Free Trial

URU Metals (URU) Competitors

URU Metals logo
GBX 5.99 -0.01 (-0.17%)
As of 08:43 AM Eastern

URU vs. BZT, CLA, CTL, GWMO, and BHL

Should you buy URU Metals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares URU Metals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with URU Metals include Bezant Resources (BZT), Celsius Resources (CLA), CleanTech Lithium (CTL), Great Western Mining (GWMO), and Bradda Head Lithium (BHL). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does URU Metals compare to Bezant Resources?

URU Metals (LON:URU) and Bezant Resources (LON:BZT) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Bezant Resources' return on equity of 39.72% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
URU MetalsN/A -42.52% -16.40%
Bezant Resources N/A 39.72%-41.17%

In the previous week, URU Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Bezant Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
URU Metals Neutral
Bezant Resources Neutral

URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bezant Resources has a beta of 0.852, suggesting that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

URU Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bezant Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.003.00
Bezant ResourcesN/AN/A-£8.40K£0.018.67

0.0% of URU Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Bezant Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 65.0% of URU Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Bezant Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Bezant Resources beats URU Metals on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does URU Metals compare to Celsius Resources?

Celsius Resources (LON:CLA) and URU Metals (LON:URU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Celsius Resources' return on equity of -7.35% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celsius ResourcesN/A -7.35% -4.41%
URU Metals N/A -42.52%-16.40%

Celsius Resources has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Celsius Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of URU Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.5% of Celsius Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 65.0% of URU Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Celsius Resources has higher revenue and earnings than URU Metals. Celsius Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than URU Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius Resources£647.0022,996.05-£2.33M-£0.06N/A
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.003.00

In the previous week, Celsius Resources had 1 more articles in the media than URU Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Celsius Resources and 0 mentions for URU Metals. Celsius Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled URU Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celsius Resources Neutral
URU Metals Neutral

Summary

Celsius Resources beats URU Metals on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does URU Metals compare to CleanTech Lithium?

URU Metals (LON:URU) and CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

0.0% of URU Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 65.0% of URU Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CleanTech Lithium has a consensus price target of GBX 20, suggesting a potential upside of 150.00%. Given CleanTech Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than URU Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
URU Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
CleanTech Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.79, indicating that its stock price is 179% less volatile than the broader market.

URU Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CleanTech Lithium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.003.00
CleanTech LithiumN/AN/A-£2.19M£0.948.51

In the previous week, URU Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CleanTech Lithium'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
URU Metals Neutral
CleanTech Lithium Neutral

URU Metals' return on equity of -42.52% beat CleanTech Lithium's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
URU MetalsN/A -42.52% -16.40%
CleanTech Lithium N/A -43.43%-13.50%

Summary

CleanTech Lithium beats URU Metals on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does URU Metals compare to Great Western Mining?

Great Western Mining (LON:GWMO) and URU Metals (LON:URU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Great Western Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than URU Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Western MiningN/AN/AN/A-£2.85N/A
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.003.00

Great Western Mining has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

5.8% of Great Western Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of URU Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Great Western Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 65.0% of URU Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Great Western Mining had 2 more articles in the media than URU Metals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Great Western Mining and 0 mentions for URU Metals. Great Western Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat URU Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Great Western Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Western Mining Neutral
URU Metals Neutral

Great Western Mining's return on equity of -9.48% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Western MiningN/A -9.48% -5.92%
URU Metals N/A -42.52%-16.40%

Summary

Great Western Mining beats URU Metals on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does URU Metals compare to Bradda Head Lithium?

Bradda Head Lithium (LON:BHL) and URU Metals (LON:URU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Bradda Head Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled URU Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bradda Head Lithium Neutral
URU Metals Neutral

Bradda Head Lithium has a beta of 0.196, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Bradda Head Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than URU Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bradda Head LithiumN/AN/A£3.63M-£0.21N/A
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.003.00

Bradda Head Lithium's return on equity of -6.46% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bradda Head LithiumN/A -6.46% -13.61%
URU Metals N/A -42.52%-16.40%

0.5% of Bradda Head Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of URU Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 20.4% of Bradda Head Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 65.0% of URU Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Bradda Head Lithium beats URU Metals on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get URU Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for URU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding URU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

URU vs. The Competition

MetricURU MetalsOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.81M£1.69B£4.91B£2.78B
Dividend Yield3.08%6.55%4.95%6.13%
P/E Ratio3.0030.6423.41364.74
Price / SalesN/A55,272.106,526.1787,565.33
Price / Cash1.4724.6327.3527.85
Price / Book-0.025.859.467.71
Net Income-£4.64M£70.60M£156.62M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.17%0.93%0.17%0.07%
1 Month Performance2.39%2.04%0.88%3.26%
1 Year Performance-1.80%113.32%70.15%75.52%

URU Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
URU
URU Metals
N/AGBX 5.99
-0.2%
N/A+16.5%£5.81MN/A3.00N/A
BZT
Bezant Resources
N/AGBX 0.11
+15.8%
N/A+265.4%£20.53MN/A9.175
CLA
Celsius Resources
N/AGBX 0.50
+8.7%
N/A+32.4%£18.60M£647.00N/AN/A
CTL
CleanTech Lithium
2.3684 of 5 stars
GBX 8.50
+3.0%
GBX 20
+135.3%
+37.5%£17.36MN/A9.0420
GWMO
Great Western Mining
N/AGBX 3.98
-5.4%
N/A+160.3%£16.50MN/AN/A9

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:URU) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners