Which has better valuation & earnings, BITF or WULF?

Bitfarms has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Bitfarms $229.28M 11.20 -$138.65M -$0.23 N/A TeraWulf $168.06M 54.43 -$661.42M -$2.48 N/A

Is BITF or WULF more profitable?

Bitfarms has a net margin of -48.26% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Bitfarms' return on equity of -4.48% beat TeraWulf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Bitfarms -48.26% -4.48% -3.71% TeraWulf -611.46% -305.07% -8.42%

Does the media prefer BITF or WULF?

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 6 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for TeraWulf and 6 mentions for Bitfarms. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Bitfarms' score of 0.46 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bitfarms 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral TeraWulf 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BITF or CIFR?

Bitfarms has higher revenue and earnings than Cipher Mining. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cipher Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Bitfarms $229.28M 11.20 -$138.65M -$0.23 N/A Cipher Mining $209.82M 45.13 -$822.24M -$2.33 N/A

Is BITF or CIFR more profitable?

Bitfarms has a net margin of -48.26% compared to Cipher Mining's net margin of -427.79%. Bitfarms' return on equity of -4.48% beat Cipher Mining's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Bitfarms -48.26% -4.48% -3.71% Cipher Mining -427.79% -117.65% -24.68%

Does the media prefer BITF or CIFR?

In the previous week, Cipher Mining had 6 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cipher Mining and 6 mentions for Bitfarms. Cipher Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Bitfarms' score of 0.46 indicating that Cipher Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bitfarms 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Cipher Mining 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is BITF or CHYM more profitable?

Chime Financial has a net margin of -41.87% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. Bitfarms' return on equity of -4.48% beat Chime Financial's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Bitfarms -48.26% -4.48% -3.71% Chime Financial -41.87% -67.86% -49.84%

Does the media refer more to BITF or CHYM?

In the previous week, Chime Financial had 6 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Chime Financial and 6 mentions for Bitfarms. Chime Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Bitfarms' score of 0.46 indicating that Chime Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bitfarms 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Chime Financial 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to BITF or VLY?

In the previous week, Valley National Bancorp had 22 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Valley National Bancorp and 6 mentions for Bitfarms. Bitfarms' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Valley National Bancorp's score of 0.36 indicating that Bitfarms is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bitfarms 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Valley National Bancorp 8 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 13 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor GGAL or BITF?

In the previous week, Bitfarms had 1 more articles in the media than Grupo Financiero Galicia. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Bitfarms and 5 mentions for Grupo Financiero Galicia. Grupo Financiero Galicia's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Bitfarms' score of 0.46 indicating that Grupo Financiero Galicia is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Grupo Financiero Galicia 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bitfarms 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Bitfarms (BITF) Competitors

$4.26 -0.55 (-11.43%)

As of 07/24/2026

Compare

BITF vs. WULF, CIFR, CHYM, VLY, and GGAL

Should you buy Bitfarms stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Bitfarms with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Bitfarms include TeraWulf (WULF), Cipher Mining (CIFR), Chime Financial (CHYM), Valley National Bancorp (VLY), and Grupo Financiero Galicia (GGAL). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Bitfarms compare to TeraWulf?

Bitfarms (NASDAQ:BITF) and TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) are both mid-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Bitfarms has a net margin of -48.26% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -611.46%. Bitfarms' return on equity of -4.48% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bitfarms	-48.26%	-4.48%	-3.71%
TeraWulf	-611.46%	-305.07%	-8.42%

Bitfarms currently has a consensus target price of $4.68, indicating a potential upside of 9.74%. TeraWulf has a consensus target price of $34.60, indicating a potential upside of 87.45%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Bitfarms.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bitfarms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
TeraWulf	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.84

In the previous week, TeraWulf had 6 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for TeraWulf and 6 mentions for Bitfarms. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Bitfarms' score of 0.46 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bitfarms	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TeraWulf	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Bitfarms has a beta of 3.77, meaning that its stock price is 277% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TeraWulf has a beta of 3.73, meaning that its stock price is 273% more volatile than the broader market.

20.6% of Bitfarms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of TeraWulf shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.5% of Bitfarms shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of TeraWulf shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Bitfarms has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TeraWulf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bitfarms	$229.28M	11.20	-$138.65M	-$0.23	N/A
TeraWulf	$168.06M	54.43	-$661.42M	-$2.48	N/A

Summary

TeraWulf beats Bitfarms on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bitfarms compare to Cipher Mining?

Bitfarms (NASDAQ:BITF) and Cipher Mining (NASDAQ:CIFR) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Cipher Mining had 6 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cipher Mining and 6 mentions for Bitfarms. Cipher Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Bitfarms' score of 0.46 indicating that Cipher Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bitfarms	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Cipher Mining	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Bitfarms has a beta of 3.77, meaning that its share price is 277% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cipher Mining has a beta of 3.18, meaning that its share price is 218% more volatile than the broader market.

Bitfarms currently has a consensus target price of $4.68, suggesting a potential upside of 9.74%. Cipher Mining has a consensus target price of $28.22, suggesting a potential upside of 21.90%. Given Cipher Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cipher Mining is more favorable than Bitfarms.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bitfarms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Cipher Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89

Bitfarms has a net margin of -48.26% compared to Cipher Mining's net margin of -427.79%. Bitfarms' return on equity of -4.48% beat Cipher Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bitfarms	-48.26%	-4.48%	-3.71%
Cipher Mining	-427.79%	-117.65%	-24.68%

Bitfarms has higher revenue and earnings than Cipher Mining. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cipher Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bitfarms	$229.28M	11.20	-$138.65M	-$0.23	N/A
Cipher Mining	$209.82M	45.13	-$822.24M	-$2.33	N/A

20.6% of Bitfarms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.3% of Cipher Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Bitfarms shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Cipher Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Bitfarms beats Cipher Mining on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bitfarms compare to Chime Financial?

Bitfarms (NASDAQ:BITF) and Chime Financial (NASDAQ:CHYM) are both mid-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Bitfarms presently has a consensus price target of $4.68, suggesting a potential upside of 9.74%. Chime Financial has a consensus price target of $29.19, suggesting a potential upside of 41.07%. Given Chime Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Chime Financial is more favorable than Bitfarms.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bitfarms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Chime Financial	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94

Bitfarms has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chime Financial. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chime Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bitfarms	$229.28M	11.20	-$138.65M	-$0.23	N/A
Chime Financial	$2.32B	3.40	-$1.01B	-$7.43	N/A

Chime Financial has a net margin of -41.87% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. Bitfarms' return on equity of -4.48% beat Chime Financial's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bitfarms	-48.26%	-4.48%	-3.71%
Chime Financial	-41.87%	-67.86%	-49.84%

20.6% of Bitfarms shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Bitfarms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.3% of Chime Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chime Financial had 6 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Chime Financial and 6 mentions for Bitfarms. Chime Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Bitfarms' score of 0.46 indicating that Chime Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bitfarms	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Chime Financial	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Chime Financial beats Bitfarms on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bitfarms compare to Valley National Bancorp?

Bitfarms (NASDAQ:BITF) and Valley National Bancorp (NASDAQ:VLY) are both mid-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

20.6% of Bitfarms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.0% of Valley National Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Bitfarms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Valley National Bancorp shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valley National Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Bitfarms. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Valley National Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bitfarms	$229.28M	11.20	-$138.65M	-$0.23	N/A
Valley National Bancorp	$2.15B	3.69	$597.98M	$1.18	12.15

Bitfarms has a beta of 3.77, suggesting that its share price is 277% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Valley National Bancorp has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Valley National Bancorp has a net margin of 19.49% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. Valley National Bancorp's return on equity of 9.13% beat Bitfarms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bitfarms	-48.26%	-4.48%	-3.71%
Valley National Bancorp	19.49%	9.13%	1.06%

Bitfarms currently has a consensus price target of $4.68, indicating a potential upside of 9.74%. Valley National Bancorp has a consensus price target of $16.03, indicating a potential upside of 11.81%. Given Valley National Bancorp's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Valley National Bancorp is more favorable than Bitfarms.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bitfarms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Valley National Bancorp	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94

In the previous week, Valley National Bancorp had 22 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Valley National Bancorp and 6 mentions for Bitfarms. Bitfarms' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Valley National Bancorp's score of 0.36 indicating that Bitfarms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bitfarms	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Valley National Bancorp	8 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Valley National Bancorp beats Bitfarms on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bitfarms compare to Grupo Financiero Galicia?

Grupo Financiero Galicia (NASDAQ:GGAL) and Bitfarms (NASDAQ:BITF) are both mid-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Grupo Financiero Galicia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. Grupo Financiero Galicia's return on equity of 0.00% beat Bitfarms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Grupo Financiero Galicia	N/A	N/A	N/A
Bitfarms	-48.26%	-4.48%	-3.71%

Grupo Financiero Galicia presently has a consensus target price of $68.33, suggesting a potential upside of 38.61%. Bitfarms has a consensus target price of $4.68, suggesting a potential upside of 9.74%. Given Grupo Financiero Galicia's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Grupo Financiero Galicia is more favorable than Bitfarms.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Grupo Financiero Galicia	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Bitfarms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

20.6% of Bitfarms shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Bitfarms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Grupo Financiero Galicia has higher revenue and earnings than Bitfarms. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grupo Financiero Galicia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Grupo Financiero Galicia	$8.62T	0.00	$170.02M	$2.27	21.72
Bitfarms	$229.28M	11.20	-$138.65M	-$0.23	N/A

In the previous week, Bitfarms had 1 more articles in the media than Grupo Financiero Galicia. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Bitfarms and 5 mentions for Grupo Financiero Galicia. Grupo Financiero Galicia's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Bitfarms' score of 0.46 indicating that Grupo Financiero Galicia is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Grupo Financiero Galicia	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bitfarms	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Grupo Financiero Galicia has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bitfarms has a beta of 3.77, meaning that its stock price is 277% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Grupo Financiero Galicia beats Bitfarms on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Bitfarms News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BITF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BITF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Bitfarms	Technology Services Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$2.57B	$3.81B	$6.82B	$12.26B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.21%	3.09%	9.79%
P/E Ratio	-18.52	33.85	28.15	23.64
Price / Sales	11.20	39.95	312.41	89.57
Price / Cash	70.53	34.09	22.68	59.64
Price / Book	3.18	3.84	5.46	6.07
Net Income	-$138.65M	$31.76M	$205.01M	$331.99M
7 Day Performance	7.85%	-1.90%	-1.95%	-0.63%
1 Month Performance	-30.39%	-7.80%	-2.71%	-2.00%
1 Year Performance	246.34%	-6.23%	4.47%	13.62%

Bitfarms Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BITF Bitfarms	1.1464 of 5 stars	$4.26 -11.4%	$4.68 +9.7%	+291.1%	$2.57B	$229.28M	N/A	110
WULF TeraWulf	4.0761 of 5 stars	$18.86 +3.9%	$34.60 +83.5%	+247.0%	$9.35B	$168.46M	N/A	6	Gap Up
CIFR Cipher Mining	3.1568 of 5 stars	$20.54 +17.0%	$28.22 +37.4%	+248.1%	$8.40B	$223.94M	N/A	10
CHYM Chime Financial	3.9952 of 5 stars	$21.93 -1.8%	$29.31 +33.7%	-42.8%	$8.36B	$2.19B	N/A	1,519	News Coverage Analyst Forecast
VLY Valley National Bancorp	4.3928 of 5 stars	$14.67 -1.9%	$15.93 +8.6%	+50.5%	$8.13B	$3.49B	13.22	3,675	Trending News Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:BITF) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Bitfarms (BITF) Competitors

BITF vs. WULF, CIFR, CHYM, VLY, and GGAL

How does Bitfarms compare to TeraWulf?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to Cipher Mining?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to Chime Financial?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to Valley National Bancorp?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to Grupo Financiero Galicia?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BITF vs. The Competition

Bitfarms Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Bitfarms (BITF) Competitors

BITF vs. WULF, CIFR, CHYM, VLY, and GGAL

How does Bitfarms compare to TeraWulf?

Is BITF or WULF more profitable?

Do analysts recommend BITF or WULF?

Does the media prefer BITF or WULF?

Which has more volatility & risk, BITF or WULF?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BITF or WULF?

Which has better valuation & earnings, BITF or WULF?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to Cipher Mining?

Does the media prefer BITF or CIFR?

Which has more risk & volatility, BITF or CIFR?

Do analysts recommend BITF or CIFR?

Is BITF or CIFR more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BITF or CIFR?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in BITF or CIFR?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to Chime Financial?

Do analysts prefer BITF or CHYM?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, BITF or CHYM?

Is BITF or CHYM more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in BITF or CHYM?

Does the media refer more to BITF or CHYM?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to Valley National Bancorp?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in BITF or VLY?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, BITF or VLY?

Which has more risk and volatility, BITF or VLY?

Is BITF or VLY more profitable?

Do analysts recommend BITF or VLY?

Does the media refer more to BITF or VLY?

Summary

How does Bitfarms compare to Grupo Financiero Galicia?

Is GGAL or BITF more profitable?

Do analysts rate GGAL or BITF?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of GGAL or BITF?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GGAL or BITF?

Does the media favor GGAL or BITF?

Which has more volatility & risk, GGAL or BITF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BITF vs. The Competition

Bitfarms Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools