Go Pro

PowerFleet (AIOT) Competitors

PowerFleet logo
$4.06 -0.12 (-2.76%)
As of 12:51 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

AIOT vs. IMOS, NN, WOLF, AMBQ, and SHLS

Should you buy PowerFleet stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PowerFleet with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PowerFleet include Chipmos Technologies (IMOS), NextNav (NN), Wolfspeed (WOLF), Ambiq Micro (AMBQ), and Shoals Technologies Group (SHLS). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does PowerFleet compare to Chipmos Technologies?

PowerFleet (NASDAQ:AIOT) and Chipmos Technologies (NASDAQ:IMOS) are both electronic equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

73.4% of PowerFleet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of PowerFleet shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Chipmos Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chipmos Technologies has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Chipmos Technologies has a net margin of 3.05% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -4.63%. Chipmos Technologies' return on equity of 3.28% beat PowerFleet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerFleet-4.63% -1.33% -0.66%
Chipmos Technologies 3.05%3.28%1.76%

In the previous week, Chipmos Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than PowerFleet. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Chipmos Technologies and 2 mentions for PowerFleet. PowerFleet's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Chipmos Technologies' score of 0.59 indicating that PowerFleet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PowerFleet
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chipmos Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PowerFleet currently has a consensus target price of $9.67, indicating a potential upside of 138.39%. Given PowerFleet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe PowerFleet is more favorable than Chipmos Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PowerFleet
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Chipmos Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Chipmos Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than PowerFleet. PowerFleet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipmos Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerFleet$443.78M1.23-$20.55M-$0.16N/A
Chipmos Technologies$762.90M2.93$17.55M$0.7485.84

Summary

Chipmos Technologies beats PowerFleet on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerFleet compare to NextNav?

NextNav (NASDAQ:NN) and PowerFleet (NASDAQ:AIOT) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, NextNav had 6 more articles in the media than PowerFleet. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for NextNav and 2 mentions for PowerFleet. NextNav's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat PowerFleet's score of 0.61 indicating that NextNav is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NextNav
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PowerFleet
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PowerFleet has higher revenue and earnings than NextNav. PowerFleet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NextNav, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NextNav$4.03M453.06-$189.25M-$1.21N/A
PowerFleet$443.78M1.23-$20.55M-$0.16N/A

NextNav currently has a consensus price target of $32.33, suggesting a potential upside of 141.67%. PowerFleet has a consensus price target of $9.67, suggesting a potential upside of 138.39%. Given NextNav's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe NextNav is more favorable than PowerFleet.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NextNav
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
PowerFleet
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

PowerFleet has a net margin of -4.63% compared to NextNav's net margin of -3,921.17%. NextNav's return on equity of 0.00% beat PowerFleet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NextNav-3,921.17% N/A -34.03%
PowerFleet -4.63%-1.33%-0.66%

79.2% of NextNav shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.4% of PowerFleet shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.8% of NextNav shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of PowerFleet shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

NextNav has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerFleet has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

NextNav beats PowerFleet on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerFleet compare to Wolfspeed?

PowerFleet (NASDAQ:AIOT) and Wolfspeed (NYSE:WOLF) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

PowerFleet presently has a consensus target price of $9.67, suggesting a potential upside of 138.39%. Wolfspeed has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential downside of 16.97%. Given PowerFleet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe PowerFleet is more favorable than Wolfspeed.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PowerFleet
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Wolfspeed
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

PowerFleet has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Wolfspeed. PowerFleet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfspeed, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerFleet$443.78M1.23-$20.55M-$0.16N/A
Wolfspeed$759.70M2.06-$548.82M-$10.56N/A

Wolfspeed has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -4.63%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of 0.00% beat PowerFleet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerFleet-4.63% -1.33% -0.66%
Wolfspeed N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Wolfspeed had 4 more articles in the media than PowerFleet. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Wolfspeed and 2 mentions for PowerFleet. PowerFleet's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Wolfspeed's score of 0.10 indicating that PowerFleet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PowerFleet
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Wolfspeed
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

73.4% of PowerFleet shares are held by institutional investors. 6.3% of PowerFleet shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

PowerFleet beats Wolfspeed on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerFleet compare to Ambiq Micro?

PowerFleet (NASDAQ:AIOT) and Ambiq Micro (NYSE:AMBQ) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Ambiq Micro had 3 more articles in the media than PowerFleet. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Ambiq Micro and 2 mentions for PowerFleet. Ambiq Micro's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat PowerFleet's score of 0.61 indicating that Ambiq Micro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PowerFleet
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ambiq Micro
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PowerFleet currently has a consensus price target of $9.67, suggesting a potential upside of 138.39%. Ambiq Micro has a consensus price target of $71.83, suggesting a potential downside of 7.84%. Given PowerFleet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe PowerFleet is more favorable than Ambiq Micro.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PowerFleet
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Ambiq Micro
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

73.4% of PowerFleet shares are held by institutional investors. 6.3% of PowerFleet shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.0% of Ambiq Micro shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

PowerFleet has higher revenue and earnings than Ambiq Micro. PowerFleet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ambiq Micro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerFleet$443.78M1.23-$20.55M-$0.16N/A
Ambiq Micro$72.51M22.98-$36.46M-$20.69N/A

PowerFleet has a net margin of -4.63% compared to Ambiq Micro's net margin of -46.86%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -1.33% beat Ambiq Micro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerFleet-4.63% -1.33% -0.66%
Ambiq Micro -46.86%-45.10%-16.29%

Summary

PowerFleet beats Ambiq Micro on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerFleet compare to Shoals Technologies Group?

Shoals Technologies Group (NASDAQ:SHLS) and PowerFleet (NASDAQ:AIOT) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Shoals Technologies Group has higher revenue and earnings than PowerFleet. PowerFleet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shoals Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shoals Technologies Group$535.53M3.21$33.57M$0.2051.33
PowerFleet$443.78M1.23-$20.55M-$0.16N/A

Shoals Technologies Group has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerFleet has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Shoals Technologies Group has a net margin of 6.27% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -4.63%. Shoals Technologies Group's return on equity of 10.03% beat PowerFleet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shoals Technologies Group6.27% 10.03% 6.63%
PowerFleet -4.63%-1.33%-0.66%

Shoals Technologies Group presently has a consensus price target of $10.46, indicating a potential upside of 1.91%. PowerFleet has a consensus price target of $9.67, indicating a potential upside of 138.39%. Given PowerFleet's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PowerFleet is more favorable than Shoals Technologies Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shoals Technologies Group
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
PowerFleet
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Shoals Technologies Group had 5 more articles in the media than PowerFleet. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Shoals Technologies Group and 2 mentions for PowerFleet. Shoals Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat PowerFleet's score of 0.61 indicating that Shoals Technologies Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Shoals Technologies Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PowerFleet
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

73.4% of PowerFleet shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Shoals Technologies Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of PowerFleet shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Shoals Technologies Group beats PowerFleet on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PowerFleet News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AIOT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AIOT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AIOT vs. The Competition

MetricPowerFleetTRANS IndustryTransportation SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$542.76M$7.33B$8.82B$12.41B
Dividend YieldN/A2.55%974.02%9.67%
P/E Ratio-25.2831.5225.1724.07
Price / Sales1.232.495.5487.33
Price / Cash8.1010.158.4659.37
Price / Book1.142.472.206.20
Net Income-$20.55M$243.42M$532.19M$331.71M
7 Day Performance-5.48%0.83%-0.33%-1.47%
1 Month Performance3.71%0.95%-1.65%-2.03%
1 Year Performance-11.27%-4.54%25.57%17.81%

PowerFleet Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AIOT
PowerFleet
3.6226 of 5 stars
$4.06
-2.8%
$9.67
+138.4%
-6.9%$544.10M$443.78MN/A2,658
IMOS
Chipmos Technologies
0.8805 of 5 stars
$64.85
-6.2%
N/A+262.4%$2.28B$762.90M88.245,747
NN
NextNav
3.3231 of 5 stars
$15.39
-0.3%
$37.50
+143.6%
-10.6%$2.10B$4.57MN/A60
WOLF
Wolfspeed
1.0151 of 5 stars
$35.24
+4.7%
$20.00
-43.2%
+2,034.4%$1.83BN/AN/A3,434
AMBQ
Ambiq Micro
1.6508 of 5 stars
$84.05
+3.3%
$71.83
-14.5%
N/A$1.80B$72.51MN/A190

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:AIOT) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners