Free Trial

URU Metals (URU) Competitors

URU Metals logo
GBX 2.70 -0.07 (-2.52%)
As of 10/5/2026 11:40 AM Eastern

URU vs. GROC, GLR, FME, SGZ, and CCZ

Should you buy URU Metals stock or one of its competitors? URU Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include GreenRoc Mining (GROC), Galileo Resources (GLR), Future Metals (FME), Scotgold Resources (SGZ), and Castillo Copper (CCZ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does URU Metals compare to GreenRoc Mining?

URU Metals (LON:URU) and GreenRoc Mining (LON:GROC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, URU Metals had 4 more articles in the media than GreenRoc Mining. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for URU Metals and 0 mentions for GreenRoc Mining. GreenRoc Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat URU Metals' score of -0.25 indicating that GreenRoc Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
URU Metals Neutral
GreenRoc Mining Neutral

URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GreenRoc Mining has a beta of 0.257, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

GreenRoc Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than URU Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.001.35
GreenRoc MiningN/AN/A-£1.48M-£0.38N/A

GreenRoc Mining's return on equity of -12.04% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
URU MetalsN/A -42.52% -16.40%
GreenRoc Mining N/A -12.04%-5.36%

0.0% of URU Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 65.0% of URU Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of GreenRoc Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

URU Metals and GreenRoc Mining tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does URU Metals compare to Galileo Resources?

URU Metals (LON:URU) and Galileo Resources (LON:GLR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, URU Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Galileo Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for URU Metals and 3 mentions for Galileo Resources. Galileo Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat URU Metals' score of -0.25 indicating that Galileo Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
URU Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Galileo Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galileo Resources has a beta of 0.178, suggesting that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

Galileo Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than URU Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.001.35
Galileo ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.05M-£0.14N/A

Galileo Resources' return on equity of -13.77% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
URU MetalsN/A -42.52% -16.40%
Galileo Resources N/A -13.77%-4.51%

0.0% of URU Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of Galileo Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 65.0% of URU Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Galileo Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Galileo Resources beats URU Metals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does URU Metals compare to Future Metals?

Future Metals (LON:FME) and URU Metals (LON:URU) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, URU Metals had 3 more articles in the media than Future Metals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for URU Metals and 1 mentions for Future Metals. Future Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat URU Metals' score of -0.25 indicating that Future Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Future Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
URU Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Future Metals has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of URU Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Future Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 65.0% of URU Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

URU Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Future Metals. Future Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than URU Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Future Metals£155.84K67.65-£7.83M-£0.40N/A
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.001.35

URU Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Future Metals' net margin of -1,051.73%. Future Metals' return on equity of -11.89% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Future Metals-1,051.73% -11.89% -11.36%
URU Metals N/A -42.52%-16.40%

Summary

URU Metals beats Future Metals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does URU Metals compare to Scotgold Resources?

Scotgold Resources (LON:SGZ) and URU Metals (LON:URU) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

0.0% of URU Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 63.4% of Scotgold Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 65.0% of URU Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

URU Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Scotgold Resources. Scotgold Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than URU Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Scotgold Resources£20.84M0.00-£14.68M-£0.13N/A
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.001.35

Scotgold Resources has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

URU Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Scotgold Resources' net margin of -70.46%. URU Metals' return on equity of -42.52% beat Scotgold Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Scotgold Resources-70.46% -67.31% -14.03%
URU Metals N/A -42.52%-16.40%

In the previous week, URU Metals had 4 more articles in the media than Scotgold Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for URU Metals and 0 mentions for Scotgold Resources. Scotgold Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat URU Metals' score of -0.25 indicating that Scotgold Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Scotgold Resources Neutral
URU Metals Neutral

Summary

URU Metals beats Scotgold Resources on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does URU Metals compare to Castillo Copper?

Castillo Copper (LON:CCZ) and URU Metals (LON:URU) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Castillo Copper's return on equity of -12.89% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Castillo CopperN/A -12.89% -8.77%
URU Metals N/A -42.52%-16.40%

0.0% of URU Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.6% of Castillo Copper shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 65.0% of URU Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Castillo Copper has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Castillo Copper has higher revenue and earnings than URU Metals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Castillo Copper£145.13K0.00-£1.46MN/AN/A
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.001.35

In the previous week, URU Metals had 4 more articles in the media than Castillo Copper. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for URU Metals and 0 mentions for Castillo Copper. Castillo Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat URU Metals' score of -0.25 indicating that Castillo Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Castillo Copper Neutral
URU Metals Neutral

Summary

Castillo Copper beats URU Metals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get URU Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for URU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

URU vs. The Competition

MetricURU MetalsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.62M£3.76B£4.72B£2.81B
Dividend Yield3.08%5.25%4.76%6.26%
P/E Ratio1.3525.2925.12366.69
Price / SalesN/A27,163.7216,186.4389,148.58
Price / Cash1.4726.3824.3927.89
Price / Book-0.0111.339.466.98
Net Income-£4.64M£127.14M£159.30M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-24.97%-1.13%-1.03%-0.67%
1 Month Performance-32.38%-5.20%-4.97%-1.14%
1 Year Performance-37.60%19.03%16.26%23.00%

URU Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
URU
URU Metals
N/AGBX 2.71
-2.5%
N/A-39.9%£2.62MN/A1.35N/A
GROC
GreenRoc Mining
N/AGBX 3.80
-5.0%
N/A+37.1%£10.78MN/AN/A6
GLR
Galileo Resources
N/AGBX 0.77
-4.3%
N/A-2.0%£10.63MN/AN/A3
FME
Future Metals
N/AGBX 1.10
-2.2%
N/A-33.7%£10.54M£155.84KN/A123,200
SGZ
Scotgold Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/A£10.47M£20.84MN/A96

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:URU) was last updated on 10/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners