Apogee Enterprises Competitors

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and Apogee Enterprises (NASDAQ:APOG) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

Dividends

Masco pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Apogee Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Masco pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Apogee Enterprises pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Apogee Enterprises has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

Masco has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Masco and Apogee Enterprises' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Apogee Enterprises. Apogee Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Masco and Apogee Enterprises, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Masco currently has a consensus price target of $62.7188, suggesting a potential downside of 6.54%. Apogee Enterprises has a consensus price target of $30.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 18.24%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Masco is more favorable than Apogee Enterprises.

Profitability

This table compares Masco and Apogee Enterprises' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.7% of Apogee Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Apogee Enterprises shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Masco beats Apogee Enterprises on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Apogee Enterprises (NASDAQ:APOG) and Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Dividends

Apogee Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Apogee Enterprises pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Apogee Enterprises has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Home & Security has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk and Volatility

Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Apogee Enterprises and Fortune Brands Home & Security's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fortune Brands Home & Security has higher revenue and earnings than Apogee Enterprises. Apogee Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Home & Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Apogee Enterprises and Fortune Brands Home & Security, as reported by MarketBeat.

Apogee Enterprises currently has a consensus price target of $30.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 18.24%. Fortune Brands Home & Security has a consensus price target of $95.8824, suggesting a potential downside of 14.36%. Given Fortune Brands Home & Security's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Home & Security is more favorable than Apogee Enterprises.

Profitability

This table compares Apogee Enterprises and Fortune Brands Home & Security's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

81.7% of Apogee Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Apogee Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fortune Brands Home & Security beats Apogee Enterprises on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Apogee Enterprises (NASDAQ:APOG) and Lennox International (NYSE:LII) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Apogee Enterprises and Lennox International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lennox International has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Apogee Enterprises and Lennox International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Apogee Enterprises currently has a consensus price target of $30.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 18.24%. Lennox International has a consensus price target of $281.4167, suggesting a potential downside of 20.39%. Given Apogee Enterprises' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Apogee Enterprises is more favorable than Lennox International.

Dividends

Apogee Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Lennox International pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Apogee Enterprises pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lennox International pays out 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Apogee Enterprises has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Lennox International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

81.7% of Apogee Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.3% of Lennox International shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Apogee Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Lennox International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Apogee Enterprises and Lennox International's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lennox International has higher revenue and earnings than Apogee Enterprises. Apogee Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lennox International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Lennox International beats Apogee Enterprises on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trex (NYSE:TREX) and Apogee Enterprises (NASDAQ:APOG) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Trex and Apogee Enterprises' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Trex has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Trex and Apogee Enterprises, as provided by MarketBeat.

Trex presently has a consensus target price of $88.0294, suggesting a potential downside of 18.37%. Apogee Enterprises has a consensus target price of $30.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 18.24%. Given Apogee Enterprises' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Apogee Enterprises is more favorable than Trex.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

98.6% of Trex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.7% of Apogee Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Trex shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Apogee Enterprises shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Trex and Apogee Enterprises' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Trex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Apogee Enterprises. Apogee Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Trex beats Apogee Enterprises on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) and Apogee Enterprises (NASDAQ:APOG) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares A. O. Smith and Apogee Enterprises' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for A. O. Smith and Apogee Enterprises, as provided by MarketBeat.

A. O. Smith presently has a consensus target price of $60.2857, suggesting a potential downside of 16.56%. Apogee Enterprises has a consensus target price of $30.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 18.24%. Given A. O. Smith's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe A. O. Smith is more favorable than Apogee Enterprises.

Dividends

A. O. Smith pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Apogee Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. A. O. Smith pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Apogee Enterprises pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. A. O. Smith has increased its dividend for 29 consecutive years and Apogee Enterprises has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Apogee Enterprises is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.7% of Apogee Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Apogee Enterprises shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares A. O. Smith and Apogee Enterprises' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

A. O. Smith has higher revenue and earnings than Apogee Enterprises. Apogee Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

A. O. Smith beats Apogee Enterprises on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) and Apogee Enterprises (NASDAQ:APOG) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Owens Corning and Apogee Enterprises, as provided by MarketBeat.

Owens Corning presently has a consensus target price of $80.70, suggesting a potential downside of 25.43%. Apogee Enterprises has a consensus target price of $30.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 18.24%. Given Apogee Enterprises' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Apogee Enterprises is more favorable than Owens Corning.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Owens Corning and Apogee Enterprises' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Owens Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Apogee Enterprises. Apogee Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Owens Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.2% of Owens Corning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.7% of Apogee Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Apogee Enterprises shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Owens Corning and Apogee Enterprises' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Apogee Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Owens Corning pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Apogee Enterprises pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Owens Corning has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Apogee Enterprises has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Owens Corning beats Apogee Enterprises on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.