Diamonds' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thor Energy	N/A	-94.46%	-11.48%
Petra Diamonds	-104.34%	-333.85%	-9.26%

Thor Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Petra Diamonds. Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petra Diamonds, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thor Energy	N/A	N/A	-£3.12M	-£0.92	N/A
Petra Diamonds	£192M	0.12	-£11.38M	-£84.51	N/A

Summary

Thor Energy and Petra Diamonds tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thor Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding THR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

THR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Thor Energy	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£5.15M	£4.05B	£5.07B	£2.91B
Dividend Yield	4.50%	5.17%	4.67%	6.18%
P/E Ratio	-0.54	25.58	26.18	364.48
Price / Sales	N/A	8,871.17	5,280.50	83,785.86
Price / Cash	3.00	29.68	27.09	27.89
Price / Book	0.14	12.74	10.63	6.81
Net Income	-£3.12M	£125.14M	£156.32M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-9.09%	-0.24%	-0.28%	-0.84%
1 Month Performance	N/A	21.37%	16.21%	2.08%
1 Year Performance	-7.06%	57.36%	45.06%	21.69%

Thor Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
THR Thor Energy	N/A	GBX 0.50 -4.8%	N/A	+1.0%	£5.15M	N/A	N/A	1,083	Positive News Gap Down
FAR Ferro-Alloy Resources	N/A	GBX 3.80 +2.7%	GBX 30 +689.5%	-58.5%	£22.34M	£4.53M	N/A	1,000
CTL CleanTech Lithium	1.7696 of 5 stars	GBX 6 flat	GBX 17 +183.3%	+15.3%	£21.78M	N/A	N/A	20
GSCU Great Southern Copper	N/A	GBX 2.80 +12.0%	N/A	+26.0%	£21.65M	N/A	N/A	9
RMR Rome Resources	N/A	GBX 0.28 -3.4%	N/A	-38.4%	£21.50M	N/A	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:THR) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thor Energy (THR) Competitors

THR vs. FAR, CTL, GSCU, RMR, and PDL

How does Thor Energy compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Summary

How does Thor Energy compare to CleanTech Lithium?

Summary

How does Thor Energy compare to Great Southern Copper?

Summary

How does Thor Energy compare to Rome Resources?

Summary

How does Thor Energy compare to Petra Diamonds?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

THR vs. The Competition

Thor Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Thor Energy (THR) Competitors

THR vs. FAR, CTL, GSCU, RMR, and PDL

How does Thor Energy compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, THR or FAR?

Is THR or FAR more profitable?

Does the media favor THR or FAR?

Which has more volatility & risk, THR or FAR?

Do analysts recommend THR or FAR?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in THR or FAR?

Summary

How does Thor Energy compare to CleanTech Lithium?

Do analysts recommend CTL or THR?

Does the media favor CTL or THR?

Is CTL or THR more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CTL or THR?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CTL or THR?

Which has more volatility & risk, CTL or THR?

Summary

How does Thor Energy compare to Great Southern Copper?

Is THR or GSCU more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in THR or GSCU?

Which has better earnings and valuation, THR or GSCU?

Which has more risk & volatility, THR or GSCU?

Does the media prefer THR or GSCU?

Summary

How does Thor Energy compare to Rome Resources?

Does the media prefer RMR or THR?

Is RMR or THR more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, RMR or THR?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of RMR or THR?

Which has more risk and volatility, RMR or THR?

Summary

How does Thor Energy compare to Petra Diamonds?

Which has more volatility and risk, THR or PDL?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in THR or PDL?

Does the media prefer THR or PDL?

Is THR or PDL more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, THR or PDL?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

THR vs. The Competition

Thor Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools