Which has better valuation & earnings, BITF or IDCC?

InterDigital has higher revenue and earnings than Bitfarms. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than InterDigital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Bitfarms $229.28M 8.70 -$138.65M -$0.23 N/A InterDigital $834.02M 10.63 $406.64M $8.67 39.64

Is BITF or IDCC more profitable?

InterDigital has a net margin of 38.32% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. InterDigital's return on equity of 28.17% beat Bitfarms' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Bitfarms -48.26% -4.48% -3.71% InterDigital 38.32% 28.17% 15.00%

Does the media prefer BITF or IDCC?

In the previous week, InterDigital had 7 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for InterDigital and 3 mentions for Bitfarms. InterDigital's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Bitfarms' score of 0.94 indicating that InterDigital is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bitfarms 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive InterDigital 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to PCOR or BITF?

In the previous week, Procore Technologies had 8 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Procore Technologies and 3 mentions for Bitfarms. Bitfarms' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Procore Technologies' score of 0.81 indicating that Bitfarms is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Procore Technologies 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bitfarms 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, BITF or WULF?

Bitfarms has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Bitfarms $229.28M 8.70 -$138.65M -$0.23 N/A TeraWulf $168.46M 51.48 -$661.42M -$4.37 N/A

Is BITF or WULF more profitable?

Bitfarms has a net margin of -48.26% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Bitfarms' return on equity of -4.48% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Bitfarms -48.26% -4.48% -3.71% TeraWulf -1,179.94% -512.60% -9.63%

Does the media prefer BITF or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 12 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for TeraWulf and 3 mentions for Bitfarms. Bitfarms' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.83 indicating that Bitfarms is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bitfarms 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TeraWulf 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BITF or TTAN?

Bitfarms has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ServiceTitan. ServiceTitan is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bitfarms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Bitfarms $229.28M 8.70 -$138.65M -$0.23 N/A ServiceTitan $960.97M 8.97 -$159.85M -$1.45 N/A

Is BITF or TTAN more profitable?

ServiceTitan has a net margin of -13.44% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. Bitfarms' return on equity of -4.48% beat ServiceTitan's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Bitfarms -48.26% -4.48% -3.71% ServiceTitan -13.44% -5.59% -4.79%

Does the media prefer BITF or TTAN?

In the previous week, ServiceTitan had 10 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for ServiceTitan and 3 mentions for Bitfarms. Bitfarms' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat ServiceTitan's score of 0.70 indicating that Bitfarms is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bitfarms 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ServiceTitan 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, BITF or DBX?

Dropbox has higher revenue and earnings than Bitfarms. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dropbox, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Bitfarms $229.28M 8.70 -$138.65M -$0.23 N/A Dropbox $2.52B 3.19 $508.40M $1.80 19.12

Is BITF or DBX more profitable?

Dropbox has a net margin of 17.49% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. Bitfarms' return on equity of -4.48% beat Dropbox's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Bitfarms -48.26% -4.48% -3.71% Dropbox 17.49% -24.26% 15.88%

Does the media refer more to BITF or DBX?

In the previous week, Dropbox had 8 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Dropbox and 3 mentions for Bitfarms. Bitfarms' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Dropbox's score of 0.73 indicating that Bitfarms is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bitfarms 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Dropbox 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Bitfarms (BITF) Competitors

$3.31 -0.23 (-6.50%)

As of 08/13/2026

Compare

BITF vs. IDCC, PCOR, WULF, TTAN, and DBX

Should you buy Bitfarms stock or one of its competitors? Bitfarms's main competitors and comparable companies include InterDigital (IDCC), Procore Technologies (PCOR), TeraWulf (WULF), ServiceTitan (TTAN), and Dropbox (DBX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does Bitfarms compare to InterDigital?

Bitfarms (NASDAQ:BITF) and InterDigital (NASDAQ:IDCC) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, InterDigital had 7 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for InterDigital and 3 mentions for Bitfarms. InterDigital's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Bitfarms' score of 0.94 indicating that InterDigital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bitfarms	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
InterDigital	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

20.6% of Bitfarms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of InterDigital shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Bitfarms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of InterDigital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

InterDigital has a net margin of 38.32% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. InterDigital's return on equity of 28.17% beat Bitfarms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bitfarms	-48.26%	-4.48%	-3.71%
InterDigital	38.32%	28.17%	15.00%

Bitfarms has a beta of 3.77, suggesting that its stock price is 277% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, InterDigital has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Bitfarms currently has a consensus target price of $4.68, indicating a potential upside of 41.24%. InterDigital has a consensus target price of $416.67, indicating a potential upside of 21.25%. Given Bitfarms' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bitfarms is more favorable than InterDigital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bitfarms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
InterDigital	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

InterDigital has higher revenue and earnings than Bitfarms. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than InterDigital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bitfarms	$229.28M	8.70	-$138.65M	-$0.23	N/A
InterDigital	$834.02M	10.63	$406.64M	$8.67	39.64

Summary

InterDigital beats Bitfarms on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bitfarms compare to Procore Technologies?

Procore Technologies (NYSE:PCOR) and Bitfarms (NASDAQ:BITF) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Procore Technologies has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. Procore Technologies' return on equity of 0.71% beat Bitfarms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Procore Technologies	-2.73%	0.71%	0.41%
Bitfarms	-48.26%	-4.48%	-3.71%

Procore Technologies has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bitfarms has a beta of 3.77, meaning that its stock price is 277% more volatile than the broader market.

81.1% of Procore Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.6% of Bitfarms shares are held by institutional investors. 16.8% of Procore Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Bitfarms shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Procore Technologies had 8 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Procore Technologies and 3 mentions for Bitfarms. Bitfarms' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Procore Technologies' score of 0.81 indicating that Bitfarms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Procore Technologies	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bitfarms	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Procore Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Bitfarms. Procore Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bitfarms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Procore Technologies	$1.32B	6.85	-$100.78M	-$0.26	N/A
Bitfarms	$229.28M	8.70	-$138.65M	-$0.23	N/A

Procore Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $70.44, suggesting a potential upside of 18.09%. Bitfarms has a consensus target price of $4.68, suggesting a potential upside of 41.24%. Given Bitfarms' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bitfarms is more favorable than Procore Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Procore Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Bitfarms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

Summary

Procore Technologies beats Bitfarms on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bitfarms compare to TeraWulf?

Bitfarms (NASDAQ:BITF) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Bitfarms has a beta of 3.77, meaning that its stock price is 277% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.76, meaning that its stock price is 276% more volatile than the broader market.

Bitfarms has a net margin of -48.26% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -1,179.94%. Bitfarms' return on equity of -4.48% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bitfarms	-48.26%	-4.48%	-3.71%
TeraWulf	-1,179.94%	-512.60%	-9.63%

Bitfarms has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bitfarms	$229.28M	8.70	-$138.65M	-$0.23	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.46M	51.48	-$661.42M	-$4.37	N/A

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 12 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for TeraWulf and 3 mentions for Bitfarms. Bitfarms' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat TeraWulf's score of 0.83 indicating that Bitfarms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bitfarms	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TeraWulf	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Bitfarms currently has a consensus target price of $4.68, indicating a potential upside of 41.24%. TeraWulf has a consensus target price of $34.21, indicating a potential upside of 96.83%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Bitfarms.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bitfarms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
TeraWulf	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

20.6% of Bitfarms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.5% of Bitfarms shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

TeraWulf beats Bitfarms on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bitfarms compare to ServiceTitan?

Bitfarms (NASDAQ:BITF) and ServiceTitan (NASDAQ:TTAN) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

Bitfarms has a beta of 3.77, indicating that its share price is 277% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ServiceTitan has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

ServiceTitan has a net margin of -13.44% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. Bitfarms' return on equity of -4.48% beat ServiceTitan's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bitfarms	-48.26%	-4.48%	-3.71%
ServiceTitan	-13.44%	-5.59%	-4.79%

Bitfarms presently has a consensus price target of $4.68, indicating a potential upside of 41.24%. ServiceTitan has a consensus price target of $111.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.79%. Given Bitfarms' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Bitfarms is more favorable than ServiceTitan.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bitfarms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
ServiceTitan	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.74

Bitfarms has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ServiceTitan. ServiceTitan is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bitfarms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bitfarms	$229.28M	8.70	-$138.65M	-$0.23	N/A
ServiceTitan	$960.97M	8.97	-$159.85M	-$1.45	N/A

20.6% of Bitfarms shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.5% of Bitfarms shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 39.9% of ServiceTitan shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ServiceTitan had 10 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for ServiceTitan and 3 mentions for Bitfarms. Bitfarms' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat ServiceTitan's score of 0.70 indicating that Bitfarms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bitfarms	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ServiceTitan	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Bitfarms beats ServiceTitan on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bitfarms compare to Dropbox?

Bitfarms (NASDAQ:BITF) and Dropbox (NASDAQ:DBX) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Dropbox has higher revenue and earnings than Bitfarms. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dropbox, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bitfarms	$229.28M	8.70	-$138.65M	-$0.23	N/A
Dropbox	$2.52B	3.19	$508.40M	$1.80	19.12

Bitfarms presently has a consensus target price of $4.68, suggesting a potential upside of 41.24%. Dropbox has a consensus target price of $28.25, suggesting a potential downside of 17.93%. Given Bitfarms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Bitfarms is more favorable than Dropbox.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bitfarms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Dropbox	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.86

Dropbox has a net margin of 17.49% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. Bitfarms' return on equity of -4.48% beat Dropbox's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bitfarms	-48.26%	-4.48%	-3.71%
Dropbox	17.49%	-24.26%	15.88%

In the previous week, Dropbox had 8 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Dropbox and 3 mentions for Bitfarms. Bitfarms' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Dropbox's score of 0.73 indicating that Bitfarms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bitfarms	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Dropbox	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Bitfarms has a beta of 3.77, suggesting that its stock price is 277% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dropbox has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

20.6% of Bitfarms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Dropbox shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Bitfarms shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of Dropbox shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Dropbox beats Bitfarms on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Bitfarms News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BITF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BITF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Bitfarms	Software Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$2.00B	$15.80B	$30.42B	$13.05B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.43%	2.72%	10.72%
P/E Ratio	-14.39	127.62	75.48	25.30
Price / Sales	8.70	1,308.63	600.19	101.40
Price / Cash	70.53	47.16	52.33	50.75
Price / Book	2.47	7.16	9.53	6.33
Net Income	-$138.65M	$436.26M	$681.19M	$347.70M
7 Day Performance	-13.35%	0.21%	1.44%	1.07%
1 Month Performance	-24.08%	2.49%	2.33%	1.03%
1 Year Performance	160.63%	7.63%	199.49%	20.77%

Bitfarms Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BITF Bitfarms	1.9135 of 5 stars	$3.31 -6.5%	$4.68 +41.2%	+178.7%	$2.00B	$229.28M	N/A	110	Gap Down
IDCC InterDigital	4.4905 of 5 stars	$344.03 +4.8%	$416.67 +21.1%	+24.6%	$8.88B	$834.02M	39.68	420	Analyst Downgrade
PCOR Procore Technologies	4.1219 of 5 stars	$56.88 +2.1%	$70.44 +23.8%	-5.4%	$8.64B	$1.32B	N/A	4,421	Insider Trade
WULF TeraWulf	3.8247 of 5 stars	$16.82 -4.5%	$34.74 +106.5%	+198.7%	$8.34B	$168.46M	N/A	6	Analyst Forecast
TTAN ServiceTitan	3.0496 of 5 stars	$86.10 +0.6%	$110.53 +28.4%	-8.6%	$8.19B	$1.01B	N/A	3,414	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:BITF) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Bitfarms (BITF) Competitors

BITF vs. IDCC, PCOR, WULF, TTAN, and DBX

How does Bitfarms compare to InterDigital?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to Procore Technologies?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to TeraWulf?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to ServiceTitan?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to Dropbox?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BITF vs. The Competition

Bitfarms Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Bitfarms (BITF) Competitors

BITF vs. IDCC, PCOR, WULF, TTAN, and DBX

How does Bitfarms compare to InterDigital?

Does the media prefer BITF or IDCC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in BITF or IDCC?

Is BITF or IDCC more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, BITF or IDCC?

Do analysts prefer BITF or IDCC?

Which has better valuation & earnings, BITF or IDCC?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to Procore Technologies?

Is PCOR or BITF more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, PCOR or BITF?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PCOR or BITF?

Does the media refer more to PCOR or BITF?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PCOR or BITF?

Do analysts prefer PCOR or BITF?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to TeraWulf?

Which has more volatility & risk, BITF or WULF?

Is BITF or WULF more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, BITF or WULF?

Does the media prefer BITF or WULF?

Do analysts recommend BITF or WULF?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BITF or WULF?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to ServiceTitan?

Which has more risk & volatility, BITF or TTAN?

Is BITF or TTAN more profitable?

Do analysts prefer BITF or TTAN?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BITF or TTAN?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BITF or TTAN?

Does the media prefer BITF or TTAN?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to Dropbox?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, BITF or DBX?

Do analysts recommend BITF or DBX?

Is BITF or DBX more profitable?

Does the media refer more to BITF or DBX?

Which has more risk & volatility, BITF or DBX?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in BITF or DBX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BITF vs. The Competition

Bitfarms Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools